For the first of three tyre review summer tyre tests this year, I've tested 12 sets of tyres in 225/45/17 using a Volkswagen Golf GTI.
All 12 sets of tyres were purchased in the open market anonymously. As always, they have been tested in the dry, wet, noise, comfort, and rolling resistance tests to find out exactly which tyre is best for your own driving needs.
The slowest tyre in the wet was the Davanti, in a group of its own, significantly behind every other tyre including the other cheap ones. It was difficult to drive, had no bite, and you really couldn't get it into or out of corners. One to avoid!
Next up were the Bridgestone and Goodride with similar lap times, though the Bridgestone was much nicer subjectively - lovely and predictable with a stable front axle. The Goodride, while posting a similar time, just wasn't as understandable and was the only tyre where I almost fell off the track. Good Ride is not yet a good ride, but last time I tested it, it was a terrible ride, so they're improving. The Kleber and Vredestein were a step up in grip and both actually quite nice to drive. The Kleber almost felt sporty, which surprised me - as a Michelin sub-brand they've always taken on the Michelin ethos of safe, boring understeer. But while it still felt safe, it actually turned really nicely.
The Debica was an odd one. On its first lap it felt like a cheap tyre, sliding at the back and difficult to get into corners. But once it had some heat in it, the second lap was significantly better - nearly a full second quicker, which is unusual as my delta between laps is normally about a tenth. On the road, especially in cooler conditions around 15 degrees, I think the lap time is probably over-promising what you'll get on the street.
The Michelin Primacy 5 was absolutely classic Michelin - understeer-y, very safe and easy to control. As always with the Primacy range, Michelin go for total life performance and excellent tread life, and I think that often hurts them in the wet because it's never the best tyre in the wet. Once again it was just average in this group, but average and safe and very Michelin.
The Maxxis Premitra HP6 continued its recent strong wet form. My one quibble was that it was a little bit peaky around the limits of grip - you'd be turning and suddenly wouldn't get much notice about the breakaway. It took a little longer than average to recover, but its actual grip was excellent.
The Kumho Ecsta Sport did a very good job, finishing fourth in lap time. Subjectively, and this is a compliment, it didn't give me anything to worry about. I just got round the lap and thought "good job, no nasty surprises," which is one of the higher compliments I can pay a tyre.
However, the Hankook, Pirelli and Continental were in a bubble of their own, showing that the Hankook can definitely mix with the big boys. The Hankook was incredible - I finally felt like I was attacking the surface and the car was going where I wanted it to. The Pirelli was even better, about half a second quicker with slightly sharper steering response, though its window between grip and no grip was narrower than the Hankook's, which is where it falls back slightly subjectively. The Continental Premium Contact 7 was a blend of the two - maybe not quite as direct as the Pirelli, but with a wide sliding window, making it the best all-rounder. These three tyres are incredible. The Kumho did pretty well too, but anything below the top four could do with more grip to really be excellent in the wet.
Wet Handling
Spread: 12.17 s (18%)|Avg: 71.81 s
Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
Continental PremiumContact 7
67.70 s
Pirelli Cinturato C3
68.09 s
Hankook Ventus Evo
68.69 s
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
70.46 s
Maxxis Premitra HP6
71.10 s
Michelin Primacy 5
71.35 s
Debica Presto UHP2
71.59 s
Vredestein Ultrac plus
71.86 s
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
72.07 s
Goodride Solmax 1
72.17 s
Bridgestone Turanza 6
72.65 s
Reference UHP All Season Ref
75.98 s
Davanti Protoura Sport
79.87 s
The top four in wet braking were the same as the top four in wet handling, just in a slightly different order, which happens when everything is this close at the top. I also ran a wet circle test, which further confirms the top four.
Wet Braking
Spread: 6.61 M (23.9%)|Avg: 29.46 M
Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Hankook Ventus Evo
27.66 M
Pirelli Cinturato C3
27.68 M
Continental PremiumContact 7
27.73 M
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
28.38 M
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
29.12 M
Bridgestone Turanza 6
29.47 M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
29.53 M
Goodride Solmax 1
29.53 M
Michelin Primacy 5
29.73 M
Vredestein Ultrac plus
30.20 M
Debica Presto UHP2
30.23 M
Davanti Protoura Sport
34.27 M
Residual Speed Calculator
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre
In the deeper water of the aquaplaning test, the Hankook, Michelin and Continental all performed excellently, with a shout out to Debica, winning curved aquaplaning.
