Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 vs Ceat 4 SeasonDrive+
Ahead in each discipline
The Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 and the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive+ have met in 4 independent tests and the record is level at 2-2. The MultiSeason Gen 02 was stronger in snow, comfort and value, the 4 SeasonDrive+ in dry and wet.
Performance profile
16 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
MultiSeason Gen 02
4 SeasonDrive+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 92%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
MultiSeason Gen 02
4 SeasonDrive+
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | MultiSeason Gen 02 | Gap | 4 SeasonDrive+ | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry 4 SeasonDrive+ ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 41.73 | 3.7% | 40.18 | 0-4 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 87.5 | 0.2% | 87.7 | 0-1 |
| Wet 4 SeasonDrive+ ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 52.53 | = | 52.43 | 2-2 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 73.5 | 3.8% | 70.8 | 1-0 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.06 | 0.4% | 12.01 | 0-1 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 71.5 | 5.6% | 75.5 | 0-1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.64 | 7.6% | 2.84 | 0-1 |
| Snow MultiSeason Gen 02 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 23.4 | 4.5% | 24.5 | 1-0 |
| Snow Traction N | 2,688 | 7.1% | 2,509 | 1-0 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 57 | 3.8% | 54.9 | 1-0 |
| Snow Slalom m/sec2 | 3.79 | 6.2% | 3.57 | 1-0 |
| Comfort MultiSeason Gen 02 ahead | ||||
| Noise dB | 72.7 | 0.1 dB | 72.8 | 1-0 |
| Tyre Weight kg | 36.4 | 5.9% | 38.7 | 1-0 |
| Value MultiSeason Gen 02 ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 30,063 | 72.8% | 51,953 | 0-1 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.16 | 18% | 8.73 | 1-0 |
| Fuel Consumption l/100km | 5.49 | 2.8% | 5.65 | 1-0 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 4 tests, 2023 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | MultiSeason Gen 02 | Field | 4 SeasonDrive+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test | P16 of 30 | P5 of 30 | |
| 2024 All Season Tyre Market Overview | P22 of 37 | P19 of 37 | |
| 2023 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | P13 of 16 | P15 of 16 | |
| 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout | P10 of 35 | P14 of 35 |
MultiSeason Gen 02 vs 4 SeasonDrive+: your questions
Is the Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 or the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive+ the better tyre?
The Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 and the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive+ have met in 4 independent tests and the record is level at 2-2. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the MultiSeason Gen 02 scores 8.6 and the 4 SeasonDrive+ 8.3 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the MultiSeason Gen 02 or the 4 SeasonDrive+?
The 4 SeasonDrive+ led 5 of the 8 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The 4 SeasonDrive+ led 5 of the 5 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 3.7% shorter in the dry across 4 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The MultiSeason Gen 02 led 4 of the 4 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the MultiSeason Gen 02 79% from 12 reviews; the 4 SeasonDrive+ has no owner reviews yet.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs 
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
0-11 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
2-9 in 11 shared tests
vs 
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
1-12 in 13 shared tests
vs 
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
1-9 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 vs Vredestein Quatrac
0-10 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02 vs Toyo Celsius AS2
5-3 in 10 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.