Menu
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 View Gallery (10)
155-355/25-70 R14-22 346 sizes 2019 Winter rated
Tested by Tyre Reviews View Test »

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Previous Bridgestone Tyres Premium Touring Winter Next

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is a premium touring winter tyre that consistently excels in wet, temperate winter conditions. Independent tests regularly place it at or near the top of its class for wet braking and wet handling, and drivers echo this with strong confidence and stability in the rain. It also delivers good comfort when new and can be reassuring in light-to-moderate snow. The main compromises are faster-than-average wear and winter traction that can fade as the tyre ages.

9.1
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
78%
Wet Grip
84%
Road Feedback
75%
Handling
73%
Wear
59%
Comfort
75%
Buy again
61%
Snow Grip
73%
Ice Grip
61%
105 Reviews
71% Average
1,011,358 miles driven
45 Tests (avg: 3rd)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Winter Premium
BETA
9.1 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Category Scores
Wet
92.6
1.93x / 138 tests
Snow
81.5
1.5x / 112 tests
Comfort
77.9
0.32x / 37 tests
Dry
70.1
1.13x / 64 tests
Value
68.9
0.42x / 71 tests
Ice
47.5
1.2x / 2 tests
Cross-Category Performance

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
84.2
105 tests
Handling
82.7
102 tests
Traction
81.3
27 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 45
Publications: 10
Period: 2019 - 2024
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 105
Avg Rating: 71%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.44
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2024 235/35 R19 5/11 12 metrics
2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2024 215/55 R17 1/10 13 metrics
2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2023 255/40 R19 5/6 22 metrics
2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild Allrad 2023 225/60 R18 8/11 14 metrics
2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test Sport Auto 2023 225/40 R18 1/9 14 metrics
2023 Sports Cars Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2023 225/40 R18 5/12 12 metrics
2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 10/22 15 metrics
2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test ADAC 2023 205/60 R16 6/16 12 metrics
2023 Tyre Reviews SUV Winter Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2023 235/60 R18 3/9 17 metrics
2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test Auto Bild 2023 225/45 R18 1/54 2 metrics
2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2023 225/45 R18 1/13 14 metrics
2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test ADAC 2023 225/45 R17 15/15 13 metrics
2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2023 255/45 R20 1/7 13 metrics
2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2022 245/40 R19 1/10 14 metrics
2022 Sport Auto All Season Tyre Test Sport Auto 2022 235/35 R19 4/8 13 metrics
2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 6/22 16 metrics
2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild Allrad 2022 225/45 R19 4/10 14 metrics
2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2022 215/55 R17 1/57 2 metrics
2022 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 ADAC 2022 185/65 R15 7/15 0 metrics
2022 ADAC SUV Winter Tyre Test - 215/60 R16 ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 5/17 0 metrics
2022/23 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2022 225/45 R17 1/9 16 metrics
2022 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2022 225/45 R17 2/8 16 metrics
2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2022 245/45 R19 4/8 13 metrics
2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2021 245/40 R18 4/14 14 metrics
2021 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test Auto Express 2021 225/45 R17 1/8 0 metrics
2021 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2021 235/55 R18 1/10 12 metrics
2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild Allrad 2021 235/55 R18 3/11 14 metrics
2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 5/22 15 metrics
2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2021 195/55 R16 1/10 12 metrics
2021 ADAC 17 Inch Winter Tyre Test ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 5/18 0 metrics
2021 ADAC 15 Inch Winter Tyre Test ADAC 2021 195/65 R15 7/16 0 metrics
2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview Auto Bild 2021 205/55 R16 1/49 2 metrics
2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2021 225/40 R18 4/10 14 metrics
The Best Winter Tyres for 2020 Tyre Reviews 2020 205/55 R16 1/19 0 metrics
2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2020 205/55 R16 1/14 11 metrics
2020 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test Auto Express 2020 205/55 R16 1/9 0 metrics
2020 ACE Winter Tyre Test ACE 2020 225/50 R17 1/9 0 metrics
2020 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2020 225/55 R17 2/11 11 metrics
2020 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 235/55 R17 ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 7/13 0 metrics
2020 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 ADAC 2020 205/55 R16 1/15 0 metrics
2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 2/21 12 metrics
2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test Auto Bild 2020 245/45 R18 1/49 2 metrics
2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 5/21 12 metrics
2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview Auto Bild 2019 225/45 R17 1/47 2 metrics
2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test Auto Motor Und Sport 2019 215/55 R17 2/11 14 metrics

Videos

The Best SUV Winter Tire? Nokian, Michelin, Continental, Bridgestone, Pirelli & More Tested!

