Auto Zeitung, a German automotive publication, has conducted a tyre test comparing the performance of all-season and winter tyres. The test features 10 premium touring tyres in size 215/55 R17, including three all-season and seven winter options, across various driving conditions.

The test results highlight the difference differences between all-season and winter tyres. In dry conditions, all-season tyres consistently outperformed their winter counterparts, demonstrating shorter braking distances and faster handling times. This showcases their versatility in warmer weather.

The gap between all-season and winter tyres narrowed in wet conditions. While some all-season tyres still excelled, certain winter tyres, notably the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, showed impressive wet performance, sometimes surpassing their all-season rivals.

As expected, winter tyres generally dominated in snowy conditions. However, the test revealed that some high-quality all-season tyres could compete effectively with winter tyres in light to moderate snow, particularly in traction and lateral grip tests.

Winter tyres seemed to have a slight edge in noise reduction, while results were mixed for rolling resistance, with both tyre types represented at the top and bottom of the rankings.

The test underscores the improving capabilities of all-season tyres, which are increasingly able to provide solid performance across a range of conditions. However, it also reaffirms the specialized advantages of winter tyres in colder, snowier environments. For drivers in moderate climates with occasional snow, a high-quality all-season tyre might suffice, while those facing frequent harsh winter conditions would still benefit from dedicated winter tyres.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking: 100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking: 100 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking: 50 → 0 km/h

Dry

The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6, an all-season tyre, outperformed all others with a braking distance of 38.3 meters. In contrast, the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 and Michelin Alpin 6, both winter tyres, had the longest braking distance at 44.9 meters. This represents a significant difference of 6.6 meters or about 17% longer braking distance. Notably, all three top performers in this test were all-season tyres, demonstrating their superior dry performance compared to winter tyres.

Dry Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	38.3 m	Best	0 km/h
2Continental AllSeasonContact 2	40.4 m	+2.10 m	30 km/h
3Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	41.8 m	+3.50 m	38 km/h
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	43.2 m	+4.90 m	44 km/h
5Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	43.3 m	+5.00 m	44 km/h
6Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	44 m	+5.70 m	47 km/h
7Vredestein Wintrac Pro	44.4 m	+6.10 m	48 km/h
8Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	44.8 m	+6.50 m	50 km/h
9Michelin Alpin 6	44.9 m	+6.60 m	50 km/h
9Hankook Winter I cept RS3	44.9 m	+6.60 m	50 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 17.2% (6.6 m ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 would still be travelling at 50 km/h when the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3, another all-season tyre, achieved the fastest lap time of 71.9 seconds. The Vredestein Wintrac Pro, a winter tyre, was the slowest with a time of 74.5 seconds, a difference of 2.6 seconds or about 3.6%. Again, all-season tyres dominated the top spots, with the best winter tyre (Continental WinterContact TS 870 P) placing fourth.

Dry Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	71.9 s	Best
2Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	72.5 s	+0.60 s
3Continental AllSeasonContact 2	72.8 s	+0.90 s
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	73 s	+1.10 s
4Hankook Winter I cept RS3	73 s	+1.10 s
6Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	73.4 s	+1.50 s
7Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	73.8 s	+1.90 s
8Michelin Alpin 6	74.2 s	+2.30 s
9Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	74.4 s	+2.50 s
10Vredestein Wintrac Pro	74.5 s	+2.60 s

The difference between best and worst was 3.6% (2.6 s).

Wet

In wet conditions, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 maintained its strong performance, stopping in 48.9 meters. The Hankook Winter I cept RS3, which also struggled in dry braking, had the longest wet braking distance at 53.7 meters, a difference of 4.8 meters or about 9.8%. Interestingly, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, a winter tyre, came in a close second, showcasing that some winter tyres can match all season tyres in wet conditions.

