Tested 4 times by independent publications, the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 averages a finish of 13th.
2026 Motor Summer Tyre Test P7 of 9
The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 finishes just 0.2 points behind Maxxis with a similarly balanced profile. It scores at a steady level across all tests without any standout weakness, which gives a safe and predictable feel behind the wheel. Rolling resistance is decent and the price is competitive.
Where the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 4 | P10.5 of 22.8 | 47% | - |
| Dry Handling | 3 | P11.3 of 14 | 25% | - |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 3 | P11.3 of 14 | 23% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 4 | P12 of 22.8 | 46% | - |
| Wet Handling | 3 | P11.7 of 14 | 24% | - |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 2 | P11 of 16.5 | 41% | - |
| Wet Circle | 3 | P10.3 of 13.7 | 30% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 3 | P11.3 of 13.7 | 22% | - |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 3 | P10.3 of 13.7 | 31% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Subj. Comfort | 3 | P3 of 14 | 87% | 1 |
| Noise | 3 | P6.7 of 14 | 51% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 1 | P8 of 20 | 63% | - |
| Value | 1 | P8 of 20 | 63% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 3 | P3.7 of 14 | 72% | 1 |
| Abrasion | 1 | P1 of 20 | 100% | 1 |
Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Kleber Dynaxer HP5. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Pirelli Cinturato C3
4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind
Compare with Cinturato C3 |
4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% |
 Kumho Ecsta Sport PS72
4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind
Compare with Ecsta Sport PS72 |
4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% |
 Continental PremiumContact 7
4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind
Compare with PremiumContact 7 |
4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% |
 Hankook Ventus Evo
4 shared: 0 ahead, 4 behind
Compare with Ventus Evo |
4 | 0 | 4 | - | 0% |
Drawn from 4 tests. Updated April 9, 2026.
Across four 2026 summer tests, the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 shows a clear split personality: it is consistently strong on efficiency/comfort metrics, but struggles to convert that into competitive safety performance in wet conditions, especially in larger 245/45 R19 fitment. Overall results range from mid-pack (7/13, 7/9, 19/50 braking) to near-bottom (19/20), indicating it is not a consistent all-rounder versus leading premium tyres.
The most repeatable positives are very low rolling resistance and good comfort/noise, while the most repeatable negatives are long wet braking distances and weaker wet handling/aquaplaning security. Dry performance tends to be average rather than disastrous (typically ~+6% braking deficit and ~+2-3% handling deficit to best), but not enough to offset wet deficits when scores are aggregated.
has the lowest rolling resistance- 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (2026)
Rolling resistance is decent- 2026 Motor Summer Tyre Test (2026)
safe and predictable feel behind the wheel- 2026 Motor Summer Tyre Test (2026)
a strong comfort score- The BEST Summer Tyres for 2026 Tested and Rated (2026)
shares the best comfort rating- 2026 Motor Summer Tyre Test (2026)
slowest round the wet handling track- 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (2026)
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 finishes just 0.2 points behind Maxxis with a similarly balanced profile. It scores at a steady level across all tests without any standout weakness, which gives a safe and predictable feel behind the wheel. Rolling resistance is decent and the price is competitive.
The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 finishes nineteenth with the lowest rolling resistance of all twenty finalists, which translates to measurably lower fuel or energy consumption. Projected mileage is reasonable and tread wear is the lowest recorded in the test. The main limitation is wet grip, where braking distances and lateral performance are below the mid-field, requiring more caution in wet conditions.
The Kleber Dynaxer HP5 finished 7th overall. It delivered a very even set of results: mid-pack in wet braking, dry braking, wet handling and dry handling, plus decent aquaplaning and a solid rolling resistance figure. Subjectively it also landed around the middle with a good wet handling score and a strong comfort score. My wet notes were positive about predictability and smooth transitions, but the lap time data shows it didn't have the final step of grip to match the tyres at the front.
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Kleber tyres