Menu

Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Minerva All Season Master

This matchup pits Michelin's premium all-season benchmark, the CrossClimate 2, against the budget-focused Minerva All Season Master. Across five shared professional tests spanning compact to SUV fitments, the Michelin consistently ranks near the top, while the Minerva trends toward the back of the field.
The headline: Michelin dominates safety-critical metrics-dry and especially wet braking, aquaplaning resistance, and snow capability-often by meaningful margins (5-15%+). Minerva's appeal centers on low purchase price and slightly lower exterior noise in one test, but its wet grip and aquaplaning reserves lag notably.
CrossClimate-2 VS All-Season-Master

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of five total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Michelin CrossClimate 2five
five wins

While it might look like the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is better than the Minerva All Season Master purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Best-in-test consistency on wet braking and aquaplaning resistance
  • Confident snow performance (traction, handling, braking)
  • Short dry braking with precise, stable steering
  • Lower rolling resistance for better fuel economy
  • Very low purchase price
  • Competent snow traction and acceptable snow braking for the class
  • Generally quiet exterior pass-by noise in some sizes
  • Usable dry braking performance at urban speeds

Dry Braking

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 11.07% less distance than the Minerva All Season Master.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
39.06M
Minerva All Season Master
43.92M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2
39.9M
Minerva All Season Master
45M (+5.1M)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
37.7M
Minerva All Season Master
42.9M (+5.2M)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
41.7M
Minerva All Season Master
44.8M (+3.1M)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
37.9M
Minerva All Season Master
43.5M (+5.6M)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
38.1M
Minerva All Season Master
43.4M (+5.3M)

Dry Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 1.25% faster around a lap than the Minerva All Season Master.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
104.25Km/H
Minerva All Season Master
102.95Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2
95Km/H
Minerva All Season Master
94.9Km/H (-0.1Km/H)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
113.5Km/H
Minerva All Season Master
111Km/H (-2.5Km/H)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during five wet braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 11.37% less distance than the Minerva All Season Master.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
51.78M
Minerva All Season Master
58.42M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2
49.2M
Minerva All Season Master
58.3M (+9.1M)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
47M
Minerva All Season Master
49.5M (+2.5M)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
51.1M
Minerva All Season Master
54.1M (+3M)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
56.4M
Minerva All Season Master
66.5M (+10.1M)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
55.2M
Minerva All Season Master
63.7M (+8.5M)

Wet Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 3.35% faster around a wet lap than the Minerva All Season Master.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
77.5Km/H
Minerva All Season Master
74.9Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed, higher is better

Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2
74.2Km/H
Minerva All Season Master
73.9Km/H (-0.3Km/H)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
80.8Km/H
Minerva All Season Master
75.9Km/H (-4.9Km/H)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 3.95% faster around a wet circle than the Minerva All Season Master.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
16.79s
Minerva All Season Master
17.48s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2
17.4s
Minerva All Season Master
17.74s (+0.34s)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
16.18s
Minerva All Season Master
17.21s (+1.03s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 floated at a 14.94% higher speed than the Minerva All Season Master.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
82Km/H
Minerva All Season Master
69.75Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2
91Km/H
Minerva All Season Master
75.2Km/H (-15.8Km/H)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73Km/H
Minerva All Season Master
64.3Km/H (-8.7Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 slipped out at a 22.26% higher speed than the Minerva All Season Master.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
2.65m/sec2
Minerva All Season Master
2.06m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2
2.65m/sec2
Minerva All Season Master
2.06m/sec2 (-0.59m/sec2)

Snow Braking

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two snow braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 2.13% less distance than the Minerva All Season Master.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
25.3M
Minerva All Season Master
25.85M
Snow braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Snow Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2
28.2M
Minerva All Season Master
29.2M (+1M)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
22.4M
Minerva All Season Master
22.5M (+0.1M)

Snow Traction

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had 8.03% better snow traction than the Minerva All Season Master.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
4378N
Minerva All Season Master
4026.5N
Pulling Force in Newtons, higher is better

Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2
4522N
Minerva All Season Master
4274N (-248N)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
4234N
Minerva All Season Master
3779N (-455N)

Snow Handling [Km/H]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 6.72% faster around a lap than the Minerva All Season Master.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
59.5Km/H
Minerva All Season Master
55.5Km/H
Snow handling average speed, higher is better

Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2
63.4Km/H
Minerva All Season Master
59.8Km/H (-3.6Km/H)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
55.6Km/H
Minerva All Season Master
51.2Km/H (-4.4Km/H)

Snow Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 provided 9% more lateral grip than the Minerva All Season Master.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
4ms/2
Minerva All Season Master
3.64ms/2
Lateral snow grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Snow Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2
4ms/2
Minerva All Season Master
3.64ms/2 (-0.36ms/2)

Snow Slalom

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 11.27% faster through a slalom than the Minerva All Season Master.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
4.97m/sec2
Minerva All Season Master
4.41m/sec2
Lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2
4.97m/sec2
Minerva All Season Master
4.41m/sec2 (-0.56m/sec2)

Noise

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Minerva All Season Master was better during one noise tests. On average the Minerva All Season Master measured 0.97% quieter than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
71.9dB
Minerva All Season Master
71.2dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Minerva All Season Master

Michelin CrossClimate 2
70.7dB
Minerva All Season Master
71.4dB (+0.7dB)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
73.1dB (+2.1dB)
Minerva All Season Master
71dB

Price

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Minerva All Season Master was better during one price tests. On average the Minerva All Season Master cost 44.76% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
715
Minerva All Season Master
395
Price in local currency, lower is better

Best In Price: Minerva All Season Master

Michelin CrossClimate 2
715 (+320)
Minerva All Season Master
395

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a 18.99% lower rolling resistance than the Minerva All Season Master.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
6.74kg / t
Minerva All Season Master
8.32kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Michelin CrossClimate 2
6.75kg / t
Minerva All Season Master
8.07kg / t (+1.32kg / t)
Michelin CrossClimate 2
6.72kg / t
Minerva All Season Master
8.57kg / t (+1.85kg / t)

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Minerva All Season Master.

In total the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has been reviewed 140 times and drivers have given the tyre 81% overall.

The Minerva All Season Master has been reviewed 1 times and drivers have given the tyre 77% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Michelin CrossClimate 2.

Best Review for the Michelin CrossClimate 2
Given 81% 235/50 R18 on a combination of roads for 5,000 average miles
Car = 2014 Infiniti Q60 AWD (aka G37 Coupe / CV36 Skyline - RWD bias ATTESA AWD) Overall, pleased with the tire as I wanted a comfortable tire with long tread life and a true "All-Season" tire for the winter months as I have not yet purchased a set of dedicated summer wheels/tires yet. Coming from previous Michelin Pilot Sport AS3+ which lasted around 52k of 45k mile rating with sometimes spirited driving, so have no reason to doubt Michelin's tread ware claims, at least on my vehicle. Handling in the dry, the AS3+ was better when taking curves/turns and activated the VDC/TCS less often,... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1495 - tyre reviewed on May 13, 2021
View all Michelin CrossClimate 2 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Minerva All Season Master
Given 77% 245/45 R18 on for 8,000 miles
Insignia b 2.0d 170 4x4. In dry conditions, the feel, steering response, cornering, and braking are very good. In wet conditions, it's also very good, with minimal understeer. In snow, it's very good from a standstill, braking is a bit weaker, and it's worst on snow and ice in tight corners; the car tends to pull out sideways. For FWD, it's probably only for city driving; for 4x4, I'd probably buy it again.
Helpful 52 - tyre reviewed on January 26, 2026
View all Minerva All Season Master driver reviews >>

Conclusion

Across every shared test, the CrossClimate 2 proves the more rounded, safety-first choice: shorter braking in dry and wet, stronger aquaplaning performance, and superior snow traction and handling. These differences aren't marginal-wet braking gaps of 10-15% and aquaplaning deltas above 20% in places can translate to crucial meters of stopping distance and greater stability in heavy rain.
The Minerva All Season Master offers meaningful savings and can feel acceptable in light-duty use, with decent snow starts and low price. However, its extended wet braking, understeer, and limited aquaplaning reserves make it hard to recommend for varied weather or higher-speed motorway use. If budget allows, choose the Michelin; if cost is the main driver and usage is gentle, urban, and fair-weather, the Minerva can suffice-but it's a compromise.
Key Differences
  • Wet braking: Michelin consistently shorter by ~5-15% across sizes
  • Aquaplaning: Michelin markedly better (straight-line +13-21%, curved advantage noted)
  • Snow capability: Michelin stronger in traction/handling; Minerva only close in snow braking in one test
  • Dry braking: Michelin leads by ~7-13% in multiple tests
  • Rolling resistance: Michelin lower (≈16-22%), aiding efficiency
  • Price: Minerva ~45% cheaper in one test, but with significant performance trade-offs
Michelin CrossClimate 2

Overall Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:


Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.