Following on from the 51 winter tyre braking test, the excellent German publication Auto Bild have promoted the best 20 tyres to their full winter test, which covers every aspect of the winter tyres performance.
As always, an (unnamed) summer and all season tyre have been included as reference, and to make a change from the past few years, it isn’t the remarkable Continental WinterContact TS860 taking the top spot overall…
Dry
During the dry braking test the summer tyre dominated, with the all season tyre bridging the gap between the best winter tyre and the summer tyre (which leads us to guess the all season tyre was either the Michelin CrossClimate or Continental AllSeasonContact.) Yokohama had a small dry braking advantage, but the rest of the pack was extremely close, covered by just a few meters.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
39.5 m | -4.30 m |
RefReference All Season |
42.2 m | -1.60 m |
| 43.8 m | Best | |
| 44.5 m | +0.70 m | |
| 44.8 m | +1.00 m | |
| 44.9 m | +1.10 m | |
| 45 m | +1.20 m | |
| 45.3 m | +1.50 m | |
| 45.5 m | +1.70 m | |
| 45.6 m | +1.80 m | |
| 45.6 m | +1.80 m | |
| 45.6 m | +1.80 m | |
| 45.7 m | +1.90 m | |
| 45.8 m | +2.00 m | |
| 46.2 m | +2.40 m | |
| 46.3 m | +2.50 m | |
| 46.3 m | +2.50 m | |
| 46.6 m | +2.80 m | |
| 47.1 m | +3.30 m | |
| 47.1 m | +3.30 m | |
| 47.1 m | +3.30 m | |
| 47.2 m | +3.40 m |
The difference between best and worst was 19.5% (7.7 m ≈ 1.7 Car Lengths).
Dry handling resulted with the summer tyre with a similar advantage, but this time the Hankook was the leading winter tyre.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
109.9 km/h | +2.30 km/h |
RefReference All Season |
107.7 km/h | +0.10 km/h |
| 107.6 km/h | Best | |
| 106.6 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 106.5 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 106.5 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 106.4 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 106.4 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 106.4 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 106.3 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 106.2 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 106.2 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 106.1 km/h | -1.50 km/h | |
| 106 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 106 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 105.7 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 105.6 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 105.6 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 105.2 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 105.1 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 105.1 km/h | -2.50 km/h | |
| 104.8 km/h | -2.80 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 4.6% (5.1 Km/H).
Wet
Wet performance is a key factor for UK winters, so these are the most important results in the test. Both Bridgestone and Continental were the standouts of wet braking, with Dunlop, Fulda and Hankook extremely close.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 34.3 m | Best | |
| 34.5 m | +0.20 m | |
| 34.8 m | +0.50 m | |
| 34.8 m | +0.50 m | |
RefReference All Season |
34.9 m | +0.60 m |
| 34.9 m | +0.60 m | |
| 35.5 m | +1.20 m | |
RefReference Summer |
35.9 m | +1.60 m |
| 35.9 m | +1.60 m | |
| 35.9 m | +1.60 m | |
| 35.9 m | +1.60 m | |
| 36.1 m | +1.80 m | |
| 36.2 m | +1.90 m | |
| 36.6 m | +2.30 m | |
| 36.6 m | +2.30 m | |
| 36.6 m | +2.30 m | |
| 36.7 m | +2.40 m | |
| 37 m | +2.70 m | |
| 37.1 m | +2.80 m | |
| 37.3 m | +3.00 m | |
| 38 m | +3.70 m | |
| 38.2 m | +3.90 m |
The difference between best and worst was 11.4% (3.9 m ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths).
Continental and Hankook were the two brands that managed to score consistently in the wet grip tests.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 72.8 km/h | Best | |
| 72.5 km/h | -0.30 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
72.3 km/h | -0.50 km/h |
| 72.2 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 72.1 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 72.1 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 72.1 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
RefReference All Season |
71.9 km/h | -0.90 km/h |
| 71.8 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 71.5 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 71.4 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 71.1 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 71.1 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 70.9 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 70.5 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 70.5 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 70.2 km/h | -2.60 km/h | |
| 69.7 km/h | -3.10 km/h | |
| 69.6 km/h | -3.20 km/h | |
| 69.5 km/h | -3.30 km/h | |
| 69.3 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 67.5 km/h | -5.30 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 7.3% (5.3 Km/H).
