Kleber Dynaxer HP5 vs Michelin Primacy 5
- TR Score
- 8.3/10
- Owners say
- 90% · 6
- TR Score
- 8.8/10
- Owners say
- 82% · 62
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Michelin Primacy 5 finished ahead 2 times and the Dynaxer HP5 not once. The Dynaxer HP5 stopped 2.1% shorter in the wet; the Primacy 5 had 9% lower rolling resistance.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Michelin Primacy 5 if you want a refined, quiet, low-rolling-resistance touring tyre with strong aquaplaning safety for heavy-rain motorway use. Choose the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 if your priority is maximum day-to-day grip security-especially braking and wet cornering-at a likely better price, and you can accept higher noise and slightly weaker hydroplaning margins.
Where the Dynaxer HP5 is stronger
- Consistently shorter braking distances in both dry and wet (wins 2/2 in each)
- Stronger lateral wet grip (wet circle wins 2/2), supporting confident cornering on damp roads
- Very even, predictable all-round balance with no major weaknesses noted by testers
Where the Primacy 5 is stronger
- Clearly stronger aquaplaning resistance in both straight and curved tests (wins 2/2 for each)
- Lower rolling resistance (about 9% advantage), supporting better fuel economy/EV range
- Quieter on the road (about 1.5-1.9 dB lower in the shared tests) with a comfortable touring bias
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Dynaxer HP5 vs Primacy 5 at a glance
| Category | Dynaxer HP5 | Gap | Primacy 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won2 shared tests | 0 | 2 | |
| Dry6 measurements | 3 | Level between the two. | 3 |
| Wet11 measurements | 6 | The Dynaxer HP5 stopped 2.1% shorter in the wet (2 tests) | 5 |
| Comfort4 measurements | 0 | The Primacy 5 was 1.2 dB quieter (2 tests) | 2 |
| Value2 measurements | 0 | The Primacy 5 had 9% lower rolling resistance (2 tests) | 2 |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.3/10 | The Primacy 5 by 0.5 | 8.8/10 |
| Owner rating6 and 62 reviews | 90% | The Dynaxer HP5 by 8 points | 82% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 80% | The Dynaxer HP5 by 2 points | 78% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 99 | 51 sizes made in both | 88 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 2 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Dynaxer HP5 | Field | Primacy 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Motor Summer Tyre Test | P7 of 9 | P5 of 9 | |
| The BEST Summer Tyres for 2026 Tested and Rated | P7 of 12 | P6 of 12 |
Performance profile
10 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Dynaxer HP5
Primacy 5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 96%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 3 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
Dynaxer HP5
Primacy 5
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Dynaxer HP5
Primacy 5
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Dynaxer HP5 90% from 6 reviews and the Primacy 5 82% from 62. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Dynaxer HP5 | Gap | Primacy 5 | Wins | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37.99 | 1.1% | 38.4 | 2-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 74.97 | 0.1% | 74.88 | 1-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 3% | scored | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 37.31 | 2.1% | 38.12 | 2-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 72.89 | 0.3% | 72.68 | 1-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 3.8% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 0.71 | 2.7% | 0.69 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 12.72 | 1.5% | 12.91 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 73.39 | 4.9% | 76.99 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 3.59 | 3.6% | 3.72 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 68.95 | 1.2 dB | 67.75 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 4.29 | 9% | 3.91 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Dynaxer HP5 scores 8.3 and the Primacy 5 8.8 out of 10.
| Dynaxer HP5 | Category | Primacy 5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69 | Dry | 62 | ||
| 60 | Wet | 77 | ||
| 47 | Comfort | 76 | ||
| 81 | Value | 92 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Dynaxer HP5 | Category | Primacy 5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.3 | Dry Grip | 8.5 | ||
| 9 | Wet Grip | 8.7 | ||
| 8.7 | Road Feedback | 7.6 | ||
| 8.5 | Handling | 7.8 | ||
| 10 | Wear | 9.1 | ||
| 9.5 | Comfort | 8.4 | ||
Owners rate the Dynaxer HP5 90% from 6 reviews and the Primacy 5 82% from 62. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Kleber Dynaxer HP5
- 90%from 6 reviews
- 80%would buy again
- 5,800 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 tyre delivers strong overall performance, with frequent praise for quiet running, a soft/comfortable ride, and confident grip-especially in wet conditions. Most high-scoring reviews describe stable, safe handling and good value for money. One lower-scoring review notes noticeably softer sidewalls leading to imprecise high-speed response compared with Goodyear Asymmetric 6, suggesting handling sharpness may not satisfy drivers wanting a firmer, sportier feel.
- Quiet/low road noise
- Comfortable, soft ride and good bump absorption
- Good grip and confident handling (notably in wet)
- Good value for money
Summarised by AI from 6 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 6 Dynaxer HP5 reviewsOnly have them for a few days, but initial impressions are great.
Grip and handling are very good, very quiet, and soft/smooth over road cracks. Recommended.
Michelin Primacy 5
- 82%from 62 reviews
- 78%would buy again
- 378,963 milesdriven by reviewers
Owners generally rate the Michelin Primacy 5 highly (82% average), most often praising its notably comfortable, refined ride and strong wet-weather confidence. Around three quarters of reviewers mention noise, and while many find it very quiet, a sizeable minority report intrusive droning on certain road surfaces. Grip and efficiency are commonly highlighted as strengths (especially in the wet and for rolling resistance), but around one in five owners feel it sacrifices dry handling and steering precision compared with sportier alternatives.
