Menu

Test source Auto Bild

2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test

Overall test winnerContinental WinterContact TS 860

The 2017 Auto Bild winter tyre test started with fifty 225/50 R17 winter tyre patterns which Auto Bild tested for wet braking performance, and then dropped the worse twenty tyres from the test.

Tyres tested
20
Tested size
225/50 R17
Disciplines
11

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

20 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Continental WinterContact TS 860

+Test winner. Excellent performance in all weather conditions, direct steering response and strong handling in the snow and on dry roads.

−Average mileage.

Read full verdict
2nd

Michelin Alpin 5

+Winter specialist with very good wet grip and low wear. Balance handling in the snow and dry, good aquaplaning resistance.

−Slightly high rolling resistance.

Read full verdict
3rd

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

+Premium winter tyre with balanced performance, good handling in the snow and wet, short wet braking distances.

−Average mileage.

Read full verdict
4th

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1

+Premium tyres with excellent performance in all weather conditions. Precise steering and good feedback, short braking distances.

−High price, high wear.

Read full verdict
5th

Semperit Speed Grip 3

+Convincing all rounder with good winter characteristics and good handling in the dry. Good comfort.

−Average mileage.

Read full verdict
6th

BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

+The winter kings, winning the snow tests, excellent aquaplaning results, good ride comfort.

−Slow steering, understeer in the dry.

Read full verdict
7th

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

+Low price, very good in the winter, excellent aquaplaning result, good ride comfort.

−Slow steering, understeer in the wet.

Read full verdict
8th

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO

+A well balanced tyre with excellent handling in the wet, low noise.

−Average snow handling, long dry braking.

Read full verdict
9th

Kleber Krisalp HP3

+Excellent in the snow, good price / performance ratio, good aquaplaning resistance, low noise.

−Poor dry grip and handling.

Read full verdict
10th

Nexen WinGuard Sport 2

+A good value winter tyre with balanced handling in the snow and on dry roads. Short wet braking distances.

−Limited aquaplaning resistance, high rolling resistance.

Read full verdict
11th

Gislaved EuroFrost 5

+Stable handling on snow and dry roads, good aquaplaning resistance.

−Limited grip in the wet with understeer.

Read full verdict
12th

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

+Good snow traction, short wet and dry braking distances, good value.

−Average handling with delayed turn-in, low comfort.

Read full verdict
13th

Uniroyal MS Plus 77

+Good traction and braking in the snow, good aquaplaning resistance.

−Slow steering response and poor cornering in the wet and dry.

Read full verdict
14th

Nokian WR D4

+Good performance in the wet and snow.

−Understeer in the dry, high wear.

Read full verdict
15th

Yokohama W drive V905

+Good traction and short braking in the snow, stable wet handling.

−Poor snow handling, low aquaplaning resistance, poor comfort, high rolling resistance.

Read full verdict
16th

Barum Polaris 3

+Low price, stable snow performance.

−Poor wet braking and handling, average aquaplaning reserves.

Read full verdict
17th

Sava Eskimo HP2

+Best price / wear ratio, good in the snow.

−Poor wet handling, long wet and dry braking distances. Low comfort.

Read full verdict
18th

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

+Short wet and dry braking distances, dynamic wet handling.

−Average winter performance, low snow traction, long snow braking, high wear.

Read full verdict
19th

Firestone Winterhawk 3

+Good snow traction, low noise.

−Poor snow and wet handling, long wet braking, high rolling resistance.

Read full verdict
20th

Hankook Winter i cept evo2

+Good dry handling, low rolling resistance.

−Poor handling in the snow and wet. Average comfort.

Read full verdict

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

2017 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test · 225/50 R17

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

The 2017 Auto Bild winter tyre test started with fifty 225/50 R17 winter tyre patterns which Auto Bild tested for wet braking performance, and then dropped the worse twenty tyres from the test.

The next phase was testing the remaining thirty patterns for snow braking, which was then combined with the wet braking distances to allow the ten worst tyres to be dropped. This left twenty winter tyres which Auto Bild regarded as the best winter tyres on the market, and deemed worthy enough to take through to the full testing.

As ever with Auto Bild testing, they undertake all the usual dry, wet and snow testing, but also including important factors such as wear and cost per 1,000 km, which a lot of tests are unable to include.

