Menu

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN vs Maxxis Premitra HP6

Firestone's Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN and Maxxis's Premitra HP6 both target the “sensible summer touring” buyer, but the shared 2026 test data shows they get there in very different ways. Across three independent tests (ADAC 225/50 R17, Auto Zeitung 235/45 R18, Netzwelt 205/55 R16), the Firestone consistently places higher overall (4/16, 4/10, 3/6) than the Maxxis (8/16, 7/10, 5/6), pointing to a more complete, easier-to-live-with performance balance.

The interesting twist is that the Maxxis can look good in isolated metrics-most notably wet braking in ADAC (33.4 m vs 34.9 m) and Netzwelt (49.9 m vs 51.1 m), plus very low rolling resistance in Netzwelt. But when you zoom out to handling stability, aquaplaning resilience, and real-world “confidence at the limit,” the Firestone builds a clearer case-especially in wet handling and aquaplaning, and in cost-per-kilometre value where measured.

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been three tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of three total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITENthree
three wins

While it might look like the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN is better than the Maxxis Premitra HP6 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Consistently shorter dry braking across all shared tests (3/3 wins; e.g., 34.9 m vs 35.8 m in ADAC)
  • Stronger aquaplaning resistance in both straight and curved measures (e.g., Auto Zeitung 82.6 vs 80.5 km/h; ADAC curved 3.6 vs 3.0 m/s²)
  • More confidence-inspiring wet dynamics overall in Auto Zeitung (faster wet handling 70.9 s vs 74.0 s; much higher subjective wet score 39 vs 20)
  • Better cost-per-kilometre case where measured, with markedly higher predicted mileage in Auto Zeitung (40,000 vs 29,000 km) and best value index (14.13 vs 17.76)
  • Can deliver shorter wet braking in some tests (ADAC 33.4 m vs 34.9 m; Netzwelt 49.9 m vs 51.1 m)
  • Lower fuel consumption/rolling efficiency indicators in parts of the data (ADAC 5.6 vs 5.7 l/100 km; Netzwelt notes lowest rolling resistance)
  • Lower abrasion in ADAC (76 vs 95 mg/km/t), suggesting potentially gentler particulate output under that methodology
  • Slightly lower external noise in Auto Zeitung (70 dB vs 71 dB)

Dry Braking

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN was better during three dry braking tests. On average the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN stopped the vehicle in 1.39% less distance than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
35.4M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
35.9M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
34.4M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
34.9M (+0.5M)
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
36.9M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
37M (+0.1M)
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
34.9M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
35.8M (+0.9M)

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN and Maxxis Premitra HP6 performed equally well in dry handling [s] tests.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
61.8s
Maxxis Premitra HP6
61.8s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Both tyres performed equally well

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
61.8s
Maxxis Premitra HP6
61.8s

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN scored 16% more points than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
25 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP6
21 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
25 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP6
21 Points (-4 Points)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Maxxis Premitra HP6 was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Maxxis Premitra HP6 stopped the vehicle in 1.16% less distance than the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
48.97M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
48.4M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Maxxis Premitra HP6

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
60.9M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
61.9M (+1M)
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
51.1M (+1.2M)
Maxxis Premitra HP6
49.9M
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
34.9M (+1.5M)
Maxxis Premitra HP6
33.4M

Wet Braking - Concrete

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Maxxis Premitra HP6 was better during one wet braking - concrete tests. On average the Maxxis Premitra HP6 stopped the vehicle in 4.99% less distance than the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
40.1M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
38.1M
Wet braking on Concrete in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking - Concrete: Maxxis Premitra HP6

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
40.1M (+2M)
Maxxis Premitra HP6
38.1M

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN was 4.19% faster around a wet lap than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
70.9s
Maxxis Premitra HP6
74s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
70.9s
Maxxis Premitra HP6
74s (+3.1s)

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN scored 48.72% more points than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
39 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP6
20 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
39 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP6
20 Points (-19 Points)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN was 3.42% faster around a wet circle than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
14.1s
Maxxis Premitra HP6
14.6s
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Circle: Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
14.1s
Maxxis Premitra HP6
14.6s (+0.5s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN floated at a 2.69% higher speed than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
79.9Km/H
Maxxis Premitra HP6
77.75Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
82.6Km/H
Maxxis Premitra HP6
80.5Km/H (-2.1Km/H)
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
77.2Km/H
Maxxis Premitra HP6
75Km/H (-2.2Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN slipped out at a 16.67% higher speed than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
3.6m/sec2
Maxxis Premitra HP6
3m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
3.6m/sec2
Maxxis Premitra HP6
3m/sec2 (-0.6m/sec2)

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN and Maxxis Premitra HP6 performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
5 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP6
5 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tyres performed equally well

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
5 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP6
5 Points

Noise

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Maxxis Premitra HP6 was better during one noise tests. On average the Maxxis Premitra HP6 measured 1.41% quieter than the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
71dB
Maxxis Premitra HP6
70dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Maxxis Premitra HP6

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
71dB (+1dB)
Maxxis Premitra HP6
70dB

Wear

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN was better during one wear tests. On average the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN is predicted to cover 13.69% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
38350KM
Maxxis Premitra HP6
33100KM
Predicted tread life in KM, higher is better

