Menu

Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S Test Results

Tested 2024 to 2025 2 publications

Tested 2 times by independent publications, the Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S averages a finish of 20th.

  • 2Independent tests
  • 0Test wins
  • 0Podium finishes
  • 20thAverage finish
  • 10%Field beaten on average
  • 2Publications
Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S

2 tests, 2024 to 2025

The latest test

2025 Autobild Crossover SUV All Season Test P10 of 10

The Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S attracts attention as a budget option with surprisingly good performance on snow. However, this is where the positives end. The tyre exhibits significantly excessive wet braking distances that pose a genuine safety concern, combined with difficult-to-control handling behavior in wet conditions and an unharmonious feel on dry roads. The testers conclude with a clear warning: drivers should avoid this tyre entirely despite its tempting low price.

Strong: Noise Weak: Dry Braking, Dry Handling, Wet Braking, Wet Handling, Straight Aqua, Curved Aquaplaning Winner: Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6

Record by discipline

Where the Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.

Discipline Tests Avg finish Field beaten Firsts
Dry
Dry Braking 2 P17.5 of 24.5 19% -
Dry Handling 1 P12 of 12 0% -
Wet
Wet Braking 2 P21.5 of 24.5 8% -
Wet Handling 1 P12 of 12 0% -
Straight Aqua 1 P12 of 12 0% -
Curved Aquaplaning 1 P11 of 12 9% -
Snow
Snow Braking 1 P4 of 12 73% -
Snow Traction 1 P7 of 12 45% -
Snow Handling 1 P8 of 12 36% -
Snow Slalom 1 P5 of 12 64% -
Comfort
Subj. Comfort 1 P8 of 10 22% -
Noise 1 P1 of 12 100% 1
Value
Rolling Resistance 1 P10 of 12 18% -

Performance Analysis

Drawn from 2 tests. Updated October 29, 2026.

Long wet stopping distances recur in the Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S's two tests. Auto Bild's 2024 market overview put wet braking 31st of 37, 36.4% behind the best. In the 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV comparison it was last overall among ten, with wet braking last of 12 at 54.99 m, 37.9% longer than the best. Wet handling was also last, 12.1% behind the best speed, and testers found it difficult to control. Dry braking, dry handling and straight aquaplaning resistance were all last of 12 too, prompting a clear warning to avoid it despite its low price.

The positives were low measured noise, the cheapest purchase price and comparatively better snow braking. Noise was first of 12 in the 2025 test, while snow braking was fourth, 7.1% behind the best, and slalom fifth. The notes unusually call those snow results third and fourth, differing from the numerical positions. Snow traction was only seventh and handling eighth of 12, so the broad praise for snow does not mean it led every winter discipline. Rolling resistance was tenth of 12 and comfort eighth of ten. Dry braking in 2024 was 23rd of 37, 15.2% behind the best, offering no evidence that the repeated wet-stopping deficit was offset by consistently short dry stops.

Performance Strengths

  • Road noise Minor
    Details
    • Lowest measured noise, 72.14 dB, 1st of 12, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV test
  • Value for money Minor
    Details
    • Cheapest purchase price, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV test; testers still warned against purchase
  • Snow braking Minor
    Details
    • 4th of 12, 7.1% behind best, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV test; notes unusually say third

Performance Weaknesses

  • Wet braking Moderate in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • 31st of 37, 36.4% behind best, 2024 Auto Bild market overview
    • Last of 12, 54.99 m, 37.9% behind best, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV test
  • Wet handling Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Last of 12, 12.1% behind best speed, difficult to control, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV test
  • Dry braking Moderate
    Details
    • 23rd of 37, 15.2% behind best, 2024 Auto Bild market overview
    • Last of 12, 18.1% behind best, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV test
  • Dry handling Minor in 1 of 1 tests
    Details
    • Last of 12, 4.7% behind best speed, unharmonious feel, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV test
  • Aquaplaning resistance Minor
    Details
    • Straight last of 12, 10.8% behind best; curved 11th of 12, 14.3% behind best, 2025 Auto Bild Sportscars SUV test

Every test, newest first 2

Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.

2025 1 test
P10 of 10 Beat 0% of the field

2025 Autobild Crossover SUV All Season Test

Auto Bild Sportscars 215/50 R18

The Fortuna Eco Plus 2 4S attracts attention as a budget option with surprisingly good performance on snow. However, this is where the positives end. The tyre exhibits significantly excessive wet braking distances that pose a genuine safety concern, combined with difficult-to-control handling behavior in wet conditions and an unharmonious feel on dry roads. The testers conclude with a clear warning: drivers should avoid this tyre entirely despite its tempting low price.

StrongNoise WeakDry BrakingDry HandlingWet BrakingWet HandlingStraight AquaCurved Aquaplaning WinnerBridgestone Turanza All Season 6

2024 1 test

Back to the Fortuna Ecoplus 2 4S overview

Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Fortuna tyres

Overview

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.