Menu

Hankook Ventus Evo vs Maxxis Premitra HP6

This is an interesting matchup because these two summer tyres are aimed at slightly different buyers: the Hankook Ventus Evo is positioned as a max-performance summer tyre, while the Maxxis Premitra HP6 is more of a touring-oriented summer option that still tries to deliver sporty manners. Both were tested in the same key size (225/45 R17) across two 2026 group tests, giving a solid like-for-like look at how they behave in the dry, the wet, and on efficiency/comfort metrics.

Across both tests, the pattern is consistent: the Hankook plays like a near-premium performance tyre, repeatedly leading the wet discipline (braking, aquaplaning, and wet handling) and staying very competitive on dry roads. The Maxxis, meanwhile, looks like a value-focused all-rounder with one standout card-dry handling speed-plus better efficiency and slightly better comfort, but with noticeably less wet “trust” at and beyond the limit on subjective ratings.

Test Results

Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been two tests which compare both tyres directly!

Summary of two total tests comparing both tyres directly
TyreTest WinsPerformance
Hankook Ventus Evotwo
two wins

While it might look like the Hankook Ventus Evo is better than the Maxxis Premitra HP6 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.

Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.

Key Strengths

  • Class-leading wet braking and wet handling across both shared tests (e.g., 27.66 m vs 29.53 m wet braking)
  • Stronger aquaplaning resistance in straight and curved tests (78.8 km/h vs 74.6 km/h straight aquaplaning)
  • More confidence-inspiring at the limit in the wet, reflected in very high subjective wet scores (8.7 vs 6.3)
  • Competitive dry performance with better dry braking in both tests (about 1.3-1.4 m shorter)
  • Better rolling resistance/efficiency in both tests (roughly 13% advantage), supporting lower fuel/energy use
  • Slightly better comfort scores in both datasets (6.6 vs 6.5)
  • Can be very quick on a dry handling circuit (wins one test: 72.83 s vs 73.48 s)
  • Generally consistent mid-pack objective results with no single catastrophic weakness noted in one professional review

Dry Braking

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Evo was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Evo stopped the vehicle in 3.52% less distance than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Hankook Ventus Evo
37.32M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
38.68M
Dry braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Dry Braking: Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook Ventus Evo
37.33M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
38.66M (+1.33M)
Hankook Ventus Evo
37.3M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
38.7M (+1.4M)

Dry Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Maxxis Premitra HP6 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Maxxis Premitra HP6 was 0.09% faster around a lap than the Hankook Ventus Evo.

Hankook Ventus Evo
73.84s
Maxxis Premitra HP6
73.77s
Dry handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Dry Handling [s]: Maxxis Premitra HP6

Hankook Ventus Evo
73.48s (+0.65s)
Maxxis Premitra HP6
72.83s
Hankook Ventus Evo
74.2s
Maxxis Premitra HP6
74.7s (+0.5s)

Subj. Dry Handling

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Evo was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Evo scored 7.5% more points than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Hankook Ventus Evo
8 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP6
7.4 Points
Subjective Dry Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook Ventus Evo
8.4 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP6
8.4 Points
Hankook Ventus Evo
7.6 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP6
6.4 Points (-1.2 Points)

Wet Braking

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Evo was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Evo stopped the vehicle in 6.32% less distance than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Hankook Ventus Evo
35.43M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
37.82M
Wet braking in meters, lower is better

Best In Wet Braking: Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook Ventus Evo
27.66M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
29.53M (+1.87M)
Hankook Ventus Evo
43.2M
Maxxis Premitra HP6
46.1M (+2.9M)

Wet Handling [s]

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Evo was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Evo was 3.19% faster around a wet lap than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Hankook Ventus Evo
69.8s
Maxxis Premitra HP6
72.1s
Wet handling time in seconds, lower is better