The results as closer than ever, and you'd be hard pressed to classify any of the top 10 tyres as bad tyres, but three in particular rose to the top.

Dry

In the dry grip testing, no tyre got close the reference summer tyre. During the braking tests, the Pirelli was the closest, but with all twenty winter tyres separated by just 3 meters overall when braking from 100 km/h, the differences between the top ten were small.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
37.9 m -5.80 m
43.7 m Best
44.5 m +0.80 m
44.5 m +0.80 m
44.5 m +0.80 m
44.6 m +0.90 m
44.8 m +1.10 m
44.9 m +1.20 m
44.9 m +1.20 m
45.1 m +1.40 m
45.2 m +1.50 m
45.4 m +1.70 m
45.4 m +1.70 m
45.5 m +1.80 m
45.6 m +1.90 m
45.6 m +1.90 m
45.6 m +1.90 m
45.7 m +2.00 m
46 m +2.30 m
46.3 m +2.60 m
46.7 m +3.00 m

The difference between best and worst was 23.2% (8.8 m ≈ 2 Car Lengths).

The Continental winter tyre was a step above the rest during dry handling, however it was still a large margin behind the summer reference tyre in another closely contested category.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
113.2 km/h +2.40 km/h
110.8 km/h Best
109.7 km/h -1.10 km/h
109.6 km/h -1.20 km/h
109.6 km/h -1.20 km/h
109.5 km/h -1.30 km/h
109.4 km/h -1.40 km/h
109.3 km/h -1.50 km/h
109.1 km/h -1.70 km/h
109.1 km/h -1.70 km/h
109 km/h -1.80 km/h
108.9 km/h -1.90 km/h
108.8 km/h -2.00 km/h
108.7 km/h -2.10 km/h
108.6 km/h -2.20 km/h
108.5 km/h -2.30 km/h
108.3 km/h -2.50 km/h
108.3 km/h -2.50 km/h
107.3 km/h -3.50 km/h
107.3 km/h -3.50 km/h
107 km/h -3.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (6.2 Km/H).

Winter tyres often have a bad reputation for being noisy, but every winter tyre managed to best the summer reference on test, with the Bridgestone winter tyre quietest by some margin.

All tests are the combined results of drive by noise readings at both 50 km/h and 80 km/h.

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
70.9 dB Best
71.8 dB +0.90 dB
71.9 dB +1.00 dB
71.9 dB +1.00 dB
72.2 dB +1.30 dB
72.2 dB +1.30 dB
72.2 dB +1.30 dB
72.4 dB +1.50 dB
72.7 dB +1.80 dB
72.8 dB +1.90 dB
72.8 dB +1.90 dB
73 dB +2.10 dB
73 dB +2.10 dB
73.1 dB +2.20 dB
73.5 dB +2.60 dB
73.5 dB +2.60 dB
73.5 dB +2.60 dB
73.7 dB +2.80 dB
73.9 dB +3.00 dB
74 dB +3.10 dB
RefReference Summer
75.3 dB +4.40 dB

The difference between best and worst was 6.2% (4.4 dB).

Wet

The shallow water wet testing results were a little more spread out, but the summer tyre still dominated. Again, the Pirelli was closest in wet braking, but this time there was over 4 meters separating the winter tyres when braking from 80 km/h.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
31 m -1.20 m
32.2 m Best
32.5 m +0.30 m
33.3 m +1.10 m
33.4 m +1.20 m
33.5 m +1.30 m
33.6 m +1.40 m
34 m +1.80 m
34.4 m +2.20 m
34.7 m +2.50 m
34.8 m +2.60 m
35 m +2.80 m
35.1 m +2.90 m
35.5 m +3.30 m
35.7 m +3.50 m
35.8 m +3.60 m
35.9 m +3.70 m
36 m +3.80 m
36.3 m +4.10 m
36.4 m +4.20 m
36.5 m +4.30 m

The difference between best and worst was 17.7% (5.5 m ≈ 1.2 Car Lengths).