Continental once again proved its wet consistency with a third wet podium in the straight aquaplaning testing.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 88.3 km/h | Best | |
| 86.4 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 84.8 km/h | -3.50 km/h | |
| 83.8 km/h | -4.50 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
83.6 km/h | -4.70 km/h |
| 83.5 km/h | -4.80 km/h | |
| 83.5 km/h | -4.80 km/h | |
| 83.3 km/h | -5.00 km/h | |
| 81.3 km/h | -7.00 km/h | |
| 81 km/h | -7.30 km/h | |
| 80.6 km/h | -7.70 km/h | |
| 80.6 km/h | -7.70 km/h | |
| 80.3 km/h | -8.00 km/h | |
RefReference All Season |
79.6 km/h | -8.70 km/h |
| 79.5 km/h | -8.80 km/h | |
| 79.4 km/h | -8.90 km/h | |
| 79.2 km/h | -9.10 km/h | |
| 76.8 km/h | -11.50 km/h | |
| 76.4 km/h | -11.90 km/h | |
| 75.6 km/h | -12.70 km/h | |
| 75.2 km/h | -13.10 km/h | |
| 75.1 km/h | -13.20 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 14.9% (13.2 Km/H).
Snow
It will come as no surprise the summer tyre struggled in the snow testing, with dangerous / unusable levels of performance. During snow braking Goodyear lead, but the results were close overall.
Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 27 m | Best | |
| 27.1 m | +0.10 m | |
| 27.4 m | +0.40 m | |
| 27.4 m | +0.40 m | |
| 27.6 m | +0.60 m | |
| 27.6 m | +0.60 m | |
| 27.6 m | +0.60 m | |
| 27.7 m | +0.70 m | |
| 27.8 m | +0.80 m | |
| 27.8 m | +0.80 m | |
| 27.9 m | +0.90 m | |
| 27.9 m | +0.90 m | |
| 28 m | +1.00 m | |
| 28.1 m | +1.10 m | |
| 28.1 m | +1.10 m | |
| 28.1 m | +1.10 m | |
| 28.4 m | +1.40 m | |
| 28.6 m | +1.60 m | |
RefReference All Season |
29.5 m | +2.50 m |
| 29.5 m | +2.50 m | |
| 29.8 m | +2.80 m | |
RefReference Summer |
43.2 m | +16.20 m |
The difference between best and worst was 60% (16.2 m ≈ 3.6 Car Lengths).
Snow handling once again had the Goodyear leading, with both the Pirelli and Nokian also consistent across the two tests.
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 52.8 km/h | Best | |
| 52.7 km/h | -0.10 km/h | |
| 52.6 km/h | -0.20 km/h | |
| 52.3 km/h | -0.50 km/h | |
| 52.2 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 52 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 52 km/h | -0.80 km/h | |
| 51.9 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 51.8 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 51.8 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 51.7 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 51.6 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 51.6 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 51.5 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 51.5 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 51.4 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 51 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 50.6 km/h | -2.20 km/h | |
| 50.4 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 50.2 km/h | -2.60 km/h | |
RefReference All Season |
50.1 km/h | -2.70 km/h |
RefReference Summer |
27.6 km/h | -25.20 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 47.7% (25.2 Km/H).
