We look forward to the big Autobild braking tests in every season, and this year Autobild have tested 51 winter tyres in wet braking (plus a summer tyre), with the best 31 moving onto a snow braking test.

The top 20 combined distances from the wet and snow braking tests will feature in the full AutoBild winter tyre test, on the site next week.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Wet Braking: 80 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking: 50 → 0 km/h

Wet

The summer tyre demonstrated the performance gap that winter tyres must overcome in wet conditions, stopping from 80 km/h in just 30.6 meters - significantly shorter than any winter tyre. Among the winter tyres, Goodyear led the wet braking performance at 32.6 meters, followed closely by Michelin at 33.2 meters and both Dunlop and Toyo at 33.3 meters. The spread in performance was substantial, with the top performers managing stops around 33-35 meters, while the poorest winter tyres required over 45 meters - a difference that could prove critical in emergency situations.

Wet Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
RefReference Summer	30.6 m	-2.00 m	0 km/h
1Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	32.6 m	Best	0 km/h
2Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	33.2 m	+0.60 m	17 km/h
3Dunlop Winter Response 2	33.3 m	+0.70 m	19 km/h
3Toyo Observe EWS1	33.3 m	+0.70 m	19 km/h
5Kumho Winter Craft WP52	33.5 m	+0.90 m	21 km/h
6Uniroyal WinterExpert	34.1 m	+1.50 m	27 km/h
7Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	34.5 m	+1.90 m	31 km/h
8Firestone Winterhawk 4	34.8 m	+2.20 m	33 km/h
9Semperit Speed Grip 5	34.9 m	+2.30 m	33 km/h
10Bridgestone Blizzak 6	35 m	+2.40 m	34 km/h
11Barum Polaris 6	35.1 m	+2.50 m	35 km/h
12Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	35.6 m	+3.00 m	38 km/h
12Hankook Winter i cept evo3	35.6 m	+3.00 m	38 km/h
14Linglong Sport Master Winter	35.7 m	+3.10 m	38 km/h
15Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	35.8 m	+3.20 m	39 km/h
16BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2	36 m	+3.40 m	40 km/h
16Vredestein Wintrac Pro+	36 m	+3.40 m	40 km/h
18Kleber Krisalp HP3	36.2 m	+3.60 m	41 km/h
19Sportiva Snow Win 3	36.5 m	+3.90 m	42 km/h
19Landsail Winter Lander	36.5 m	+3.90 m	42 km/h
19Paxaro Paxaro Winter	36.5 m	+3.90 m	42 km/h
22Ceat WinterDrive	36.9 m	+4.30 m	44 km/h
22Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36.9 m	+4.30 m	44 km/h
24Apollo Aspire XP Winter	37.3 m	+4.70 m	46 km/h
25Giti GitiWinterW2	37.7 m	+5.10 m	48 km/h
26Sava Eskimo HP2	37.9 m	+5.30 m	49 km/h
26Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906	37.9 m	+5.30 m	49 km/h
28Platin RP 70 Winter	38 m	+5.40 m	49 km/h
29Debica Frigo HP2	38.1 m	+5.50 m	49 km/h
30Lassa Snoways 4	38.4 m	+5.80 m	51 km/h
31Rotalla S210	38.7 m	+6.10 m	52 km/h
32Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501	38.8 m	+6.20 m	52 km/h
32Tracmax S210 Ice Plus	38.8 m	+6.20 m	52 km/h
34Trazano Z 507 ZuperSnow	38.9 m	+6.30 m	52 km/h
35GT Radial WinterPro2 Sport	39.2 m	+6.60 m	53 km/h
36Sumitomo WT200	39.4 m	+6.80 m	54 km/h
36Royal Black Royal Winter UHP	39.4 m	+6.80 m	54 km/h
38Tigar Winter 1	39.7 m	+7.10 m	55 km/h
39Nankang Winter Activa SV 4	39.9 m	+7.30 m	56 km/h
39Davanti Wintoura+	39.9 m	+7.30 m	56 km/h
41Goodride ZuperSnow Z507	40.1 m	+7.50 m	56 km/h
42Imperial Snowdragon UHP	40.4 m	+7.80 m	57 km/h
43Westlake SW 608	40.9 m	+8.30 m	59 km/h
44Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6	41 m	+8.40 m	59 km/h
45Star Performer Stratos UHP	41.2 m	+8.60 m	59 km/h
46Tomket Snowroad Pro 3	41.3 m	+8.70 m	60 km/h
47Atlas Polarbear UHP	42.2 m	+9.60 m	62 km/h
48Sunny Wintermax NW 211	42.5 m	+9.90 m	63 km/h
49Milever Winter maX A1 MW255	42.8 m	+10.20 m	63 km/h
50Infinity Ecozen	43.3 m	+10.70 m	65 km/h
51Windforce Snowblazer UHP	45.1 m	+12.50 m	68 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 47.4% (14.5 m ≈ 3.2 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Windforce Snowblazer UHP would still be travelling at 68 km/h when the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow

In snow braking from 50 km/h, the winter tyres demonstrated their purpose-built advantage over the summer reference, which required 51.1 meters to stop. Kleber achieved the shortest snow braking distance at 27.1 meters, with BF Goodrich close behind at 27.3 meters. Dunlop and Michelin followed at 27.5 and 27.8 meters respectively. The top performing tyres clustered tightly between 27-29 meters, while the weakest performers extended beyond 32 meters, highlighting significant differences in snow compound and tread design effectiveness across the market.

Snow Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Kleber Krisalp HP3	27.1 m	Best	0 km/h
2BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2	27.3 m	+0.20 m	11 km/h
3Dunlop Winter Response 2	27.5 m	+0.40 m	16 km/h
4Michelin Pilot Alpin 5	27.8 m	+0.70 m	21 km/h
5Fulda Kristall Control HP2	28 m	+0.90 m	23 km/h
5Bridgestone Blizzak 6	28 m	+0.90 m	23 km/h
5Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	28 m	+0.90 m	23 km/h
8Sava Eskimo HP2	28.1 m	+1.00 m	25 km/h
8Hankook Winter i cept evo3	28.1 m	+1.00 m	25 km/h
10Ceat WinterDrive	28.2 m	+1.10 m	26 km/h
10Barum Polaris 6	28.2 m	+1.10 m	26 km/h
10Firestone Winterhawk 4	28.2 m	+1.10 m	26 km/h
13Kumho Winter Craft WP52	28.3 m	+1.20 m	27 km/h
14Giti GitiWinterW2	28.4 m	+1.30 m	28 km/h
15Platin RP 70 Winter	28.5 m	+1.40 m	29 km/h
15Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	28.5 m	+1.40 m	29 km/h
17Debica Frigo HP2	28.6 m	+1.50 m	30 km/h
17Uniroyal WinterExpert	28.6 m	+1.50 m	30 km/h
19Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	28.7 m	+1.60 m	31 km/h
19Linglong Sport Master Winter	28.7 m	+1.60 m	31 km/h
19Vredestein Wintrac Pro+	28.7 m	+1.60 m	31 km/h
19Apollo Aspire XP Winter	28.7 m	+1.60 m	31 km/h
23Yokohama BluEarth Winter V906	29 m	+1.90 m	33 km/h
23Semperit Speed Grip 5	29 m	+1.90 m	33 km/h
25Sportiva Snow Win 3	29.2 m	+2.10 m	35 km/h
26Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro	29.5 m	+2.40 m	37 km/h
27Paxaro Paxaro Winter	29.7 m	+2.60 m	38 km/h
27Toyo Observe EWS1	29.7 m	+2.60 m	38 km/h
29Lassa Snoways 4	30.5 m	+3.40 m	43 km/h
30Landsail Winter Lander	32.5 m	+5.40 m	53 km/h
31Rotalla S210	32.6 m	+5.50 m	53 km/h
RefReference Summer	51.1 m	+24.00 m	89 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 88.6% (24 m ≈ 5.3 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Rotalla S210 would still be travelling at 53 km/h when the Kleber Krisalp HP3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Results

Wet97.9%

Snow98.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 51	33.3 m	+0.70 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 31	27.5 m	+0.40 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 510.00

Wet98.2%

Snow97.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 51	33.2 m	+0.60 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 31	27.8 m	+0.70 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 630.00

Wet100%

Snow95.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 51	32.6 m	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	15^th / 31	28.5 m	+1.40 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 580.00

Wet97.3%

Snow95.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 51	33.5 m	+0.90 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	13^th / 31	28.3 m	+1.20 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 430.00

Wet95.6%

Snow94.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 51	34.1 m	+1.50 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	17^th / 31	28.6 m	+1.50 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 460.00

Wet93.1%

Snow96.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 51	35 m	+2.40 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 31	28 m	+0.90 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 600.00

Wet93.7%

Snow96.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 51	34.8 m	+2.20 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 31	28.2 m	+1.10 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 450.00

Wet97.9%

Snow91.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 51	33.3 m	+0.70 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	27^th / 31	29.7 m	+2.60 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 480.00

Wet94.5%

Snow94.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 51	34.5 m	+1.90 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	19^th / 31	28.7 m	+1.60 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 620.00

Wet92.9%

Snow96.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	11^th / 51	35.1 m	+2.50 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 31	28.2 m	+1.10 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 380.00

Wet90.6%

Snow99.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	16^th / 51	36 m	+3.40 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 31	27.3 m	+0.20 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 510.00

Wet90.1%

Snow100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	18^th / 51	36.2 m	+3.60 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 31	27.1 m	Best in this discipline

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 500.00

Wet91.6%

Snow96.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	12^th / 51	35.6 m	+3.00 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 31	28 m	+0.90 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 610.00

Wet91.6%

Snow96.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	12^th / 51	35.6 m	+3.00 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	8^th / 31	28.1 m	+1.00 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 480.00

Wet93.4%

Snow93.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	9^th / 51	34.9 m	+2.30 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	23^rd / 31	29 m	+1.90 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 490.00

Wet91.3%

Snow94.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	14^th / 51	35.7 m	+3.10 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	19^th / 31	28.7 m	+1.60 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 360.00

Wet90.6%

Snow94.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	16^th / 51	36 m	+3.40 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	19^th / 31	28.7 m	+1.60 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 500.00

Wet88.4%

Snow96.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	22^nd / 51	36.9 m	+4.30 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 31	28 m	+0.90 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 440.00

Wet88.4%

Snow96.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	22^nd / 51	36.9 m	+4.30 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 31	28.2 m	+1.10 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 380.00

Wet91.1%

Snow91.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	15^th / 51	35.8 m	+3.20 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	26^th / 31	29.5 m	+2.40 m

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 510.00

Wet89.3%

Snow92.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	19^th / 51	36.5 m	+3.90 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	25^th / 31	29.2 m	+2.10 m

3PMSF: Yes

Wet87.4%

Snow94.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	24^th / 51	37.3 m	+4.70 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	19^th / 31	28.7 m	+1.60 m

3PMSF: Yes

Wet86%

Snow96.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	26^th / 51	37.9 m	+5.30 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	8^th / 31	28.1 m	+1.00 m

3PMSF: Yes

Wet86.5%

Snow95.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	25^th / 51	37.7 m	+5.10 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	14^th / 31	28.4 m	+1.30 m

3PMSF: Yes

Wet89.3%

Snow91.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	19^th / 51	36.5 m	+3.90 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	27^th / 31	29.7 m	+2.60 m

3PMSF: Yes

Wet85.8%

Snow95.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	28^th / 51	38 m	+5.40 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	15^th / 31	28.5 m	+1.40 m

3PMSF: Yes

Wet85.6%

Snow94.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	29^th / 51	38.1 m	+5.50 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	17^th / 31	28.6 m	+1.50 m

3PMSF: Yes

Wet86%

Snow93.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	26^th / 51	37.9 m	+5.30 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	23^rd / 31	29 m	+1.90 m

3PMSF: Yes

Wet84.9%

Snow88.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	30^th / 51	38.4 m	+5.80 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	29^th / 31	30.5 m	+3.40 m

3PMSF: Yes

Wet89.3%

Snow83.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	19^th / 51	36.5 m	+3.90 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	30^th / 31	32.5 m	+5.40 m

3PMSF: Yes

Wet84.2%

Snow83.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (2)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	31^st / 51	38.7 m	+6.10 m
Snow BrakingLower is better	31^st / 31	32.6 m	+5.50 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	32^nd / 51	38.8 m	+6.20 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	32^nd / 51	38.8 m	+6.20 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	34^th / 51	38.9 m	+6.30 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	35^th / 51	39.2 m	+6.60 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	36^th / 51	39.4 m	+6.80 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	36^th / 51	39.4 m	+6.80 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	38^th / 51	39.7 m	+7.10 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	39^th / 51	39.9 m	+7.30 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	39^th / 51	39.9 m	+7.30 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	41^st / 51	40.1 m	+7.50 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	42^nd / 51	40.4 m	+7.80 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	43^rd / 51	40.9 m	+8.30 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	44^th / 51	41 m	+8.40 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	45^th / 51	41.2 m	+8.60 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	46^th / 51	41.3 m	+8.70 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	47^th / 51	42.2 m	+9.60 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	48^th / 51	42.5 m	+9.90 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	49^th / 51	42.8 m	+10.20 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	50^th / 51	43.3 m	+10.70 m

3PMSF: Yes

All discipline results (1)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Wet BrakingLower is better	51^st / 51	45.1 m	+12.50 m

3PMSF: Yes

Menu

Tyre shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Wet

Snow

Results

Cross-check this test