Menu

Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02

The Continental ExtremeContactSport 02 is an extreme performance summer tyre. When compared to the previous version, the ExtremeContactSport, the new ECS 02 is up to one second faster per lap in the dry, has improved steering responsiveness, shorter dry and wet braking, and still has a 30,000 mile treadwear warranty.

6.5
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
93%
Wet Grip
93%
Road Feedback
81%
Handling
88%
Wear
90%
Comfort
83%
Buy again
85%
13 Reviews
87% Average
49,600 miles driven
1 Tests (avg: 3rd)
Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02

Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02

Summer Premium
BETA
6.5 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · Medium Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Wet
95.6
2x / 4 tests
Dry
85.2
1.8x / 5 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
99.3
2 tests
Handling
96
4 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 2
Publications: 2
Period: 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 13
Avg Rating: 87.4%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 1.05
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test Tire Rack 2025 275/35 R19 3/10 9 metrics
2025 Car and Driver All Weather Tyre Test Car and Driver 2025 225/45 R18 6/7 5 metrics
1
Tests
3rd
Average
3rd
Best
3rd
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
3rd/10
A benchmark performer with refined road comfort, responsive handling, and impressive wet and dry grip, this tyre delivers confidence and precision at any speed. It offers strong braking and quick lap times in all conditions, making it one of the most well-rounded and capable options in the Max Performance category.

Questions and Answers for the Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02

Ask a question
April 29, 2024

Does MaxContact MC7 from Asian Market have the same tread pattern like this one? Are they actually same one with only tiny difference?

The MC7 and extreme contact 02 are totally different tyres.
August 4, 2025

Hi, love your work! Just fitted Continental ContactSport 07 to my i30 Sedan/Elantra N here in Australia. How different are they to these Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02? Cant seem to get Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 here. I loved the original PS4S tyres, but price was a cheaper for the SC07's, but I know wear will be a bit higher as PS4S were 300tw, and SC07 are 250tw.

Also, your Passenger Car Summer Max Performance Tyres list, is that in any real order? It seems quite a jumbled list compared to test results, yet tyres are labeled as 'The Azenis RS820 is ranked 2nd of 84 Summer Max Performance tyres', but click on a comparison test, Falken Azenis RS820 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S, and the PS4S wins overall, yet the PS4S is ranked 18th? doesnt make any sense to me? And a couple of top tyres are missing their wear percentage?

Look forward to hearing your view on the above when you can? Keep up the great work. Cheers.

No one has tested the ECS02 vs SC7, however general US vs EU market demands will mean the SC7 will likely have lower rolling resistance and better wet grip, and the ECS02 will last a little longer.

As for the list of tyres, they are purely based on user reviews, not tests. We plan to update this section in the future.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

YouTube Review

Review Summary

Based on 13 user reviews

Drivers widely praise the Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 for outstanding dry and wet grip, confident handling, and comfort, often comparing it favorably to the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S at a lower price with a strong warranty. Noise levels are generally low to moderate and track durability/heat tolerance is solid for a UUHP street tyre. A minority note softer sidewalls with some on-center vagueness and tramlining, and one EV owner reports a notable range hit. Overall sentiment is strongly positive given the high scores and frequency of praise.

Strengths
  • Wet grip
  • Dry grip
  • Comfort/ride quality
  • Low noise
  • Value/price and warranty
  • Track capability/durability
  • Progressive/forgiving at the limit
Areas for Improvement
  • Soft sidewall/on-center vagueness
  • Tramlining
  • Ev efficiency/range impact