This time the Pirelli matched its wet braking peformance and finished the best winter tyre during wet handling too.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
77.5 km/h +1.70 km/h
75.8 km/h Best
74.9 km/h -0.90 km/h
74.7 km/h -1.10 km/h
74.6 km/h -1.20 km/h
74.2 km/h -1.60 km/h
74.1 km/h -1.70 km/h
73.6 km/h -2.20 km/h
73.6 km/h -2.20 km/h
73.5 km/h -2.30 km/h
72.8 km/h -3.00 km/h
72.6 km/h -3.20 km/h
72.3 km/h -3.50 km/h
72.2 km/h -3.60 km/h
72.1 km/h -3.70 km/h
71.9 km/h -3.90 km/h
71.3 km/h -4.50 km/h
71.3 km/h -4.50 km/h
71.2 km/h -4.60 km/h
71.1 km/h -4.70 km/h
70.6 km/h -5.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 8.9% (6.9 Km/H).

The summer tyre could only manage fourth place overall in the deep water aquaplaning tests, with the Michelin owned BF Goodrich and Kleber taking the top two places.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
93.3 km/h Best
90.9 km/h -2.40 km/h
90.7 km/h -2.60 km/h
RefReference Summer
90.5 km/h -2.80 km/h
90.5 km/h -2.80 km/h
88.9 km/h -4.40 km/h
88.7 km/h -4.60 km/h
88.3 km/h -5.00 km/h
88.1 km/h -5.20 km/h
87.8 km/h -5.50 km/h
87.5 km/h -5.80 km/h
87.5 km/h -5.80 km/h
87.5 km/h -5.80 km/h
86.8 km/h -6.50 km/h
86.5 km/h -6.80 km/h
86.1 km/h -7.20 km/h
85.5 km/h -7.80 km/h
85.4 km/h -7.90 km/h
85 km/h -8.30 km/h
84.8 km/h -8.50 km/h
84.6 km/h -8.70 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 9.3% (8.7 Km/H).

Snow

BF Goodrich and Kleber continued their success during the aquaplaning tests to stop the quickest when braking from 50 km/h on snow.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
25.9 m Best
26.7 m +0.80 m
27.2 m +1.30 m
27.4 m +1.50 m
27.5 m +1.60 m
27.6 m +1.70 m
27.6 m +1.70 m
27.7 m +1.80 m
27.7 m +1.80 m
27.9 m +2.00 m
28 m +2.10 m
28.1 m +2.20 m
28.1 m +2.20 m
28.3 m +2.40 m
28.3 m +2.40 m
28.6 m +2.70 m
28.7 m +2.80 m
28.7 m +2.80 m
29.2 m +3.30 m
29.8 m +3.90 m
RefReference Summer
60.7 m +34.80 m

The difference between best and worst was 134.4% (34.8 m ≈ 7.7 Car Lengths).

Barum took a surprise win during snow handling, with BF Goodrich a close second place. The reference summer tyre couldn't even manage a lap of the snow handling course.

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
52.6 km/h Best
52.3 km/h -0.30 km/h
52.2 km/h -0.40 km/h
52.2 km/h -0.40 km/h
52 km/h -0.60 km/h
51.9 km/h -0.70 km/h
51.7 km/h -0.90 km/h
51.6 km/h -1.00 km/h
51.4 km/h -1.20 km/h
51.2 km/h -1.40 km/h
51.1 km/h -1.50 km/h
50.9 km/h -1.70 km/h
50.9 km/h -1.70 km/h
50.9 km/h -1.70 km/h
50.7 km/h -1.90 km/h
50.6 km/h -2.00 km/h
50.4 km/h -2.20 km/h
50.2 km/h -2.40 km/h
50 km/h -2.60 km/h
49.7 km/h -2.90 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (2.9 Km/H).

Cost

Difference between value and wear is an important distinction. Wear simply shows the projected mileage of the tyre, based on Auto Bild's testing. Value looks at the projected mileage divided by the price Auto Bild paid for the set, giving you a "euro per 1,000 km" figure. While Michelin offered the best value of the premium tyres on test, Nexen scored best in value thanks to excellent wear and a low purchase price.

