Menu

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2

This head-to-head pitches the value-oriented BFGoodrich Advantage All Season against the premium-touring benchmark, Continental AllSeasonContact 2. Across six shared tests from 2023-2025 in 17-18-inch sizes, both target year-round road use, but they prioritize different strengths. The BFGoodrich consistently excels in dry stopping and aquaplaning resistance, while Continental dominates wet braking and overall balance.

Expect clear contrasts: BFGoodrich posts repeatedly shorter dry braking distances and strong aquaplaning margins, plus competitive snow performance and low abrasion. Continental counters with class-leading wet grip, higher mileage, lower rolling resistance, and stronger overall scores-including all six overall test wins-signaling a more rounded, premium execution.
Advantage-All-Season VS AllSeasonContact-2

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been six tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of six total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Continental AllSeasonContact 2six
six wins

While it might look like the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is better than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Consistently shorter dry braking across all shared tests
  • Strong straight and curved aquaplaning resistance
  • Low abrasion and favorable fuel use in several tests
  • Competitive snow braking and traction with stable winter manners
  • Class-leading wet braking and wet handling performance
  • High mileage and strong value over life despite higher purchase price
  • Balanced all-round performance with good winter capability
  • Low rolling resistance and refined noise characteristics

Dry Braking

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during six dry braking tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season stopped the vehicle in 2.96% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
39.32M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
40.52M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
38.9M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
40.4M (+1.5M)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
38.9M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
40.4M (+1.5M)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
38.9M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
40M (+1.1M)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
38.9M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
40M (+1.1M)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
39.3M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
40.8M (+1.5M)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
41M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
41.5M (+0.5M)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 1.25% faster around a lap than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
92.05Km/H
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
90.9Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
88.2Km/H
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
87.8Km/H (-0.4Km/H)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
95.9Km/H
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
94Km/H (-1.9Km/H)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 8.05% less distance than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
49.7M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
45.7M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
47.4M (+2M)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
45.4M
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
47.4M (+2M)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
45.4M
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
59M (+5.4M)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
53.6M
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
59M (+5.4M)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
53.6M
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
34.3M (+3M)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
31.3M
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
51.1M (+6.2M)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
44.9M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 8.79% less distance than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
42.1M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
38.4M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
42.1M (+3.7M)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
38.4M

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 4.87% faster around a wet lap than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
71.3Km/H
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
74.95Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
72Km/H (-2.6Km/H)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
74.6Km/H
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
70.6Km/H (-4.7Km/H)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
75.3Km/H

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 3.95% faster around a wet circle than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
12.16s
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
11.68s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
12.21s (+0.25s)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
11.96s
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
12.1s (+0.7s)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
11.4s

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season floated at a 4.48% higher speed than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
77.47Km/H
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
74Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
80.4Km/H
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
76.1Km/H (-4.3Km/H)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
74.9Km/H
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
72.9Km/H (-2Km/H)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
77.1Km/H
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
73Km/H (-4.1Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during three curved aquaplaning tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season slipped out at a 5.67% higher speed than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
3m/sec2
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
2.83m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
3.31m/sec2
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
2.95m/sec2 (-0.36m/sec2)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
3.09m/sec2
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
3.04m/sec2 (-0.05m/sec2)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
2.6m/sec2
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
2.5m/sec2 (-0.1m/sec2)

Snow Braking

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow braking tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season stopped the vehicle in 1.37% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
18.67M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
18.93M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
22.9M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
23.2M (+0.3M)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
23.8M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
24.4M (+0.6M)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
9.3M (+0.1M)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
9.2M

Snow Traction

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow traction tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season had 0.89% better snow traction than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
1902.67N
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
1885.67N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
2713N (-31N)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
2744N
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
2745N
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
2668N (-77N)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
250N
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
245N (-5N)

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 0.8% faster around a lap than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
55.95Km/H
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
56.4Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
57.5Km/H
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
57.4Km/H (-0.1Km/H)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
54.4Km/H (-1Km/H)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
55.4Km/H

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 1.64% faster through a slalom than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
4.27m/sec2
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
4.2m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
4.18m/sec2 (-0.05m/sec2)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
4.23m/sec2
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
4.36m/sec2
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
4.16m/sec2 (-0.2m/sec2)

Ice Braking

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one ice braking tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season stopped the vehicle 1.92% shorter than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
15.3M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
15.6M
Ice braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Ice Braking: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
15.3M
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
15.6M (+0.3M)

Noise

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two noise tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 measured 0.37% quieter than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
72.47dB
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
72.2dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
73dB (+0.7dB)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
72.3dB
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
72.2dB (+0.2dB)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
72dB
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
72.2dB
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
72.3dB (+0.1dB)

Tyre Weight

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one tyre weight tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season weighed 5.11% less than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
35.3Kg
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
37.2Kg
Tyre Weight Per Set, lower is better

Best In Tyre Weight: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
35.3Kg
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
37.2Kg (+1.9Kg)

Wear

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two wear tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is predicted to cover 15.92% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
43849KM
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
52151KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
40317KM (-18606KM)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
58923KM
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
49430KM
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
49330KM (-100KM)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
41800KM (-6400KM)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
48200KM

Value

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two value tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 proved to have a 10.91% better value based on price/1000km than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
8.8Price/1000
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
7.84Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
12.28Price/1000 (+4.13Price/1000)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
8.15Price/1000
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
11.03Price/1000
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
12.57Price/1000 (+1.54Price/1000)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
3.09Price/1000 (+0.29Price/1000)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
2.8Price/1000

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had a 1.3% lower rolling resistance than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
7.71kg / t
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
7.61kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Continental AllSeasonContact 2

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
7.7kg / t (+0.02kg / t)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
7.68kg / t
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
7.71kg / t (+0.18kg / t)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
7.53kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season used 1.12% less fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
5.3l/100km
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
5.36l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
5.57l/100km (+0.01l/100km)
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
5.56l/100km
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
4.74l/100km
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
4.81l/100km (+0.07l/100km)
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
5.6l/100km
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
5.7l/100km (+0.1l/100km)

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one abrasion tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season emitted 10.45% less particle wear matter than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
60mg/km/t
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
67mg/km/t
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
60mg/km/t
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
67mg/km/t (+7mg/km/t)

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season and Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

In total the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tyre 0% overall.

The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has been reviewed 45 times and drivers have given the tyre 83% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Best Review for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
View all BFGoodrich Advantage All Season driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Given 88% 225/40 R18 on a combination of roads for 50 spirited miles
Compared to my previous premium summer tyres, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is incredibly quiet and has fantastic grip. I am driving a plug-in hybrid Audi A3, and it became basically silent in fully electric mode. I always had wheelspin when I accelerated a little harder, because of the instant torque of the electric motor. What fascinates me is that this happened with both Bridgestone and Vredestein summer tyres in warm, dry weather conditions. This is no longer the case with the ASC2. The rolling resistance also feels much better, the car coasts so effortlessly. Power consumption... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1536 - tyre reviewed on November 2, 2023
View all Continental AllSeasonContact 2 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

Continental's AllSeasonContact 2 is the more complete tyre: it wins all six tests overall, leads decisively in wet braking and wet handling (often by 4-12%), and pairs that with high predicted mileage and low rolling resistance. For safety-first buyers who frequently drive in rain or mixed climates, it's the clear choice despite the higher price.

The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season makes a strong case on value and specific metrics: consistently shorter dry braking, top-tier straight and curved aquaplaning resistance, competitive snow braking/traction, and notably low abrasion with solid fuel use. If your priority is dry-road stopping, aquaplaning security, and long tread life per euro, BFGoodrich delivers excellent practicality-just accept its moderate wet-grip limitations. The takeaway: choose Continental for all-weather balance and wet-road confidence; pick BFGoodrich if you want dry bite, aquaplaning headroom, and lower ownership cost.
Key Differences
  • Overall results: Continental wins all 6 shared tests; BFGoodrich has none
  • Dry braking: BFGoodrich shorter by ~2.7-3.7% in multiple tests
  • Wet braking: Continental shorter by ~4-12% and consistently superior
  • Aquaplaning: BFGoodrich holds higher straight/curved aquaplaning margins
  • Mileage: Continental projects notably longer life (e.g., +15-46% in ADAC/Auto Bild)
  • Operating costs: Continental lower rolling resistance; BFGoodrich lower abrasion and often better purchase price/value index
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

Overall Winner: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.