Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- TR Score
- 9.5/10
- Owners say
- 85% · 16
- TR Score
- 8.4/10
- Owners say
- 70% · 18
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 finished ahead 2 times and the Potenza Sport Evo once. The N Fera Sport SU2 stopped 4% shorter in the wet.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo if you prioritize the most reliable safety-centric performance (especially hard braking and wet-road control) and you're willing to pay more and accept higher rolling resistance. Choose the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 if you want strong braking potential for the money plus lower noise and better efficiency-best for value-focused drivers-while accepting that its performance appears less consistent across different tests/sizes.
Where the Potenza Sport Evo is stronger
- More consistent high-end safety performance across categories, highlighted by podium result in ACE (3/10)
- Excellent braking capability in at least one major comparative test (ACE: 32.85 m dry braking; near-top wet braking score)
- Stronger wet dynamics in Autobild: better wet handling (82.4 vs 82.0 km/h), wet circle (14.73 s vs 14.82 s) and curved aquaplaning (3.54 vs 3.38 m/sec²)
Where the N Fera Sport SU2 is stronger
- Strong braking showing in Autobild and especially the large braking test: 3rd/50 overall with 33.9 m dry and 27.1 m wet braking
- Better value proposition: lower cost index (12.13 vs 16.39 price/1000) and described as a solid mid-range choice in Autobild
- Lower noise and better efficiency: 70.6 dB vs 73.8 dB, and lower rolling resistance (8.04 vs 8.74 kg/t)
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
Potenza Sport Evo vs N Fera Sport SU2 at a glance
| Category | Potenza Sport Evo | Gap | N Fera Sport SU2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won3 shared tests | 1 | 2 | |
| Dry4 measurements | 1 | The N Fera Sport SU2 stopped 1.7% shorter in the dry (2 tests) | 2 |
| Wet7 measurements | 4 | 3 | |
| Comfort2 measurements | 1 | Level between the two. | 1 |
| Value3 measurements | 2 | 1 | |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 9.5/10 | The Potenza Sport Evo by 1.1 | 8.4/10 |
| Owner rating16 and 18 reviews | 85% | The Potenza Sport Evo by 15 points | 70% |
| Would buy againshare of owners | 86% | The Potenza Sport Evo by 48 points | 38% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 115 | 90 sizes made in both | 138 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 3 tests in 2026
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | Potenza Sport Evo | Field | N Fera Sport SU2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test | P11 of 20 | P9 of 20 | |
| 2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? | P11 of 50 | P3 of 50 | |
| 2026 ACE Summer Tyre Test | P3 of 10 | P10 of 10 |
Performance profile
14 measurements from the 3 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
Potenza Sport Evo
N Fera Sport SU2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it.
Where each scores higher
Potenza Sport Evo
N Fera Sport SU2
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Where owners rate each higher
Potenza Sport Evo
N Fera Sport SU2
Not ahead in any category
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Owners rate the Potenza Sport Evo 85% from 16 reviews and the N Fera Sport SU2 70% from 18. Each spoke is one question owners answer out of 10; reviews are vetted by hand before publication.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | Potenza Sport Evo | Gap | N Fera Sport SU2 | Wins | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34.5 | 1.7% | 33.9 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 99.8 | 0.4% | 99.4 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | = | scored | 0-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 36.15 | 4% | 34.7 | 0-2 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 82.4 | 0.5% | 82 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 9.6% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 14.73 | 0.6% | 14.82 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 91.1 | 2% | 92.9 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 3.54 | 4.7% | 3.38 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| scored | 9.6% | scored | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 73.8 | 3.2 dB | 70.6 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 51,860 | 8.5% | 47,810 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 8.74 | 8% | 8.04 | 0-1 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
| 1,533 | 10.8% | 1,719 | 1-0 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Potenza Sport Evo scores 9.5 and the N Fera Sport SU2 8.4 out of 10.