Environment
Nokian and Goodyear continued the strong results in the rolling resistance tests, with the Nokian having a huge advantage in fuel use.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.96 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.63 kg/t | +0.67 kg/t | £42 | |
| 8.01 kg/t | +1.05 kg/t | £67 | |
| 8.03 kg/t | +1.07 kg/t | £68 | |
| 8.06 kg/t | +1.10 kg/t | £70 | |
| 8.11 kg/t | +1.15 kg/t | £73 | |
RefReference All Season |
8.15 kg/t | +1.19 kg/t | £75 |
| 8.17 kg/t | +1.21 kg/t | £77 | |
| 8.32 kg/t | +1.36 kg/t | £86 | |
| 8.43 kg/t | +1.47 kg/t | £93 | |
| 8.48 kg/t | +1.52 kg/t | £96 | |
RefReference Summer |
8.48 kg/t | +1.52 kg/t | £96 |
| 8.49 kg/t | +1.53 kg/t | £97 | |
| 8.49 kg/t | +1.53 kg/t | £97 | |
| 8.49 kg/t | +1.53 kg/t | £97 | |
| 8.58 kg/t | +1.62 kg/t | £103 | |
| 8.66 kg/t | +1.70 kg/t | £108 | |
| 8.68 kg/t | +1.72 kg/t | £109 | |
| 8.88 kg/t | +1.92 kg/t | £122 | |
| 9.03 kg/t | +2.07 kg/t | £131 | |
| 9.13 kg/t | +2.17 kg/t | £137 | |
| 9.14 kg/t | +2.18 kg/t | £138 |
The difference between best and worst was 31.3% (2.18 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Michelin Alpin 5 uses about 95 L (£138) more fuel than the Nokian WR D4.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.
The noise testing highlighted the fact many winter tyres are now quieter than their summer counterparts.
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 64.8 dB | Best | |
| 64.8 dB | Best | |
| 65.6 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 65.6 dB | +0.80 dB | |
| 65.6 dB | +0.80 dB | |
RefReference All Season |
65.7 dB | +0.90 dB |
| 66 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 66.2 dB | +1.40 dB | |
| 66.3 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 66.3 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 66.4 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 66.4 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 66.5 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 67.3 dB | +2.50 dB | |
| 67.4 dB | +2.60 dB | |
| 67.4 dB | +2.60 dB | |
| 67.7 dB | +2.90 dB | |
| 67.8 dB | +3.00 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
67.8 dB | +3.00 dB |
| 68.2 dB | +3.40 dB | |
| 68.2 dB | +3.40 dB | |
| 68.4 dB | +3.60 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 5.6% (3.6 dB).
Value
As we’ve seen with other Michelin patterns, the Alpin 5 had a clear lead in wear testing, which made them the best value tyre on test. Hankook also proved to be a very low wear tyre, which when combined with the lower purchase price, proved to be as equally good value as the Michelin.
Wear
Predicted tread life in KM
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 72,450 KM | Best | |
| 59,850 KM | -12,600 KM | |
RefReference All Season |
52,200 KM | -20,250 KM |
| 51,750 KM | -20,700 KM | |
| 48,600 KM | -23,850 KM | |
| 47,700 KM | -24,750 KM | |
| 47,250 KM | -25,200 KM | |
| 45,900 KM | -26,550 KM | |
| 45,000 KM | -27,450 KM | |
| 43,650 KM | -28,800 KM | |
| 43,650 KM | -28,800 KM | |
| 42,750 KM | -29,700 KM | |
| 41,400 KM | -31,050 KM | |
| 41,400 KM | -31,050 KM | |
| 40,500 KM | -31,950 KM | |
| 40,500 KM | -31,950 KM | |
| 39,150 KM | -33,300 KM | |
| 37,800 KM | -34,650 KM | |
| 34,200 KM | -38,250 KM | |
| 33,300 KM | -39,150 KM | |
| 28,800 KM | -43,650 KM |
The difference between best and worst was 60.2% (43,650 KM).
