Polish magazine Motor has tested nine winter tyres in 225/45 R17, a size fitted to cars such as the VW Golf, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 and BMW 3 Series, using a Golf as the test car. The field covers every market segment: three premium tyres from Continental, Pirelli and Dunlop, three mid-range tyres from Kleber, Firestone and Nokian, and three budget options, the Debica Frigo HP2 from the Polish brand, the Chinese-made Mazzini Snow Leopard 2 and the Insa Turbo Pirineos Plus, a retread from Spain. Prices ranged from 244 to 612 zloty per tyre.
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 and Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3 finished level on points and share the win, the Continental the best tyre on wet roads and the Pirelli the most rounded, with the best aquaplaning resistance and the quietest running. The Dunlop Winter was third and the Kleber Krisalp HP3 fourth, both recommended by Motor. The surprise was on snow, where the cheapest tyre in the test, the Mazzini, had the most traction and was the fastest round the handling course. On wet roads it fell far behind, along with the Insa Turbo retread, and Motor advises against both.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 50 → 0 km/h
- Snow Traction
- 0 → 20 km/h
The tyres were bought from an online shop, run in on wet asphalt at a test centre in Germany, then tested on snow in Sweden before returning to Germany for the wet and dry tests. Rolling resistance was measured in a laboratory. This is our summary of the headline findings; for the full scoring and Motor's methodology, see the original test.
Snow
The Kleber stopped shortest on snow, with the Pirelli next, and less than 3 metres separated the whole field. The Nokian needed the longest distance.
Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28.3 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 28.8 m | +0.50 m | 17 km/h | |
| 29 m | +0.70 m | 20 km/h | |
| 29 m | +0.70 m | 20 km/h | |
| 29.3 m | +1.00 m | 24 km/h | |
| 29.3 m | +1.00 m | 24 km/h | |
| 29.5 m | +1.20 m | 26 km/h | |
| 30.2 m | +1.90 m | 33 km/h | |
| 31 m | +2.70 m | 38 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 9.5% (2.7 m ≈ 0.6 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Nokian Snowproof 2 would still be travelling at 38 km/h when the Kleber Krisalp HP3 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
The Mazzini had the most traction on snow, ahead of the Kleber and the Insa Turbo retread, while the Continental and Nokian had the least.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 2613 N | Best | |
| 2597 N | -16.00 N | |
| 2590 N | -23.00 N | |
| 2564 N | -49.00 N | |
| 2515 N | -98.00 N | |
| 2511 N | -102.00 N | |
| 2499 N | -114.00 N | |
| 2393 N | -220.00 N | |
| 2328 N | -285.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 10.9% (285 N).
In the acceleration test from standstill to 20 km/h the Pirelli needed the shortest distance, with the Mazzini and Debica next. The Nokian was again the weakest.
Snow Traction
Snow acceleration distance in meters (0 - 20 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 8.64 m | Best | |
| 8.77 m | +0.13 m | |
| 8.85 m | +0.21 m | |
| 8.91 m | +0.27 m | |
| 8.93 m | +0.29 m | |
| 8.96 m | +0.32 m | |
| 9.02 m | +0.38 m | |
| 9.03 m | +0.39 m | |
| 9.4 m | +0.76 m |
The difference between best and worst was 8.8% (0.76 m).
The Mazzini was fastest round the snow handling course, ahead of the Kleber and Firestone. The Pirelli and Nokian were the slowest.
Snow Handling
Snow handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 78.9 s | Best | |
| 79.6 s | +0.70 s | |
| 80.6 s | +1.70 s | |
| 81 s | +2.10 s | |
| 81.2 s | +2.30 s | |
| 81.3 s | +2.40 s | |
| 81.5 s | +2.60 s | |
| 83 s | +4.10 s | |
| 85.6 s | +6.70 s |
The difference between best and worst was 8.5% (6.7 s).