Straight Aqua
Spread: 8.78 Km/H (11.1%)|Avg: 74.39 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
Hankook Ventus Evo
78.81 Km/H
Michelin Primacy 5
76.97 Km/H
Pirelli Cinturato C3
76.86 Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac plus
75.36 Km/H
Debica Presto UHP2
75.25 Km/H
Continental PremiumContact 7
74.88 Km/H
Maxxis Premitra HP6
74.59 Km/H
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
73.38 Km/H
Goodride Solmax 1
72.93 Km/H
Bridgestone Turanza 6
72.24 Km/H
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
71.43 Km/H
Davanti Protoura Sport
70.03 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
Spread: 0.60 m/sec2 (15.3%)|Avg: 3.64 m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)
Debica Presto UHP2
3.92 m/sec2
Continental PremiumContact 7
3.85 m/sec2
Hankook Ventus Evo
3.84 m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac plus
3.76 m/sec2
Michelin Primacy 5
3.72 m/sec2
Maxxis Premitra HP6
3.68 m/sec2
Goodride Solmax 1
3.59 m/sec2
Bridgestone Turanza 6
3.59 m/sec2
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
3.59 m/sec2
Pirelli Cinturato C3
3.42 m/sec2
Davanti Protoura Sport
3.37 m/sec2
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
3.32 m/sec2
Dry
In the dry handling test, the Goodride and Davanti were bad. The Goodride should have been faster but I made a mistake, usually I exclude these laps but it was so tricky to drive subjectively I thought it was ok to keep in.
Then you have the Bridgestone to Debica group, all fine grip, but not really suited to being on track. For this class of tyre, braking and comfort is more important than dry handling, but the Debica was impressive for its pricepoint being lovely and easy to drive. If you don't know, Debica is a goodyear subbrand, I wonder if there's some old asymmetric technology in it.
The first to 5th place split by 1%.
The Maxxis was the real surprise, it didn't have the most grip as proven by the braking data, but it was the most drivable so ended up the fastest. This is the Tyre Reviews top tip I know some of you are here for, if you want a cheaper 17" road tyre that is fun on track, this might be the new product.
It's no surprise that Pirelli, Kumho, Conti and Hankook were all excellent. I'd like to give a nod to kumho. I've seen this tyre tested a lot, and it's a really nice tyre subjectively, as is the Hankook, both slightly ahead of the Pirelli dynamically, which itself was ahead of the Continental.
Dry Handling
Spread: 3.33 s (4.6%)|Avg: 74.21 s
Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
Maxxis Premitra HP6
72.83 s
Pirelli Cinturato C3
72.97 s
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
73.15 s
Continental PremiumContact 7
73.29 s
Hankook Ventus Evo
73.48 s
Debica Presto UHP2
73.67 s
Vredestein Ultrac plus
74.52 s
Michelin Primacy 5
74.56 s
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
74.83 s
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74.91 s
Reference UHP All Season Ref
74.95 s
Davanti Protoura Sport
75.45 s
Goodride Solmax 1
76.16 s
Pirelli led dry braking, Continental was a close second, with Kumho 3rd. Interestingly, the Maxxis, which did well in the dry handling test, only placed ninth in dry braking, 7% behind the best.
Dry Braking
Spread: 6.74 M (18.9%)|Avg: 38.15 M
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Pirelli Cinturato C3
35.75 M
Continental PremiumContact 7
36.03 M
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
37.11 M
Hankook Ventus Evo
37.33 M
Bridgestone Turanza 6
37.45 M
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
37.98 M
Michelin Primacy 5
38.39 M
Debica Presto UHP2
38.39 M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
38.66 M
Goodride Solmax 1
38.86 M
Vredestein Ultrac plus
39.33 M
Davanti Protoura Sport
42.49 M
Residual Speed Calculator
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre
Comfort
Sadly, I didn't have the time to dig into the subjective comfort levels of the tyres too much. I just did one quick lap of the comfort lanes before going off to handling. However, a colleague ran the test a few days earlier, so I'm using his scoring.
Overall, if comfort is your focus, the Michelin Primacy 5 and the Debica are good choices, though the Continental is also strong in comfort, if not a little noisier in the EU label external noise test. Basically, as always, they are all incredibly close. On my brief run around the comfort course, I found it difficult to notice many differences, even on the firm GTI suspension. Comfort amongst tyres is definitely getting closer.
The only two that really struggled in comfort were the Goodride and the Davanti, but ironically they had the lowest external noise levels, so if noise is your thing, they are the ones to buy. But hopefully by now you have seen enough data to know not to buy them.
