2026 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro finished eleventh and was rated satisfactory, but Auto Bild advises against it. Its long wet braking and early aquaplaning are serious weaknesses for a winter tyre.
Tested 20 times by independent publications, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro averages a finish of 12th. Its strongest discipline is Subj. Comfort, beating 67% of the field across 6 tests; its weakest is Snow Handling, at 12% across 13 tests.
2026 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test P11 of 12
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro finished eleventh and was rated satisfactory, but Auto Bild advises against it. Its long wet braking and early aquaplaning are serious weaknesses for a winter tyre.
Where the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 15 | P7.1 of 13 | 46% | - |
| Dry Handling | 13 | P5.3 of 12.6 | 60% | - |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 1 | P9 of 13 | 33% | - |
| Subj. Road Score | 1 | P5 of 6 | 20% | - |
| Dry Lane Change | 1 | P4 of 6 | 40% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 18 | P10.8 of 19.5 | 39% | - |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | 1 | P10 of 16 | 40% | - |
| Wet Handling | 13 | P7.2 of 12.6 | 45% | - |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 3 | P4 of 8 | 39% | - |
| Wet Circle | 9 | P5.8 of 13.1 | 59% | - |
| Straight Aqua | 16 | P9.8 of 11.9 | 20% | - |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 13 | P10.9 of 12.8 | 17% | - |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 18 | P13.2 of 15.9 | 19% | - |
| Snow Traction | 14 | P9.1 of 12.8 | 37% | - |
| Snow Handling Weak | 13 | P10.9 of 12.2 | 12% | - |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 3 | P5.7 of 8 | 46% | 1 |
| Snow Circle | 1 | P6 of 7 | 17% | - |
| Snow Slalom | 7 | P11.7 of 14.3 | 25% | - |
| Ice | ||||
| Ice Braking | 1 | P11 of 16 | 33% | - |
| Subj. Ice Handling | 2 | P1 of 5.5 | 100% | 2 |
| Comfort | ||||
| Subj. Comfort Strong | 6 | P3.3 of 11 | 67% | 2 |
| Noise | 13 | P7.4 of 12.8 | 44% | - |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 4 | P16.8 of 17.8 | 7% | - |
| Value | 4 | P14.8 of 17.5 | 17% | - |
| Rolling Resistance | 14 | P10.4 of 12.8 | 22% | - |
| Fuel Consumption | 3 | P3.3 of 9 | 63% | - |
| Abrasion | 1 | P13 of 16 | 20% | - |
Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 | 0 | 18 | - | 0% | |
| 16 | 0 | 16 | - | 0% | |
| 12 | 0 | 12 | - | 0% | |
| 12 | 0 | 12 | - | 0% | |
| 9 | 1 | 8 | - | 11% | |
| 9 | 0 | 9 | - | 0% | |
| 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 29% | |
| 7 | 1 | 6 | - | 14% | |
| 7 | 0 | 7 | - | 0% | |
| 6 | 2 | 4 | - | 33% | |
| 6 | 1 | 5 | - | 17% | |
| 6 | 0 | 6 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 3 | 2 | - | 60% | |
| 5 | 1 | 4 | - | 20% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 5 | 0 | 5 | - | 0% | |
| 4 | 4 | 0 | - | 100% | |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | - | 50% | |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | - | 25% |
Drawn from 20 tests. Updated October 27, 2026.
Across 20 independent winter tyre tests, the Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro shows a clear split personality: it is often praised for road manners on clear tarmac (especially dry handling) and for comfort/refinement, but repeatedly falls short on core winter safety metrics in snow and, in many tests, aquaplaning. This is reflected in its largely lower-table overall results (average overall placing 11.5), including last places such as 20/20 in the 2025 Auto Bild winter test and 9/9 in the 2023 Sport Auto UHP winter test, plus failures/penalties where snow performance is heavily weighted (failed 11/16 in the 2026 ADAC test; safety penalties in multiple Auto Bild tests tied to wet braking/aquaplaning). Testers frequently describe it as comfortable/refined (e.g. 1/20 comfort in 2025 Auto Bild; 1/13 comfort in the 2023 Tyre Reviews test) and capable on a dry handling circuit (e.g. 5/22 dry handling in 2025 Auto Bild; 3/13 in the 2023 Tyre Reviews test), matching the tagged write-ups which praise dry handling in 11/16 reviews and ride comfort in 9/16.
The recurring exceptions are that its wet handling can be genuinely competitive in some formats (e.g. 3/11 wet circle in the 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV test; 2/13 subjective wet handling in the 2023 Tyre Reviews test), and it occasionally posts strong braking figures on dry or wet surfaces (e.g. 4/15 dry braking at just +1.2% from best in the 2026 AvD test; 3/9 wet braking at +2.8% in the 2023 Sport Auto test). However, these upsides are often undermined by very weak snow handling (e.g. 12/12 snow handling in the 2026 Auto Bild Sportscars test; 7/7 in the 2023 AMS SUV test; and testers noting it 'barely' combines braking/cornering on snow in the 2026 ADAC test) and frequent aquaplaning shortfalls (e.g. 13/13 straight aquaplaning in the 2026 Auto Bild Sportscars test, 21/22 in the 2025 Auto Bild winter test, and 7/7 for both straight and curved aquaplaning in the 2023 AMS SUV test).
and on dry roads, and had reasonable snow traction- 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV Winter Tyre Test (2026)
manages to provide good performance on dry roads- 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test (2025)
respectable driving performance on dry pavement- 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test (2025)
Dynamic handling on wet and dry roads- 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (2024)
rated among the more comfortable tyres- 2026 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test (2026)
comfort was acceptable- 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test (2026)
good rolling comfort- 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (2024)
good rolling comfort- 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test (2024)
rated it the quietest tyre in the test,- 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV Winter Tyre Test (2026)
low road noise- 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (2024)
on the wet handling course it was not far behind several of the premium tyres- 2026 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test (2026)
second only to the Pirelli among the winter tyres on the wet circle, handled respectably in the wet- 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV Winter Tyre Test (2026)
Dynamic handling on wet and dry roads- 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (2024)
Good dry and wet handling- 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test (2023)
Safe wet and dry handling- 2023 Sports Cars Winter Tyre Test (2023)
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro was good in wet and dry braking- 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test (2026)
Wet braking performs very well- 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test (2025)
Decent braking and cornering grip on wet and dry roads- 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test (2024)
short wet and dry braking distances- 2023 Sports Cars Winter Tyre Test (2023)
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro was good in wet and dry braking- 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test (2026)
short dry braking distances- 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (2024)
and in dry conditions- 2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (2023)
short wet and dry braking distances- 2023 Sports Cars Winter Tyre Test (2023)
perform well in all conditions- 2025 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test (2025)
Good grip and largely safe, support-neutral driving dynamics in the wet- 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test (2023)
good wet grip- 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (2023)
perform well in all conditions- 2025 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test (2025)
bare pavement performance is good- 2025 Studded, Friction and European Winter Tyre Test (2025)
very poor on the snow handling course, barely combining braking and cornering forces so that the car understeered or oversteered very early with little precision- 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 (2026)
joint-lowest snow handling of its class- 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test (2026)
It was also near the back in the snow slalom- 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV Winter Tyre Test (2026)
slowest on the handling course and in the bottom three for braking and the slalom- 2026 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test (2026)
oversteering tendency on snow as well as on wet surfaces- 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test (2024)
the first tyre to float in straight-line aquaplaning and second-worst in curved aquaplaning- 2026 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test (2026)
the weakest aquaplaning result of the Central European tyres- 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test (2026)
in the lower half of the field for both straight-line and curved aquaplaning,- 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV Winter Tyre Test (2026)
straight aquaplaning resistance as "bereits kritisch- 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test (2025)
limited safety reserves for aquaplaning- 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (2024)
it had the shortest projected tread life in the test- 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 (2026)
particularly rapid wear, resulting in the lowest projected mileage in the entire test- 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test (2025)
limited mileage- 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (2023)
and had higher rolling resistance than most- 2026 Auto Bild Allrad SUV Winter Tyre Test (2026)
highest rolling resistance on test- 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test (2023)
high rolling resistance- 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (2023)
high rolling resistance- 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (2023)
had the second-longest wet braking distance, which earned it a safety penalty- 2026 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test (2026)
extended braking distances in both wet and dry conditions- 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test (2025)
Long wet braking distances- 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test (2023)
Snow braking and traction were in the bottom four,- 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 (2026)
weaker overall performance on snow with compromised grip and handling- 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test (2025)
Average winter performance- 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (2024)
very low grip level on snow- 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test (2023)
the lowest snow braking score- 2026 Teknikens Värld Studded, Nordic and Central European Winter Tyre Test (2026)
Snow braking and traction were in the bottom four,- 2026 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 225/50 R17 (2026)
in the bottom three for braking and the slalom- 2026 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test (2026)
load change sensitivity and oversteering tendency on snow as well as on wet surfaces- 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test (2024)
Slow steering, less stable rear in fast corners- 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test (2023)
weak lateral guidance- 2023 Sports Cars Winter Tyre Test (2023)
slow steering response- 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test (2024)
Slow steering, less stable rear in fast corners- 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test (2023)
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro finished eleventh and was rated satisfactory, but Auto Bild advises against it. Its long wet braking and early aquaplaning are serious weaknesses for a winter tyre.
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro finished sixth overall, rated satisfactory. It is consistent but rarely near the front, and its aquaplaning results cost it a safety penalty.
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro finished eleventh and is rated recommended. It is a safe tyre on wet and dry roads but weak on snow and costly to run, so it best suits drivers in regions that see little snow.
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro finished last of the six Central European tyres. It falls short of the others in its class, especially on snow.
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro failed the test. Dry and wet performance was satisfactory at best, but its very weak snow handling earned a poor winter score, which under ADAC's rules sets the overall grade. It also had the shortest tread life projection of all the tyres.
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro performs like its competitors in the Central European friction class regarding ice and snow - the weakest side - with barely adequate winter performance. It performs well on snow, but struggles on ice. In other respects, it delivers mediocre performance where wet roads present the biggest problems despite this being supposedly the tyre's strong suit. Wet braking performs very well, but overall handling and behavior on wet surfaces doesn't match the class leaders. The stability and comfort are adequate but unremarkable. Aquaplaning performance is decent for the category. As a Japanese manufacturer with winter tyre production in Turkey, Falken has produced a tyre that represents the Central European friction compromise without excelling at any particular aspect. The middling performance across most categories means it lacks a compelling reason to choose it over better-performing alternatives. While the bare pavement performance is good, it's not outstanding enough to compensate for the winter weaknesses, leaving it as a mediocre all-around performer in a competitive field.
The FALKEN Eurowinter HS02 Pro is presented as a "snow talent" that also manages to provide good performance on dry roads, all for an affordable price. However, its capabilities are severely compromised on wet surfaces, where it showed generally weaker performance. Testers described its straight aquaplaning resistance as "bereits kritisch" (already critical) and noted its weakness in both wet handling and curved aquaplaning tests.
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro demonstrates respectable driving performance on dry pavement, maintaining decent handling characteristics and acceptable behavior in clear conditions. However, this Japanese-branded tyre (developed by Sumitomo) reveals significant weaknesses where they matter most for winter safety. It shows weaker overall performance on snow with compromised grip and handling, while extended braking distances in both wet and dry conditions raise serious safety concerns. The tyre also suffers from particularly rapid wear, resulting in the lowest projected mileage in the entire test—nearly 20,000 kilometers less than the longest-lasting competitors. This accelerated wear makes it extremely expensive over its shortened lifetime despite a mid-range purchase price around €510. The combination of safety compromises and poor durability makes the Falken impossible to recommend, as drivers would face both increased risk and the inconvenience and cost of premature replacement.
Reviewers describe the Falken as “refined” and able to perform well in all conditions. It strikes a solid balance between grip and ride comfort, making it an easy tyre to live with and competitively priced.
Satisfactory.
Very sluggish snow handling, good wet grip, high rolling resistance.
Satisfactory.
The Falken Eurowinter HS02 Pro struggled in the rolling resistance test, having the worst of the group, and wasn't the best in the snow either, but it was obviously much better than the summer tyre. It WAS good in wet and dry handling, and had great aquaplaning resistance. Perhaps not a bad winter tyre for somewhere like the UK that doesn't see much snow.
Too weak on snow. The otherwise passable Falken has to be downgraded."Satisfactory"
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Falken tyres