For this year's Tyre Reviews winter tyre test, we've got nine sets of the most popular winter tyres, half of which are brand new tyres for this year!
As always I'll be testing in the snow, wet and dry, and looking at rolling resistance, noise and comfort, to ensure you get the best overview of all the new winter tyres!
The slowest tyre on test was the Vredestein Wintrac Pro, 5.2% off the best. This tyre was a joy to drive as everything it did was smooth and progressive, but it just lacked a little grip.
The next bundle of tyres were less than 4% behind the best, and you're going to be surprised, it's the Semperit, Continental and Bridgestone. If you know your winter tyres, you'll know this is unusual as the Continental and the Bridgestone are excellent in the snow, and they all were here too, there are just some very new tyres in this group which have performed very well! The Bridgestone felt the most rounded, but they were all incredibly close.
The Michelin Alpin 6 was next, less than 3% off the best, again lovely to drive, just picked up a little more understeer than most hurting the lap time, perhaps it'll do better in traction and braking.
The new Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 was fourth, 2.3% off the best, and the new Hankook Winter ICept RS3 was third, just 1.2% behind the fastest! The Pirelli was subjectively lovely, you could drive it easily and quickly and I super enjoyed it, and the Hankook just had a huge amount of grip!
Kleber, which is a Michelin second tier brand came second. This will be no surprise if you've been following winter tyre testing last year, the Krisalp HP3 is constantly one of the best, if not the best in the snow in all tests, so when I found out it was the Kleber here (I was testing blind) I wasn't overly surprised.
What I was surprised about was the best tyre in snow handling being the Petlas, which is by far the cheapest tyre here. This tyre was simply exceptional in these very cold conditions, it was fastest in snow handling and had very good marks subjectively too, the only negative perhaps being slightly peaky grip.
You might be confused, as generally the message from testing is that budget tyres are bad. In this example, it's not the biggest surprise that the Petlas has done well in the snow, as cheap tyres can be very good at one thing, at the expense of everything else.
What will be a surprise is if this tyre also does well in the wet.
Snow Braking
Spread: 2.40 M (8.8%)|Avg: 28.48 M
Snow braking in meters (45 - 5 km/h) (Lower is better)
Kleber Krisalp HP3
27.20 M
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
27.20 M
Petlas Snow Master W651
27.80 M
Continental WinterContact TS 870
27.80 M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
28.90 M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
29.10 M
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
29.30 M
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
29.40 M
Michelin Alpin 6
29.60 M
Snow Traction
Spread: 0.70 s (14.9%)|Avg: 5.06 s
Snow acceleration time (5 - 40 km/h) (Lower is better)
Petlas Snow Master W651
4.70 s
Kleber Krisalp HP3
4.70 s
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
4.90 s
Michelin Alpin 6
5.10 s
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
5.10 s
Continental WinterContact TS 870
5.10 s
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
5.10 s
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
5.40 s
Semperit Speed Grip 5
5.40 s
Snow Handling
Spread: 6.30 s (5.6%)|Avg: 115.26 s
Snow handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
Petlas Snow Master W651
112.20 s
Kleber Krisalp HP3
113.30 s
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
113.60 s
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
114.90 s
Michelin Alpin 6
115.60 s
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
116.20 s
Continental WinterContact TS 870
116.50 s
Semperit Speed Grip 5
116.50 s
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
118.50 s
Wet
Unfortunately the Petlas was not a surprise in wet handling. The tyre just slides around totally unpredictably, the steering really tells you nothing that's going on underneath you, and the grip is so limited it was the only tyre I did two laps instead of four, though they were exactly the same, then gave up as I didn't want to risk coming off and damaging the test vehicle. It might only be 15 seconds in lap time but I can't explain how difficult it was to drive.
Kleber and Semperit were next, way ahead of the budget, but still around 5 seconds off the best. The both had a little oversteer in the balance but were otherwise fine, just lacking a bit of wet grip.
The Michelin Alpin 6 finished sixth. This tyre had the safest balance of the group, with almost no unpredictability or oversteer, but lots of mid corner understeer really hurts a lap time.
Pirelli and Vredestein almost tie for fourth in time, and were two of the most fun tyres to drive, both feeling playful and giving good steering feedback and response, these two were fun to drive.
The smallest margin ahead was the Hankook which was certainly grippy, but lost a little time on corner exit as you had to be a little more careful with the throttle.
That only leaves Continental and Bridgestone, and if you're familiar with winter tyre testing, I bet you can guess who was fastest. The Continental put up a good fight, and rewarded a little more of a smoother driving style, but it couldn't knock bridgestone from it's almost guaranteed number one spot in wet handling. Once again the Blizzak LM005 was the best in wet handling, feeling extremely strong on the brakes, turn in and mid corner, with a safe understeer balance like the Michelin, just more grip.
Wet Braking
Spread: 12.20 M (44.7%)|Avg: 31.27 M
Wet braking in meters (80 - 5 km/h) (Lower is better)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
27.30 M
Continental WinterContact TS 870
27.60 M
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
28.20 M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
29.50 M
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
30.40 M
Michelin Alpin 6
31.80 M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
32.30 M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
34.80 M
Petlas Snow Master W651
39.50 M
Wet Handling
Spread: 14.80 s (15.3%)|Avg: 100.99 s
Wet handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
97.00 s
Continental WinterContact TS 870
97.70 s
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
98.80 s
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
99.00 s
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
99.00 s
Michelin Alpin 6
100.60 s
Semperit Speed Grip 5
102.20 s
Kleber Krisalp HP3
102.80 s
Petlas Snow Master W651
111.80 s
Straight Aqua
Spread: 12.30 Km/H (14.7%)|Avg: 79.54 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
Kleber Krisalp HP3
83.50 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 870
82.40 Km/H
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
81.80 Km/H
Semperit Speed Grip 5
81.30 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
80.00 Km/H
Michelin Alpin 6
79.90 Km/H
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
78.90 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
76.90 Km/H
Petlas Snow Master W651
71.20 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
Spread: 3.30 m/sec2 (40.7%)|Avg: 7.03 m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)
Continental WinterContact TS 870
8.10 m/sec2
Semperit Speed Grip 5
8.00 m/sec2
Michelin Alpin 6
7.60 m/sec2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
7.30 m/sec2
Kleber Krisalp HP3
7.10 m/sec2
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
7.10 m/sec2
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
6.80 m/sec2
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
6.50 m/sec2
Petlas Snow Master W651
4.80 m/sec2
Dry
This is what I learnt during dry handling. They're all non performance winter tyres. The data is below, and if you want a 17" non performance winter tyre to handle well in the dry, I'd go with the Pirelli.
Ignoring the budget and the Kleber, they were all actually very impressive considering dry handling testing is WAY out of their designed operating parameters.
Dry Braking
Spread: 2.80 M (7.7%)|Avg: 38.09 M
Dry braking in meters (100 - 5 km/h) (Lower is better)
Michelin Alpin 6
36.60 M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
36.90 M
Semperit Speed Grip 5
37.50 M
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
37.60 M
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
37.80 M
Kleber Krisalp HP3
38.40 M
Continental WinterContact TS 870
39.20 M
Petlas Snow Master W651
39.40 M
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
39.40 M
Dry Handling
Spread: 2.10 s (2.6%)|Avg: 80.42 s
Dry handling time in seconds (Lower is better)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
79.80 s
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
79.90 s
Semperit Speed Grip 5
79.90 s
Continental WinterContact TS 870
80.20 s
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
80.30 s
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
80.40 s
Kleber Krisalp HP3
80.70 s
Michelin Alpin 6
80.70 s
Petlas Snow Master W651
81.90 s
Environment
The internal noise and subjective comfort of the tyres was all extremely close, but the Pirelli and Bridgestone had a small edge. The Petlas was the most noisy tyre internally, but the difference from best to worse was less than 2 dB.
Noise
Spread: 1.30 dB (1.9%)|Avg: 69.30 dB
Internal noise in dB (Lower is better)
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
68.50 dB
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
68.90 dB
Kleber Krisalp HP3
69.10 dB
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
69.20 dB
Semperit Speed Grip 5
69.30 dB
Continental WinterContact TS 870
69.50 dB
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
69.60 dB
Petlas Snow Master W651
69.80 dB
Michelin Alpin 6
69.80 dB
Subj. Comfort
Spread: 15.00 Points (15%)|Avg: 92.78 Points
Subjective Comfort Score (Higher is better)
Michelin Alpin 6
100.00 Points
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
100.00 Points
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
100.00 Points
Kleber Krisalp HP3
90.00 Points
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
90.00 Points
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90.00 Points
Semperit Speed Grip 5
90.00 Points
Hankook Winter I cept RS3
90.00 Points
Petlas Snow Master W651
85.00 Points
The Petlas did have a huge lead in fuel use with an unusually low rolling resistance. The Bridgestone was the best of the rest.
Fastest dry and wet handling, shortest wet braking, good aquaplaning resistance, excellent snow braking, low noise, lowest rolling resistance.
Long dry braking distances, average snow handling.
As in previous tests the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 wasn't the best in dry braking, and wasn't quite as balanced as some of the other tyres in snow handling, but they were the only weaknesses of the LM005. The LM005 excelled in the wet grip tests with the best grip in wet handling and the shortest wet braking distances, it also won the snow braking and performed well in snow traction, had some of the lowest noise on test and the lowest rolling resistance of the top tyres. A thoroughly deserved test win for the Japanese giant, congratulations to Bridgestone
Excellent in the wet, very good snow braking and traction, good dry handling, low rolling resistance.
Average in car noise, average snow handling.
The Continental WinterContact TS870 might be one of the older new tyres in this test, but you can never count Continental out of a winter tyre test, and the TS870 had an exceptional run of results. It was the best tyre in the wet overall, being one of the few tyres which excelled in both the wet grip tests and the deeper water tests of aquaplaning. In the snow it was better longitudinally than laterally, which helps it in the overall results as braking is the highest weighted scoring, and it also was good during dry handling even if it struggled a little in dry braking, PLUS had a relatively low rolling resistance. Very impressive tyre, another one worthy of being highly recommended
A very balanced tyre, excellent grip in all wet tests, good in the snow, good in the dry.
Slightly elevated internal noise level, average rolling resistance.
The new Hankook Winter I*Cept RS3 continues Hankooks impressive results, and other than an outlier in snow braking, it is a winter tyre with no major weakness. IT was impressive in the dry, very impressive in the wet and thoroughly enjoyable around the snow handling track with predictable handling and high levels of grip. A good aquaplaning resistance and high snow traction cements the tyre in third place and is a tyre I highly recommend
Enjoyable dynamic tyre to drive in all conditions, short dry braking, good snow handling, lowest internal noise.
Low aquaplaning resistance, weaker snow braking, high rolling resistance.
The new Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 was the most fun tyre to drive in all conditions. It was the winter tyre of the group that seemed to focus more on lateral grip than longitudinal grip, and while it wasn't the best in snow braking or the aquaplaning tests, it was great in snow handling, wet handling and dry handling and a very likable tyre. A deserved fourth overall and a tyre I recommend
Excellent in the dry with fast handing and short braking distances, very good aquaplaning resistance, very low rolling resistance.
Low grip in wet handling and braking, limited grip in the snow.
The Semperit Speed Grip 5 in fifth was essentially exactly as good as the Vredestein in the dry, not as good in the wet grip tests but much better in the aquaplaning tests, a little better in the snow but it did have one of the best rolling resistances on test. I'd like to see some more wet performance from this tyre to push it further towards the best of the group.
Excellent in the dry with fast handing and short braking distances, good trip in the wet, low noise.
Weakest snow handling result of the group, low aquaplaning resistance, low snow traction, very high rolling resistance.
Sixth place overall went to the impressive Vredestein Wintrac Pro. This tyre was excellent in the dry, held its own in the wet with good subjective handling and was a quiet tyre. Unfortunately it wasn't the strongest in the snow with the slowest snow handling time and the worst traction, it struggled in the deeper water of the aquaplaning tests and had the highest rolling resistance of all the tyres on test. Potentially an option for climates like the UK who really want to fit a winter tyre instead of an all season tyre, but not a strong option anymore for a climate with a lot of snow.
Shortest dry braking, good aquaplaning resistance, safe snow handling balance.
Poor snow braking, reduced grip in the wet grip tests, high rolling resistance.
The Michelin Alpin 6 finished seventh overall. As usual, it was a very good tyre in the dry with the shortest dry braking, however its wet and snow performance didn't live up to the usual Michelin brand expectations and it had one of the highest rolling resistances on test. A test to forget for the French manufacturer, especially after the Michelin CrossClimate 2 won the Tyre Reviews all season test in the same size and same conditions.
Excellent in the snow, high aquaplaning resistance, low noise.
Long wet and dry braking distances.
The Kleber Krisalp HP3 was another tyre that excelled in the snow, and it had great straight aquaplaning resistance, and while it was nowhere near as bad as the Petlas in the wet, it still couldn't match the best on test, especially in the important wet braking test meaning eighth overall is the best it could manage.
Excellent in the snow, fastest snow handling lap, best snow traction and good snow braking. Very low rolling resistance.
Extremely long wet and dry braking distances, very difficult to control in wet handling, very low aquaplaning resistance.
The Petlas Snowmaster W651 really is the snow master of this group, finishing as one of best in the three snow tests. However like other budget tyres it can't continue that performance onto other surfaces and is particularly bad in wet handling, with low grip and a very difficult balance.