The Best SUV Winter Tire? Nokian, Michelin, Continental, Bridgestone, Pirelli & More Tested!

Best 11 Winter Tires for 2023/24 - Tested and Rated

Best 11 Winter Tires for 2023/24 - Tested and Rated

The BEST 10 Winter Tires for 2022/23 Tested and Rated!

The BEST 10 Winter Tires for 2022/23 Tested and Rated!

In Depth Tyre Comparisons
View More Comparisons
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Continental WinterContact TS 870
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
All Tests
View Test Results
45
Tests
3rd
Average
1st
Best
15th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test
215/55 R17 • 2024
1st/10
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 excels in wet conditions with the shortest braking distance and responsive handling, while maintaining stability. It's easy to control even when pushed to its limits. On snow, it provides good traction and a balanced performance, although the steering feedback could be clearer. In dry conditions, it prioritizes comfort, providing the smoothest ride among the winter tyres tested. However, it does have a slightly longer braking distance. It handles corners effectively but is not the most eager to turn. Overall, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 emerges as the top performer among winter tyres, thanks to its exceptional wet grip. However, it delivers an average performance on dry surfaces.
2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test
235/35 R19 • 2024
5th/11
The best in wet handling and wet braking. A reliable, precise performer in snow.
Loses the "Exemplary" seal due to poor dry braking performance.
2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test
225/45 R18 • 2023
1st/13
Best in wet handling and wet braking, good in the snow, high levels of comfort, very low rolling resistance.
Extended dry braking and dry handling, average aquaplaning resistance.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is an awesome tyre, it was the only tyre that could get close to the Continentals rolling resistance levels and was the best tyre in the wet and one of the best in the snow, with excellent noise and comfort levels. It wasn't the best in the dry, but as it finished so well in almost every other category, the LM005 is proving to still be one of the best winter tyres on the market.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
14 inch
175/65 R14 82 T C A 71
185/60 R14 82 T C A 70
165/70 R14 85 T XL C A 70
15 inch
185/65 R15 92 T XL C A 70
195/65 R15 95 T XL C A 71
195/65 R15 91 T C A 71
195/55 R15 85 H C A 71
195/65 R15 91 H C A 71
195/65R15 91 H C A 71
195/65R15 95 T XL C A 71
185/65 R15 88 T C A 71
185/65R15 88 T C A 71
16 inch
205/55 R16 91 H C A 71
215/70 R16 100 T C A 71
205/55 R16 91 T C A 71
205/55 R16 94 V XL C A 71
205/55 R16 94 H XL C A 71
205/60 R16 92 H C A 71
205/60 R16 96 H XL C A 71
205/60 R16 96 H XL A B 72
205/60 R16 96 H XL A B 72
215/70 R16 100 T C A 71
205/60R16 96 H XL C A 71
205/55R16 91 H C A 71
215/60 R16 99 H XL C A 71
215/60R16 99 H XL B A 71
17 inch
225/45 R17 91 H C A 71
225/60 R17 99 H C A 71
235/65 R17 108 H XL B A 72
235/65 R17 108 V XL B A 72
215/45 R17 91 V XL C A 71
205/50 R17 93 V XL C A 71
225/50 R17 98 H XL C A 71
225/50 R17 98 V XL C A 71
215/55 R17 98 V XL C A 71
225/60 R17 103 V XL C A 71
225/45 R17 94 H XL C A 71
215/55 R17 98 H XL C A 71
225/50 R17 98 H XL B A 70
225/50 R17 98 H XL B A 70
205/50 R17 93 H XL C A 72
205/50 R17 93 H XL C A 72
215/45 R17 91 H XL C A 71
215/45 R17 91 H XL C A 71
215/45 R17 91 H XL C A 71
225/50R17 98 V XL C A 71
225/45R17 94 V XL C A 72
225/45R17 94 V XL C A 72
265/65R17 116 H XL B A 72
215/55R17 98 V XL C A 72
215/55R17 98 V XL C A 72
225/60R17 99 H C A 71
235/65R17 108 V XL B A 72
225/45 R17 94 V XL C A 71
265/65 R17 116 H XL B A 73
215/55R17 94 V C B 71
215/55R17 94 V C B 71
18 inch
235/60 R18 107 H XL C A 72
255/35 R18 94 V XL C A 73
225/40 R18 92 V XL C A 72
245/45 R18 100 V XL C A 72
235/60 R18 107 V XL C A 72
245/40 R18 97 W XL C A 72
225/40 R18 92 V XL D A 72
225/40 R18 92 V XL D A 72
235/60 R18 107 H XL C A 71
225/40R18 92 V XL C A 72
225/40R18 92 V XL C A 72
245/40 R18 97 V XL C A 72
245/45R18 100 V XL C A 72
235/60R18 107 H XL C A 71
19 inch
235/35 R19 91 W XL C A 72
20 inch
245/35 R20 95 W XL C A 72
255/45 R20 105 V XL C B 73
255/45 R20 105 V XL C B 73
255/45 R20 105 V XL C A 73
255/45 R20 101 T C B 73
255/45 R20 101 T C B 73
255/45 R20 101 T C B 73
255/45 R20 101 T C B 73
255/45 R20 105 V XL C B 73
255/45R20 105 V XL C A 73
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 >>

Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 93 user reviews

Drivers of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 frequently praise its outstanding wet grip and braking, along with predictable, stable handling and good comfort when new. Many also find it capable in light-to-moderate snow. However, a significant number report rapid tread wear and a notable drop-off in snow/ice traction as the tyre ages, with some also noting rising noise levels over time. Overall sentiment is moderately positive, but durability and aged winter performance are recurring concerns.

Strengths
  • Outstanding wet grip and braking
  • Predictable
  • Stable handling
  • Good comfort/quiet when new
  • Solid performance in light-to-moderate snow
Areas for Improvement
  • Rapid tread wear and early performance degradation
  • Weak traction on ice and in deeper/compacted snow (worsens as they wear)
  • Noise increases as the tyre ages

Top 3 Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Reviews

Given 91% while driving a BMW 3 series (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 12,000 spirited miles
best winter tires, for winter. Proper one, with a lot of snow, and ice or melted snow, mushy one, here are extraordinary. I was clinbing on snow covered road many times on a step hills witha rear wheel BMW, didnt hasitate. I pass AWD cars, SUVs and saw them struggeling, spinning wheels etc. Blizzaks are unbeateable. Thats why are option OEM #1 on premium cars (not performance cars).

On dry or hot period with rain are very good, but michellin or goodyear are here bit better.
Helpful 1086
December 20, 2024
Given 87% while driving a Mazda cx5 (225/55 R19) on mostly town for 2,000 spirited miles
I like this tire comfort. With this tire my Mazda CX-5 received in improvement in noise level, like I performed a noise isolation.
It is so soft and quite, I really like it.

In terms of car handling, it still very good, not as good as my previous Blizzak DM-V2. The feedback after wheel turning is a bit slower. I would not recommend it for a track day )
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 image
Helpful 940
March 3, 2025
Given 86% while driving a Kia Motors ceed (195/65 R15) on mostly town for 2,000 average miles
I had these tires for approximately 2000 miles (3200 km) and I love them.
The dry grip is exceptional for these kind of dimensions on the tyre.
The wet grip is pretty good.
I've found that when braking on a thin layer of snow, in -7 degrees, the tires felt mushy, but I guess it is expected, since it is a softer composite vs summer tires.
I'd buy them anytime for any car, especially if the needed dimensions are lower I'd rather spend money on these premium tires than on something budget.

It is a moderately dry climate in which I am in, so no snow or ice grip experiences with this one.
Helpful 931
March 3, 2025

How would you rate the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005?

