BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- -
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 83% · 70
In the 7 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 finished ahead 7 times and the Advantage All Season not once. The Advantage All Season stopped 3% shorter in the dry; the AllSeasonContact 2 lasted 20.4% longer in the wear tests.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Continental AllSeasonContact 2 for wet-road safety, year-round balance, and long mileage; choose BFGoodrich Advantage All Season if you prioritize short dry stops, strong aquaplaning reserves, and lower upfront cost/abrasion for budget-conscious daily driving.
Where the Advantage All Season is stronger
- Consistently shorter dry braking across all shared tests
- Strong straight and curved aquaplaning resistance
- Low abrasion and favorable fuel use in several tests
Where the AllSeasonContact 2 is stronger
- Class-leading wet braking and wet handling performance
- High mileage and strong value over life despite higher purchase price
- Balanced all-round performance with good winter capability
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Advantage All Season vs AllSeasonContact 2 at a glance
| Category | Advantage All Season | Gap | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won7 shared tests | 0 | 7 | |
| Dry9 measurements | 9 | The Advantage All Season stopped 3% shorter in the dry (7 tests) | 0 |
| Wet18 measurements | 6 | The AllSeasonContact 2 stopped 7.9% shorter in the wet (7 tests) | 12 |
| Snow10 measurements | 6 | The Advantage All Season stopped 0.9% shorter on snow (3 tests) | 4 |
| Ice1 measurement | 1 | 0 | |
| Comfort4 measurements | 2 | Level between the two. | 2 |
| Value10 measurements | 5 | Level between the two. | 5 |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.5/10 | Level | 9.5/10 |
| Pricein the 3 tests that listed prices | Cheaper | The AllSeasonContact 2 was dearer in 2 of 3 | +9.8% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 72 | 59 sizes made in both | 140 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 7 tests, 2023 to 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Advantage All Season | Field | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 All Season Tyre Braking Test - 30 Sets | P17 of 30 | P8 of 30 | |
| 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test | P18 of 30 | P7 of 30 | |
| 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | P7 of 16 | P2 of 16 | |
| 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | P10 of 15 | P2 of 15 | |
| 2024 All Season Tyre Market Overview | P9 of 37 | P3 of 37 | |
| 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | P9 of 16 | P2 of 16 | |
| 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout | P7 of 35 | P5 of 35 |
Performance profile
15 measurements from the 7 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Advantage All Season
AllSeasonContact 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 94%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 5 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Advantage All Season
AllSeasonContact 2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Advantage All Season | Gap | AllSeasonContact 2 | Wins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.17 | 3% | 40.4 | 7-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 92.05 | 1.2% | 90.9 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 49.41 | 7.9% | 45.47 | 0-7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 42.1 | 8.8% | 38.4 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 71.3 | 5.1% | 74.95 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 12.16 | 3.9% | 11.68 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 77.47 | 4.7% | 74 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 5.9% | 2.83 | 3-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 18.67 | 0.9% | 18.93 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,903 | 1.3% | 1,886 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 55.95 | 0.8% | 56.4 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 4.27 | 1.8% | 4.2 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 15.3 | 1.9% | 15.6 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 72.47 | 0.3 dB | 72.2 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 35.3 | 5.1% | 37.2 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 43,849 | 20.4% | 52,151 | 1-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.71 | 1.3% | 7.61 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.3 | 1% | 5.36 | 2-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 60 | 10.4% | 67 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 609 | 23% | 791 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Advantage All Season scores 9.5 and the AllSeasonContact 2 9.5 out of 10.
| Advantage All Season | Category | AllSeasonContact 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 94 | Dry | 87 | ||
| 65 | Wet | 94 | ||
| 70 | Comfort | 83 | ||
| 49 | Value | 74 | ||
| 92 | Snow | 84 | ||
| 45 | Ice | 42 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Advantage All Season | Category | AllSeasonContact 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| - | Dry Grip | 8.4 | ||
| - | Wet Grip | 8.7 | ||
| - | Road Feedback | 8 | ||
| - | Handling | 8 | ||
| - | Wear | 7.9 | ||
| - | Comfort | 8.9 | ||
| - | Snow Grip | 8.3 | ||
| - | Ice Grip | 7.7 | ||
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 2 83% from 70 reviews; the Advantage All Season has no owner reviews yet. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
No owner reviews yet. Be the first to review it →
Continental AllSeasonContact 2
- 83%from 70 reviews
- 82%would buy again
- 667,287 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners rate the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 highly overall (81% average), most often praising its smooth, comfortable ride and low noise levels, alongside very strong wet grip that inspires confidence. Dry grip is also widely viewed as secure and predictable, and around one in five owners report it coping well in snow for an all-season. The main recurring drawback is steering feel: around one in four owners describe softer, less immediate response, and tread life feedback is mixed, with a noticeable minority reporting faster-than-expected wear.
