Menu

Pirelli Cinturato C3 vs Vredestein Ultrac plus

Pirelli's Cinturato C3 and Vredestein's Ultrac+ sit in the same “premium touring summer” space on paper, aimed at drivers who want a comfortable, safe tyre for everyday use rather than a hardcore UHP track-focused option. The interesting part is that in multiple independent 2026 group tests, they don't perform like near-peers: the Pirelli consistently runs at the front, while the Vredestein tends to land in the lower half or last.

Across three shared tests (Motor, a 13-tyre comparative, and ADAC), the pattern is clear: Cinturato C3 is the more complete tyre for grip and braking-especially in the wet-whereas the Ultrac+ leans more toward efficiency/refinement metrics (lower rolling resistance and often lower measured noise) and shows flashes of strength in aquaplaning resilience. If your priority is maximum safety margin and all-round pace, this comparison is largely about how much you're willing to trade for comfort/efficiency gains.
Cinturato-C3 VS Ultrac-plus

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been three tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of three total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Pirelli Cinturato C3three
three wins

While it might look like the Pirelli Cinturato C3 is better than the Vredestein Ultrac plus purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Consistently class-leading braking (wins all 3 wet-braking comparisons and all 3 dry-braking comparisons; up to ~8-9% shorter stops vs Ultrac+ in 225/45 R17 tests)
  • Strong, confidence-building wet and dry handling balance (front-running wet handling/circle and strong subjective scores in the 13-tyre test)
  • Excellent predicted longevity and lower wear impact (ADAC 48,600 km vs 30,600 km; lower abrasion 79 vs 97 mg/km/t)
  • Well-rounded wet safety including strong straight-line aquaplaning (wins straight aquaplaning in all three tests)
  • Better efficiency metrics (lower rolling resistance in both non-ADAC tests; slightly lower fuel consumption in ADAC: 5.6 vs 5.7 l/100 km)
  • Often lower measured noise (wins noise in the two 225/45 R17 tests)
  • Strong curved aquaplaning in 225/45 R17 testing (wins both datasets: 3.76 vs 3.42 m/s²)
  • Generally acceptable everyday stability/communication in the wet when driven within limits (mid-pack subjective wet impressions in the 13-tyre test)

Dry Braking

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Pirelli Cinturato C3 was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Pirelli Cinturato C3 stopped the vehicle in 7% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac plus.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
35.32M
Vredestein Ultrac plus
37.98M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Pirelli Cinturato C3

Pirelli Cinturato C3
35.75M
Vredestein Ultrac plus
39.33M (+3.58M)
Pirelli Cinturato C3
34.5M
Vredestein Ultrac plus
35.3M (+0.8M)
Pirelli Cinturato C3
35.7M
Vredestein Ultrac plus
39.3M (+3.6M)

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Pirelli Cinturato C3 was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Pirelli Cinturato C3 was 2.23% faster around a lap than the Vredestein Ultrac plus.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
73.29s
Vredestein Ultrac plus
74.96s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Pirelli Cinturato C3

Pirelli Cinturato C3
72.97s
Vredestein Ultrac plus
74.52s (+1.55s)
Pirelli Cinturato C3
73.6s
Vredestein Ultrac plus
75.4s (+1.8s)

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Pirelli Cinturato C3 was better during two subj. dry handling tests. On average the Pirelli Cinturato C3 scored 13.38% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac plus.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
7.85 Points
Vredestein Ultrac plus
6.8 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Pirelli Cinturato C3

Pirelli Cinturato C3
8.4 Points
Vredestein Ultrac plus
7.5 Points (-0.9 Points)
Pirelli Cinturato C3
7.3 Points
Vredestein Ultrac plus
6.1 Points (-1.2 Points)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Pirelli Cinturato C3 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Pirelli Cinturato C3 stopped the vehicle in 7.65% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac plus.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
34.26M
Vredestein Ultrac plus
37.1M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Pirelli Cinturato C3

Pirelli Cinturato C3
27.68M
Vredestein Ultrac plus
30.2M (+2.52M)
Pirelli Cinturato C3
31.8M
Vredestein Ultrac plus
33.9M (+2.1M)
Pirelli Cinturato C3
43.3M
Vredestein Ultrac plus
47.2M (+3.9M)

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Pirelli Cinturato C3 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Pirelli Cinturato C3 stopped the vehicle in 5.57% less distance than the Vredestein Ultrac plus.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
37.3M
Vredestein Ultrac plus
39.5M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Pirelli Cinturato C3

Pirelli Cinturato C3
37.3M
Vredestein Ultrac plus
39.5M (+2.2M)