Best In Wear: Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
40000KM
Maxxis Premitra HP6
29000KM (-11000KM)
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
36700KM (-500KM)
Maxxis Premitra HP6
37200KM

Value

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN was better during one value tests. On average the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN proved to have a 20.44% better value based on price/1000km than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
14.13Price/1000
Maxxis Premitra HP6
17.76Price/1000
Euros/1000km based on cost/wear, lower is better

Best In Value: Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
14.13Price/1000
Maxxis Premitra HP6
17.76Price/1000 (+3.63Price/1000)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN had a 2.7% lower rolling resistance than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
7.2kg / t
Maxxis Premitra HP6
7.4kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
7.2kg / t
Maxxis Premitra HP6
7.4kg / t (+0.2kg / t)

Fuel Consumption

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Maxxis Premitra HP6 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Maxxis Premitra HP6 used 1.75% less fuel than the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
5.7l/100km
Maxxis Premitra HP6
5.6l/100km
Fuel consumption in Litres per 100 km, lower is better

Best In Fuel Consumption: Maxxis Premitra HP6

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
5.7l/100km (+0.1l/100km)
Maxxis Premitra HP6
5.6l/100km

Abrasion

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Maxxis Premitra HP6 was better during one abrasion tests. On average the Maxxis Premitra HP6 emitted 20% less particle wear matter than the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN.

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
95mg/km/t
Maxxis Premitra HP6
76mg/km/t
Weight of Tyre Wear Particles Lost (mg/km/t), lower is better

Best In Abrasion: Maxxis Premitra HP6

Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
95mg/km/t (+19mg/km/t)
Maxxis Premitra HP6
76mg/km/t

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN and Maxxis Premitra HP6.

In total the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN has been reviewed 10 times and drivers have given the tyre 88% overall.

The Maxxis Premitra HP6 has been reviewed 1 times and drivers have given the tyre 73% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN.

Best Review for the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN
Given 88% 255/40 R19 on mostly motorways for 20,000 average miles
So far, so good,... Very good. Mainly highway with some spirited drive. Only 4000 km so far in 4 different countries. Very happy with the tires. Handling and comfort are excellent (well, it's a Jag), but the noise is dependent on the asphalt and psi in the tires.
Helpful 1111 - tyre reviewed on May 11, 2024
View all Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Maxxis Premitra HP6
Given 73% 215/45 R17 on mostly country roads for 6,000 spirited miles
I have the OE version of the tire for BMW, which is a AAA version in 215/45 17. They were mounted on the rear axle of a Ford Fiesta ST Line 155 MH for testing.
Continental Premium Contact 6 tires are used up front.
The MAXXIS tires are very quiet, precise, and light. I'm convinced they're absolutely on par with the Continentals, as my car zips around fast corners with absolute neutrality and remains neutral with every load change.
Helpful 833 - tyre reviewed on July 3, 2025
View all Maxxis Premitra HP6 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

Taken as a whole, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN is the stronger all-rounder and the safer recommendation for most drivers. It wins dry braking in all three shared tests (e.g., 34.4 m vs 34.9 m in Auto Zeitung; 34.9 m vs 35.8 m in ADAC) and repeatedly shows superior aquaplaning resistance (Auto Zeitung straight aquaplaning 82.6 vs 80.5 km/h; ADAC curved aquaplaning 3.6 vs 3.0 m/s²). It also delivered a major durability/value advantage in Auto Zeitung (40,000 km vs 29,000 km predicted wear and a better value index), which is the kind of difference drivers actually feel in ownership costs.

The Maxxis Premitra HP6's best argument is targeted efficiency and occasional strong wet stopping-ADAC also credits it with low fuel use (5.6 vs 5.7 l/100 km) and markedly lower abrasion (76 vs 95 mg/km/t). However, professional testers repeatedly flag its dynamic weaknesses: less precise steering, weaker wet-road behaviour, and in Auto Zeitung an unpredictable wet-limit balance plus poor predicted tread life. If your priority is squeezing a bit more wet-braking distance in some conditions or chasing low rolling resistance, the HP6 can make sense-but for a dependable summer tyre that blends braking, stability and ownership value, the Firestone is the more convincing choice.
Key Differences
  • Overall test ranking consistently favours Firestone (4/16, 4/10, 3/6) over Maxxis (8/16, 7/10, 5/6), indicating a broader performance envelope
  • Dry braking is a clear Firestone advantage across sizes (wins 3/3), even if margins are sometimes small
  • Wet braking is split: Maxxis leads in ADAC and Netzwelt, but Firestone leads in Auto Zeitung-so Maxxis's wet-stop edge isn't consistent across methodologies and conditions
  • Aquaplaning resistance strongly favours Firestone in the measured tests (straight and curved), aligning with multiple reports of better wet security
  • Durability/value diverges sharply depending on test: Auto Zeitung heavily favours Firestone (40k vs 29k km), while ADAC shows near parity (36.7k vs 37.2k km), suggesting Maxxis's longevity is more uncertain and can be weak in some fitments
  • Handling character: Firestone is repeatedly described as safe/neutral/predictable, while Maxxis is criticised for weaker precision and, in Auto Zeitung, a less predictable wet-limit breakaway
Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Overall Winner: Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Firestone Roadhawk 2 ENLITEN has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:

Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.