Wet
The wet tests changed the picture completely. The Continental stopped shortest, with the Dunlop and Pirelli next, while the budget tyres fell well behind: the Mazzini needed more than 14 metres further than the Continental, and the Insa Turbo retread around 22 metres further.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 45.4 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 46.8 m | +1.40 m | 22 km/h | |
| 47 m | +1.60 m | 24 km/h | |
| 48.7 m | +3.30 m | 34 km/h | |
| 50.4 m | +5.00 m | 41 km/h | |
| 50.6 m | +5.20 m | 42 km/h | |
| 53 m | +7.60 m | 49 km/h | |
| 59.7 m | +14.30 m | 64 km/h | |
| 67.4 m | +22.00 m | 74 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 48.5% (22 m ≈ 4.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Insa Turbo Pirineos Plus would still be travelling at 74 km/h when the Continental WinterContact TS 870 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
The Continental was also fastest round the wet handling course, ahead of the Pirelli and Dunlop, and the Mazzini and Insa Turbo were clearly the slowest.
Wet Handling
Wet handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 83.5 s | Best | |
| 84.3 s | +0.80 s | |
| 85 s | +1.50 s | |
| 86.4 s | +2.90 s | |
| 87.3 s | +3.80 s | |
| 87.5 s | +4.00 s | |
| 89.4 s | +5.90 s | |
| 94.6 s | +11.10 s | |
| 98.8 s | +15.30 s |
The difference between best and worst was 18.3% (15.3 s).
On the wet circle the Continental and Pirelli held the most grip, and the Mazzini and Insa Turbo the least by a wide margin.
Wet Circle
Average cornering G force in the wet
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 0.79 g | Best | |
| 0.79 g | Best | |
| 0.76 g | -0.03 g | |
| 0.74 g | -0.05 g | |
| 0.73 g | -0.06 g | |
| 0.72 g | -0.07 g | |
| 0.71 g | -0.08 g | |
| 0.61 g | -0.18 g | |
| 0.53 g | -0.26 g |
The difference between best and worst was 32.9% (0.26 g).
The Pirelli resisted straight-line aquaplaning longest, well ahead of the Kleber and Continental. The Insa Turbo and Mazzini were the first to float.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 85.9 km/h | Best | |
| 79.1 km/h | -6.80 km/h | |
| 78.9 km/h | -7.00 km/h | |
| 75.6 km/h | -10.30 km/h | |
| 75.3 km/h | -10.60 km/h | |
| 72.9 km/h | -13.00 km/h | |
| 71.5 km/h | -14.40 km/h | |
| 61.2 km/h | -24.70 km/h | |
| 57.7 km/h | -28.20 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 32.8% (28.2 Km/H).
The Pirelli also kept the most grip in curved aquaplaning, with the Kleber next, while the Mazzini held far less than any other tyre.
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.23 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.02 m/sec2 | -0.21 m/sec2 | |
| 2.93 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 | |
| 2.93 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 | |
| 2.75 m/sec2 | -0.48 m/sec2 | |
| 2.69 m/sec2 | -0.54 m/sec2 | |
| 2.37 m/sec2 | -0.86 m/sec2 | |
| 2.2 m/sec2 | -1.03 m/sec2 | |
| 1.33 m/sec2 | -1.90 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 58.8% (1.9 m/sec2).
Dry
The Dunlop stopped shortest on dry roads, just ahead of the Continental, Pirelli and Nokian, and the Insa Turbo needed the most distance.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 42.2 m | +0.20 m | 9 km/h | |
| 42.5 m | +0.50 m | 14 km/h | |
| 42.6 m | +0.60 m | 15 km/h | |
| 43.8 m | +1.80 m | 26 km/h | |
| 44.6 m | +2.60 m | 31 km/h | |
| 45.4 m | +3.40 m | 36 km/h | |
| 45.9 m | +3.90 m | 38 km/h | |
| 47 m | +5.00 m | 42 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 11.9% (5 m ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Insa Turbo Pirineos Plus would still be travelling at 42 km/h when the Dunlop Winter had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
The Nokian set the fastest dry lap, with the Continental and Pirelli a fraction behind, and the Mazzini was the slowest.
Dry Handling
Dry handling time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 53.9 s | Best | |
| 54 s | +0.10 s | |
| 54.1 s | +0.20 s | |
| 54.2 s | +0.30 s | |
| 54.3 s | +0.40 s | |
| 54.4 s | +0.50 s | |
| 55 s | +1.10 s | |
| 55.1 s | +1.20 s | |
| 55.7 s | +1.80 s |
The difference between best and worst was 3.3% (1.8 s).
Motor's testers rated the Pirelli best for dry handling, with the Continental and Nokian close behind. The Mazzini and Insa Turbo were rated lowest.
Subj. Dry Handling
Subjective Dry Handling Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 6.9 Points | -0.10 Points | |
| 6.9 Points | -0.10 Points | |
| 6.5 Points | -0.50 Points | |
| 6.4 Points | -0.60 Points | |
| 6.3 Points | -0.70 Points | |
| 5.5 Points | -1.50 Points | |
| 5 Points | -2.00 Points | |
| 4.9 Points | -2.10 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 30% (2.1 Points).
Comfort
The Pirelli was the quietest tyre in the exterior noise measurement at 50 km/h, with the Continental and, perhaps surprisingly, the Mazzini next. The Insa Turbo was the loudest.
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 63.8 dB | Best | |
| 64.8 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 64.8 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 64.9 dB | +1.10 dB | |
| 65.7 dB | +1.90 dB | |
| 65.9 dB | +2.10 dB | |
| 66.7 dB | +2.90 dB | |
| 67.5 dB | +3.70 dB | |
| 68.3 dB | +4.50 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 7.1% (4.5 dB).
The Dunlop was rated the most comfortable, and the Insa Turbo the least.
Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Points | Best | |
| 6.5 Points | -0.50 Points | |
| 6.5 Points | -0.50 Points | |
| 6.5 Points | -0.50 Points | |
| 6.5 Points | -0.50 Points | |
| 6.1 Points | -0.90 Points | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 5.9 Points | -1.10 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 15.7% (1.1 Points).
Value
The Nokian had by far the lowest rolling resistance, with the Dunlop and Continental next. The Insa Turbo had the highest.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.46 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 8.34 kg/t | +0.88 kg/t | £52 | |
| 8.41 kg/t | +0.95 kg/t | £56 | |
| 8.69 kg/t | +1.23 kg/t | £73 | |
| 8.74 kg/t | +1.28 kg/t | £76 | |
| 8.81 kg/t | +1.35 kg/t | £80 | |
| 9.29 kg/t | +1.83 kg/t | £108 | |
| 9.39 kg/t | +1.93 kg/t | £114 | |
| 9.66 kg/t | +2.20 kg/t | £130 |
The difference between best and worst was 29.5% (2.2 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Insa Turbo Pirineos Plus uses about 90 L (£130) more fuel than the Nokian Snowproof 2.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.
Results
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 and Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3 share the win, with the Dunlop Winter third and the Kleber Krisalp HP3 a strong fourth at a much lower price. Motor's advice is that the premium tyres are the choice for the most demanding drivers, that the mid-range offers good value, and that buyers looking for a cheap tyre should avoid the Mazzini: the Polish Debica beat it clearly overall. Motor also advises against the Insa Turbo retread, which was good on snow but unsafe on wet roads. For the full data and methodology, see Motor's original test.
Continental WinterContact TS 870
225/45 R17Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 9 | 42.2 m | +0.20 m |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 9 | 54 s | +0.10 s |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 6.9 Points | -0.10 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 9 | 45.4 m | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 1st / 9 | 83.5 s | Best in this discipline |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 0.791 g | Best in this discipline |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 78.9 km/h | -7.00 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 2.93 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 7th / 9 | 29.5 m | +1.20 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 7th / 9 | 9.02 m | +0.38 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 8th / 9 | 2393 N | -220.00 N |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 7th / 9 | 81.5 s | +2.60 s |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 6.5 Points | -0.50 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 9 | 64.8 dB | +1.00 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 3rd / 9 | 8.41 kg/t | +0.95 kg/t |
- Production
- 4825
- Origin
- Slovakia
- Shore
- 63
- Price
- 612.00
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 3
225/45 R17Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 9 | 42.5 m | +0.50 m |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 9 | 54.1 s | +0.20 s |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 7 Points | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 9 | 47 m | +1.60 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 9 | 84.3 s | +0.80 s |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 0.79 g | 0.00 g |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 85.9 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 3.23 m/sec2 | Best in this discipline |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 9 | 28.8 m | +0.50 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 1st / 9 | 8.64 m | Best in this discipline |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 6th / 9 | 2511 N | -102.00 N |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 8th / 9 | 83 s | +4.10 s |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 6.5 Points | -0.50 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 1st / 9 | 63.8 dB | Best in this discipline |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 5th / 9 | 8.74 kg/t | +1.28 kg/t |
- Production
- 4025
- Origin
- Romania
- Shore
- 58
- Price
- 594.00
Dunlop Winter
225/45 R17Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 9 | 42 m | Best in this discipline |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 6th / 9 | 54.4 s | +0.50 s |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 9 | 6.4 Points | -0.60 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 9 | 46.8 m | +1.40 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 9 | 85 s | +1.50 s |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 0.756 g | -0.04 g |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 6th / 9 | 72.9 km/h | -13.00 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 7th / 9 | 2.37 m/sec2 | -0.86 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 5th / 9 | 29.3 m | +1.00 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 5th / 9 | 8.93 m | +0.29 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 5th / 9 | 2515 N | -98.00 N |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 6th / 9 | 81.3 s | +2.40 s |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 7 Points | Best in this discipline |
| NoiseLower is better | 4th / 9 | 64.9 dB | +1.10 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 2nd / 9 | 8.34 kg/t | +0.88 kg/t |
- Production
- 3925
- Origin
- Serbia
- Shore
- 61
- Price
- 515.00
Kleber Krisalp HP3
225/45 R17Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 5th / 9 | 43.8 m | +1.80 m |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 4th / 9 | 54.2 s | +0.30 s |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 9 | 6.5 Points | -0.50 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 5th / 9 | 50.4 m | +5.00 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 6th / 9 | 87.5 s | +4.00 s |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 6th / 9 | 0.723 g | -0.07 g |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 79.1 km/h | -6.80 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 3.02 m/sec2 | -0.21 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 1st / 9 | 28.3 m | Best in this discipline |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 4th / 9 | 8.91 m | +0.27 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 2597 N | -16.00 N |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 2nd / 9 | 79.6 s | +0.70 s |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 6.5 Points | -0.50 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 6th / 9 | 65.9 dB | +2.10 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 6th / 9 | 8.81 kg/t | +1.35 kg/t |
- Production
- 1925
- Origin
- Poland
- Shore
- 63
- Price
- 419.00
Firestone Winterhawk 4
225/45 R17Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 6th / 9 | 44.6 m | +2.60 m |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 5th / 9 | 54.3 s | +0.40 s |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 9 | 6.3 Points | -0.70 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 4th / 9 | 48.7 m | +3.30 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 4th / 9 | 86.4 s | +2.90 s |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 4th / 9 | 0.739 g | -0.05 g |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 4th / 9 | 75.6 km/h | -10.30 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 6th / 9 | 2.69 m/sec2 | -0.54 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 8th / 9 | 30.2 m | +1.90 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 8th / 9 | 9.03 m | +0.39 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 7th / 9 | 2499 N | -114.00 N |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 3rd / 9 | 80.6 s | +1.70 s |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 7th / 9 | 6 Points | -1.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 5th / 9 | 65.7 dB | +1.90 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 4th / 9 | 8.69 kg/t | +1.23 kg/t |
- Production
- 2225
- Origin
- Italy
- Shore
- 62
- Price
- 417.00
Nokian Snowproof 2
225/45 R17Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 4th / 9 | 42.6 m | +0.60 m |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 1st / 9 | 53.9 s | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 6.9 Points | -0.10 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 6th / 9 | 50.6 m | +5.20 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 5th / 9 | 87.3 s | +3.80 s |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 5th / 9 | 0.726 g | -0.07 g |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 5th / 9 | 75.3 km/h | -10.60 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 2.93 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 9th / 9 | 31 m | +2.70 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 9th / 9 | 9.4 m | +0.76 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 9th / 9 | 2328 N | -285.00 N |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 9th / 9 | 85.6 s | +6.70 s |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 6th / 9 | 6.1 Points | -0.90 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 8th / 9 | 67.5 dB | +3.70 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 1st / 9 | 7.46 kg/t | Best in this discipline |
- Production
- 0325
- Origin
- Romania
- Shore
- 70
- Price
- 459.00
Debica Frigo HP2
225/45 R17Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 7th / 9 | 45.4 m | +3.40 m |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 8th / 9 | 55.1 s | +1.20 s |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 9 | 5.5 Points | -1.50 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 7th / 9 | 53 m | +7.60 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 7th / 9 | 89.4 s | +5.90 s |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 7th / 9 | 0.708 g | -0.08 g |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 7th / 9 | 71.5 km/h | -14.40 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 5th / 9 | 2.75 m/sec2 | -0.48 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 9 | 29 m | +0.70 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 3rd / 9 | 8.85 m | +0.21 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 4th / 9 | 2564 N | -49.00 N |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 4th / 9 | 81 s | +2.10 s |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 2nd / 9 | 6.5 Points | -0.50 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 7th / 9 | 66.7 dB | +2.90 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 7th / 9 | 9.29 kg/t | +1.83 kg/t |
- Production
- 3425
- Origin
- Germany
- Shore
- 62
- Price
- 397.00
Mazzini Snow Leopard 2
225/45 R17Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 8th / 9 | 45.9 m | +3.90 m |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 9th / 9 | 55.7 s | +1.80 s |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 9 | 4.9 Points | -2.10 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 8th / 9 | 59.7 m | +14.30 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 8th / 9 | 94.6 s | +11.10 s |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 8th / 9 | 0.605 g | -0.19 g |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 9th / 9 | 57.7 km/h | -28.20 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 9th / 9 | 1.33 m/sec2 | -1.90 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 9 | 29 m | +0.70 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 2nd / 9 | 8.77 m | +0.13 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 1st / 9 | 2613 N | Best in this discipline |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 1st / 9 | 78.9 s | Best in this discipline |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 7th / 9 | 6 Points | -1.00 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 9 | 64.8 dB | +1.00 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 8th / 9 | 9.39 kg/t | +1.93 kg/t |
- Production
- 1325
- Origin
- China
- Shore
- 57
- Price
- 244.00
Insa Turbo Pirineos+
225/45 R17Category scores (% of best)
All discipline results (15)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 9th / 9 | 47 m | +5.00 m |
| Dry HandlingLower is better | 7th / 9 | 55 s | +1.10 s |
| Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 9 | 5 Points | -2.00 Points |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 9th / 9 | 67.4 m | +22.00 m |
| Wet HandlingLower is better | 9th / 9 | 98.8 s | +15.30 s |
| Wet CircleHigher is better | 9th / 9 | 0.53 g | -0.26 g |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 8th / 9 | 61.2 km/h | -24.70 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 8th / 9 | 2.2 m/sec2 | -1.03 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 5th / 9 | 29.3 m | +1.00 m |
| Snow TractionLower is better | 6th / 9 | 8.96 m | +0.32 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 3rd / 9 | 2590 N | -23.00 N |
| Snow HandlingLower is better | 5th / 9 | 81.2 s | +2.30 s |
| Subj. ComfortHigher is better | 9th / 9 | 5.9 Points | -1.10 Points |
| NoiseLower is better | 9th / 9 | 68.3 dB | +4.50 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 9th / 9 | 9.66 kg/t | +2.20 kg/t |
- Production
- 4022
- Origin
- Spain
- Shore
- 70
- Price
- 311.00

Discussion