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Pirelli Cinturato C3 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Pirelli Cinturato C3 was 4.71% faster around a wet lap than the Vredestein Ultrac plus.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
69.4s
Vredestein Ultrac plus
72.83s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Pirelli Cinturato C3

Pirelli Cinturato C3
68.09s
Vredestein Ultrac plus
71.86s (+3.77s)
Pirelli Cinturato C3
70.7s
Vredestein Ultrac plus
73.8s (+3.1s)

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Pirelli Cinturato C3 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Pirelli Cinturato C3 scored 9.3% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac plus.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
8.6 Points
Vredestein Ultrac plus
7.8 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Pirelli Cinturato C3

Pirelli Cinturato C3
8.6 Points
Vredestein Ultrac plus
7.8 Points (-0.8 Points)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Pirelli Cinturato C3 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Pirelli Cinturato C3 had 8.97% higher lateral wet grip than the Vredestein Ultrac plus.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
0.78m/s
Vredestein Ultrac plus
0.71m/s
Lateral wet grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Wet Circle: Pirelli Cinturato C3

Pirelli Cinturato C3
0.775m/s
Vredestein Ultrac plus
0.711m/s (-0.06m/s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Pirelli Cinturato C3 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Pirelli Cinturato C3 floated at a 1.45% higher speed than the Vredestein Ultrac plus.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
77.82Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac plus
76.69Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Pirelli Cinturato C3

Pirelli Cinturato C3
76.86Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac plus
75.36Km/H (-1.5Km/H)
Pirelli Cinturato C3
79.7Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac plus
79.3Km/H (-0.4Km/H)
Pirelli Cinturato C3
76.9Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac plus
75.4Km/H (-1.5Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac plus was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac plus slipped out at a 5.18% higher speed than the Pirelli Cinturato C3.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
3.48m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac plus
3.67m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Vredestein Ultrac plus

Pirelli Cinturato C3
3.42m/sec2 (-0.34m/sec2)
Vredestein Ultrac plus
3.76m/sec2
Pirelli Cinturato C3
3.6m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac plus
3.5m/sec2 (-0.1m/sec2)
Pirelli Cinturato C3
3.42m/sec2 (-0.34m/sec2)
Vredestein Ultrac plus
3.76m/sec2

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Pirelli Cinturato C3 was better during two subj. comfort tests. On average the Pirelli Cinturato C3 scored 3.03% more points than the Vredestein Ultrac plus.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
6.6 Points
Vredestein Ultrac plus
6.4 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Pirelli Cinturato C3

Pirelli Cinturato C3
6.6 Points
Vredestein Ultrac plus
6.4 Points (-0.2 Points)
Pirelli Cinturato C3
6.6 Points
Vredestein Ultrac plus
6.4 Points (-0.2 Points)

Noise

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac plus was better during two noise tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac plus measured 1.5% quieter than the Pirelli Cinturato C3.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
69.95dB
Vredestein Ultrac plus
68.9dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Vredestein Ultrac plus

Pirelli Cinturato C3
74.1dB (+1.5dB)
Vredestein Ultrac plus
72.6dB
Pirelli Cinturato C3
65.8dB (+0.6dB)
Vredestein Ultrac plus
65.2dB

Wear

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Pirelli Cinturato C3 was better during one wear tests. On average the Pirelli Cinturato C3 is predicted to cover 37.04% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Vredestein Ultrac plus.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
48600KM
Vredestein Ultrac plus
30600KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Pirelli Cinturato C3

Pirelli Cinturato C3
48600KM
Vredestein Ultrac plus
30600KM (-18000KM)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac plus was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac plus had a 6.39% lower rolling resistance than the Pirelli Cinturato C3.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
4.54kg / t
Vredestein Ultrac plus
4.25kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Vredestein Ultrac plus

Pirelli Cinturato C3
8.27kg / t (+0.54kg / t)
Vredestein Ultrac plus
7.73kg / t
Pirelli Cinturato C3
0.818kg / t (+0.06kg / t)
Vredestein Ultrac plus
0.762kg / t

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Vredestein Ultrac plus was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Vredestein Ultrac plus used 1.75% less fuel than the Pirelli Cinturato C3.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
5.7l/100km
Vredestein Ultrac plus
5.6l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Vredestein Ultrac plus

Pirelli Cinturato C3
5.7l/100km (+0.1l/100km)
Vredestein Ultrac plus
5.6l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Pirelli Cinturato C3 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Pirelli Cinturato C3 emitted 18.56% less particle wear matter than the Vredestein Ultrac plus.