- Very comfortable, smooth ride quality
- Low road noise for a touring tyre (especially at speed)
- Strong wet grip and reassuring wet traction
- Low rolling resistance / good efficiency
- Can be noisy or drone on rougher road surfaces
- Soft, less confident dry handling in corners
- Less direct steering feel / reduced precision
Summarised by AI from 62 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 62 Primacy 5 reviewsThe tires are very silent and comfortable. Despite this they are very grippy in the dry and wet and give a good feedback. Driven in 40+ degrees in summer until now in rainy 5 degrees autumn and they make the drive 100% secure.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 99 sizes of the Dynaxer HP5 and 88 of the Primacy 5, 51 of them made in both.
| Category | Dynaxer HP5 | Primacy 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 99 sizes, 16 to 21 inch | 88 sizes, 16 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 51 sizes 195/55 R16195/60 R16205/55 R16205/60 R16215/55 R16215/60 R16215/65 R16225/55 R16205/45 R17205/50 R17205/55 R17215/45 R17and 39 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A100%B0% | A100% |
| EU label rolling resistance | B63%C37% | B88%C12% |
| EU label noise | 70-73 dB B100% | 70-72 dB B95%A5% |
| On the market since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Replaced | - | Michelin Primacy 4+ (2022) |
| Awards | - | Highly Recommended: Best Tyres for Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2026/27) Winner: Best Tyres for Large Family Cars (DriverReviews, 2026/27) |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Kleber's Dynaxer HP5 and Michelin's Primacy 5 sit in the same “premium-touring summer” brief for everyday passenger cars, but the two tyres chase that goal in noticeably different ways. Across two independent 2026 tests in the popular 225/45 R17 size, the Kleber repeatedly focuses on grip-based safety metrics (especially braking and lateral wet grip), while the Michelin leans harder into refined road manners and efficiency.
What makes this head-to-head interesting is that Michelin is the higher-priced premium benchmark brand, yet in both shared tests the Primacy 5 only finishes mid-pack overall (5/9 and 6/13). Meanwhile the Kleber, often positioned as the value choice within the Michelin group ecosystem, lands just behind it overall (7/9 and 7/13) and actually beats it in several key objective grip measurements-while losing clearly on aquaplaning resistance, noise and rolling resistance.
Conclusion
On pure “stop and turn” grip in typical wet and dry conditions, the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 is consistently the sharper tool in these two tests. It beats the Primacy 5 in dry braking twice (38.0 m vs 38.4 m; 37.98 m vs 38.39 m) and also in wet braking twice (45.5 m vs 46.5 m; 29.12 m vs 29.73 m). It further shows stronger lateral wet grip via wet circle in both tests, suggesting more confidence when the road is damp and you're loading the tyre through longer corners.
The Michelin Primacy 5's wins are concentrated where “touring” tyres earn their reputation: it is quieter (by ~1.5-1.9 dB in these tests), more energy-efficient (rolling resistance advantage ~9%), and markedly better in aquaplaning (about +4.9% straight-line and +3.6% curved in both test datasets). Subjectively, drivers also rated the Michelin better on dry handling feel, and both tyres matched on comfort scoring in the provided results. The practical takeaway: if your priorities are low noise, fuel/EV efficiency and strong hydroplaning security on waterlogged motorways, the Primacy 5 fits the brief; if you want stronger braking and wet cornering grip for mixed roads and frequent stop/turn scenarios-especially at a competitive price-the Dynaxer HP5 is the better-value “safety grip” pick, even if it gives up refinement and aquaplaning headroom.
Dynaxer HP5 vs Primacy 5: your questions
Is the Kleber Dynaxer HP5 or the Michelin Primacy 5 the better tyre?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Michelin Primacy 5 finished ahead 2 times and the Dynaxer HP5 not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Dynaxer HP5 scores 8.3 and the Primacy 5 8.8 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Dynaxer HP5 or the Primacy 5?
The Dynaxer HP5 led 6 of the 11 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.1% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
Across the shared tests the dry measurements are split 3-3 between the Dynaxer HP5 and the Primacy 5.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The Primacy 5 had 9% lower rolling resistance (2 tests). Owners rate wear 10/10 for the Dynaxer HP5 and 9.1/10 for the Primacy 5.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
The Primacy 5 was 1.2 dB quieter (2 tests). Owners rate comfort 9.5/10 for the Dynaxer HP5 and 8.4/10 for the Primacy 5.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Dynaxer HP5 90% from 6 reviews and the Primacy 5 82% from 62. 80% of Dynaxer HP5 owners would buy it again, against 78% for the Primacy 5.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Dynaxer HP5 is made in 99 sizes (16 to 21 inch) and the Primacy 5 in 88 (16 to 22 inch). 51 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Dynaxer HP5 is graded A for wet grip and B for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Primacy 5 A and B.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
Continental PremiumContact 7 vs Michelin Primacy 5
8-2 in 11 shared tests
vs
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Michelin Primacy 5
0-5 in 5 shared tests
vs
Bridgestone Turanza 6 vs Michelin Primacy 5
3-4 in 7 shared tests
vs
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 vs Michelin Primacy 5
2-1 in 3 shared tests
vs
Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 vs Michelin Primacy 5
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Michelin Primacy 5 vs Pirelli Cinturato C3
1-8 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Michelin Primacy 5 vs Vredestein Ultrac+
3-1 in 4 shared tests
vs
Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs Michelin Primacy 5
4-1 in 5 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion