2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test

Below is all the glorious data from the Auto Bild full winter test, in 205/55 R16. These are the top 20 tyres that made it through the 53 tyre shootout, so they're all essentially good tyres, they're just different shades of good.

In a welcome change, Auto Bild actually published what the reference summer and all season tyres were. They were the Continental PremiumContact 7 summer tyre, and the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 all season tyre. Naturally the summer tyre aced dry and wet, and was useless in snow, however the performance of the Goodyear all season tyre really further throws into question the line between European winter tyres and a well rounded all season tyre.

Dry

In the dry braking test, the Kumho Winter Craft WP52 performed best among winter tyres, stopping in 43.0 meters. The worst-performing winter tyre was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2, which took 46.4 meters to stop - a difference of 3.4 meters. Interestingly, the reference summer tyre outperformed all winter tyres with a stopping distance of 38.6 meters, while the reference all-season tyre was comparable to the best winter tyres at 43.1 meters. The reference budget winter tyre performed significantly worse, needing 47.9 meters to stop.

The Continental WinterContact TS 870 achieved the highest average speed of 110.6 km/h in the dry handling test, while the Firestone Winterhawk 4 was the slowest at 108.2 km/h - a difference of 2.4 km/h. The reference summer tyre again outperformed all winter tyres with an average speed of 115.0 km/h. The reference all-season tyre performed well, matching some of the better winter tyres at 112.6 km/h. The reference budget winter tyre was significantly slower at 106.3 km/h, showing the performance gap in dry conditions.

These results demonstrate that while winter tyres have improved in dry performance, they still lag behind summer tyres in these conditions. The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 and Continental WinterContact TS 870 showed consistent performance across both dry tests, while the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 and Firestone Winterhawk 4 struggled in dry conditions.

Wet

The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 and Kumho Winter Craft WP52 tied for the best wet braking performance among winter tyres, both stopping in 54.0 meters. The worst performer was the Fulda Kristall Control HP2, needing 60.3 meters - a significant difference of 6.3 meters. The reference summer tyre outperformed all tyres with a stopping distance of 52.9 meters, while the reference all-season tyre was close to the best winter tyres at 54.7 meters. The reference budget winter tyre performed extremely poorly, requiring 79.1 meters to stop - highlighting the importance of quality in wet conditions.

The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 achieved the highest average speed of 76.01 km/h in wet handling, while the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was again the slowest at 71.49 km/h - a difference of 4.52 km/h. The reference summer tyre once more outperformed all others with a speed of 77.36 km/h. The reference all-season tyre performed well at 74.52 km/h, while the reference budget winter tyre was significantly slower at 62.36 km/h.

The Hankook Winter I cept RS3 performed best in straight aquaplaning resistance, maintaining control up to 84.5 km/h. The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 performed worst, losing control at 73.0 km/h - a substantial difference of 11.5 km/h. Interestingly, the reference summer tyre (80.4 km/h) and all-season tyre (79.8 km/h) were outperformed by many winter tyres in this test. The reference budget winter tyre performed poorly, losing control at just 66.1 km/h.

The Hankook Winter I cept RS3 also excelled in curved aquaplaning, maintaining 3.93 m/s² of lateral acceleration. The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 struggled most, managing only 1.98 m/s² - a significant difference of 1.95 m/s². The reference summer tyre (3.19 m/s²) and all-season tyre (2.95 m/s²) were outperformed by many winter tyres. The reference budget winter tyre performed very poorly at 1.23 m/s².

These wet tests highlight the superior performance of quality winter tyres in challenging conditions. The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 showed consistent excellence across wet tests, while the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 and Kumho Winter Craft WP52 struggled in multiple wet scenarios. The results also demonstrate that while summer tyres excel in some wet conditions, winter tyres can outperform them in specific scenarios like aquaplaning resistance.

Snow

In snow braking, the Hankook Winter I cept RS3, Semperit Speed Grip 5, and Continental WinterContact TS 870 tied for best performance, stopping in 29.1 meters. The worst performer was the Firestone Winterhawk 4, needing 30.9 meters - a difference of 1.8 meters. As expected, the reference summer tyre performed extremely poorly, requiring 46.1 meters to stop. The reference all-season tyre performed well at 29.7 meters, while the reference budget winter tyre needed 35.8 meters, showing the importance of quality in winter tyres.

The Dunlop Winter Sport 5 provided the best snow traction with 2570 N of pulling force. The Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906+ performed worst with 2271 N - a significant difference of 299 N. The reference summer tyre struggled immensely with only 849 N of pulling force. The reference all-season tyre performed surprisingly well with 2516 N, while the reference budget winter tyre managed 1790 N.

The Giti GitiWinterW2 achieved the highest average speed of 60.9 km/h in snow handling. The Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906+ performed worst at 57.5 km/h - a difference of 3.4 km/h. The reference summer tyre's performance was not recorded for this test. The reference all-season tyre performed well at 59.6 km/h, while the reference budget winter tyre achieved 55.9 km/h.

These snow tests clearly demonstrate the superior performance of winter tyres in snowy conditions compared to summer tyres. The Hankook Winter I cept RS3 and Continental WinterContact TS 870 showed consistent excellence across multiple snow tests. The Firestone Winterhawk 4 and Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906+struggled in various snow scenarios. The all-season tyre performed surprisingly well in snow, often matching or exceeding some winter tyres, while the budget winter tyre consistently underperformed compared to premium options.

Comfort

The Giti GitiWinterW2 was the quietest tyre, producing 70.3 dB of external noise. The Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was the loudest at 72.9 dB - a difference of 2.6 dB. Interestingly, both the reference summer tyre (73.4 dB) and the reference budget winter tyre (74.2 dB) were noisier than all the tested winter tyres. The reference all-season tyre performed well at 71.0 dB, matching some of the quieter winter tyres.

Value

The Michelin Alpin 6 showed the best predicted tread life at 50,500 km. The Kumho Winter Craft WP52 had the worst wear performance at just 37,350 km - an difference of 13,150 km. 

The Semperit Speed Grip 5 offered the best value at €6.64 per 1000 km. The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 was the most expensive at €11.29 per 1000 km - a difference of €4.65 per 1000 km. 

The Barum Polaris 5 had the lowest rolling resistance at 7.28 kg/t. The Giti GitiWinterW2 had the highest at 10.15 kg/t - a difference of 2.87 kg/t. 

These results show that there can be significant differences in comfort, longevity, and efficiency among winter tyres. The Giti GitiWinterW2 excelled in noise reduction but struggled with rolling resistance. The Firestone Winterhawk 4 showed excellent wear characteristics but performed poorly in several performance tests. The Semperit Speed Grip 5 offered the best value, balancing cost and performance effectively.

Results

1^st

Continental WinterContact TS 870

205/55 R16 91H

The Continental WinterContact TS 870 emerges as the test winner, showcasing exceptional performance across all weather conditions. It excels in both snowy and wet conditions, offering short braking distances and very high mileage. While it comes with a higher price tag, its balanced performance and safety features make it a top choice for drivers seeking premium winter tyres.

Dry99%

Wet97.4%

Snow98.9%

Comfort99%

Value87.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4th / 20	43.9 m	+0.90 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	1st / 20	110.6 km/h	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	11th / 20	57.9 m	+3.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2nd / 20	75.14 km/h	-0.87 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	2nd / 20	12.29 s	+0.03 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	2nd / 20	84.3 km/h	-0.20 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	2nd / 20	3.82 m/sec2	-0.11 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	1st / 20	29.1 m	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	3rd / 20	2520 N	-50.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4th / 20	60 km/h	-0.90 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	6th / 20	3.28 m/sec2	-0.03 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	5th / 20	71 dB	+0.70 dB
WearHigher is better	5th / 20	47970 KM	-2,530.00 KM
ValueLower is better	16th / 20	9.59 Price/1000	+2.95 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5th / 20	7.83 kg/t	+0.55 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/70

3PMSF

Yes

Price

460.00

2^nd

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3

205/55 R16 91H

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 proves to be a well-rounded winter tyre, delivering excellent performance in all weather conditions. It offers safe driving characteristics and impressive mileage. Despite its higher price, it stands out as a reliable choice for those prioritizing safety and performance in winter conditions.

Dry98.5%

Wet96.6%

Snow98.2%

Comfort99.3%

Value86.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4th / 20	43.9 m	+0.90 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	7th / 20	109.6 km/h	-1.00 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	10th / 20	57.7 m	+3.70 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	6th / 20	74.81 km/h	-1.20 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	5th / 20	12.41 s	+0.15 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	7th / 20	82.2 km/h	-2.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	5th / 20	3.61 m/sec2	-0.32 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	8th / 20	29.4 m	+0.30 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	5th / 20	2512 N	-58.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	6th / 20	59.9 km/h	-1.00 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	10th / 20	3.23 m/sec2	-0.08 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	2nd / 20	70.8 dB	+0.50 dB
WearHigher is better	6th / 20	47500 KM	-3,000.00 KM
ValueLower is better	13th / 20	9.26 Price/1000	+2.62 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	10th / 20	8.2 kg/t	+0.92 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/70

3PMSF

Yes

Price

440.00

3^rd

Semperit Speed Grip 5

205/55 R16 91H

The Semperit Speed-Grip 5 offers an impressive balance of performance and value. As Continental's second-tier brand, it provides good performance across all weather conditions, especially excelling in snowy conditions. With very high mileage and low rolling resistance, it's an economical choice that doesn't compromise much on safety, despite slightly reduced wet grip.

Dry98.8%

Wet95.8%

Snow97.8%

Comfort98.2%

Value95.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3rd / 20	43.7 m	+0.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	5th / 20	109.8 km/h	-0.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	9th / 20	57.5 m	+3.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	13th / 20	73.53 km/h	-2.48 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	6th / 20	12.44 s	+0.18 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	8th / 20	82 km/h	-2.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	10th / 20	3.42 m/sec2	-0.51 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	1st / 20	29.1 m	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	13th / 20	2457 N	-113.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	10th / 20	59.5 km/h	-1.40 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	8th / 20	3.25 m/sec2	-0.06 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	10th / 20	71.6 dB	+1.30 dB
WearHigher is better	4th / 20	48210 KM	-2,290.00 KM
ValueLower is better	1st / 20	6.64 Price/1000	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6th / 20	7.91 kg/t	+0.63 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/72

3PMSF

Yes

Price

320.00

4^th

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

205/55 R16 94H XL

The Bridgestone Blizzak 6 "Enliten" demonstrates strong performance across all conditions, particularly excelling in its sporty handling. It offers short braking distances and convincing mileage, making it a reliable choice for winter driving. While it comes with a higher price, its all-round performance justifies the investment for those seeking a premium winter tyre.

Dry98.6%

Wet98.4%

Snow98%

Comfort97.2%

Value78.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8th / 20	44.1 m	+1.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2nd / 20	110.2 km/h	-0.40 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	1st / 20	54 m	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	1st / 20	76.01 km/h	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better	1st / 20	12.26 s	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	10th / 20	81 km/h	-3.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	13th / 20	3.2 m/sec2	-0.73 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	11th / 20	29.6 m	+0.50 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	5th / 20	2512 N	-58.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	12th / 20	59.2 km/h	-1.70 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	7th / 20	3.27 m/sec2	-0.04 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	18th / 20	72.3 dB	+2.00 dB
WearHigher is better	9th / 20	44300 KM	-6,200.00 KM
ValueLower is better	20th / 20	11.29 Price/1000	+4.65 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	14th / 20	8.77 kg/t	+1.49 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/70

3PMSF

Yes

Price

500.00

5^th

Michelin Alpin 6

205/55 R16 91H

The Michelin Alpin 6 showcases why it's a premium tyre with its balanced performance across all weather conditions. It stands out with very high mileage, low rolling resistance, and good comfort, making it an excellent choice for those who prioritize long-term value and driving comfort. Despite its high price, it offers strong performance in key areas, including receiving the "Green Tyre 2024/25" award for its environmental credentials.

Dry98.2%

Wet95.8%

Snow96.7%

Comfort98.5%

Value86.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7th / 20	44 m	+1.00 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	11th / 20	109.2 km/h	-1.40 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	6th / 20	56.6 m	+2.60 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	3rd / 20	75.02 km/h	-0.99 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	9th / 20	12.52 s	+0.26 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	16th / 20	78.5 km/h	-6.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	14th / 20	3.16 m/sec2	-0.77 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	13th / 20	29.7 m	+0.60 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	10th / 20	2483 N	-87.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	16th / 20	58.7 km/h	-2.20 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	16th / 20	3.18 m/sec2	-0.13 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	8th / 20	71.4 dB	+1.10 dB
WearHigher is better	1st / 20	50500 KM	Best in this discipline
ValueLower is better	18th / 20	10.3 Price/1000	+3.66 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	9th / 20	8.1 kg/t	+0.82 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/69

3PMSF

Yes

Price

520.00

6^th

Hankook Winter I cept RS3

205/55 R16 91H

The Hankook Winter i*cept RS3 offers a compelling mix of performance and value. It provides sporty, direct handling in all weather conditions and particularly excels in aquaplaning resistance. With outstanding mileage and a fair price, it's an attractive option for budget-conscious drivers. However, its slightly extended wet braking distance is a point to consider. Notably, it won the "Eco-Master" award, indicating excellent environmental and economic performance.

Dry97.2%

Wet96%

Snow98.8%

Comfort98.2%

Value95.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	15th / 20	45.2 m	+2.20 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	5th / 20	109.8 km/h	-0.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	18th / 20	59.1 m	+5.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7th / 20	74.3 km/h	-1.71 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	14th / 20	12.66 s	+0.40 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	1st / 20	84.5 km/h	Best in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	1st / 20	3.93 m/sec2	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	1st / 20	29.1 m	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	7th / 20	2509 N	-61.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	7th / 20	59.6 km/h	-1.30 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	1st / 20	3.31 m/sec2	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	10th / 20	71.6 dB	+1.30 dB
WearHigher is better	2nd / 20	50250 KM	-250.00 KM
ValueLower is better	2nd / 20	7.16 Price/1000	+0.52 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3rd / 20	7.72 kg/t	+0.44 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/72

3PMSF

Yes

Price

360.00

7^th

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

205/55 R16 91H

The Dunlop Winter Sport 5 shines in winter conditions, offering excellent performance on snow. It boasts outstanding mileage and low rolling resistance, making it an economical choice for winter driving. While it performs well overall, its slightly limited grip on wet roads is a minor drawback to consider.

Dry96%

Wet95.6%

Snow99.3%

Comfort97%

Value92.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	18th / 20	46 m	+3.00 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	16th / 20	108.9 km/h	-1.70 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	14th / 20	58.5 m	+4.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	9th / 20	74.13 km/h	-1.88 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	8th / 20	12.48 s	+0.22 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	17th / 20	77.5 km/h	-7.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	3rd / 20	3.71 m/sec2	-0.22 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	4th / 20	29.2 m	+0.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	1st / 20	2570 N	Best in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better	7th / 20	59.6 km/h	-1.30 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	1st / 20	3.31 m/sec2	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	19th / 20	72.5 dB	+2.20 dB
WearHigher is better	3rd / 20	48690 KM	-1,810.00 KM
ValueLower is better	5th / 20	7.8 Price/1000	+1.16 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	4th / 20	7.82 kg/t	+0.54 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/71

3PMSF

Yes

Price

380.00

8^th

Kleber Krisalp HP3

205/55 R16 91H

The Kleber Krisalp HP3 proves to be a solid winter tyre, particularly excelling on snowy roads. It offers very good protection against aquaplaning and has low rolling resistance, contributing to fuel efficiency. However, its slightly longer braking distance on wet roads is a point of concern. Overall, it provides good value for its performance.

Dry97.4%

Wet94.8%

Snow97%

Comfort97.4%

Value81.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	12th / 20	44.7 m	+1.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	14th / 20	109 km/h	-1.60 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	18th / 20	59.1 m	+5.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	14th / 20	73.49 km/h	-2.52 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	19th / 20	12.74 s	+0.48 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	4th / 20	83.4 km/h	-1.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	6th / 20	3.58 m/sec2	-0.35 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	6th / 20	29.3 m	+0.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	18th / 20	2429 N	-141.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	14th / 20	59 km/h	-1.90 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	10th / 20	3.23 m/sec2	-0.08 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	17th / 20	72.2 dB	+1.90 dB
WearHigher is better	11th / 20	41730 KM	-8,770.00 KM
ValueLower is better	11th / 20	8.63 Price/1000	+1.99 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	13th / 20	8.61 kg/t	+1.33 kg/t

EU Label

D/B/69

3PMSF

Yes

Price

360.00

Joint 9^th

Uniroyal WinterExpert

205/55 R16 91H

The Uniroyal WinterExpert offers a balanced performance, with particular strength in wet conditions. It provides good mileage and low rolling resistance, making it an economical choice. However, its moderate lateral guidance on snow suggests that while it's competent in winter conditions, it may not be the top performer in severe winter weather.

Dry98.1%

Wet96.2%

Snow96%

Comfort97.9%

Value91.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8th / 20	44.1 m	+1.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	11th / 20	109.2 km/h	-1.40 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	8th / 20	57.1 m	+3.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	10th / 20	74.12 km/h	-1.89 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	3rd / 20	12.38 s	+0.12 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	10th / 20	81 km/h	-3.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	11th / 20	3.4 m/sec2	-0.53 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	10th / 20	29.5 m	+0.40 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	15th / 20	2450 N	-120.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	19th / 20	58 km/h	-2.90 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	17th / 20	3.15 m/sec2	-0.16 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	14th / 20	71.8 dB	+1.50 dB
WearHigher is better	7th / 20	45540 KM	-4,960.00 KM
ValueLower is better	4th / 20	7.47 Price/1000	+0.83 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2nd / 20	7.64 kg/t	+0.36 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/71

3PMSF

Yes

Price

340.00

Joint 9^th

BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

205/55 R16 91H

The BF Goodrich g-Force Winter 2 excels in winter conditions, offering top performance on snow. It also provides good protection against aquaplaning and offers a quiet ride. Its main drawback is a slightly longer braking distance in wet conditions. This tyre seems well-suited for areas with harsh winters but may be less ideal for regions with frequent wet conditions.

Dry97.1%

Wet94.9%

Snow98.3%

Comfort98.1%

Value80.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	13th / 20	45 m	+2.00 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	14th / 20	109 km/h	-1.60 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	16th / 20	58.6 m	+4.60 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	14th / 20	73.49 km/h	-2.52 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	15th / 20	12.67 s	+0.41 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	4th / 20	83.4 km/h	-1.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	9th / 20	3.46 m/sec2	-0.47 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	8th / 20	29.4 m	+0.30 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	4th / 20	2513 N	-57.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	13th / 20	59.1 km/h	-1.80 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	4th / 20	3.3 m/sec2	-0.01 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	12th / 20	71.7 dB	+1.40 dB
WearHigher is better	12th / 20	41330 KM	-9,170.00 KM
ValueLower is better	12th / 20	9.19 Price/1000	+2.55 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	12th / 20	8.48 kg/t	+1.20 kg/t

EU Label

D/B/69

3PMSF

Yes

Price

380.00

11^th

Vredestein Wintrac

205/55 R16 91H

The Vredestein Wintrac offers a well-rounded performance across all weather conditions. It provides good protection against aquaplaning and has low rolling resistance, contributing to fuel efficiency. While it performs well in most areas, its slightly longer braking distance on wet roads is a point to consider. Overall, it's a solid all-rounder for winter conditions.

Dry98.9%

Wet94.5%

Snow96.2%

Comfort98.7%

Value81.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2nd / 20	43.5 m	+0.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	8th / 20	109.4 km/h	-1.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	13th / 20	58.3 m	+4.30 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	11th / 20	74.08 km/h	-1.93 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	13th / 20	12.63 s	+0.37 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	13th / 20	80.7 km/h	-3.80 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	16th / 20	3.12 m/sec2	-0.81 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	15th / 20	30.2 m	+1.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	16th / 20	2449 N	-121.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	18th / 20	58.5 km/h	-2.40 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	13th / 20	3.22 m/sec2	-0.09 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	6th / 20	71.2 dB	+0.90 dB
WearHigher is better	13th / 20	40400 KM	-10,100.00 KM
ValueLower is better	15th / 20	9.41 Price/1000	+2.77 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7th / 20	8.01 kg/t	+0.73 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/70

3PMSF

Yes

Price

380.00

12^th

Apollo Alnac 4G Winter

205/55 R16 91H

The Apollo Alnac 4G Winter provides balanced performance across various weather conditions. It offers short braking distances and operates quietly, enhancing driving comfort. However, its moderate lateral guidance on snow suggests that while it's competent in winter conditions, it may not be the top performer in severe winter weather. It represents a good value option for those in areas with milder winters.