Subj. Comfort
Spread: 1.50 Points (21.1%)|Avg: 6.55 Points
Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)
Debica Presto UHP2
7.10 Points
Reference UHP All Season Ref
7.00 Points
Michelin Primacy 5
6.90 Points
Continental PremiumContact 7
6.90 Points
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
6.90 Points
Bridgestone Turanza 6
6.60 Points
Pirelli Cinturato C3
6.60 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP6
6.60 Points
Hankook Ventus Evo
6.50 Points
Vredestein Ultrac plus
6.40 Points
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
6.10 Points
Goodride Solmax 1
5.90 Points
Davanti Protoura Sport
5.60 Points
Noise
Spread: 3.50 dB (5%)|Avg: 72.10 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
Davanti Protoura Sport
70.60 dB
Hankook Ventus Evo
70.70 dB
Goodride Solmax 1
70.70 dB
Michelin Primacy 5
70.90 dB
Debica Presto UHP2
71.00 dB
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
72.30 dB
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
72.30 dB
Reference UHP All Season Ref
72.30 dB
Vredestein Ultrac plus
72.60 dB
Bridgestone Turanza 6
72.80 dB
Continental PremiumContact 7
73.10 dB
Maxxis Premitra HP6
73.90 dB
Pirelli Cinturato C3
74.10 dB
Value
The rolling resistance levels, or energy use of the tyres were interesting. For some reason, Bridgestone had a 10% lead over the next best tyre, which was the Michelin Primacy 5, and that in itself was nearly 10% better than the average of the rest of the tyres. There are clearly some different opinions on the levels of rolling resistance these tyres should have, and that does explain the Bridgestone's relatively weak wet grip, as low rolling resistance and good wet grip are opposing performance qualities.
Rolling Resistance
Spread: 2.55 kg / t (40.3%)|Avg: 7.89 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
Bridgestone Turanza 6
6.32 kg / t
Michelin Primacy 5
7.00 kg / t
Maxxis Premitra HP6
7.58 kg / t
Vredestein Ultrac plus
7.62 kg / t
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
7.70 kg / t
Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
8.04 kg / t
Davanti Protoura Sport
8.06 kg / t
Pirelli Cinturato C3
8.18 kg / t
Debica Presto UHP2
8.20 kg / t
Continental PremiumContact 7
8.33 kg / t
Hankook Ventus Evo
8.76 kg / t
Goodride Solmax 1
8.87 kg / t
Fuel & Energy Cost Calculator
19,000 km
£1.45/L
8.0 L/100km
--
Annual Difference
--
Lifetime Savings
--
Extra Fuel/Energy
--
Extra CO2
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.
Results
I've used the standard score weighting I've always used for this category of tyres to keep it fair and consistent, but as always, you can go to the 'Results Table' tab and adjust the score weighting for your own driving needs eg if you would prefer a more comfort bias results set or lower rolling resistance etc, you can go and do that. I've actually improved this functionality a lot in the past few months. It is well worth checking out.
Top-level grip in both dry and wet, with an easy, confidence-building balance when you push on.
Measured noise was the worst here, and standing-water performance was only mid-pack.
The Pirelli Cinturato C3 finished joint wins the test with the Continental Premium Contact 7. The C3 was best in dry braking and stayed right at the front across the wet tests, including near-best wet braking and 2nd in wet handling and wet circle. Subjectively it also scored at the top for dry handling and very high in the wet, which matched how easy it was to drive quickly. The compromises were refinement and water performance: it recorded the highest measured noise in the test and only mid-pack curved aquaplaning, plus rolling resistance was only average.
Best wet performance overall, combining very fast lap times with strong aquaplaning resistance.
Efficiency and measured noise were below average, and it didn't feel as sporty or supported as the most track-leaning tyres.
The Continental PremiumContact 7 finished a joint test winner with the Pirelli Cinturato C3. The PC7 set the quickest wet handling time and was also 1st on the wet circle, while staying very close to the best in wet braking and near the top for curved aquaplaning. Dry results were still competitive, but it only managed 4th in dry handling and my notes describe a safe balance without the body control of the more enthusiast-focused tyres. Comfort was solid rather than standout, and rolling resistance sat towards the back of the group.
Best wet braking and aquaplaning performance, with a sporty feel and excellent confidence at the limit.
Rolling resistance was near the bottom, and dry braking wasn't at the same level as the test winners.
The Hankook Ventus Evo finished 3rd overall and earned a Highly Recommended award. It delivered the best wet braking and the highest straight-line aquaplaning result, backed up by a front-running wet handling time and the highest subjective wet handling score. In the dry it stayed in the leading group, with a strong handling result and one of the top subjective dry scores. The main weakness in this dataset is efficiency, where rolling resistance was near the bottom, and it didn't match the very shortest dry braking distances.
A strong blend of dry and wet grip with sporty, predictable steering and a high-confidence feel.
Aquaplaning resistance was near the bottom and comfort scores were in the lower part of the group.
The Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72 finished joint 4th overall and earned a Recommended award. It was consistently near the front for objective grip with top-four placements across wet and dry braking and handling, and it backed that up with one of the top subjective dry handling scores and a strong subjective wet score. My notes repeatedly mention steering and predictability, which fits the balanced results. Its clear weaknesses were aquaplaning performance, where it was low in both straight and curved tests, and comfort, where it sat towards the back on subjective scoring.
Best in test for efficiency, giving a clear rolling resistance advantage over everything else here.
Wet handling pace was well behind the leaders, and it didn't have the bite or grip level I expected in the wet.
The Bridgestone Turanza 6 finished joint 4th overall, mainly because it was 1st in rolling resistance. In braking it was mid-pack in both wet and dry, but in the wet it gave away a lot of time compared to the top tyres and my notes mention a lack of bite when turning and braking, plus a couple of hydroplaning moments. In the dry it felt touring-focused with understeer and a step down in grip once hot. If efficiency is your priority it makes sense, but it's not a wet performance choice in this group.
A quiet, comfortable, efficient road tyre with a stable, safe balance in both wet and dry driving.
Grip-based results were mostly mid-pack, so it isn't a front-runner for braking or handling pace.
The Michelin Primacy 5 finished 6th overall and earned a Recommended award. It was one of the more road-leaning tyres in the test, combining 2nd best rolling resistance with good comfort results, including a strong subjective comfort score and a good measured noise reading. In wet aquaplaning it did well in the straight-line test, but objective wet grip was more mid-pack and the wet circle result was towards the back. Dry performance followed a similar pattern: safe and usable, but not a leader for braking or handling.
A very even all-rounder with predictable behaviour and no big weaknesses across the main tests.
It didn't have the outright wet or dry lap time pace to run with the leading group.
The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 finished 7th overall. It delivered a very even set of results: mid-pack in wet braking, dry braking, wet handling and dry handling, plus decent aquaplaning and a solid rolling resistance figure. Subjectively it also landed around the middle with a good wet handling score and a strong comfort score. My wet notes were positive about predictability and smooth transitions, but the lap time data shows it didn't have the final step of grip to match the tyres at the front.
Fastest on the dry handling course with a sporty, track-friendly feel and strong steering response.
Wet confidence at the limit was low on subjective scoring compared with its objective wet pace.
The Maxxis Premitra HP6 finished 8th overall, but it had one clear highlight: it was 1st in dry handling time and also scored in the top group for subjective dry handling. It also delivered a strong rolling resistance result compared with several performance-focused tyres. In the wet, the objective results were decent in the middle group, but the subjective wet handling score was in the bottom group, which suggests the way it reached and went past the limit in the wet wasn't as confidence-inspiring as the stopwatch alone.
Very strong comfort and standing-water resistance, with a surprisingly sporty dry handling feel for the price point.
Wet braking and wet confidence were only mid-pack, and its behaviour changed a lot between cold and warm running.
The Debica Presto UHP2 finished 9th overall. It stood out for comfort and aquaplaning, with the highest subjective comfort score and the best curved aquaplaning result. Dry handling was also relatively strong for its finishing position, supported by a high subjective dry score, and my dry notes were very positive about steering response and adjustability. The weaknesses were in wet grip, where wet braking and subjective wet handling were in the lower half, and my wet notes describe very different cold versus warm behaviour, making it harder to predict in changing conditions.
Good wet stability with strong aquaplaning results and sensible efficiency for an everyday road tyre.
Dry performance and subjective dry handling were below average, and it overheated quickly when driven hard.
The Vredestein Ultrac plus finished 10th overall. In the wet it was generally solid, with good straight-line aquaplaning and a strong curved aquaplaning result, plus mid-pack wet handling and a sensible rolling resistance figure. Subjectively it also sat around the middle in the wet, and my notes mention good communication even if it wasn't the sharpest. In the dry it dropped back with below-average dry braking and a low subjective dry handling score, and my dry notes mention understeer and overheating quickly on track.
Poor dry handling and weak efficiency, with abrupt transitions and low confidence at the limit.
The Goodride Solmax 1 finished 11th overall. It had a couple of positives in the data, including one of the better measured noise results and a mid-pack wet braking distance. However, the core performance results were mostly towards the back: it was slowest in dry handling, last in subjective dry handling, and rolling resistance was also near the bottom. In the wet, both objective and subjective handling results were in the lower half, and my notes repeatedly mention abrupt transitions and poor communication at and beyond the limit.
The best measured noise result in the test, so it can look refined on a simple dB reading.
Worst in the key wet grip tests, with weak braking and handling and poor communication at the limit.
The Davanti Protoura Sport finished 12th overall. It recorded the lowest measured noise, but the performance results put it at the back where it matters: last in wet handling, last on the wet circle, and 12th in wet braking, plus weak straight aquaplaning. Dry results were also towards the bottom, including low positions in dry braking and subjective dry handling. My wet notes describe weak turn-in, low braking confidence and abrupt breakaway, and the large gaps in wet lap time and braking distance show it wasn't close to the main group in this test.
