Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
Expect a tight fight: the Blizzak 6 consistently delivers outstanding wet braking (winning 3 of 4 wet stops) and strong fuel-efficiency, while the TS 870 counters with superior snow performance, lower noise, and proven longevity. The outcome hinges on your climate mix-more cold rain and slush vs. frequent, deeper snow-and whether you prioritise efficiency or ultimate all-round control.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been four tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Blizzak 6 | one | |
| Continental WinterContact TS 870 | three |
While it might look like the Continental WinterContact TS 870 is better than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading wet braking in multiple tests (e.g., 34.6 m vs 37.1 m, −6.7%)
- Strong aquaplaning resistance in key evaluations (notably curved aquaplaning wins)
- Lower rolling resistance in most comparisons (efficiency benefit)
- Consistent performance across dry/wet with sporty, precise feel
- Superior snow capability (wins in snow handling across tests, frequent snow braking wins)
- Balanced wet/dry performance with confident steering feel
- Lower noise and higher projected mileage (wear) for better long-term value
- More overall test victories and top rankings across 2024-2025
Dry Braking
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 stopped the vehicle in 0.65% less distance than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Dry Braking: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one dry handling [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was 1.3% faster around a lap than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was 0.36% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during three wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 stopped the vehicle in 4.4% less distance than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.
Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was 1.94% faster around a wet lap than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was 1.14% faster around a wet lap than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was 0.24% faster around a wet circle than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.
Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during two straight aqua tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 floated at a 1.55% higher speed than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Straight Aqua: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during one curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 slipped out at a 13.67% higher speed than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during three snow braking tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 stopped the vehicle in 0.4% less distance than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Snow Braking: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 accelerated 0.59% faster than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Snow Traction: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had 0.32% better snow traction than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Snow Traction: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during two snow handling [s] tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was 4.32% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was 1.33% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one snow slalom tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was 0.3% faster through a slalom than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Snow Slalom: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during two noise tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 measured 1.91% quieter than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Noise: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one wear tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 is predicted to cover 7.65% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Wear: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 was better during one value tests. On average the Continental WinterContact TS 870 proved to have a 15.06% better value based on price/1000km than the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Best In Value: Continental WinterContact TS 870
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was better during two rolling resistance tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 had a 1.14% lower rolling resistance than the Continental WinterContact TS 870.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Bridgestone Blizzak 6
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Continental WinterContact TS 870.
In total the Bridgestone Blizzak 6 has been reviewed 5 times and drivers have given the tyre 92% overall.
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 has been reviewed 22 times and drivers have given the tyre 84% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Bridgestone Blizzak 6.
Conclusion
Bridgestone's Blizzak 6 shines when the roads are cold and wet: it led wet braking repeatedly (up to 6-7% shorter stops vs. TS 870 in several sizes), posted excellent aquaplaning resistance in some tests, and often delivered lower rolling resistance. If your winters skew milder with frequent rain and standing water, the Blizzak 6's wet-road confidence and efficiency make it compelling. If you regularly face sustained snow and mixed winter conditions, the TS 870 remains the more rounded, confidence-inspiring choice.
Key Differences
- Overall results: TS 870 leads overall (3 test wins vs. 1 for Blizzak 6).
- Snow focus: TS 870 consistently quicker on snow handling and traction; edges snow braking in most sizes.
- Wet braking: Blizzak 6 repeatedly stops shorter in the wet (up to ~6-7% advantage).
- Aquaplaning: Mixed-Blizzak 6 excels in some tests (notably curved), TS 870 wins straight-line in others.
- Efficiency vs. longevity: Blizzak 6 usually has lower rolling resistance; TS 870 offers better wear and value scores.
- Refinement: TS 870 tends to be quieter; Blizzak 6 skews sportier in feel.
Overall Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Continental WinterContact TS 870 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.