BFGoodrich Advantage All Season vs Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Expect a clear split: the Turanza AS6 dominates on safety-critical wet performance and overall rankings (5 test wins vs 1), plus delivers better mileage and value scores. The Advantage All Season shines where snow confidence, comfort/noise, and efficiency matter more, making this a classic safety-versus-winter/efficiency trade-off.

Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been six tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| BFGoodrich Advantage All Season | one | |
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 | five |
While it might look like the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 is better than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Stronger snow performance (braking, traction, handling) and solid ice braking
- Lower rolling resistance and slightly better fuel consumption
- Quieter exterior noise and lighter tyre weight
- Good dry braking with stable, predictable dry handling
- Class-leading wet and dry braking with superior wet handling
- Better aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved) overall
- Longer tread life and stronger value scores
- Consistently higher overall test finishes and broad all-weather capability
Dry Braking
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 stopped the vehicle in 3.69% less distance than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Dry Braking: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was 0.38% faster around a lap than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from six tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during six wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 stopped the vehicle in 10.26% less distance than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Concrete
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 stopped the vehicle in 8.55% less distance than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wet Braking - Concrete winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was 4.3% faster around a wet lap than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was 4.11% faster around a wet circle than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 floated at a 0.97% higher speed than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Straight Aqua: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 slipped out at a 0.33% higher speed than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during three snow braking tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season stopped the vehicle in 5.08% less distance than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Braking: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during three snow traction tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season had 6.11% better snow traction than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Traction: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 2.14% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two snow slalom tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was 5.39% faster through a slalom than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Snow Slalom: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one ice braking tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season stopped the vehicle 1.29% shorter than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Ice Braking: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during three noise tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season measured 1% quieter than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Noise: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Tyre Weight
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one tyre weight tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season weighed 5.11% less than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Tyre Weight: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Tyre Weight winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during three wear tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 is predicted to cover 13.28% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Wear: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was better during three value tests. On average the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 proved to have a 10.11% better value based on price/1000km than the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season.
Best In Value: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season had a 6.77% lower rolling resistance than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Rolling Resistance: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season used 0.75% less fuel than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Fuel Consumption: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season was better during one abrasion tests. On average the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season emitted 10.45% less particle wear matter than the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
Best In Abrasion: BFGoodrich Advantage All Season
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season and Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
In total the BFGoodrich Advantage All Season has been reviewed 0 times and drivers have given the tyre 0% overall.
The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 has been reviewed 30 times and drivers have given the tyre 80% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6.
View all BFGoodrich Advantage All Season driver reviews >>
Conclusion
The BFGoodrich Advantage All Season is the smarter pick for frequent light-winter users and efficiency-minded buyers. It repeatedly edges Bridgestone on snow braking/traction and ice braking, runs quieter, and posts lower rolling resistance with marginally lower fuel use in several tests. If your climate brings regular snow days but you still want an all-season, or you prioritize comfort and economy over ultimate wet grip, BFGoodrich makes sense.
Key Differences
- Wet safety: Bridgestone stops notably shorter (e.g., 50.5 m vs 59 m; +14% advantage) and handles better in the wet
- Dry braking: Bridgestone consistently shorter by ~1-7%
- Winter: BFGoodrich leads on snow braking/traction (often 3-12% better) and edges ice braking
- Longevity: Bridgestone shows ~10-24% higher mileage in multiple tests
- Efficiency: BFGoodrich has lower rolling resistance and marginally lower fuel use in several results
- Noise/comfort: BFGoodrich measures slightly quieter across tests
Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.