Menu

Kleber Quadraxer SUV Test Results

Tested 2025 to 2026 2 publications

Tested 2 times by independent publications, the Kleber Quadraxer SUV averages a finish of 6th.

  • 2Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 6thAverage finish
  • 38%Field beaten on average
  • 2Publications

2 tests, 2025 to 2026

The latest test

2026 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test for EVs (215/55 R18) P5 of 8

The Kleber Quadraxer SUV finished fifth as a snow-focused, sensibly priced choice. It rewards drivers who value winter ability over outright warm-road handling.

Strong: Snow Braking, Snow Traction, Snow Handling, Snow Slalom Weak: Dry Handling Winner: Hankook iON FlexClimate

Record by discipline

Where the Kleber Quadraxer SUV finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.

Record by discipline
Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 2 P5 of 11 60% -
Dry Handling 2 P10 of 11 10% -
Wet
Wet Braking 2 P6.5 of 11 47% -
Wet Handling 2 P9.5 of 11 16% -
Wet Circle 1 P7 of 10 33% -
Straight Aqua 2 P7 of 11 42% -
Curved Aquaplaning 2 P7.5 of 11 37% -
Snow
Snow Braking 2 P2 of 11 90% -
Snow Traction 2 P2.5 of 11 85% -
Snow Handling 2 P4 of 10.5 71% -
Snow Slalom 2 P2 of 10.5 89% -
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 2 P3.5 of 9 69% -
Noise 2 P6.5 of 11 45% -
Value
Wear 1 P5 of 8 43% -
Value 1 P4 of 8 57% -
Rolling Resistance 2 P6 of 11 47% -

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 2 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.

Snow braking and traction are the Kleber Quadraxer SUV's clearest strengths across two tests. In the 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars comparison, snow braking was second of 12, traction third and slalom second; the 2026 Auto Bild EV test put snow braking and traction second of ten, with handling second of nine. Overall it finished seventh of ten in 2025 and fifth of eight in 2026. Dry and wet handling were repeatedly weak: 11th of 12 for both in 2025, then ninth and eighth of ten respectively in 2026. Both verdicts favour it for snow rather than warm-road cornering.

Other results varied unusually. Aquaplaning was tenth of 12 both straight and in bends in 2025, but improved to fourth and fifth of ten in 2026, when testers praised it. Wet braking moved from ninth of 12, 22.3% behind the best, to fourth of ten, 7.7% behind. Rolling resistance went the other way, from fourth of 12 to eighth of ten. Snow handling also improved from sixth of 12 to second of nine. The 2025 notes unusually call snow braking and slalom best and traction second, whereas the numerical positions are second, second and third; their third-lowest rolling-resistance claim also differs from fourth numerically. The measured results still support strong snow braking and traction, but not consistent wet-road ability.

Performance Strengths

Performance Weaknesses

  • Dry handling Strong in 2 of 2 tests
    Details
    • 11th of 12, 3.1% behind best speed, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars test
    • 9th of 10, 4.8% behind best speed, 2026 Auto Bild EV test
  • Wet handling Strong in 2 of 2 tests
    Details
    • 11th of 12, 6.5% behind best speed, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars test
    • 8th of 10, 4.2% behind best speed, 2026 Auto Bild EV test
  • Wet braking Minor in 1 of 2 tests
    Details
    • 9th of 12, 22.3% behind best, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars test
    • Unusually stronger 4th of 10, 7.7% behind best, 2026 Auto Bild EV test
  • Aquaplaning resistance Minor
    Details
    • 10th of 12 both straight and curved, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars test
    • Unusually stronger 4th of 10 straight and 5th of 10 curved, praised, 2026 Auto Bild EV test
  • Rolling resistance Minor
    Details
    • 8th of 10, 12.5% above best, 2026 Auto Bild EV test
    • Unusually stronger 4th of 12 in 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars test; notes instead say third-lowest

Every test, newest first 2

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2026 1 test
P5 of 8 Beat 43% of the field

2026 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test for EVs (215/55 R18)

Auto Bild 215/55 R18 gut (Good)

The Kleber Quadraxer SUV finished fifth as a snow-focused, sensibly priced choice. It rewards drivers who value winter ability over outright warm-road handling.

StrongSnow BrakingSnow TractionSnow HandlingSnow Slalom WeakDry Handling WinnerHankook iON FlexClimate

2025 1 test
P7 of 10 Beat 33% of the field

2025 Autobild Crossover SUV All Season Test

Auto Bild Sportscars 215/50 R18

The Kleber Quadraxer 3 SUV emerges as the snow specialist of the test, recording the best lateral grip and shortest braking distance on snow among all candidates. Drivers without all-wheel drive should particularly appreciate its strong traction values for getting moving on slippery surfaces. However, the tyre's winter focus comes at the expense of wet handling and braking performance, as well as dry handling precision, making it best suited for regions with significant snowfall.

StrongSnow BrakingSnow Slalom WeakDry HandlingWet Handling WinnerBridgestone Turanza All Season 6

Back to the Kleber Quadraxer SUV overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Kleber tyres

Overview

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.