| Potenza Sport Evo | Category | N Fera Sport SU2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 98 | Dry | 78 | ||
| 97 | Wet | 76 | ||
| 11 | Comfort | 91 | ||
| 20 | Value | 29 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| Potenza Sport Evo | Category | N Fera Sport SU2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.8 | Dry Grip | 8.1 | ||
| 8.6 | Wet Grip | 7.7 | ||
| 8.4 | Road Feedback | 7.8 | ||
| 9.2 | Handling | 7.7 | ||
| 7.8 | Wear | 5.6 | ||
| 7.7 | Comfort | 6.4 | ||
Owners rate the Potenza Sport Evo 85% from 16 reviews and the N Fera Sport SU2 70% from 18. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
- 85%from 16 reviews
- 86%would buy again
- 71,803 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers report the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo delivers outstanding dry grip and exceptionally strong wet traction, with very sharp turn-in and confident, stable handling that suits fast road use and even track days. Many also feel wear and track durability are improved versus the older Potenza Sport, and value-for-money is frequently praised against Michelin/Continental rivals. The main recurring drawback is higher road noise and a firmer, stiff-sidewall ride, which can reduce refinement on quieter cars.
- Excellent dry grip
- Very strong wet grip and confidence in rain/cold conditions
- Sharp steering response and quick turn-in
- Stable, predictable handling with strong braking/traction
- Noticeably higher road noise/roar
- Firm ride and stiff sidewalls (reduced comfort/refinement for some)
Summarised by AI from 13 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 16 Potenza Sport Evo reviewsBefore switching to the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo (in size 205/45/17), I had the Yokohama Advan Neova RS (in size 205/55/17). The difference is night and day—in favor of the Bridgestones. Their grip and user-friendliness are on an entirely different level; they are in a different league compared to the unacceptable Yokohama Advan Neova RS, whose only real advantage was minimal wear.
The Bridgestones seem much more prone to wear, but that’s a fair trade-off given their excellent performance—after all, you can’t have everything. I can’t comment on their performance in the rain, as I haven’t had the chance to drive in such conditions yet.
To wrap up, they are quiet and feature a very solid sidewall—though perhaps not quite as good as those found on older Bridgestone models.
I recommend them without hesitation!
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
- 70%from 18 reviews
- 38%would buy again
- 141,160 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers describe the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 as a strong value-focused performance tyre with very good dry and wet grip, confident handling, and stability at speed for the money. However, a large share of users report short tread life (often with heavy/uneven shoulder wear) and many also mention poor refinement as the tyre ages, including increased road noise and a harsher ride. Overall sentiment is mixed, with performance praised but longevity and comfort commonly limiting repeat purchases.
- Very good dry grip and handling
- Strong wet grip and confidence in rain
- Good value/price versus premium brands
- Stable and predictable at higher speeds
- Fast wear/short tread life (often uneven shoulder wear)
- High road noise and mediocre comfort/harsh ride
- Weaker performance in cold temperatures
Summarised by AI from 15 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 18 N Fera Sport SU2 reviewsI've driven the tyre's about 40 000km on my family diesel wagon.The final result is four summers and they're gone.The protector is about 4mm,the outer side of the tires is melted like slick tire,and pieces of rubber come off.After a little bump one of the tires got a puncture in the side board,which surprised me a little,but for the price everything is OK.The grip is very good in wet and dry,they perform good in dynamic driving...when they new :)
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 115 sizes of the Potenza Sport Evo and 138 of the N Fera Sport SU2, 90 of them made in both.
