Dunlop All Season 2 vs Viking Fourtech Plus
- TR Score
- 8.7/10
- Owners say
- 70% · 7
- TR Score
- 8.2/10
- Owners say
- 84% · 1
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Dunlop All Season 2 finished ahead 3 times and the Fourtech Plus once. The All Season 2 lasted 51.4% longer in the wear tests; the Fourtech Plus held 5.5% more grip in curved aquaplaning.
Data updated
Which should you buy?
Choose Dunlop All Season 2 for all-round safety with standout dry stops, stronger winter performance, and far better wear/value. Pick Viking Fourtech Plus if your priority is wet-road aquaplaning security and you accept shorter tread life.
Where the All Season 2 is stronger
- Consistently shorter dry braking (e.g., 41.6 m vs 43.1 m; +3-4%)
- Stronger winter ability (better snow traction/ice braking in ADAC)
- Class-leading longevity and low abrasion (+40-63% mileage advantage)
Where the Fourtech Plus is stronger
- Superior aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved)
- Occasional wet-braking advantage (e.g., 55.4 m vs 57.3 m)
- Stable, safe handling feel on wet and dry at moderate speeds
The bullet points are analysis of the shared tests and of owner reviews; the measured wins in each discipline are in the tables below. Where the two disagree, the figures are right.
All Season 2 vs Fourtech Plus at a glance
| Category | All Season 2 | Gap | Fourtech Plus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared tests won4 shared tests | 3 | 1 | |
| Dry5 measurements | 4 | The All Season 2 stopped 2.9% shorter in the dry (4 tests) | 1 |
| Wet11 measurements | 4 | The Fourtech Plus held 5.5% more grip in curved aquaplaning (2 tests) | 7 |
| Snow6 measurements | 4 | 2 | |
| Ice1 measurement | 1 | 0 | |
| Comfort2 measurements | 1 | Level between the two. | 1 |
| Value7 measurements | 5 | The All Season 2 lasted 51.4% longer in the wear tests (2 tests) | 1 |
| Tyre Reviews Scoreevery test and review we hold | 8.7/10 | The All Season 2 by 0.5 | 8.2/10 |
| Owner rating7 and 1 reviews | 70% | The Fourtech Plus by 14 points | 84% |
| Sizes madeEU label registrations | 99 | 50 sizes made in both | 51 |
Wins count every measurement the shared tests recorded for both tyres; a tick marks the tyre ahead on that line. Subjective driver scores count as wins but are never averaged, because each test uses its own scale.
Head to head in 4 tests, 2024 to 2025
Each row is one published test in which both tyres ran on the same car, in the same size, on the same day. The line is the whole field, winner on the left.
| Test | All Season 2 | Field | Fourtech Plus |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 All Season 30 Tyre Braking Test | P15 of 30 | P21 of 30 | |
| 2025 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | P6 of 16 | P8 of 16 | |
| 2024 AutoBild All Season Tyre Test | P6 of 15 | P11 of 15 | |
| 2024 All Season Tyre Market Overview | P11 of 37 | P10 of 37 |
Performance profile
9 measurements from the 4 shared tests, each tyre shown as its share of the better figure in every test.
Where each is furthest ahead
All Season 2
Fourtech Plus
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
In each test the better of the two figures counts as 100% and the other as its share of it, so a 36 m stop against 34.2 m is 95%; each spoke averages the shared tests that recorded it. The scale stops at 95%: a point further in sits on the hub's edge, hollow. 10 measurements recorded in only one shared test are left off; every measurement is in the table further down.
Where each scores higher
All Season 2
Fourtech Plus
Point at or tap any spoke for both tyres' figures.
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
Every measurement, side by side
Averages of the figures both tyres posted in the same tests. The gap is the average of each test's own gap, so figures from different cars and years are never mixed. Open a discipline for its measurements, and a measurement for every test's figure.
| Measurement | All Season 2 | Gap | Fourtech Plus | Wins | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42.23 | 2.9% | 43.48 | 4-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 93.9 | 1% | 94.8 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 49.38 | 1.1% | 48.65 | 2-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 40.2 | 1.2% | 39.7 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 72.4 | 0.4% | 72.1 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 11.63 | 3.9% | 12.1 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 74.05 | 2.4% | 75.8 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 2.98 | 5.5% | 3.14 | 0-2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 16.8 | 1.4% | 16.9 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 1,428 | 3.4% | 1,440 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 52.5 | 1.7% | 51.6 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 3.87 | 5.2% | 3.68 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 14.8 | 5.7% | 15.7 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 72.75 | 0 dB | 72.7 | 1-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 65,055 | 51.4% | 43,100 | 2-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 7.68 | 1.5% | 7.8 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 5.25 | 2% | 5.15 | 0-1 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 52 | 24.6% | 69 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 533 | 30% | 761 | 1-0 | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Braking distances and lap times are better when lower; speeds, wear and grip figures when higher. A test's figures are its own: sizes, cars, surfaces and temperatures differ from one to the next, which is why the averages here are only ever of tests the two tyres shared. "Scored" rows are subjective driver ratings: each test uses its own scale, so only the wins are counted.
Scores beyond the shared tests
On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the All Season 2 scores 8.7 and the Fourtech Plus 8.2 out of 10.
| All Season 2 | Category | Fourtech Plus | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 43 | Dry | 32 | ||
| 72 | Wet | 78 | ||
| 46 | Comfort | 30 | ||
| 94 | Value | 56 | ||
| 90 | Snow | 61 | ||
| 79 | Ice | 26 | ||
Category scores are percentiles among tyres of the same season and class: 90 means this tyre out-performs 90% of them, measured across every test we hold, not only the ones it appeared in.
What owners say
| All Season 2 | Category | Fourtech Plus | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.4 | Dry Grip | 8 | ||
| 7.8 | Wet Grip | 8 | ||
| 7.7 | Road Feedback | 8 | ||
| 5.3 | Handling | 8 | ||
| 7.4 | Wear | - | ||
| 8 | Comfort | 9 | ||
| 8 | Snow Grip | 10 | ||
| 8 | Ice Grip | 8 | ||
Owners rate the All Season 2 70% from 7 reviews and the Fourtech Plus 84% from 1. Reviews are vetted by hand before publication; ownership is not verified.
Dunlop All Season 2
- 70%from 7 reviews
- 43%would buy again
- 47,065 milesdriven by reviewers
Drivers' feedback on the Dunlop All Season 2 is mixed but generally favorable, with the highest-scoring reviews strongly praising confident all-season traction-especially in wet and colder conditions-and good real-world mileage. Several users also describe it as good value and secure in everyday driving. A smaller but recurring set of comments mentions noticeable noise/squeal and less satisfying handling/understeer on warmer, dry roads; one very low score reports poor sidewall durability but this is not widely echoed.
- Strong grip/traction in wet and cold conditions
- Good all-season versatility (including light snow capability)
- Good tread life/mileage when maintained
- Good value for money
- Noticeable road noise/squeaking
- Less precise handling on warm/dry roads (can feel like understeer)
Summarised by AI from 7 vetted reviews; the reviews themselves are on the tyre page.
All 7 All Season 2 reviewsFrom my experience tyre is very good in cold, wet and damp condition. On dry and warmer asphalt not so great at handling.
Wear is expetional, they wear very little.
Viking Fourtech Plus
- 84%from 1 reviews
- 1,000 milesdriven by reviewers
All 1 Fourtech Plus reviewsA good all season tyre with excellent braking and grip on snow, like a winter tyre. High comfort and low noise.
Sizes, EU label and lineage
From the EU label registrations for each tyre: 99 sizes of the All Season 2 and 51 of the Fourtech Plus, 50 of them made in both.
| Category | All Season 2 | Fourtech Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Season | All Season | All Season |
| Sizes made | 99 sizes, 13 to 21 inch | 51 sizes, 13 to 19 inch |
| Made in both | 50 sizes 155/80 R13175/70 R13155/65 R14165/65 R14165/70 R14175/65 R14175/70 R14185/60 R14185/65 R14175/65 R15185/55 R15185/60 R15and 38 more | |
| EU label wet grip | B51%C46%D2%A1% | B70%C30% |
| EU label rolling resistance | C68%B30%D2% | C59%D41% |
| EU label noise | 70-72 dB B100% | 71-72 dB B100% |
| Severe snow (3PMSF) sizes | 175 of 175 | 56 of 56 |
| On the market since | 2023 | 2022 |
Label grades are shown as the share of registered sizes carrying each grade, so "B (88%), C (12%)" means most sizes are B. Grades vary by size; check the label for yours.
Reading the results
Written from the test results and owner reviews above. It is analysis, not a measurement: where it and the tables disagree, the tables are right.
Dunlop All Season 2 and Viking Fourtech Plus target the same all-season touring brief, but they go about it differently. Across four shared tests in 2024-2025, Dunlop consistently posts shorter dry stops and markedly stronger longevity, while Viking counters with better aquaplaning resistance and flashes of wet braking speed.
In objective rankings, Dunlop generally finishes ahead (three comparative wins to Viking's one), driven by superior wear, abrasion, and value. Viking, however, proves competent in dynamic wet safety margins thanks to stronger straight-line and curved aquaplaning results and competitive handling feel in some sizes.
Conclusion
Overall, Dunlop All Season 2 is the more rounded, higher-value option. It brakes shorter on dry in every shared test, is materially better on snow/ice braking and traction, and dominates durability: +40% to +63% higher projected mileage and lower abrasion. Those advantages translate into fewer replacements and lower running costs, reinforced by Dunlop's better price/value scores.
Viking Fourtech Plus earns its case with wet-road security reserves: it edges Dunlop in aquaplaning and posts a couple of wet-braking wins, with safe, predictable manners. If your priority is wet-weather standing-water performance over the long haul, Viking is a sensible budget-leaning pick. For most drivers seeking balanced safety year-round and long service life, Dunlop is the clear choice.
All Season 2 vs Fourtech Plus: your questions
Is the Dunlop All Season 2 or the Viking Fourtech Plus the better tyre?
In the 4 independent tests that ran both tyres, the Dunlop All Season 2 finished ahead 3 times and the Fourtech Plus once. On the Tyre Reviews Score, which weighs every test and review we hold, the All Season 2 scores 8.7 and the Fourtech Plus 8.2 out of 10.
Which is better in the wet, the All Season 2 or the Fourtech Plus?
The Fourtech Plus led 7 of the 11 wet measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it held 5.5% more grip in curved aquaplaning across 2 tests.
Which is better in the dry?
The All Season 2 led 4 of the 5 dry measurements the shared tests recorded. On average it stopped 2.9% shorter in the dry across 4 tests.
Which is better in snow?
The All Season 2 led 4 of the 6 snow measurements the shared tests recorded.
Which lasts longer and costs less to run?
The All Season 2 lasted 51.4% longer in the wear tests (2 tests); the Fourtech Plus used 2% less fuel (2 tests).
Which is quieter and more comfortable?
Owners rate comfort 8/10 for the All Season 2 and 9/10 for the Fourtech Plus.
What do owners say?
Owners rate the All Season 2 70% from 7 reviews and the Fourtech Plus 84% from 1.
Are they available in the same sizes?
The All Season 2 is made in 99 sizes (13 to 21 inch) and the Fourtech Plus in 51 (13 to 19 inch). 50 sizes are available in both. On the EU label the All Season 2 is graded B for wet grip and C for rolling resistance in most sizes; the Fourtech Plus B and C.
Which is the newer tyre?
The All Season 2 is the newer design: it reached the market in 2023, the Fourtech Plus in 2022.
More comparisons with these tyres
vs
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Dunlop All Season 2
10-0 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Dunlop All Season 2 vs Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
0-4 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Dunlop All Season 2 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2
0-4 in 4 shared tests
vs 
Dunlop All Season 2 vs Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3
0-10 in 10 shared tests
vs 
Dunlop All Season 2 vs Nexen N Blue 4Season 2
4-2 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Dunlop All Season 2 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2
0-2 in 2 shared tests
vs 
Dunlop All Season 2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
1-5 in 6 shared tests
vs 
Dunlop All Season 2 vs Vredestein Quatrac
0-6 in 6 shared tests
Run either of these?
Your review is the part of this page no test can supply: how the tyre wore, how it aged, what it was like in the rain in year three. It takes about five minutes.
Where this data comes from
Finishing positions and measurements are transcribed from each published test. A test only counts here when both tyres ran in it, so every figure was recorded on the same car, size and day as the one it is compared to.
About the TR Score
The Tyre Reviews Score rates each tyre out of 10 from every independent test result and vetted owner review we hold, so two tyres can be compared even before a test has run them together.
Who does the testing
Every test published as a Tyre Reviews test is run by Jonathan Benson, who has been testing tyres independently since 2007.
Discussion