Best In Wet Handling [s]: Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook Ventus Evo
68.69s
Maxxis Premitra HP6
71.1s (+2.41s)
Hankook Ventus Evo
70.9s
Maxxis Premitra HP6
73.1s (+2.2s)

Subj. Wet Handling

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Evo was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Evo scored 27.59% more points than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Hankook Ventus Evo
8.7 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP6
6.3 Points
Subjective Wet Handling Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook Ventus Evo
8.7 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP6
6.3 Points (-2.4 Points)

Wet Circle

Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Evo was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Evo had 5.19% higher lateral wet grip than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Hankook Ventus Evo
0.77m/s
Maxxis Premitra HP6
0.73m/s
Lateral wet grip in m/s squared, higher is better

Best In Wet Circle: Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook Ventus Evo
0.765m/s
Maxxis Premitra HP6
0.733m/s (-0.03m/s)

Straight Aqua

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Evo was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Evo floated at a 5.34% higher speed than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Hankook Ventus Evo
78.81Km/H
Maxxis Premitra HP6
74.6Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H, higher is better

Best In Straight Aqua: Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook Ventus Evo
78.81Km/H
Maxxis Premitra HP6
74.59Km/H (-4.22Km/H)
Hankook Ventus Evo
78.8Km/H
Maxxis Premitra HP6
74.6Km/H (-4.2Km/H)

Curved Aquaplaning

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Evo was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Evo slipped out at a 4.17% higher speed than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Hankook Ventus Evo
3.84m/sec2
Maxxis Premitra HP6
3.68m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration, higher is better

Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook Ventus Evo
3.84m/sec2
Maxxis Premitra HP6
3.68m/sec2 (-0.16m/sec2)
Hankook Ventus Evo
3.84m/sec2
Maxxis Premitra HP6
3.68m/sec2 (-0.16m/sec2)

Subj. Comfort

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Maxxis Premitra HP6 was better during two subj. comfort tests. On average the Maxxis Premitra HP6 scored 1.52% more points than the Hankook Ventus Evo.

Hankook Ventus Evo
6.5 Points
Maxxis Premitra HP6
6.6 Points
Subjective Comfort Score, higher is better

Best In Subj. Comfort: Maxxis Premitra HP6

Hankook Ventus Evo
6.5 Points (-0.1 Points)
Maxxis Premitra HP6
6.6 Points
Hankook Ventus Evo
6.5 Points (-0.1 Points)
Maxxis Premitra HP6
6.6 Points

Noise

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Hankook Ventus Evo was better during two noise tests. On average the Hankook Ventus Evo measured 2.45% quieter than the Maxxis Premitra HP6.

Hankook Ventus Evo
67.75dB
Maxxis Premitra HP6
69.45dB
External noise in dB, lower is better

Best In Noise: Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook Ventus Evo
70.7dB
Maxxis Premitra HP6
73.9dB (+3.2dB)
Hankook Ventus Evo
64.8dB
Maxxis Premitra HP6
65dB (+0.2dB)

Rolling Resistance

Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Maxxis Premitra HP6 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Maxxis Premitra HP6 had a 13.17% lower rolling resistance than the Hankook Ventus Evo.

Hankook Ventus Evo
4.86kg / t
Maxxis Premitra HP6
4.22kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t, lower is better

Best In Rolling Resistance: Maxxis Premitra HP6

Hankook Ventus Evo
8.84kg / t (+1.15kg / t)
Maxxis Premitra HP6
7.69kg / t
Hankook Ventus Evo
0.876kg / t (+0.12kg / t)
Maxxis Premitra HP6
0.758kg / t

Real World Driver Reviews

Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Hankook Ventus Evo and Maxxis Premitra HP6.

In total the Hankook Ventus Evo has been reviewed 11 times and drivers have given the tyre 83% overall.

The Maxxis Premitra HP6 has been reviewed 1 times and drivers have given the tyre 73% overall.

This means in real world driving, people prefer the Hankook Ventus Evo.