Click a star to start your review

191 reviews submitted this month Earn your Contributor badge No account needed

Latest Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 38% while driving a Ford Focus ST250 (215/50 R17) on for 9,500 miles
I've used these tires for about 3 winters and around 9500 miles and a 250hp FWD car.
Let's start with the first winter, they were great, good snow grip, good wet and dry grip. Felt I've made a good choice to handle my limited winter driving for the next couple of years. The second winter they had lost some of their snow grip but nothing too serious and I half expected it so everything was fine. Now we come to this winter which would be their last. No snow grip what so ever. I had trouble taking off in a couple inches of snow and would get constant wheel spin. When they had to do both acceleration and cornering at they same time they were borderline dangerous. Wet and dry grip is still okay.
Considering how little they have been driven on and have been stored correctly in the summer I half expected them to last one more winter. They still have a lot of tread left but the compound has become really hard.
For the price I paid for them I could have spend a little bit more and tried Michelin Alpin 6/7 since they get better reviews for longevity.
Helpful 0
February 27, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 50% while driving a Nissan LEAF Tekna (215/50 R17) on for 40,000 miles
Performs bad on ice and snow, even new tires noticeably bad on ice and snow, feels like suer tires. I would never ever buy them again.
Helpful 135
January 9, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 52% while driving a BMW i4 e40 (225/45 R17) on for 20,000 miles
Got these tires for my Bmw i4 e40 (RWD). They were test winners and supposedly very good.

My experience is the opposite. For snowy, icy nordic winters. They are horrendous. I initially didn't think they were too bad. When new, they were decent. But having now switched to Conti VikingContacts (7 rear, 8 front, due to supply limitations in my dimensions). I got some awakening perspective.

It felt similar to what I believe F1 drivers feel like when switching to intermediates/wets after staying out for too long in the rain on slicks.
I now had traction, throttle, braking, turning. I could actually drive the car.

Before I could provoke oversteer with the lightest of throttle application, now I really have to do it with intent to get some action.

The Blizzaks were never unpredictable with oversteer or understeer. They were predictably horrible in snow and ice.

Wear was also a big problem. Chewed through a set of rears in about 10000km/6000miles. Twice.

