The 2022 Auto Zeitung performance winter tyre test has tested eight popular winter tyres in 225/45 R17.
Continental, Bridgestone and Michelin all perform well, with the Continental WinterContact TS870 taking another win in 2022 winter tyre tests thanks to a well balanced performance in all conditions, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 performing extremely well in the dry and wet, and the Michelin Alpin 6 offering good grip in all conditions.
Test Publication:
225/45 R17
8 tyres
5 categories
Images courtesy of Auto Zeitung
Test Publication:
Images courtesy of Auto Zeitung
Test Size:
225/45 R17
Tyres Tested:
8 tyres
Dry
The Nokian SnowProof P was the best in dry braking, stopping the Audi A3 four meters shorter than the worst of the group.
- Nokian Snowproof P
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Giti GitiWinterW2
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was the best tyre during dry handling, narrowly beating the Continental WinterContact TS870.
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- Nokian Snowproof P
- Giti GitiWinterW2
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Michelin Alpin 6
The Continental and Bridgestone were also the best subjectively in the dry.
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- Nokian Snowproof P
- Giti GitiWinterW2
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Wet
Wet braking was again led by the impressive Bridgestone and Continental pair.
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- Nokian Snowproof P
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Giti GitiWinterW2
As was wet handling, but this time with Continental in front of Bridgestone. Michelin again placed a respectable third.
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Nokian Snowproof P
- Giti GitiWinterW2
Conti, Bridgestone and Michelin were the testers favorites subjectively too.
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
- Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Nokian Snowproof P
- Giti GitiWinterW2
Continental and Bridgestone also had the best straight aquaplaning resistance.
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Giti GitiWinterW2
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
- Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- Nokian Snowproof P
Snow
Continental was again the best in snow braking, but this time Giti took second place with the GitiWinterW2!
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Giti GitiWinterW2
- Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Nokian Snowproof P
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
Michelin led in snow traction, with the Fulda close behind.
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Giti GitiWinterW2
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- Nokian Snowproof P
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
Continental and Michelin were back at the front during snow handling.
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Nokian Snowproof P
- Giti GitiWinterW2
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
Environment
The Nokian was the quietest tyre on test externally.
- Nokian Snowproof P
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Giti GitiWinterW2
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Vredestein Wintrac Pro
And offered the best subjective comfort levels.
- Nokian Snowproof P
- Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
- Giti GitiWinterW2
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
The Nokian also had the lowest fuel use on test, followed by Bridgestone and Continental.
- Nokian Snowproof P
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- Giti GitiWinterW2
The Giti was the cheapest tyre in the test, and the Michelin the most expensive.
- Giti GitiWinterW2
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Vredestein Wintrac Pro
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Nokian Snowproof P
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
- Continental WinterContact TS 870
- Michelin Alpin 6
Results
The Continental WinterContact TS870 is extremely strong on any surface, very safe and therefor the clear winner of this test.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
46.1 M |
45 M |
+1.1 M |
97.61% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
63.3 s |
63.1 s |
+0.2 s |
99.68% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
1st |
30 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
51.9 M |
50.3 M |
+1.6 M |
96.92% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
89.7 s |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
1st |
45 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
75.2 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
1st |
2.96 m/sec2 |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
1st |
26 M |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Traction |
4th |
2712 N |
2782 N |
-70 N |
97.48% |
| Snow Handling |
1st |
81.8 s |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
1st |
30 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
2nd |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
2nd |
71 dB |
70 dB |
+1 dB |
98.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
7th |
640 |
375 |
+265 |
58.59% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
8.1 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+0.8 kg / t |
90.12% |
The LM005 grips extremely well in the dry and wet, but could benefit from a little more grip in the snow.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
45.5 M |
45 M |
+0.5 M |
98.9% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
63.1 s |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
2nd |
29 Points |
30 Points |
-1 Points |
96.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
50.3 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
90.2 s |
89.7 s |
+0.5 s |
99.45% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
2nd |
42 Points |
45 Points |
-3 Points |
93.33% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
74.4 Km/H |
75.2 Km/H |
-0.8 Km/H |
98.94% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
5th |
2.8 m/sec2 |
2.96 m/sec2 |
-0.16 m/sec2 |
94.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
4th |
27 M |
26 M |
+1 M |
96.3% |
| Snow Traction |
7th |
2683 N |
2782 N |
-99 N |
96.44% |
| Snow Handling |
6th |
84.4 s |
81.8 s |
+2.6 s |
96.92% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
6th |
20 Points |
30 Points |
-10 Points |
66.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
2nd |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
4th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
4th |
535 |
375 |
+160 |
70.09% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
8 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+0.7 kg / t |
91.25% |
Good grip on all surfaces. The Michelin Alpin 6 offers very good driving safety and is therefore highly recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
46.4 M |
45 M |
+1.4 M |
96.98% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
64.5 s |
63.1 s |
+1.4 s |
97.83% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
6th |
24 Points |
30 Points |
-6 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
53.3 M |
50.3 M |
+3 M |
94.37% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
91.2 s |
89.7 s |
+1.5 s |
98.36% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
3rd |
37 Points |
45 Points |
-8 Points |
82.22% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
73.4 Km/H |
75.2 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
97.61% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
4th |
2.85 m/sec2 |
2.96 m/sec2 |
-0.11 m/sec2 |
96.28% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
7th |
27.3 M |
26 M |
+1.3 M |
95.24% |
| Snow Traction |
1st |
2782 N |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Handling |
2nd |
82.9 s |
81.8 s |
+1.1 s |
98.67% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
4th |
22 Points |
30 Points |
-8 Points |
73.33% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
2nd |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
4th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
8th |
660 |
375 |
+285 |
56.82% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
8.8 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+1.5 kg / t |
82.95% |
Good on snow and dry roads, but when it's wet the WR SnowProof P is weaker.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
45 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
63.9 s |
63.1 s |
+0.8 s |
98.75% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
3rd |
27 Points |
30 Points |
-3 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
55.5 M |
50.3 M |
+5.2 M |
90.63% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
95.5 s |
89.7 s |
+5.8 s |
93.93% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
7th |
19 Points |
45 Points |
-26 Points |
42.22% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
64.8 Km/H |
75.2 Km/H |
-10.4 Km/H |
86.17% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
8th |
1.61 m/sec2 |
2.96 m/sec2 |
-1.35 m/sec2 |
54.39% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
4th |
27 M |
26 M |
+1 M |
96.3% |
| Snow Traction |
5th |
2705 N |
2782 N |
-77 N |
97.23% |
| Snow Handling |
4th |
83.2 s |
81.8 s |
+1.4 s |
98.32% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
3rd |
23 Points |
30 Points |
-7 Points |
76.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
1st |
8 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Noise |
1st |
70 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
5th |
575 |
375 |
+200 |
65.22% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
7.3 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Overall, the Vredestein Wintrac Pro offers decent reserves. Snow grip and efficiency could be better - but still recommendable
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
46.3 M |
45 M |
+1.3 M |
97.19% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
63.9 s |
63.1 s |
+0.8 s |
98.75% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
3rd |
27 Points |
30 Points |
-3 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
53.6 M |
50.3 M |
+3.3 M |
93.84% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
92.2 s |
89.7 s |
+2.5 s |
97.29% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
5th |
26 Points |
45 Points |
-19 Points |
57.78% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
71.4 Km/H |
75.2 Km/H |
-3.8 Km/H |
94.95% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
6th |
2.67 m/sec2 |
2.96 m/sec2 |
-0.29 m/sec2 |
90.2% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
4th |
27 M |
26 M |
+1 M |
96.3% |
| Snow Traction |
5th |
2705 N |
2782 N |
-77 N |
97.23% |
| Snow Handling |
7th |
84.7 s |
81.8 s |
+2.9 s |
96.58% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
7th |
17 Points |
30 Points |
-13 Points |
56.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
2nd |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
7th |
73 dB |
70 dB |
+3 dB |
95.89% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
3rd |
515 |
375 |
+140 |
72.82% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
9.1 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+1.8 kg / t |
80.22% |
The Fulda Kristall Control HP2 is very strong on snow, but in the wet the tyre struggles and it has long dry braking distances.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
48.1 M |
45 M |
+3.1 M |
93.56% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
64.5 s |
63.1 s |
+1.4 s |
97.83% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
8th |
22 Points |
30 Points |
-8 Points |
73.33% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
59.2 M |
50.3 M |
+8.9 M |
84.97% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
95 s |
89.7 s |
+5.3 s |
94.42% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
6th |
21 Points |
45 Points |
-24 Points |
46.67% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
72.7 Km/H |
75.2 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
96.68% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
2nd |
2.92 m/sec2 |
2.96 m/sec2 |
-0.04 m/sec2 |
98.65% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
2nd |
26.7 M |
26 M |
+0.7 M |
97.38% |
| Snow Traction |
2nd |
2750 N |
2782 N |
-32 N |
98.85% |
| Snow Handling |
2nd |
82.9 s |
81.8 s |
+1.1 s |
98.67% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
2nd |
27 Points |
30 Points |
-3 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
8th |
6 Points |
8 Points |
-2 Points |
75% |
| Noise |
7th |
73 dB |
70 dB |
+3 dB |
95.89% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
2nd |
475 |
375 |
+100 |
78.95% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
8.5 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+1.2 kg / t |
85.88% |
The compound has had an update since DOT 2622 which vastly improves the performance of the Cinturato Winter 2, see other tests.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
45.8 M |
45 M |
+0.8 M |
98.25% |
| Dry Handling |
6th |
64.3 s |
63.1 s |
+1.2 s |
98.13% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
7th |
23 Points |
30 Points |
-7 Points |
76.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
55.8 M |
50.3 M |
+5.5 M |
90.14% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
92.5 s |
89.7 s |
+2.8 s |
96.97% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
4th |
29 Points |
45 Points |
-16 Points |
64.44% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
72.6 Km/H |
75.2 Km/H |
-2.6 Km/H |
96.54% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
7th |
2.64 m/sec2 |
2.96 m/sec2 |
-0.32 m/sec2 |
89.19% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
8th |
28.1 M |
26 M |
+2.1 M |
92.53% |
| Snow Traction |
8th |
2661 N |
2782 N |
-121 N |
95.65% |
| Snow Handling |
8th |
85.2 s |
81.8 s |
+3.4 s |
96.01% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
8th |
14 Points |
30 Points |
-16 Points |
46.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
2nd |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
4th |
72 dB |
70 dB |
+2 dB |
97.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
6th |
600 |
375 |
+225 |
62.5% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
8.6 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+1.3 kg / t |
84.88% |
The inexpensive Giti Winter W2 dominates snow, but lacks grip in the wet. The braking performance is weak on dry roads.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
49 M |
45 M |
+4 M |
91.84% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
64.1 s |
63.1 s |
+1 s |
98.44% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
5th |
26 Points |
30 Points |
-4 Points |
86.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
61.4 M |
50.3 M |
+11.1 M |
81.92% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
96.3 s |
89.7 s |
+6.6 s |
93.15% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
8th |
17 Points |
45 Points |
-28 Points |
37.78% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
73.9 Km/H |
75.2 Km/H |
-1.3 Km/H |
98.27% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
2nd |
2.92 m/sec2 |
2.96 m/sec2 |
-0.04 m/sec2 |
98.65% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
2nd |
26.7 M |
26 M |
+0.7 M |
97.38% |
| Snow Traction |
3rd |
2735 N |
2782 N |
-47 N |
98.31% |
| Snow Handling |
5th |
83.9 s |
81.8 s |
+2.1 s |
97.5% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
5th |
21 Points |
30 Points |
-9 Points |
70% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
2nd |
7 Points |
8 Points |
-1 Points |
87.5% |
| Noise |
2nd |
71 dB |
70 dB |
+1 dB |
98.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
1st |
375 |
|
|
100% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
9.3 kg / t |
7.3 kg / t |
+2 kg / t |
78.49% |