GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport vs Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4 finished ahead 2 times and the WinterPro2 Sport not once. The Winter I*cept Evo 4 was stronger in dry, wet, snow, comfort and value.
Performance profile
15 measurements from the 2 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
WinterPro2 Sport
Not ahead on any measurement here
Winter I*cept Evo 4
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 90%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow.
Where each scores higher
WinterPro2 Sport
Not ahead in any category
Winter I*cept Evo 4
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Wins count the tests in which each tyre did better.
| Measurement | WinterPro2 Sport | Gap | Winter I*cept Evo 4 | Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Winter I*cept Evo 4 ahead | ||||
| Dry Braking m | 44 | 0.7% | 43.7 | 0-1 |
| Dry Handling km/h | 109.5 | 1.9% | 111.6 | 0-1 |
| Wet Winter I*cept Evo 4 ahead | ||||
| Wet Braking m | 50.2 | 7.3% | 46.55 | 0-2 |
| Wet Handling km/h | 78.6 | 1.1% | 79.5 | 0-1 |
| Wet Circle s | 12.56 | = | 12.56 | 0-0 |
| Straight Aqua km/h | 89.2 | 1.7% | 90.7 | 0-1 |
| Curved Aquaplaning m/sec2 | 2.65 | 3.4% | 2.74 | 0-1 |
| Snow Winter I*cept Evo 4 ahead | ||||
| Snow Braking m | 29.6 | 1.4% | 29.2 | 0-2 |
| Snow Traction N | 5,067 | 3.5% | 5,243 | 0-1 |
| Snow Handling km/h | 53.7 | 4.7% | 56.2 | 0-1 |
| Snow Slalom m/sec2 | 3.34 | 2.1% | 3.41 | 0-1 |
| Comfort Winter I*cept Evo 4 ahead | ||||
| Subj. Comfort pts | scored | 29.7% | scored | 0-1 |
| Noise dB | 72.4 | 0.3 dB | 72.1 | 0-1 |
| Value Winter I*cept Evo 4 ahead | ||||
| Wear km | 47,500 | 16.9% | 55,550 | 0-1 |
| Rolling Resistance kg / t | 7.99 | 4.4% | 7.64 | 0-1 |
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared.
Head to head in 2 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | WinterPro2 Sport | Field | Winter I*cept Evo 4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | P16 of 20 | P3 of 20 | |
| 2026 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 50 Sets | P14 of 50 | P4 of 50 |
WinterPro2 Sport vs Winter I*cept Evo 4: your questions
Is the GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport or the Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4 the better tyre?
In the 2 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Hankook Winter I*cept Evo 4 finished ahead 2 times and the WinterPro2 Sport not once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the WinterPro2 Sport scores 7.7 and the Winter I*cept Evo 4 9.6 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the WinterPro2 Sport or the Winter I*cept Evo 4?
The Winter I*cept Evo 4 led 5 of the 6 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 7.3% shorter in the wet across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The Winter I*cept Evo 4 led 2 of the 2 dry measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in snow?
The Winter I*cept Evo 4 led 5 of the 5 snow measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.4% shorter on snow across 2 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8/10 for the WinterPro2 Sport and 10/10 for the Winter I*cept Evo 4.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the WinterPro2 Sport 81% from 1 reviews and the Winter I*cept Evo 4 96% from 3.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The WinterPro2 Sport is made in 34 sizes (17 to 20 inch) and the Winter I*cept Evo 4 in 87 (17 to 22 inch). 19 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the WinterPro2 Sport is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Winter I*cept Evo 4 B and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The Winter I*cept Evo 4 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2025, the WinterPro2 Sport in 2020.
More comparisons with these tyres
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.