Value
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | cost per 1,000 km |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.07 Price/1000 | Best | €13.31 | |
| 4.09 Price/1000 | +0.02 Price/1000 | €13.49 | |
| 5.11 Price/1000 | +1.04 Price/1000 | €13.11 | |
| 5.38 Price/1000 | +1.31 Price/1000 | €11.05 | |
| 5.45 Price/1000 | +1.38 Price/1000 | €12.78 | |
RefReference All Season |
5.46 Price/1000 | +1.39 Price/1000 | €11.31 |
| 5.56 Price/1000 | +1.49 Price/1000 | €15.14 | |
| 5.6 Price/1000 | +1.53 Price/1000 | €11.55 | |
| 5.61 Price/1000 | +1.54 Price/1000 | €13.02 | |
| 5.66 Price/1000 | +1.59 Price/1000 | €7.13 | |
| 5.68 Price/1000 | +1.61 Price/1000 | €13.51 | |
| 5.76 Price/1000 | +1.69 Price/1000 | €9.74 | |
| 5.8 Price/1000 | +1.73 Price/1000 | €13.25 | |
| 5.85 Price/1000 | +1.78 Price/1000 | €14.42 | |
| 5.96 Price/1000 | +1.89 Price/1000 | €11.77 | |
| 6.13 Price/1000 | +2.06 Price/1000 | €12.28 | |
| 6.42 Price/1000 | +2.35 Price/1000 | €13.31 | |
| 6.48 Price/1000 | +2.41 Price/1000 | €14.14 | |
| 6.77 Price/1000 | +2.70 Price/1000 | €12.24 | |
| 8.11 Price/1000 | +4.04 Price/1000 | €15.79 | |
| 9.99 Price/1000 | +5.92 Price/1000 | €19.96 |
The difference between best and worst was 145.5% (5.92 Price/1000). Over 40,000 km the cheapest tyre to own (Nokian WR D4) works out €513 cheaper than the most expensive (Pirelli Cinturato Winter).
How this is calculated
Assumes a typical car using 8 l/100km (with rolling resistance causing 20% of fuel use), fuel at €1.65 per litre and €70 fitting per set of four. Purchase prices are from the time of the 2018 test; financing costs are excluded.
Results
The overall results are below, and be sure to check out autobild.de, or the September 20th issue of the Auto Bild magazine for the full results.
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 6 |
| Wet | 7 |
| Snow | 7 |
| Comfort | 7 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7 |
| Noise | 7 |
| Wear | 8 |
Total: 49
- Price
- 290.00
Continental WinterContact TS 860
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 6 |
| Wet | 8 |
| Snow | 7 |
| Comfort | 9 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7 |
| Noise | 7 |
| Wear | 6 |
Total: 50
- Price
- 320.00
Kleber Krisalp HP3
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 6 |
| Wet | 6 |
| Snow | 9 |
| Comfort | 5 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7 |
| Noise | 8 |
| Wear | 5 |
Total: 46
- Price
- 240.00
Fulda Kristall Control HP2
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 5 |
| Wet | 7 |
| Snow | 7 |
| Comfort | 5 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7 |
| Noise | 7 |
| Wear | 5 |
Total: 43
- Price
- 255.00
Hankook Winter i cept RS2
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 6 |
| Wet | 7 |
| Snow | 8 |
| Comfort | 6 |
| Rolling Resistance | 4 |
| Noise | 5 |
| Wear | 9 |
Total: 45
- Price
- 245.00
Goodyear UltraGrip 9
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 5 |
| Wet | 7 |
| Snow | 9 |
| Comfort | 6 |
| Rolling Resistance | 8 |
| Noise | 6 |
| Wear | 7 |
Total: 48
- Price
- 280.00
Debica Frigo HP2
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 6 |
| Wet | 5 |
| Snow | 6 |
| Comfort | 5 |
| Rolling Resistance | 6 |
| Noise | 6 |
| Wear | 5 |
Total: 39
- Price
- 235.00
Falken Eurowinter HS01
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 6 |
| Wet | 6 |
| Snow | 5 |
| Comfort | 7 |
| Rolling Resistance | 4 |
| Noise | 7 |
| Wear | 5 |
Total: 40
- Price
- 225.00
Nokian WR D4
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 5 |
