Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 vs Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS
Across the two shared comparisons (275/35 R19 and 335/30 R21), the pattern is consistent: the Trofeo RS is the faster tyre in the dry and tends to stay strong over repeated laps, while the Cup 2's main counterpunch is conditional-its extra tread void can help in certain wet situations, but it doesn't consistently translate into overall wet performance leadership.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been two tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS | one | |
| one draws in one tests | ||
While it might look like the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS is better than the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Stronger wet braking in AutoBild 2026: 47.0 m vs 53.3 m (about 11.8% shorter), suggesting better water evacuation in heavy-braking zones
- More tread grooves/void ratio (per test notes) can make it a safer bet when conditions are variable or damp-to-wet
- Lowest set weight in the AutoBild test, which can marginally help unsprung mass/response depending on fitment
- Often positioned as a cheaper, reasonable entry point for occasional track use (AutoBild context)
- Best-in-class dry braking in both shared tests (28.8 m and 27.2 m), including shorter stops than other track-focused tyres in the AutoBild field
- Faster dry handling and hot-lap pace in both tests (e.g., 148.53 s vs 150.58 s), with strong precision and feedback reported
- Stronger long-run consistency (e.g., 152.35 s vs 155.6 s in AutoBild) and less lap-to-lap fall-off during sessions
- Wide limit range and good integration with stability control/ABS in the dry (AutoBild notes), making it easier to exploit on track
Dry Braking
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS stopped the vehicle in 9.36% less distance than the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2.
Best In Dry Braking: Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS was 1.55% faster around a lap than the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling Long Run [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS was better during two dry handling long run [s] tests. On average the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS was on average 2.45% faster than the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2.
Best In Dry Handling Long Run [s]: Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS
See how the Dry Handling Long Run winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 was better during one wet braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 stopped the vehicle in 6.05% less distance than the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS.
Best In Wet Braking: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS was 0.55% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS was 0.12% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 and Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS.
In total the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 has been reviewed 20 times and drivers have given the tyre 79% overall.
The Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS has been reviewed 1 times and drivers have given the tyre 67% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2.
Conclusion
The Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 makes sense as the more “entry-point” semi-slick: typically cheaper in the AutoBild test context, lighter, and in that same AutoBild dataset it delivered the best wet braking of the two (47.0 m vs 53.3 m), a meaningful margin if you're worried about sudden standing-water braking zones. The trade-off is that it struggled most in dry pace and, crucially, showed rapid degradation/pick-up from lap two in the 2026 AutoBild long-run assessment-exactly the scenario that matters in real trackdays.
Practical takeaway: choose the Trofeo RS if you want a tyre you can lean on for lap time and consistency across a full session; choose the Cup 2 if you want a more conservative semi-slick feel and you expect mixed-weather track use where wet braking confidence (not just wet cornering speed) is a deciding factor.
Key Differences
- Dry braking is a decisive Trofeo RS advantage in both tests: ~6.7% shorter (28.8 m vs 30.88 m) and ~12.0% shorter (27.2 m vs 30.9 m)
- Dry pace favors Trofeo RS on both hot lap and long run (AutoBild: 148.53 s vs 150.58 s; 152.35 s vs 155.6 s), indicating both higher grip and better session durability
- Wet braking splits by test: Cup 2 wins clearly in AutoBild (47.0 m vs 53.3 m), but Trofeo RS edges the 2024 test (29.4 m vs 30.7 m), suggesting wet braking depends heavily on compound/spec and conditions
- Wet handling is close but consistently (slightly) Trofeo RS-favored in the provided data (AutoBild: 138.55 s vs 139.31 s; 2024: 81.9 vs 81.8 km/h)
- Heat/pick-up behavior differs: Cup 2 showed rapid degradation and heavy pick-up from lap two in AutoBild, while Trofeo RS maintained pace from lap two to six with little performance loss
- Value/positioning differs by test context: AutoBild frames Cup 2 as the cheap baseline reference, while the 2024 test notes Trofeo RS as the least expensive in that specific group-so real-world value likely depends on size/OE marking availability
Overall Winner: Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tyre.
Pirelli P Zero Trofeo RS Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tyre.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.
Discussion
- No comments yet — be the first.