Value

Euros/1000km based on cost/wear

Lower is better ↓
Value
Position / TyreResultGap to bestcost per 1,000 km
7.55 Price/1000 Best €16.32
7.57 Price/1000 +0.02 Price/1000 €11.87
9.13 Price/1000 +1.58 Price/1000 €13.76
9.2 Price/1000 +1.65 Price/1000 €13.86
9.33 Price/1000 +1.78 Price/1000 €12.80
9.87 Price/1000 +2.32 Price/1000 €14.27
11.47 Price/1000 +3.92 Price/1000 €13.82
11.55 Price/1000 +4.00 Price/1000 €17.94
12.3 Price/1000 +4.75 Price/1000 €18.02
12.43 Price/1000 +4.88 Price/1000 €19.29
12.47 Price/1000 +4.92 Price/1000 €18.60
12.62 Price/1000 +5.07 Price/1000 €20.28
12.71 Price/1000 +5.16 Price/1000 €18.54
12.72 Price/1000 +5.17 Price/1000 €20.33
13.78 Price/1000 +6.23 Price/1000 €18.78
15.04 Price/1000 +7.49 Price/1000 €20.48
15.94 Price/1000 +8.39 Price/1000 €21.17
16.1 Price/1000 +8.55 Price/1000 €22.50
16.59 Price/1000 +9.04 Price/1000 €22.29
16.88 Price/1000 +9.33 Price/1000 €23.52

The difference between best and worst was 123.6% (9.33 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Sava Eskimo HP2) works out €466 cheaper than the most expensive (Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3).

How this is calculated

Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2017 test; financing costs are excluded.

Wear

Predicted tread life in KM

Higher is better ↑
Wear
Position / TyreResultGap to best
48,375 KM Best
47,625 KM -750 KM
44,250 KM -4,125 KM
44,250 KM -4,125 KM
42,375 KM -6,000 KM
40,125 KM -8,250 KM
38,625 KM -9,750 KM
37,500 KM -10,875 KM
37,500 KM -10,875 KM
37,500 KM -10,875 KM
36,375 KM -12,000 KM
35,250 KM -13,125 KM
34,875 KM -13,500 KM
34,875 KM -13,500 KM
34,500 KM -13,875 KM
33,375 KM -15,000 KM
32,625 KM -15,750 KM
32,250 KM -16,125 KM
29,625 KM -18,750 KM
28,875 KM -19,500 KM

The difference between best and worst was 40.3% (19,500 KM).

While none of the winter tyres could beat the summer tyre during the rolling resistance testing, a number of tyres were close. Ironically, the best value tyre on test had the worst rolling resistance, which will offset some of the savings made over the tyres tread life.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
RefReference Summer
7.1 kg/t -0.13 kg/t £0
7.23 kg/t Best £0
7.53 kg/t +0.30 kg/t £18
7.78 kg/t +0.55 kg/t £34
7.83 kg/t +0.60 kg/t £37
7.88 kg/t +0.65 kg/t £40
7.91 kg/t +0.68 kg/t £41
7.95 kg/t +0.72 kg/t £44
7.96 kg/t +0.73 kg/t £45
8.03 kg/t +0.80 kg/t £49
8.05 kg/t +0.82 kg/t £50
8.15 kg/t +0.92 kg/t £56
8.17 kg/t +0.94 kg/t £57
8.2 kg/t +0.97 kg/t £59
8.21 kg/t +0.98 kg/t £60
8.25 kg/t +1.02 kg/t £62
8.3 kg/t +1.07 kg/t £65
8.52 kg/t +1.29 kg/t £79
8.57 kg/t +1.34 kg/t £82
8.62 kg/t +1.39 kg/t £85
9.07 kg/t +1.84 kg/t £112

The difference between best and worst was 27.7% (1.97 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 uses about 77 L (£112) more fuel than the Uniroyal MS Plus 77.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

The full results are below, and have Auto Bild's usual confusing weighting attached to each of the criteria. For more information, be sure to check out the Auto Bild website (German).