| Wet | 4 |
| Snow | 9 |
| Comfort | 5 |
| Rolling Resistance | 10 |
| Noise | 7 |
| Wear | 6 |
Total: 46
- Price
- 270.00
Uniroyal MS+ 77
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 4 |
| Wet | 7 |
| Snow | 7 |
| Comfort | 7 |
| Rolling Resistance | 5 |
| Noise | 5 |
| Wear | 5 |
Total: 40
- Price
- 245.00
Michelin Alpin 5
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 6 |
| Wet | 6 |
| Snow | 4 |
| Comfort | 2 |
| Rolling Resistance | 4 |
| Noise | 5 |
| Wear | 10 |
Total: 37
- Price
- 295.00
Semperit Master Grip 2
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 4 |
| Wet | 6 |
| Snow | 7 |
| Comfort | 6 |
| Rolling Resistance | 6 |
| Noise | 8 |
| Wear | 6 |
Total: 43
- Price
- 250.00
Pirelli Cinturato Winter
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 5 |
| Wet | 7 |
| Snow | 8 |
| Comfort | 7 |
| Rolling Resistance | 5 |
| Noise | 8 |
| Wear | 2 |
Total: 42
- Price
- 295.00
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 EVO
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 5 |
| Wet | 7 |
| Snow | 4 |
| Comfort | 9 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7 |
| Noise | 8 |
| Wear | 5 |
Total: 45
- Price
- 235.00
Yokohama BluEarth Winter V905
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 7 |
| Wet | 6 |
| Snow | 4 |
| Comfort | 8 |
| Rolling Resistance | 6 |
| Noise | 7 |
| Wear | 5 |
Total: 43
- Price
- 260.00
Barum Polaris 3
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 5 |
| Wet | 4 |
| Snow | 7 |
| Comfort | 4 |
| Rolling Resistance | 7 |
| Noise | 5 |
| Wear | 4 |
Total: 36
- Price
- 240.00
Vredestein Snowtrac 5
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 6 |
| Wet | 4 |
| Snow | 6 |
| Comfort | 5 |
| Rolling Resistance | 6 |
| Noise | 5 |
| Wear | 3 |
Total: 35
- Price
- 270.00
Matador MP 92 Sibir Snow
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 5 |
| Wet | 4 |
| Snow | 5 |
| Comfort | 7 |
| Rolling Resistance | 6 |
| Noise | 7 |
| Wear | 3 |
Total: 37
- Price
- 200.00
Firestone Winterhawk 3
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 5 |
| Wet | 4 |
| Snow | 5 |
| Comfort | 4 |
| Rolling Resistance | 6 |
| Noise | 6 |
| Wear | 6 |
Total: 36
- Price
- 230.00
Gislaved Euro Frost 6
195/65 R15All discipline results (7)
| Test | Result |
|---|---|
| Dry | 5 |
| Wet | 4 |
| Snow | 6 |
| Comfort | 6 |
| Rolling Resistance | 6 |
| Noise | 6 |
| Wear | 4 |
Total: 37
- Price
- 245.00


I don't get it. How snow tyres can be 27 meters in snow braking meanwhile all-season tyres in snow braking is 16.9 meters. So... with these tests all-season tyres are better then winter tyres? Can someone explain it to me?
Just trying to figure out the distance of snow braking by Gislaved Euro Frost 6 vs Michelin CrossClimate2 and how worse all-season tyres are. But i'm confused now. It can't be that All-season tyres have better snow braking.
The all season tyre was better than ONE winter tyre in this test (from 2018) so I'm not sure what's confusing. There's bad winter tyres and good all season tyres
How so? Take for example the worst all-season tyre Vredestein (18.08 meters) and compare to the best winter tyre GoodYear Ultragrip (27 meters). So.. even the worst all-season tyre outperformed the best winter tyre by 9 meters shorter distance? Maybe i'm not understanding something.
Okey i think i got it. Numbers are just wrong in 2018 winter braking, cuz in your youtube video results seem fine and 2021 winter tyre results are also fine.
Not sure what you're looking at but this is the snow braking result
https://uploads.disquscdn.c...