Would not recommend, if you only se slight snow once or twice a year. Maybe, but then you'd be better off with a great all season tire I think.
Helpful 166
January 9, 2026
Initial Impressions Review
Given 93% while driving a Toyota GT86 (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 20,000 spirited miles
I have driven this tyre in continental winter conditions - everything except pure ice. Dry grip was excellent, and pushing it was particularly enjoyable as the tyre is very predictable and progressive at the limit. In moist and greasy my confidence is limited, but the tyre was still predictable, although the grip level gets quite low. I don't recall having any issues in the wet, including standing water.
In the snow (and they have seen proper snow) lateral load in the corners is excellent and grip under braking was good as well, proportionally in all types of snow (dry, wet, compact, slush). Traction is somewhat limited, although still quite good once moving, however setting off from standstill is by far the biggest challenge, without doubt influenced by the lightweight RWD configuration.
Finally, I decided to change them at the age of 5 as performance in the snow dropped off slightly, but still noticeably, with still plenty of tread (5 mm). When the time came I took 1 h at deserted dry tarmac with the goal to finish them off, yet there was barely any sign of wear.
Overall a very rewarding tyre in the snow, and solid, although not particularly sporty in other conditions.
P.S. I drove about 30,000 km over 3 seasons. The tyres came with the car when I bought it from the previous owner and were used the previous 2 seasons.
Helpful 135
December 28, 2025
Given 59% while driving a Mitsubishi Outlander (215/70 R16) on a combination of roads for 13,000 easy going miles
I bought 4 Bridgestone LM005 winter tires at the end of 2020. They have been used for 4 winter seasons since then. The pattern is missing in many places on the outer tread. If it were natural wear, the entire outer tread would have been worn, but here only one is missing. I think they are defective in production. I do not recommend them for this reason. Otherwise, there are no other problems.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image
Helpful 187
November 20, 2025
Tyre reviews and ratingsTyre Reviews Replies
While this looks troubling, I believe it is by design. It is advantageous for handling to put non full depth siping on the shoulders, which is why you are seeing the siping disappearing before the full depth siping elsewhere on the tyre. They should still be perfectly fine to use, but I suggest sending a photo to Bridgestone just to be safe.
Given 40% while driving a Volkswagen Taigo (205/55 R17) on a combination of roads for 12,000 average miles
Horrible tire. Dont buy it. I used them 2 winter seasons. They have aprox 20.000 km. Worn out after 2 seasons only. See the photos below how they look like. They have several spots with flat surface. I dont understand how they could reach also the best performance in the wet condition as wet handling was average. If I compare this tyres with Polaris 6 (used on 2nd car), this tyre is piece of...
They are winner in the shortest lifetime. How this can be a premium tyre for such money? Disaster.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image
Helpful 191
November 11, 2025
Tyre reviews and ratingsTyre Reviews Replies
It looks like the flat spots are part of non-full depth sipes, which would be by design, however I suggest you double check with Bridgestone and report back.
Given 68% while driving a Mazda MX5 ND2 RF 2.0 (205/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 4,500 spirited miles
Excellent snow and ice tire but a rather bad dry and wet performance. Additionally I expected a longer life but I accept the fact that I usually drive harder than this tire is meant to be driven.
Must buy if expecting heavy snow or ice roads.
I would look somewhere else if expecting dry or mostly wet winter roads.
Helpful 242
November 4, 2025
Given 87% while driving a Volkswagen Golf sportsvan tsi 150 (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 170,877 easy going miles
In my opinion, the tires are great. Bought them new in 2021 and mounted them on a Golf VII Variant. As most of our winters are not exactly ice and snow, but more slush and wet, these tires performed very well. During wet conditions (between -3 and +8 Celsius) car was handling very well, easily controllable, and had no issues whatsoever. However, if the slush gets deep and on a corner, even these tires are not enough to maintain grip, but that is probably expected as these are not Nordic winter tires. Going uphill when snow has been crushed and pretty much become ice can be a struggle if you have to come to a complete stop, which means you will not be sliding backward or anything dangerous like that, but the wheels will spin until they get some traction to slowly start you going. Driving trough a snow storm and maintaining constant speed of around 70kmh is however very easy with these tyres, I saw many cars on the side of the road and many needing a push out of a ditch, or as in one case BMW was stuck on a road, so pushed him out so we could continue on our journey, drove on autobahn with them when the road was not yet plowed and there was icy bumps that needed driving over (of course at reasonable speed for the conditions) and 0 issues maintaining control of the car, so overall these are great tyres for winter. I probably would not pick these to drive in Finland or Norway, but for me they served great. Lasted about 2-3 seasons, so maybe not the longest longevity, but they do perform well.
Helpful 238
November 4, 2025
Given 16% while driving a Toyota RAV4 Hybrid 4x4 2023. (225/60 R18) on a combination of roads for 2,000 average miles
I bought 4 new Bridgestone Blizzak L005 tires at an authorized Toyota center in Novi Sad, Serbia, in September 2023 (DOT 1222) on Toyota rims measuring 225/60/18 and after 13,000 km, the first signs of significant wear of the tire sipes on all 4 tires to the level of complete wear were seen, with increased noise, vibrations, significantly longer stopping distances and instability on the road, especially in the wet, not to mention snow and ice. The frame, shock absorbers and brakes were inspected at the official Toyota service center and the findings were in order. I filed a complaint, but it was rejected even though it was within the warranty period. I don't know whether I am more disappointed in Toyota or Bridgestone.
Helpful 213
October 28, 2025
Given 86% while driving a BMW 330xi (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 16,000 average miles
I’ve had the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 fitted on my car for four winters, covering around 15,500 miles in total, and my experience has been excellent.
What stands out the most is their performance on wet roads – grip and braking are very secure even in heavy rain. On snow and cold roads, they also perform remarkably well, offering consistent traction and a very confident driving feel.

In terms of driving sensations, the tires feel stable, precise, and comfortable, with low noise levels and no excessive softness.
They’ve also shown very even wear, which speaks well for their durability as winter tires.

Another point worth mentioning is the price, which I find very reasonable for a premium tire. The Blizzak LM005 manages to stand out from other premium brands by offering top-level performance at a more affordable cost.

Overall, the Blizzak LM005 is a well-balanced tire with excellent grip on wet and snowy roads, great comfort, impressive longevity, and a price that truly sets it apart. Highly recommended for anyone looking for safety, reliability, and great value in winter conditions.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 additional image
Helpful 254
October 16, 2025
Given 90% while driving a Volkswagen Tiguan (215/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 5,000 miles
Excellent winter tyre. I drove heavy snow with them, snow grip was perfect. Never slide. I highly recommend
Helpful 334
September 29, 2025
Given 64% while driving a Toyota RAV4 (225/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 14,000 easy going miles
As premium tires, these are not impressive at all. They are good when new, though most tires are, but from mid-life onward, traction on snow and ice becomes quite poor. The wear is terrible.
Helpful 249
September 26, 2025
Rate the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005