Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
Across braking, handling, aquaplaning, wear, and efficiency, Continental repeatedly lands near the front of the field (including test wins), whereas Nexen delivers selective highlights-particularly short dry braking and commendable winter traction-tempered by weaker wet grip and aquaplaning resistance. Buyers are essentially choosing between all-round security versus targeted strengths and lower cost.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been six tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | six |
While it might look like the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is better than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading wet braking and wet handling performance
- Strong aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved)
- Balanced winter ability with short snow stops and good traction
- Low abrasion and competitive rolling resistance/fuel use
- Consistently short dry braking distances
- Very strong ice braking and solid snow traction
- Comfortable ride with low external noise in several tests
- Compelling value with lower purchase price
Dry Braking
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 stopped the vehicle in 2.22% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Dry Braking: Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 1.49% faster around a lap than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 10.26% less distance than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.
Best In Wet Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 6.34% less distance than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 4.97% faster around a wet lap than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 3.02% faster around a wet circle than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.
Best In Wet Circle: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 floated at a 4.25% higher speed than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.
Best In Straight Aqua: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 slipped out at a 11.24% higher speed than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two snow braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 2.49% less distance than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.
Best In Snow Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had 4.63% better snow traction than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.
Best In Snow Traction: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 3.39% faster around a lap than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 provided 3.61% more lateral grip than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Snow Circle: Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 9.69% faster through a slalom than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.
Best In Snow Slalom: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 was better during one ice braking tests. On average the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 stopped the vehicle 8.97% shorter than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Ice Braking: Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 was better during two noise tests. On average the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 measured 0.73% quieter than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Noise: Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Tyre Weight
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 was better during one tyre weight tests. On average the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 weighed 2.15% less than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Tyre Weight: Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
See how the Tyre Weight winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 was better during one wear tests. On average the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 is predicted to cover 8% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Wear: Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 was better during two value tests. On average the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 proved to have a 35.04% better value based on price/1000km than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Value: Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had a 5.69% lower rolling resistance than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 used 0.18% less fuel than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 emitted 12.99% less particle wear matter than the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2.
Best In Abrasion: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 highly, praising its excellent wet grip and braking, quiet and comfortable ride, and balanced performance across seasons, including competent snow traction. Many high-scoring reviews also note strong longevity and good efficiency/low rolling resistance. The main drawbacks reported by a noticeable minority are a softer sidewall feel with vague/less precise steering (especially in warm, dry conditions or at higher speeds) and some mixed reports of faster front-axle wear. Overall, it's a confident, well-rounded choice for mild climates and everyday driving.
Based on 45 reviews with an average rating of 83%
Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 Driver Reviews
Drivers of the Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 report a strong all-rounder with standout snow and ice traction, a very quiet and comfortable ride, and solid performance in typical dry and wet conditions. Many highlight excellent value and even improved fuel economy. A minority note that dry/wet grip can feel merely average at times and that traction in heavy standing water isn't class-leading, but overall satisfaction is high.
Based on 7 reviews with an average rating of 87%
Conclusion
Nexen N Blue 4Season 2 appeals on value and specific use cases. It repeatedly posts shorter dry braking and achieved standout ice braking in ADAC, with strong winter traction and good comfort. However, its weaker wet grip and aquaplaning reserves limit safety margins in everyday rainy conditions. If budget is tight and winter bite (including ice) plus short dry stops matter most, Nexen fits; for year-round confidence, especially in the wet, Continental is the clear choice.
Key Differences
- Wet safety: Continental stops 7-13% shorter in wet braking across tests; Nexen trails notably.
- Aquaplaning: Continental holds higher straight and curved thresholds; Nexen shows limited reserves.
- Dry braking: Nexen typically stops 1-3% shorter; Continental is adequate but not best-in-class.
- Winter mix: Continental stronger on snow braking/traction overall; Nexen excels specifically on ice.
- Efficiency and wear: Continental shows lower abrasion and competitive fuel use; Nexen offers lower purchase price and, in one test, higher mileage.
- Overall results: Continental consistently finishes near the top and takes test wins; Nexen places mid-pack with value-led positioning.
Overall Winner: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.