| Category | Potenza Sport Evo | N Fera Sport SU2 |
|---|---|---|
| Season | Summer | Summer |
| Sizes made | 115 sizes, 16 to 22 inch | 138 sizes, 16 to 22 inch |
| Made in both | 90 sizes 205/55 R16205/45 R17205/55 R17215/45 R17215/55 R17225/45 R17225/50 R17225/55 R17205/40 R18215/45 R18225/35 R18225/40 R18and 78 more | |
| EU label wet grip | A99%B1% | A64%B34%C2% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C67%D30%B3% | C36%A26%D25%B13% |
| EU label noise | 71-73 dB B100% | 68-75 dB B80%A20% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 0 of 153 | 2 of 266 |
| On the market since | 2025 | - |
| Replaced | Bridgestone Potenza Sport (2021) | Nexen N Fera SU1 (2012) |
| Awards | Winner: Supersports Tyre of the Year (WhatTyre, 2026/27) | - |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Previous generation: Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 (7 shared tests)
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
This is a revealing match-up because the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo and Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 aim at the same “fast summer road tyre” buyer, but they get there in different ways. The Bridgestone is positioned as a max-performance option with a premium price tag, while the Nexen plays the value-led ultra-high-performance card-often impressing on key safety metrics for the money.
Across three shared 2026 tests, the picture isn't a simple “premium wins” story. Nexen repeatedly posts excellent braking numbers in the large 50-tyre braking test and looks like a strong mid-range safety pick in Autobild, yet it also collapses to last place in the ACE group test due mainly to braking and dry safety deficits. Bridgestone is the inverse: less headline-grabbing in Autobild and hampered by cost/efficiency metrics, but extremely convincing in the ACE test with top-tier braking and no major safety holes.
Conclusion
If you want the most dependable, repeatable high-grip performance-especially when braking hard-Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo is the safer “bet” overall. In the ACE test it delivered standout stopping power (shortest dry braking at 32.85 m and near-best wet braking), translating to a podium finish (3/10) and the strongest dry-safety scoring in the field. It also shows a well-rounded dynamic profile in Autobild (small wins in wet handling, wet circle and curved aquaplaning), plus better wear (51,860 km vs 47,810 km) and comfort.
Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 is the higher-variance choice: it can be brilliant on braking in some contexts (3rd of 50 in the Autobild braking-only mega test; and it beat Bridgestone in Autobild's wet and dry braking by 1.74% and 4.08%), while also being quieter (70.6 dB vs 73.8 dB) and far better value (12.13 vs 16.39 price/1000) with lower rolling resistance (8.04 vs 8.74). However, the ACE test flags a meaningful risk: it recorded the longest braking distances there and finished last overall despite strong economy, suggesting compound/sizing sensitivity or a narrower operating window. The practical takeaway: Nexen can be a smart budget performance buy if your priority is cost, noise and efficiency-just be mindful that its outright safety performance appears less consistent across different test formats and sizes.
Potenza Sport Evo vs N Fera Sport SU2: your questions
Is the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo or the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 the better tyre?
In the 3 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Nexen N Fera Sport SU2 finished ahead 2 times and the Potenza Sport Evo once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the Potenza Sport Evo scores 9.5 and the N Fera Sport SU2 8.4 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the Potenza Sport Evo or the N Fera Sport SU2?
The Potenza Sport Evo led 4 of the 7 wet measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which is better in the dry?
The N Fera Sport SU2 led 2 of the 4 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 1.7% shorter in the dry across 2 tests.
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 7.7/10 for the Potenza Sport Evo and 6.4/10 for the N Fera Sport SU2.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the Potenza Sport Evo 85% from 16 reviews and the N Fera Sport SU2 70% from 18. 86% of Potenza Sport Evo owners would buy it again, against 38% for the N Fera Sport SU2.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The Potenza Sport Evo is made in 115 sizes (16 to 22 inch) and the N Fera Sport SU2 in 138 (16 to 22 inch). 90 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the Potenza Sport Evo is graded A for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the N Fera Sport SU2 A and C.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
Bridgestone Potenza Sport vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
7-0 in 7 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5
1-2 in 3 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Continental SportContact 7
1-2 in 3 shared tests
vs
Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
6-3 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
1-1 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
2-2 in 4 shared tests
vs
Michelin Pilot Sport 5 vs Nexen N Fera Sport SU2
8-1 in 9 shared tests
vs 
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
3-0 in 3 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion