Continental AllSeasonContact 2 vs Kleber Quadraxer 3
The pattern is clear: Continental dominates wet grip and overall balance, with strong subjective handling and excellent rolling resistance in several tests. Kleber counters with shorter dry braking in many sizes, solid aquaplaning resistance, lower noise in some results, and a friendlier purchase price. If you're deciding between year-round consistency and budget-led winter assurance, this comparison will clarify where each tyre shines.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been seven tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | seven |
While it might look like the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is better than the Kleber Quadraxer 3 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Outstanding wet braking across all shared tests (e.g., 44.9 m vs 47.9 m; +6% advantage)
- Strong wet handling and lateral grip (consistent leads in wet handling and wet circle)
- Excellent snow traction and balanced winter performance
- Very competitive rolling resistance in multiple tests, with strong subjective handling and comfort
- Frequently shorter dry braking distances (e.g., 39.3 m vs 41.5 m)
- Good aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved) across sizes
- Low noise and comfortable ride; attractive pricing/value
- Solid snow capability and dependable winter balance for the money
Dry Braking
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during six dry braking tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 stopped the vehicle in 3.87% less distance than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Dry Braking: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 1.14% faster around a lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 0.07% faster around a lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 10% more points than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during seven wet braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 6.91% less distance than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Wet Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 2.8% faster around a wet lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during three wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 5.44% faster around a wet lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 scored 10% more points than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during three wet circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 4.01% faster around a wet circle than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Wet Circle: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during four straight aqua tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 floated at a 4.3% higher speed than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Straight Aqua: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during four curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 slipped out at a 5.94% higher speed than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow braking tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 stopped the vehicle in 0.61% less distance than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Snow Braking: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 accelerated 9.75% faster than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Snow Traction: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during two snow traction tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had 0.91% better snow traction than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Snow Traction: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one snow handling [s] tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was 1.03% faster around a lap than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 0.18% faster around a lap than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Snow Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 scored 5% more points than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 provided 1.06% more lateral grip than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Snow Circle: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was 1.19% faster through a slalom than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Snow Slalom: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 and Kleber Quadraxer 3 performed equally well in subj. comfort tests.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Both tyres performed equally well
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one noise tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 measured 0.66% quieter than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Noise: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Tyre Weight
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one tyre weight tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 weighed 5.11% less than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Tyre Weight: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Tyre Weight winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was better during one wear tests. On average the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 is predicted to cover 7.57% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Kleber Quadraxer 3.
Best In Wear: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during two value tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 proved to have a 10.07% better value based on price/1000km than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Value: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 had a 0.13% lower rolling resistance than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during two fuel consumption tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 used 0.96% less fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Abrasion
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 was better during two abrasion tests. On average the Kleber Quadraxer 3 lost 24.43% less particle wear matter than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.
Best In Abrasion: Kleber Quadraxer 3
See how the Abrasion winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 highly, praising its excellent wet grip and braking, quiet and comfortable ride, and balanced performance across seasons, including competent snow traction. Many high-scoring reviews also note strong longevity and good efficiency/low rolling resistance. The main drawbacks reported by a noticeable minority are a softer sidewall feel with vague/less precise steering (especially in warm, dry conditions or at higher speeds) and some mixed reports of faster front-axle wear. Overall, it's a confident, well-rounded choice for mild climates and everyday driving.
Based on 45 reviews with an average rating of 83%
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Driver Reviews
Drivers rate the Kleber Quadraxer 3 very highly, praising its confident winter capability (snow and ice), excellent wet grip with strong aquaplaning resistance, and a quiet, comfortable ride. Many note solid dry performance for everyday driving, good longevity, and strong value compared to premium options like Michelin CrossClimate. A few isolated reviews mention high-speed noise or less inspiring dry grip versus previous models, but these are in the minority. Overall, it's viewed as a safe, refined, and durable all-season choice.
Based on 24 reviews with an average rating of 87%
Motorway driving is on par with many other tyres; the wind noise coming from the car is always louder than the tyres themselves, so no trouble there; you get just a wee bit less fuel efficiency overall (compared to the more expensive choice), but it is nothing to transcendental, on the dry they... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
Kleber Quadraxer 3 is the value specialist: it often stops shorter in the dry, rides quietly, shows strong aquaplaning reserves, and typically costs less. It's also a dependable performer in wintry conditions. However, its wet braking and wet handling lag behind the Continental, which matters most for safety-critical everyday driving. If you prioritise budget and winter-tilted performance with good aquaplaning security, the Kleber is compelling; if you want the most complete, wet-secure all-season package, pick the Continental.
Practical takeaway: for year-round confidence and the best wet stopping, choose Continental; for lower cost, quietness, and snow-leaning balance with good aquaplaning, choose Kleber.
Key Differences
- Overall results: Continental wins all 7 shared tests; Kleber records no overall wins
- Wet grip: Continental leads wet braking in every test and dominates wet handling/circle
- Dry braking: Kleber often stops shorter in dry (6 category wins vs 1 for Continental)
- Aquaplaning: Kleber consistently better in straight and curved aquaplaning
- Snow balance: Continental stronger in traction; Kleber edges some snow braking/handling metrics
- Value/noise: Kleber commonly cheaper with lower noise; Continental can be pricier with slightly higher noise
Overall Winner: Continental AllSeasonContact 2
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.