1st

Continental WinterContact TS 860

225/50 R17
Continental WinterContact TS 860
Exemplary.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry7
Wet7
Snow7
Comfort6
Rolling Resistance6
Noise6
Wear5
Cost4

Total: 48

2nd

Michelin Alpin 5

225/50 R17
Michelin Alpin 5
Exemplary.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry6
Wet7
Snow6
Comfort7
Rolling Resistance4
Noise7
Wear8
Cost6

Total: 51

3rd

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

225/50 R17
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Exemplary.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry6
Wet7
Snow6
Comfort6
Rolling Resistance6
Noise6
Wear5
Cost5

Total: 47

4th

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1

225/50 R17
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1
Good.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry6
Wet7
Snow7
Comfort6
Rolling Resistance6
Noise7
Wear4
Cost3

Total: 46

5th

Semperit Speed Grip 3

225/50 R17
Semperit Speed Grip 3
Good.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry6
Wet6
Snow7
Comfort7
Rolling Resistance6
Noise7
Wear4
Cost5

Total: 48

6th

BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

225/50 R17
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
Good.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry5
Wet6
Snow9
Comfort7
Rolling Resistance6
Noise8
Wear6
Cost6

Total: 53

7th

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

225/50 R17
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Good.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry6
Wet6
Snow7
Comfort6
Rolling Resistance6
Noise5
Wear9
Cost8

Total: 53

8th

Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO

225/50 R17
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
Good.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry5
Wet8
Snow6
Comfort4
Rolling Resistance6
Noise9
Wear7
Cost6

Total: 51

9th

Kleber Krisalp HP3

225/50 R17
Kleber Krisalp HP3
Good.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry5
Wet6
Snow8
Comfort6
Rolling Resistance5
Noise8
Wear6
Cost7

Total: 51

10th

Nexen WinGuard Sport 2

225/50 R17
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
Good.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry6
Wet5
Snow6
Comfort5
Rolling Resistance3
Noise8
Wear9
Cost9

Total: 51

11th

Gislaved EuroFrost 5

225/50 R17
Gislaved EuroFrost 5
Average.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry6
Wet5
Snow6
Comfort5
Rolling Resistance6
Noise5
Wear6
Cost8

Total: 47

12th

Kumho WinterCraft WP71

225/50 R17
Kumho WinterCraft WP71
Average.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry5
Wet5
Snow6
Comfort4
Rolling Resistance6
Noise7
Wear7
Cost8

Total: 48

13th

Uniroyal MS+ 77

225/50 R17
Uniroyal MS Plus 77
Average.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry5
Wet5
Snow6
Comfort6
Rolling Resistance8
Noise6
Wear6
Cost7

Total: 49

14th

Nokian WR D4

225/50 R17
Nokian WR D4
Average.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry5
Wet6
Snow6
Comfort5
Rolling Resistance6
Noise7
Wear3
Cost4

Total: 42

15th

Yokohama W drive V905

225/50 R17
Yokohama W drive V905
Average.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry5
Wet5
Snow6
Comfort4
Rolling Resistance4
Noise6
Wear4
Cost6

Total: 40

16th

Barum Polaris 3

225/50 R17
Barum Polaris 3
Average.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry6
Wet4
Snow8
Comfort5
Rolling Resistance7
Noise6
Wear6
Cost8

Total: 50

17th

Sava Eskimo HP2

225/50 R17
Sava Eskimo HP2
Average.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry5
Wet4
Snow6
Comfort3
Rolling Resistance6
Noise6
Wear8
Cost9

Total: 47

18th

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3

225/50 R17
Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Average.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry6
Wet8
Snow4
Comfort4
Rolling Resistance5
Noise6
Wear3
Cost3

Total: 39

19th

Firestone Winterhawk 3

225/50 R17
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Average.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry6
Wet4
Snow6
Comfort5
Rolling Resistance4
Noise7
Wear5
Cost6

Total: 43

20th

Hankook Winter i cept evo2

225/50 R17
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Average.
All discipline results (8)
TestResult
Dry6
Wet5
Snow4
Comfort3
Rolling Resistance6
Noise6
Wear5
Cost6

Total: 41

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

18 comments
  1. Mickey archived

    If you ditch the handling tests because the difference in speed is close to irrelevant, you can see that there is no way that Continental can be the best, mainly because high price and poor wear. Be sure on what surface you drive the most, it may be snowing but if the road is clear it is wet surface etc. I would suggest that you redo the results of the tes without the speed tests because they don't matter, safety comes first on winter tyres !

    #3856
    1. Dataminer with PhD Mickey archived

      But the speed measurement is a direct metric on how safe the tyre is. For example the higher the aquaplaning speed is the safer it is to drive in a wet condition if the speed is below that measurement.

      #5045
  2. Riccardo archived

    Hi Jonathan, I cannot understand the meaning of Dry and Wet Braking for Reference Summer. Shouldn't it be the other way around? Shouldn't summer tires stop after winter tires during the bad season? Thanks for the clarification.

    #3099
    1. TyreReviews Riccardo archived

      Do you mean in the dry and wet? A good summer tyre will always beat a winter tyre in the dry, and the wet braking can be very close between the best summer and winter tyres.

      The summer tyre behaves as you would expect in the snow!

      #3100
      1. Riccardo TyreReviews archived

        So what is the utility of winter tires if the summer ones stop first in the wet???
        I am talking about my climate, very rainy but almost never snowy in Fall/Winter...

        #3101
        1. TyreReviews Riccardo archived

          The winter tyre works in lower / freezing temperatures, and obviously works on snow and ice. But I agree, a winter tyre isn't always the best choice.

          https://www.youtube.com/wat...

          #3102
          1. Riccardo TyreReviews archived

            Anyway, one morning of the last week my Goodyear Ultragrip Performance Gen-1 saved me from a crash. It was cold and it was raining, so they did their job very well...

            #3103
  3. Richard DuBois archived

    Unable to find Nokian WRD4 on their website. Is this an old model ?
    Also cannot find anywhere in this test a statement as to whether any of these tires are studded or non-studded.
    Best current studded tire I know of is Nokian Hakkapeliitta 9

    #2985
  4. Ursu Bogdan archived

    The Bridgestone Blizzak LM 001 has class C for wet braking
    How is possible in your test to be no 3 before Continental, Michelin, etc, which has B class?

    Thank you for your answer

    #2978
    1. TyreReviews Ursu Bogdan archived

      As with the Nokian question below, it might be this test used an newer version of the tyre with better label scores, or that the Bridgestone tyre is more sensitive to this braking test scenario - things such as temperature, vehicle used and Mu of the road surface all make a difference.

      #2979
      1. Ursu Bogdan TyreReviews archived

        Thank you for answer.
        May you recommend me a tire model for a weather more wet than snow ?
        Also ice from time to time.
        Thank you

        #2980
        1. TyreReviews Ursu Bogdan archived

          The winner of this test would be a good place to start your research :)

          #2981
  5. Ufuk AKKAŞOĞLU archived

    If you look at the EU label, Nokian has A grade wet braking performance; however, in this test, it sits behind the tyres who has B grade wet braking performance in EU label.
    How is this possible? Which one is wrong: EU label or the test :)
    Another question: 205/55 R17 95V Goodyear winter tire tyre has C grade wet braking performace in its EU label, while same tyre has B grade performance in 215/55 R17 98V. Is it normal to have that difference? To be honest, I would expact better performance in 205 than 215, since width is smaller (only in wet and snow, in dry roads it's vice versa)

    #2971
    1. TyreReviews Ufuk AKKAŞOĞLU archived

      It's normal to have a difference between sizes in the brands, you can even sometimes find the same tyre / size on sale with different label scores if a more recent manufacturer date has had a compound update to improve the label score.

      As for the Nokian being an A, there's no way a company like Nokian would lie on the EU label test. It might be this test used an older version of the tyre with worse label scores, or that the Nokian tyre was more sensitive to this braking test scenario - things such as temperature, vehicle used and Mu of the road surface all make a difference.

      #2975
  6. UK winter archived

    So basically the almost last tire in this test(am looking at you Pirelli),is actually the best "winter" tire for our mild(less snowy) winters?

    #2966
    1. TyreReviews UK winter archived

      It certainly wouldn't be that low in a UK based test, though if you're more concerned about dry and wet performance (which is good for the UK) I'd suggest something like the Michelin CrossClimate.

      #2967
      1. UK winter TyreReviews archived

        Good suggestion,but in my size(205/50 r17) they are prohibitively expensive.
        And the all-season test only confirm that there isn't much else to choose from.So I guess my old(2010) wintersport 3d will have to hold on for a one more winter trough.

        #2968
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.