Dry97.7%

Wet94.9%

Snow95.5%

Comfort99.2%

Value82.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	10th / 20	44.4 m	+1.40 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	13th / 20	109.1 km/h	-1.50 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	7th / 20	56.9 m	+2.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	8th / 20	74.23 km/h	-1.78 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	10th / 20	12.56 s	+0.30 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	15th / 20	78.8 km/h	-5.70 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	17th / 20	2.93 m/sec2	-1.00 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	18th / 20	30.6 m	+1.50 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	14th / 20	2452 N	-118.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	17th / 20	58.6 km/h	-2.30 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	17th / 20	3.15 m/sec2	-0.16 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	4th / 20	70.9 dB	+0.60 dB
WearHigher is better	14th / 20	39840 KM	-10,660.00 KM
ValueLower is better	6th / 20	8.03 Price/1000	+1.39 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	11th / 20	8.44 kg/t	+1.16 kg/t

EU Label

C/C/71

3PMSF

Yes

Price

320.00

13^th

Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2

205/55 R16 94H XL

The Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 demonstrates good performance in winter conditions, particularly excelling in braking on snow and wet roads. It also offers a quiet ride, enhancing driving comfort. However, its moderate mileage might be a concern for those looking for long-term value. This tyre seems well-suited for drivers who prioritize performance and comfort in winter conditions but may not be the best choice for high-mileage drivers.

Dry97.5%

Wet96.7%

Snow97.5%

Comfort98.5%

Value74.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	11th / 20	44.5 m	+1.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	17th / 20	108.8 km/h	-1.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	4th / 20	55.6 m	+1.60 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	5th / 20	74.89 km/h	-1.12 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	6th / 20	12.44 s	+0.18 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	12th / 20	80.9 km/h	-3.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	14th / 20	3.16 m/sec2	-0.77 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	15th / 20	30.2 m	+1.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	8th / 20	2491 N	-79.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4th / 20	60 km/h	-0.90 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	8th / 20	3.25 m/sec2	-0.06 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	8th / 20	71.4 dB	+1.10 dB
WearHigher is better	16th / 20	38700 KM	-11,800.00 KM
ValueLower is better	19th / 20	10.85 Price/1000	+4.21 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	16th / 20	8.83 kg/t	+1.55 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/69

3PMSF

Yes

Price

420.00

14^th

Giti GitiWinterW2

205/55 R16 91H

The Giti GitiWinter W2 performs well on snowy roads and offers good protection against aquaplaning. It also provides good mileage, offering decent value. However, its extended braking distance on wet roads and delayed steering response are significant drawbacks to consider. This tyre might be a good choice for areas with predominantly snowy winters but less ideal for regions with frequent wet conditions.

Dry96.9%

Wet95.2%

Snow98.9%

Comfort100%

Value77.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	14th / 20	45.1 m	+2.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	17th / 20	108.8 km/h	-1.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	14th / 20	58.5 m	+4.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	18th / 20	72.94 km/h	-3.07 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	10th / 20	12.56 s	+0.30 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	6th / 20	82.5 km/h	-2.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	4th / 20	3.64 m/sec2	-0.29 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	4th / 20	29.2 m	+0.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	12th / 20	2477 N	-93.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	1st / 20	60.9 km/h	Best in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better	1st / 20	3.31 m/sec2	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	1st / 20	70.3 dB	Best in this discipline
WearHigher is better	8th / 20	44810 KM	-5,690.00 KM
ValueLower is better	14th / 20	9.37 Price/1000	+2.73 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	20th / 20	10.15 kg/t	+2.87 kg/t

EU Label

D/B/68

3PMSF

Yes

Price

420.00

15^th

Kumho Winter Craft WP52

205/55 R16 91H

The Kumho Wintercraft WP52 offers a balanced performance with sporty handling and short braking distances across various weather conditions. However, its low resistance to aquaplaning and low mileage are significant drawbacks. This tyre might appeal to drivers who enjoy responsive handling in winter conditions but may not be the best choice for those prioritizing longevity or frequently driving in heavy rain.

Dry99.7%

Wet94.5%

Snow96.4%

Comfort97.5%

Value77.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1st / 20	43 m	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3rd / 20	109.9 km/h	-0.70 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	1st / 20	54 m	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	4th / 20	74.94 km/h	-1.07 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	10th / 20	12.56 s	+0.30 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	20th / 20	73 km/h	-11.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	20th / 20	1.98 m/sec2	-1.95 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	17th / 20	30.3 m	+1.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	17th / 20	2446 N	-124.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	11th / 20	59.4 km/h	-1.50 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	14th / 20	3.21 m/sec2	-0.10 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	15th / 20	72.1 dB	+1.80 dB
WearHigher is better	20th / 20	37350 KM	-13,150.00 KM
ValueLower is better	9th / 20	8.57 Price/1000	+1.93 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	18th / 20	9.05 kg/t	+1.77 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/72

3PMSF

Yes

Price

320.00

Joint 16^th

Barum Polaris 5

205/55 R16 91H

The Barum Polaris 5 performs well in winter conditions and on dry roads, offering safe driving behavior. Its low rolling resistance is a plus for fuel efficiency. However, its poor performance in wet conditions and low resistance to aquaplaning are significant concerns. This tyre might be suitable for areas with predominantly dry, cold winters but is less ideal for regions with wet winter conditions.

Dry96.9%

Wet92.8%

Snow97.7%

Comfort97.5%

Value87.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	17th / 20	45.5 m	+2.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3rd / 20	109.9 km/h	-0.70 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	17th / 20	58.9 m	+4.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	17th / 20	73.07 km/h	-2.94 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	18th / 20	12.72 s	+0.46 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	18th / 20	75.4 km/h	-9.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	18th / 20	2.88 m/sec2	-1.05 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	14th / 20	30 m	+0.90 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	2nd / 20	2526 N	-44.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	7th / 20	59.6 km/h	-1.30 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	10th / 20	3.23 m/sec2	-0.08 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	15th / 20	72.1 dB	+1.80 dB
WearHigher is better	15th / 20	39500 KM	-11,000.00 KM
ValueLower is better	7th / 20	8.1 Price/1000	+1.46 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1st / 20	7.28 kg/t	Best in this discipline

EU Label

C/C/72

3PMSF

Yes

Price

320.00

Joint 16^th

GT Radial WinterPro2 Evo

205/55 R16 91H

The GT Radial Winterpro 2 evo demonstrates good performance in winter conditions and offers safe handling on wet roads. However, its delayed steering response might affect the overall driving experience, and its limited mileage could be a concern for value-conscious buyers. This tyre could be a decent budget option for those in areas with moderate winters but may not be ideal for drivers seeking responsive handling or long-term value.

Dry96.5%

Wet93.7%

Snow98%

Comfort99.3%

Value82.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	15th / 20	45.2 m	+2.20 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	19th / 20	108.3 km/h	-2.30 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	5th / 20	56.2 m	+2.20 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	19th / 20	72.77 km/h	-3.24 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	17th / 20	12.71 s	+0.45 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	19th / 20	75.3 km/h	-9.20 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	19th / 20	2.68 m/sec2	-1.25 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	6th / 20	29.3 m	+0.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	9th / 20	2486 N	-84.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	2nd / 20	60.4 km/h	-0.50 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	14th / 20	3.21 m/sec2	-0.10 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	2nd / 20	70.8 dB	+0.50 dB
WearHigher is better	17th / 20	38335 KM	-12,165.00 KM
ValueLower is better	3rd / 20	7.3 Price/1000	+0.66 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	15th / 20	8.79 kg/t	+1.51 kg/t

EU Label

D/B/70

3PMSF

Yes

Price

280.00

Joint 18^th

Firestone Winterhawk 4

205/55 R16 91H

The Firestone Winterhawk 4 performs well in winter conditions and offers safe handling on dry roads. However, its poor performance on wet roads, including limited grip and extended braking distances, is a significant drawback. This tyre might be suitable for areas with predominantly dry, cold winters but could be problematic in regions with frequent wet conditions during winter.

Dry95.4%

Wet96.5%

Snow95%

Comfort98.7%

Value81%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	19th / 20	46.3 m	+3.30 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	20th / 20	108.2 km/h	-2.40 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	3rd / 20	55.4 m	+1.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	16th / 20	73.24 km/h	-2.77 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	15th / 20	12.67 s	+0.41 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	3rd / 20	83.9 km/h	-0.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	8th / 20	3.48 m/sec2	-0.45 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	20th / 20	30.9 m	+1.80 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	19th / 20	2427 N	-143.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	14th / 20	59 km/h	-1.90 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	20th / 20	3.12 m/sec2	-0.19 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	6th / 20	71.2 dB	+0.90 dB
WearHigher is better	18th / 20	37400 KM	-13,100.00 KM
ValueLower is better	8th / 20	8.56 Price/1000	+1.92 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8th / 20	8.02 kg/t	+0.74 kg/t

EU Label

C/B/71

3PMSF

Yes

Price

320.00

Joint 18^th

Fulda Kristall Control HP2

205/55 R16 91H

The Fulda Kristall Control HP 2 offers good performance on both wet and dry roads, providing safe driving characteristics. However, its limited suitability for winter conditions is a significant drawback for a winter tyre. Combined with low mileage and high rolling resistance, this tyre may not offer the best value or performance for true winter conditions. It might be more suitable for areas with mild winters where severe snow and ice are rare.

Dry95.7%

Wet92.9%

Snow98.2%

Comfort96.4%

Value80.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	20th / 20	46.4 m	+3.40 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	9th / 20	109.3 km/h	-1.30 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	20th / 20	60.3 m	+6.30 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	20th / 20	71.49 km/h	-4.52 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	20th / 20	12.84 s	+0.58 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	14th / 20	79.5 km/h	-5.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	6th / 20	3.58 m/sec2	-0.35 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	11th / 20	29.6 m	+0.50 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	10th / 20	2483 N	-87.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	3rd / 20	60.2 km/h	-0.70 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	5th / 20	3.29 m/sec2	-0.02 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	20th / 20	72.9 dB	+2.60 dB
WearHigher is better	10th / 20	41810 KM	-8,690.00 KM
ValueLower is better	10th / 20	8.61 Price/1000	+1.97 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	17th / 20	8.92 kg/t	+1.64 kg/t

EU Label

C/C/72

3PMSF

Yes

Price

360.00

20^th

Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906+

205/55 R16 91H

The Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906+ demonstrates good performance on both wet and dry roads, offering safe driving characteristics in these conditions. However, its limited suitability for winter conditions is a significant drawback for a tyre marketed as a winter product. The low mileage suggests it may wear out faster than competitors, potentially increasing long-term costs. Additionally, the high rolling resistance could negatively impact fuel efficiency. While this tyre might perform adequately in milder climates with infrequent snow, it may not be the best choice for areas with harsh winters or for drivers seeking long-term value and fuel efficiency.

Dry98.4%

Wet95.4%

Snow93%

Comfort98.1%

Value71.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (15)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4th / 20	43.9 m	+0.90 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	9th / 20	109.3 km/h	-1.30 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	11th / 20	57.9 m	+3.90 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	12th / 20	73.75 km/h	-2.26 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better	4th / 20	12.4 s	+0.14 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	9th / 20	81.1 km/h	-3.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	12th / 20	3.28 m/sec2	-0.65 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	19th / 20	30.8 m	+1.70 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	20th / 20	2271 N	-299.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	20th / 20	57.5 km/h	-3.40 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better	17th / 20	3.15 m/sec2	-0.16 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better	12th / 20	71.7 dB	+1.40 dB
WearHigher is better	19th / 20	37360 KM	-13,140.00 KM
ValueLower is better	17th / 20	10.17 Price/1000	+3.53 Price/1000
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	19th / 20	9.75 kg/t	+2.47 kg/t

EU Label

D/B/71

3PMSF

Yes

Price

380.00