- Noticeably smoother, more comfortable ride
- Low cabin noise and a refined drive
- Excellent wet grip and confidence in the rain
- Strong dry grip and traction under acceleration
- Steering feels soft or delayed, with a dead spot for some drivers
- Tread life reports are inconsistent, with some seeing faster wear
- Handling can feel less sharp than expected in the dry
Summarised by AI from 61 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 70 AllSeasonContact 2 reviewsI chose XL-rated tires because I tend to drive a bit faster, and they provide better stability with less sidewall flex. I use them only during the winter, and they've been excellent. They are no noisier than winter tires, and in my experience they perform better in about 90% of winter conditions. The only exception is deep snow, where proper winter tires still have an advantage, although these tires handle it quite well too.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 72 sizes of the Advantage All Season and 140 of the AllSeasonContact 2, 59 of them made in both.
| Category | Advantage All Season | AllSeasonContact 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 72 sizes, 14 to 20 inch | 140 sizes, 15 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 59 sizes 165/60 R15175/65 R15185/55 R15185/60 R15185/65 R15195/60 R15195/65 R15205/60 R15205/65 R15185/50 R16195/45 R16195/50 R16and 47 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B100% | B98%C2% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C67%D26%B7% | B75%C20%A4%D1% |
| EU label noise | 69-71 dB A74%B26% | 70-73 dB B97%A3% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 121 of 121 | 248 of 248 |
| On the market since | 2022 | - |
| Replaced | - | Continental AllSeasonContact (2017) |
| Awards | - | Highly Recommended: Best All Season Tyres (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Recommended: Best All Season Tyres for SUVs (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Winner: All-Season SUV Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2026/27) |
| Price in the shared tests | The AllSeasonContact 2 was the dearer tyre in 2 of the 3 tests that listed prices, by 9.8% on average. Each test priced the tyres in its own market at the time; only the gap is comparable. | |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This head-to-head pitches the value-oriented BFGoodrich Advantage All Season against the premium-touring benchmark, Continental AllSeasonContact 2. Across six shared tests from 2023-2025 in 17-18-inch sizes, both target year-round road use, but they prioritize different strengths. The BFGoodrich consistently excels in dry stopping and aquaplaning resistance, while Continental dominates wet braking and overall balance.
Expect clear contrasts: BFGoodrich posts repeatedly shorter dry braking distances and strong aquaplaning margins, plus competitive snow performance and low abrasion. Continental counters with class-leading wet grip, higher mileage, lower rolling resistance, and stronger overall scores-including all six overall test wins-signaling a more rounded, premium execution.
Conclusion
Continental's AllSeasonContact 2 is the more complete tyre: it wins all six tests overall, leads decisively in wet braking and wet handling (often by 4-12%), and pairs that with high predicted mileage and low rolling resistance. For safety-first buyers who frequently drive in rain or mixed climates, it's the clear choice despite the higher price.
The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season makes a strong case on value and specific metrics: consistently shorter dry braking, top-tier straight and curved aquaplaning resistance, competitive snow braking/traction, and notably low abrasion with solid fuel use. If your priority is dry-road stopping, aquaplaning security, and long tread life per euro, BFGoodrich delivers excellent practicality-just accept its moderate wet-grip limitations. The takeaway: choose Continental for all-weather balance and wet-road confidence; pick BFGoodrich if you want dry bite, aquaplaning headroom, and lower ownership cost.
Advantage All Season vs AllSeasonContact 2: your questions
Is the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season or the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 the better tyre?
In the 7 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 finished ahead 7 times and the Advantage All Season not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Advantage All Season scores 9.5 and the AllSeasonContact 2 9.5 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Advantage All Season or the AllSeasonContact 2?
The AllSeasonContact 2 led 12 of the 18 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 7.9% shorter in the wet across 7 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Advantage All Season led 9 of the 9 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3% shorter in the dry across 7 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The Advantage All Season led 6 of the 10 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 0.9% shorter on snow across 3 tests.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Advantage All Season used 1% less fuel (3 tests); the AllSeasonContact 2 lasted 20.4% longer in the wear tests (3 tests) and had 1.3% lower rolling resistance (2 tests).
What do owners say?
Owners rate the AllSeasonContact 2 83% from 70 reviews; the Advantage All Season has no owner reviews yet.
Which is more expensive?
In the 3 tests that listed prices, the AllSeasonContact 2 was the dearer tyre in 2 of them, by 9.8% on average. Prices are the test's own at the time, in its own market.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Advantage All Season is made in 72 sizes (14 to 20 inch) and the AllSeasonContact 2 in 140 (15 to 22 inch). 59 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Advantage All Season is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the AllSeasonContact 2 B and B.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
10-15 in 26 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
8-4 in 13 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
15-1 in 17 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Goodyear Vector All Season 4
0-7 in 7 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2
9-18 in 30 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3
6-3 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
11-1 in 12 shared tests
vs 
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 3 Sport
2-4 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Review the Advantage All Season Review the AllSeasonContact 2
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion