Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Minerva All Season Master
The headline: Michelin dominates safety-critical metrics-dry and especially wet braking, aquaplaning resistance, and snow capability-often by meaningful margins (5-15%+). Minerva's appeal centers on low purchase price and slightly lower exterior noise in one test, but its wet grip and aquaplaning reserves lag notably.

Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been five tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 | five |
While it might look like the Michelin CrossClimate 2 is better than the Minerva All Season Master purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Best-in-test consistency on wet braking and aquaplaning resistance
- Confident snow performance (traction, handling, braking)
- Short dry braking with precise, stable steering
- Lower rolling resistance for better fuel economy
- Very low purchase price
- Competent snow traction and acceptable snow braking for the class
- Generally quiet exterior pass-by noise in some sizes
- Usable dry braking performance at urban speeds
Dry Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during five dry braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 11.07% less distance than the Minerva All Season Master.
Best In Dry Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 1.25% faster around a lap than the Minerva All Season Master.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during five wet braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 11.37% less distance than the Minerva All Season Master.
Best In Wet Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 3.35% faster around a wet lap than the Minerva All Season Master.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two wet circle tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 3.95% faster around a wet circle than the Minerva All Season Master.
Best In Wet Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 floated at a 14.94% higher speed than the Minerva All Season Master.
Best In Straight Aqua: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 slipped out at a 22.26% higher speed than the Minerva All Season Master.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two snow braking tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 stopped the vehicle in 2.13% less distance than the Minerva All Season Master.
Best In Snow Braking: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had 8.03% better snow traction than the Minerva All Season Master.
Best In Snow Traction: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 6.72% faster around a lap than the Minerva All Season Master.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 provided 9% more lateral grip than the Minerva All Season Master.
Best In Snow Circle: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was 11.27% faster through a slalom than the Minerva All Season Master.
Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Minerva All Season Master was better during one noise tests. On average the Minerva All Season Master measured 0.97% quieter than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Noise: Minerva All Season Master
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Minerva All Season Master was better during one price tests. On average the Minerva All Season Master cost 44.76% less than the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Best In Price: Minerva All Season Master
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Michelin CrossClimate 2 had a 18.99% lower rolling resistance than the Minerva All Season Master.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Michelin CrossClimate 2
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Michelin CrossClimate 2 and Minerva All Season Master.
In total the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has been reviewed 140 times and drivers have given the tyre 81% overall.
The Minerva All Season Master has been reviewed 1 times and drivers have given the tyre 77% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Michelin CrossClimate 2.
Conclusion
The Minerva All Season Master offers meaningful savings and can feel acceptable in light-duty use, with decent snow starts and low price. However, its extended wet braking, understeer, and limited aquaplaning reserves make it hard to recommend for varied weather or higher-speed motorway use. If budget allows, choose the Michelin; if cost is the main driver and usage is gentle, urban, and fair-weather, the Minerva can suffice-but it's a compromise.
Key Differences
- Wet braking: Michelin consistently shorter by ~5-15% across sizes
- Aquaplaning: Michelin markedly better (straight-line +13-21%, curved advantage noted)
- Snow capability: Michelin stronger in traction/handling; Minerva only close in snow braking in one test
- Dry braking: Michelin leads by ~7-13% in multiple tests
- Rolling resistance: Michelin lower (≈16-22%), aiding efficiency
- Price: Minerva ~45% cheaper in one test, but with significant performance trade-offs
Overall Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Minerva All Season Master Top Comparisons
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.