Best Review for the Hankook Ventus Evo
Given 92% 215/40 R18 on mostly country roads for 250 spirited miles
My initial impressions of the Hankook Ventus EVO are very positive. At the time of writing, this tyre has just launched. Its launch coincided with the previous summer tyres (Dunlop Sport Maxx RT2) on my Alfa Romeo Mito QV warranting replacement due to some cracking on the sidewall (Dunlops were coming up on 6 years of age but still would’ve had tread for 1 or 2 summers more). The above, combined with getting a good deal on them, meant I chose to give these Hankooks a try.

The size is a bit of an unusual one, and therefore the price of this set, compared to a set of... Continue reading this review using the link below
Helpful 1372 - tyre reviewed on April 4, 2025
View all Hankook Ventus Evo driver reviews >>
Best Review for the Maxxis Premitra HP6
Given 73% 215/45 R17 on mostly country roads for 6,000 spirited miles
I have the OE version of the tire for BMW, which is a AAA version in 215/45 17. They were mounted on the rear axle of a Ford Fiesta ST Line 155 MH for testing.
Continental Premium Contact 6 tires are used up front.
The MAXXIS tires are very quiet, precise, and light. I'm convinced they're absolutely on par with the Continentals, as my car zips around fast corners with absolute neutrality and remains neutral with every load change.
Helpful 833 - tyre reviewed on July 3, 2025
View all Maxxis Premitra HP6 driver reviews >>

Conclusion

If you care most about wet safety and confidence, the Hankook Ventus Evo is the clear winner in the data provided. It beats the Maxxis in wet braking by a meaningful margin in both tests (43.2 m vs 46.1 m; 27.66 m vs 29.53 m), and it also leads on wet handling and aquaplaning (straight aquaplaning 78.8 km/h vs 74.6 km/h in both datasets). Just as importantly, the professional feedback aligns with the numbers: the Hankook is described as confident and attackable at the limit in the wet, backed by a huge subjective wet-handling advantage in one test (8.7 vs 6.3).

The Maxxis Premitra HP6 makes the strongest case for drivers who prioritize running costs and day-to-day comfort, but still want some sporty edge. It's consistently better on rolling resistance (about 13% lower in both tests) and slightly ahead on comfort scoring (6.6 vs 6.5). It also managed a real headline result by going fastest on the dry handling course in one test (72.83 s vs 73.48 s). The trade-off is that it doesn't stop as strongly (dry braking loses in both tests) and, crucially, it inspires less confidence in the wet when pushed.

Practical takeaway: the Hankook is the smarter “do everything fast and safe” summer choice-especially for mixed weather, motorway spray, and spirited B-road driving-while the Maxxis is the pragmatic value pick if efficiency and comfort matter most and your driving style (and local climate) doesn't demand class-leading wet performance.
Key Differences
  • Wet stopping power: Hankook is consistently stronger (e.g., 27.66 m vs 29.53 m), a meaningful safety margin in emergency braking
  • Aquaplaning resistance: Hankook leads clearly (78.8 km/h vs 74.6 km/h straight aquaplaning), improving stability in heavy rain
  • Wet drivability at the limit: Hankook feels more progressive and confidence-inspiring (subjective wet handling 8.7 vs 6.3 in one test)
  • Efficiency: Maxxis has substantially lower rolling resistance (~13% better), likely reducing fuel/energy consumption
  • Dry circuit pace: Maxxis can edge Hankook on dry handling time (wins one test), but Hankook is generally close and brakes better
  • Overall ranking/positioning: Hankook is a consistent front-runner (3rd of 9; 3rd of 13 with a 'Highly Recommended' award) while Maxxis is mid-pack (6th of 9; 8th of 13)
Hankook Ventus Evo

Overall Winner: Hankook Ventus Evo

Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Hankook Ventus Evo has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.

Similar Comparisons

Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:

Footnote

This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.

Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.

As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.

Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.