Pirelli Cinturato C3
79mg/km/t
Vredestein Ultrac plus
97mg/km/t
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Pirelli Cinturato C3

Pirelli Cinturato C3
79mg/km/t
Vredestein Ultrac plus
97mg/km/t (+18mg/km/t)

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Pirelli Cinturato C3 and Vredestein Ultrac plus.

In total the Pirelli Cinturato C3 has been reviewed 13 times and drivers have given the tyre 93% overall.

The Vredestein Ultrac plus has been reviewed 5 times and drivers have given the tyre 80% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Pirelli Cinturato C3.

Best Review for the Pirelli Cinturato C3
Given 93% 215/55 R17 on a combination of roads for 100 average miles
I just put this model on my Superb and did a "test" on a day of heavy rain and day after on dry and behavior looks great. I had P7 Blue years ago which I did not really like. In the meantime I had Goodyear EfficientGrip Performance 2 that I liked and I definitely like these new C3.
Helpful 1072 - tyre reviewed on March 30, 2025
View all Pirelli Cinturato C3 driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Vredestein Ultrac plus
Given 86% 225/60 R18 on a combination of roads for 500 spirited miles
Changed from Pirelli All Season Plus to Ultrac+ this year, had no issues going at my car's Vmax in heavy rain on a highway.
They are much quieter than All Season Pirellis, the noise is mainly a low hum, which is nicer to the ear than the alternatives.
I feel more comfortable when cornering at speed with them. Been driving some forest/field roads and they held up nicely. The tread doesn't seem as deep as other brands, will update how things are looking after 10k km.
Helpful 997 - tyre reviewed on May 14, 2025
View all Vredestein Ultrac plus driver reviews >>

Conclusion

If you're buying on objective performance and safety margins, the Pirelli Cinturato C3 is the decisive winner. It tops both non-ADAC tests (1/9 and 1/13) and places 2/16 in ADAC, driven by consistently shorter braking distances and higher wet/dry grip. The headline numbers are hard to ignore: in Motor's 225/45 R17 test it stops in 35.7 m vs 39.3 m for the Ultrac+ in dry braking (~9% shorter), and in wet braking it's 43.3 m vs 47.2 m (~8% shorter). ADAC reinforces that advantage while adding a major ownership benefit: predicted wear of 48,600 km for the Pirelli vs 30,600 km for the Vredestein (~59% higher mileage), alongside lower abrasion (79 vs 97 mg/km/t).

The Vredestein Ultrac+ isn't unsafe-it's repeatedly described as acceptable/solid for everyday use-but it's outgunned in the core performance areas that matter most in emergency situations and spirited driving. Its main wins come in measured noise and rolling resistance (e.g., Motor rolling resistance 0.762 vs 0.818 kg/t; the 13-tyre test 7.73 vs 8.27 kg/t), and it performs well in curved aquaplaning in the two 225/45 R17 datasets (3.76 vs 3.42 m/s²). However, the same tests highlight weaker lateral wet grip and longer wet braking, and the 13-tyre test notes it can overheat and understeer when pushed.

Practical takeaway: choose the Cinturato C3 if you want a “set-and-forget” touring summer tyre with top-tier wet/dry stopping power and notably better longevity; choose the Ultrac+ mainly if your priorities skew toward efficiency and potentially quieter running and you drive in a calmer, less demanding style-while accepting a clear reduction in ultimate grip and braking performance.
Key Differences
  • Overall competitiveness: Cinturato C3 is a repeat front-runner (1/9, 1/13, 2/16) while Ultrac+ trails (9/9, 10/13, 12/16)
  • Braking safety margin: Pirelli repeatedly stops materially shorter-Motor dry braking 35.7 m vs 39.3 m; Motor wet braking 43.3 m vs 47.2 m; ADAC wet braking 31.8 m vs 33.9 m
  • Wet grip consistency: C3 is strong across wet braking/handling/circle; Ultrac+ is described as inconsistent, with weaker wet braking/lateral grip despite decent aquaplaning
  • Aquaplaning shape: Ultrac+ tends to be better in curved aquaplaning (two wins in 225/45 R17), while C3 is consistently better in straight-line aquaplaning (three wins) and is also strong in ADAC curved aquaplaning
  • Running costs and sustainability: C3 shows a major durability advantage (48,600 km vs 30,600 km) and lower abrasion, whereas Ultrac+ is penalized on mileage/abrasion despite decent efficiency
  • Refinement/efficiency trade: Ultrac+ generally brings lower rolling resistance and lower noise, while C3 is frequently marked as relatively noisy and only average for rolling resistance
Pirelli Cinturato C3

Overall Winner: Pirelli Cinturato C3

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Pirelli Cinturato C3 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:

Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.