The Goodride Solmax 1 finished 11th overall. It had a couple of positives in the data, including one of the better measured noise results and a mid-pack wet braking distance. However, the core performance results were mostly towards the back: it was slowest in dry handling, last in subjective dry handling, and rolling resistance was also near the bottom. In the wet, both objective and subjective handling results were in the lower half, and my notes repeatedly mention abrupt transitions and poor communication at and beyond the limit.
Where the Goodride Solmax 1 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.
Record by discipline
Discipline
Tests
Avg finish
Field beaten
Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking
3
P11 of 12
8%
-
Dry Handling
2
P10.5 of 10.5
0%
-
Subj. Dry Handling
1
P13 of 13
0%
-
Wet
Wet Braking
3
P10.3 of 12
15%
-
Wet Braking - Concrete
1
P16 of 16
0%
-
Wet Handling
2
P9 of 10.5
13%
-
Subj. Wet Handling
1
P10 of 13
25%
-
Wet Circle
2
P7.5 of 10
23%
-
Straight Aqua
3
P7.7 of 12
36%
-
Curved Aquaplaning
3
P4.3 of 12
68%
-
Comfort
Subj. Comfort
2
P10 of 10.5
4%
-
Noise
3
P4.7 of 12.3
67%
-
Value
Wear
2
P10.5 of 12
18%
-
Value
2
P6.5 of 12
63%
1
Rolling Resistance
2
P8.5 of 10.5
26%
-
Fuel Consumption
1
P7 of 16
60%
-
Range
1
P4 of 8
57%
-
Abrasion
1
P15 of 16
7%
-
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Goodride Solmax 1. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
The Goodride Solmax 1 repeatedly finished towards the back of summer test fields, with handling, braking and wear compromises. It was last of eight in Auto Bild's 2025 EV test and 11th of 12 in Tyre Reviews' 2026 comparison. Auto Bild measured the longest wet stop, 48.7 m and 23.6% behind the best, while ADAC 2024 also placed it last in wet braking. Dry handling was last in 2025 and 2026, with testers criticising steering feedback and abrupt behaviour at the limit. Projected mileage was sixth of eight in 2025 and 15th of 16 in 2024.
There are limited positives and unusual differences. Curved aquaplaning was third in both 2024 and 2025, before a mid-field result in 2026. External noise was second of 13 in 2026, despite poor comfort. Wet braking improved unusually to seventh of 12 that year, only 6.8% behind the best, contrasting with the earlier last places. ADAC's favourable dry-braking assessment also contrasts unusually with its measured 15th of 16. Efficiency varied: 2024 fuel consumption was seventh of 16, but 2026 rolling resistance was 12th of 13. Auto Bild praised the low price and cost per kilometre in 2025, yet gave only a conditionally recommended verdict because of the safety limitations.
Performance Strengths
Aquaplaning resistanceModeratein 1 of 3 testsDetails
Curved aquaplaning 3rd of 16, ADAC 2024, and 3rd of 8, Auto Bild 2025.
Curved aquaplaning 7th of 12 and straight-line 9th of 12, Tyre Reviews 2026.
barely satisfactory in wet handling, demonstrating a relatively weak grip level and moderate ability to combine longitudinal and lateral forces - 2024 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (2024)
The Goodride Solmax 1 finished 11th overall. It had a couple of positives in the data, including one of the better measured noise results and a mid-pack wet braking distance. However, the core performance results were mostly towards the back: it was slowest in dry handling, last in subjective dry handling, and rolling resistance was also near the bottom. In the wet, both objective and subjective handling results were in the lower half, and my notes repeatedly mention abrupt transitions and poor communication at and beyond the limit.
As the budget option, the Goodride Solmax 1 showed significant compromises in safety. It recorded the longest wet braking distance (48.7m) and limited handling capabilities. Its projected lifespan was 31,030km with moderate rolling resistance (7.22 kg/t), providing a range of 373.2km. Despite its affordable price (€340), its safety limitations resulted in a "conditionally recommended" rating, placing it last in the test.
StrongValue WeakDry BrakingDry HandlingWet BrakingWet HandlingWet CircleSubj. Comfort WinnerHankook iON Evo
The Goodride Solmax 1 achieves only a satisfactory rating in this year's summer tyre test, primarily due to its performance on wet roads. On dry surfaces, it fails to provide sufficiently accurate steering feedback, making it challenging for drivers to adjust the steering angle for curves as needed for a good rating. Its handling at the limit is also rated as just satisfactory, although it scores a clearly good rating in braking distance. On wet surfaces, the Solmax 1 receives clear satisfactory ratings in braking distance and barely satisfactory in wet handling, demonstrating a relatively weak grip level and moderate ability to combine longitudinal and lateral forces. However, its aquaplaning resistance is rated as good. Environmentally, the Goodride Solmax 1 has a satisfactory impact, with both its projected mileage and wear rated as satisfactory. In terms of efficiency, it achieves a good rating due to low fuel consumption and a comparatively reasonable weight. However, the sustainability of this tyre, produced in China, is considered adequate.