I'm looking at this page above. 2018 winter tyre snow braking. Best tyre is 27 meters. And then i'm looking at 2021 all-season tyres. Best tyre at snow braking is 16.91 meters. And for example 2021 best winter tyre is 15.67 meters. You sure it's correct numbers in 2018? 27 meters was the best? Just scroll up and check snow braking. If it's correct then it means over 3 years tyres have improved alot. Hopefully now you understood 😊
Different conditions and speeds, you can't compare between tests
Yeah i didn't understand at first sorry. I thought both tests are yours. Cheers 👌 still would be interesting to see gislaved euro frost 6 vs. michelin crossclimate 2 but i'm sure difference wouldn't be big anyways.
It could be that i'm comparing auto bild results to your results. Auto bild results seem very different than yours. Maybe that's the issue.
Looking for advice on 225/55 19 winter tyre for SUV Xtrail. In Yorkshire but drive to Germany and Switzerland in winter.
All the usual suspects work well in the SUV sizes :)
Can't believe I missed the Kleber! Just fallen for the tread pattern, looking at tests and reviews to try and put myself off has conversely resulted in me wishing to advertise a kidney on ebay..... No winter suitable tyres this year leaves me feeling vulnerable. Anybody want a kidney? :-)
I know, Im sad, I should covet X-boxes or something, but im afraid tyres are much more desirable.... :-/
Hi All, From the data on the winter tyres it seems that they could be used all season - would you say that this would be OK? - certainly from a cost basis - it would save money!
I'll answer with a question - if you want an all season tyre, why not fit an all season tyre?
I suppose its more to do with the latter part of my comment - they cost 3x as much!
A good all season and a good winter tyre are pretty much priced the same!
I appreciate that - as the results of the Auto Bild test had the 20 tyres cost from £64.70 to £41.60 - the older test of all season I understood to be £138 plus on those tested! If you can point me to the All season tyre at the £40 to £60 mark I'd be pleased. BUT I wonder if you could say that the winter tyre CAN be used all year safely or NOT?
I would guess those two tests tested different sizes hence the different prices shown...
Yes I see - was just checking the comparison and my size at 17" are significantly more than the 13" which matches the quoted price on this article. Will continue to check through and make a decision on balance between the All season and Winter as I go!
Hi there - I have been enjoying your videos on Youtube and have now subscribed. This is the first year that I am planning on running a dedicated winter tyre on a mk7 Golf R. The challenge I am finding is that a lot of the tyres don't come in 235/35/19 - which is a fairly common performance size. The new Conti 860p does not come in that size, but I am thinking of plumping for the older Conti 850p (quite expensive for an older tyre though). I have yet to find any winter tryre test reviews for this size, but thought I would see if you have any views or thoughts.
Cheers
Jon
Thanks for the kind words. In that size my money would go to Conti, Goodyear or Michelin, can't really go wrong with any of the big three!
Hi John, I have a question and you're probably the only one that can get an answer.
As you know, manufacturers sell brand new "old" model tyre. For example Conti WinterContact TS830P is still sold today in some dimensions, DOT XX18, even if the model is very old.
How does this tyre compound compare to original compound from years ago when this model was introduced? I'm sure it was updated... What do you think? Is this comparable to say TS850P? Thanks!
The compounds do get updated, but there's no guarantee that it has been updated. Usually the newer tyre is the better option as they have more advanced tread patterns and constructions.
Thanks! I know that newer tyre is better, it's just that some tyres are only available as older models in certain dimensions
The logical reply is: The current compound is the same or potentially improved, as this is usually not explicitly commented and you would need to ask the producer directly.
What is known more general is the models comparison, e.g. here: http://www.tyrereviews.co.u...
or here: https://www.continental-tyr...
Would be useful if you can mention what kind of rare dimension you have that you can't find newer model than TS 830P...curious!
Plus don't forget that newest successor for the UHP category from the given producer is http://www.tyrereviews.co.u...
Hope this helps.
Seems to me they've placed too much emphasis on rolling resistance, looking at the graphs the Hankook is a bloody exceptional tyre, yet it ended up quite low down. I can only see the rolling resistance weighting causing this, yet, the economy difference is very slight in real terms, and surely the significant safety benefits offered are of more importance in the winter...
I agree, but 5th overall is still an excellent result for Hankook!
Oh indeed!