Top 3 Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 Reviews

Given 88% while driving a Infiniti G37 (265/40 R18) on mostly country roads for 2,500 spirited miles
Good deal when on sale for such a high performance tire. The TW rating and performance is a good street daily mix. Have not experienced any hydro planing even with the increased width. Car is G37s (big brakes) 6mt with hks digresive coil overs and extra 1 deg camber in front and back. Very sporty feel and will tram line on undulating road + tar snakes
Ask a question | Helpful 1137
February 19, 2025
Given 97% while driving a BMW 335i (255/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 5,000 spirited miles
A lot more comfortable than the regular Michelin pilot 4S. Very comfortable over rough roads for the type of tire that it is. 2015 335 xDrive with M adaptive suspension. Very progressive tire, feels very natural at the limit. No twitchy break away at the limit unlike the 4S. Though the 4S star spec(BMW spec) is softer and just as comfortable but at what cost.
October 2, 2024
Given 81% while driving a Chevrolet camaro (285/35 R19) on mostly country roads for 4,500 spirited miles
I have had these on my summer car for 2 seasons, and I have done some track work on them. They hold up great on track, they do well in the wet, and they are more comfortable than the Goodyears which came on the car.
March 6, 2025
Have you driven on the Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 >

Latest Continental ExtremeContact Sport 02 Reviews

Given 81% while driving a Mercedes Benz E Class AMG (285/30 R19) on mostly motorways for 2,000 spirited miles
These are the best tires I’ve tried so far on my E55 which is a big heavy sedan wear is typical of a big car on a summer tire and I haven’t pushed them very hard in the wet but they provide excellent feedback on the road and the dry handling is excellent.
| Helpful 175
December 2, 2025
Given 90% while driving a Chevrolet Corvette (285/35 R19) on mostly country roads for 1,500 spirited miles
I have had these tires on my ~575rwhp supercharged Corvette for a couple years and they perform very well. The car has a positive displacement supercharger so the boost delivery is instant and when the tires are warm they don't spin above 40mph even when stabbing the throttle. These tires have been nice for weekend cruising as well as spirited driving including Powercruise at BIR. Perform excellent in the wet, much more comfortable than run flats, and are quiet enough that I can't hear them over my exhaust. Very satisfied with the ECS 02
December 2, 2025
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 65% while driving a MINI Cooper SE (205/45 R16) on a combination of roads for 600 average miles
Bought a set of these for my EV Mini. Grip and handling are indeed excellent for tyres that manage to last over 10k miles. They do ride harder than stock tires and are noisier. What upset me is that I have lost 20% of my range. They are worse than Yokohama A052s and almost as bad as Falken RT660s. Both of those being 200TW road legal track tyres... Yet for some reason, Conti says that they are ideal for EVs! Conti said tough luck when I complained.
October 9, 2024
Given 99% while driving a Hyundai Sonata N Line (245/40 R19) on mostly town for 10,000 spirited miles
Excellent tyre. I highly recommend.
October 5, 2024
Given 97% while driving a Mazda MX5 (205/45 R17) on mostly country roads for 500 spirited miles
If you are looking for a fun slidey tire, this is not it but this is a tire that will stay stuck to the road in both wet and dry conditions. Truly amazing levels of grip that give high levels of confidence going into every corner.
July 16, 2024
Given 98% while driving a Cadillac 2014 ctsv (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
I considered all models of summer tires before choosing Continental ECS02. I had certain criteria, some of which were needs while others were wants. I needed Y speed rating to pass tech inspection on my car for Nevada’s Silver State Classic in fall. I also wanted a mileage warranty and a top flight manufacturer with a storied pedigree in Motorsport… one who knows how to make a quality product beyond round black rubber rings. I also rejected all run flats and tires that have mediocre reviews after years on the market.

I also have a second set of 200tw tires/wheels for auto-x and HPDE days, so I

After all that, there remained the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S (mega bucks but 30k warranty), Potenza Sport (no mileage warranty and atrocious treadlife reports, $$$), Goodyear Eagle F1 Supercar 3 (great tire but $$$$, no mileage warranty, and a 220 utqg, limited availability), Falken Azenis FK510 (no warranty, no-hum looks, inconsistent reports of performance versus touring tire, but $$$ pricing was a plus), and the Continental ECS02 ($$$ with the rebate, 30k warranty, roadside assistance and troop interruption coverage all included, schwing!)

At time of writing, prices were: Michelin $1,261; Continental $1,017; Bridgestone $981; Falken $815. $220 Conti rebate bright the ECS to $797. This became a no-brainer on price point alone. A are top-shelf tires at mid-tier pricing!

In summary, these tires have been SUPERLATIVE! They perform in lock step with Michelin’s Pilot Sport 4S, the cream of the current UUHP summer crop. They have equal performance with a slightly differentiated character while offering stunningly good comfort and road manners.

I have one good spirited drive on these ECS02 over twisty roads and they exhibit great steering feedback with a solid, weighty feel off center (which I was worried about based on the opposite issue with DWS06+ tires recently). Effort builds very linearly as you put it through its paces.

I do find there is a bit of vagueness on center for freeway cruising and I over-adjust some as a result but, I also have a relatively high camber setup for blended street and HPDE uses which may contribute some.

Comparing these to Michelin Pilot Sport AS3+ using a decibel meter mounted in the vehicle over the same road way at similar speeds and conditions, these tires average 1.5-2dB lower using an A sound weighting. This is flat-out impressive.

They are handsome tires but could be made a bit wider as they look (and are) narrower than equivalent sizes from competitors. This is only an issue for the OCD tire folks (like me), most wouldn’t even notice.

Anyway, I’ll try to update after a few thousand miles.
July 11, 2023
Given 85% while driving a Volkswagen Golf R 270 BHP (245/35 R19) on for 1,000 miles
Just recently swapped from 4s's to the Conti 02's and have not been disappointed with my decision. Running 245/35-19 on my golf R and like any space I can get in the wheel wells. 02 seems a bit quieter on paved roads. Mid turn I can understand the vague feel comment but once hooked to finish the turn, I feel the Conti has a bit more positive bite which helps my car feel neutral in the turns with a bit less push. Braking seams as strong with the Conti's as the 4s's and have yet to get too much aggressive driving in the rain- Thinking the slightly wider grooves on the Conti's may inspire a little more confidence against hydroplaning but we shall see. Love your test's and I completely agree that if for nothing more than the cost alone, they are well worth the gamble!
July 7, 2023
Given 94% while driving a Mazda MX5 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
As recent owner of PS4S tires, I keep myself up to date on tires for my ND2 Miata. That said I decided to switch to the Conti ECSO2 this spring (2023). I'm glad I did for a variety of reasons and the the 2 main takeaways being price and warranty. As much as I loved the Michelins they are always the most expensive and at the peak drop off faster than I'd want for serious touge driving let alone track duty. In contrast I personally felt the ECS hold up better at the limit and the drop off was more than manageable and with a proper street+ alignment could eat up the road for hours of fun. It almost feels like the new updated conti is trying to find it's endurance mode similar to it's bigger brother the endurance 200tw tire ECF. Looking at Conti competitors this tire does the work you'd hope a summer tire would do, but has the longevity to keep you going past what you'd expect. It's wet grip felt on par with the Michelin in almost every way, even in hydroplaning conditions. I've put a good bit of miles on these tires and I'm happy to say I'd easily purchase them again.....not necessarily because it's just as good in dry or wet to the PS4S but because it's a better price, warranty and still provides the driver confidence you'd want out of a proper summer tire. An easy win in my book!
July 7, 2023
Given 88% while driving a Volkswagen Golf GTI MK7 (235/35 R19) on mostly country roads for 10,000 average miles
I really like the ECS02. Feels very similar to the Pilot Sport 4S so perhaps not the sportiest of sports tires but has endless grip and good comfort. Plenty cheaper than the Michelin too and has the same warranty.
June 4, 2023
Given 70% while driving a Toyota 2022 GR86 (215/45 R17) on track for 3,000 spirited miles
Had one dry track day and one wet (heavy rain) track day on the ECS02. Overall, the grip level is phenomenal, especially in the wet. The tire hydroplaning little, it is so confident in the rain. I was still able to pull .8G in the wet. In the dry the grip level is comparable with pilot 4s. However, I wasn't satisfied by the handling characteristic. It has a soft side wall which causes the tire to roll a bit when cornering. It loses the direct feeling compared to my car's oe tire. When I turn the wheel, there is always a delay in response. Also, the breakaway characteristic is a bit more abrupt than I expected.

Noise level is pretty good, with slight groove noise when the pavement is really bad. Ride comfort is excellent due to the soft side wall. It feels even more compliance than my winter tire.
May 17, 2023