Wet Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	48.9 m	Best	0 km/h
2Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	49 m	+0.10 m	6 km/h
3Continental AllSeasonContact 2	49.8 m	+0.90 m	17 km/h
4Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	51.2 m	+2.30 m	28 km/h
5Michelin Alpin 6	51.5 m	+2.60 m	29 km/h
6Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	51.9 m	+3.00 m	31 km/h
7Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	52.5 m	+3.60 m	34 km/h
8Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	53 m	+4.10 m	36 km/h
9Vredestein Wintrac Pro	53.3 m	+4.40 m	37 km/h
10Hankook Winter I cept RS3	53.7 m	+4.80 m	39 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 9.8% (4.8 m ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 would still be travelling at 39 km/h when the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 excelled in wet handling with a lap time of 86.5 seconds, while the Michelin Alpin 6 was the slowest at 88.9 seconds, a difference of 2.4 seconds or about 2.8%. The best all-season tyre, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3, came in second, demonstrating that both winter and all-season tyres can perform well in wet conditions.

Wet Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	86.5 s	Best
2Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	86.6 s	+0.10 s
3Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	86.8 s	+0.30 s
4Continental AllSeasonContact 2	86.9 s	+0.40 s
5Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	87 s	+0.50 s
6Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	87.3 s	+0.80 s
7Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	87.6 s	+1.10 s
8Vredestein Wintrac Pro	88.3 s	+1.80 s
9Hankook Winter I cept RS3	88.5 s	+2.00 s
10Michelin Alpin 6	88.9 s	+2.40 s

All the tyres in the Wet Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Continuing its strong wet performance, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had the fastest wet circle time of 12.18 seconds. The Michelin Alpin 6, which also struggled in wet handling, had the slowest time at 12.69 seconds, a difference of 0.51 seconds or about 4.2%. The best all-season tyre, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3, was again second, further highlighting the competitiveness of all-season tyres in wet conditions.

Wet Circle
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	12.18 s	Best
2Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	12.21 s	+0.03 s
3Continental AllSeasonContact 2	12.33 s	+0.15 s
4Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	12.39 s	+0.21 s
5Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	12.46 s	+0.28 s
6Vredestein Wintrac Pro	12.47 s	+0.29 s
7Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	12.48 s	+0.30 s
8Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	12.5 s	+0.32 s
9Hankook Winter I cept RS3	12.59 s	+0.41 s
10Michelin Alpin 6	12.69 s	+0.51 s

The difference between best and worst was 4.2% (0.51 s).

The Hankook Winter I cept RS3 showed impressive aquaplaning resistance with a float speed of 82.2 km/h, while the Vredestein Wintrac Pro had the lowest float speed at 75.8 km/h, a difference of 6.4 km/h or about 8.4%. The best all-season tyre, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6, placed third, indicating that some winter tyres have an advantage in extreme wet conditions.

Straight Aqua
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Hankook Winter I cept RS3	82.2 km/h	Best
2Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	79.4 km/h	-2.80 km/h
3Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	79.3 km/h	-2.90 km/h
4Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	78.7 km/h	-3.50 km/h
5Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	78.3 km/h	-3.90 km/h
6Michelin Alpin 6	78.1 km/h	-4.10 km/h
7Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	77.1 km/h	-5.10 km/h
8Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	76.5 km/h	-5.70 km/h
8Continental AllSeasonContact 2	76.5 km/h	-5.70 km/h
10Vredestein Wintrac Pro	75.8 km/h	-6.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (6.4 Km/H).

Snow

The Vredestein Wintrac Pro demonstrated excellent snow braking, stopping in 21.7 meters. The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3, an all-season tyre, had the longest braking distance at 22.2 meters, a difference of 0.5 meters or about 2.3%. This small difference suggests that some all-season tyres can approach the snow performance of winter tyres.

Snow Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Vredestein Wintrac Pro	21.7 m	Best	0 km/h
2Michelin Alpin 6	21.9 m	+0.20 m	12 km/h
2Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	21.9 m	+0.20 m	12 km/h
2Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	21.9 m	+0.20 m	12 km/h
2Hankook Winter I cept RS3	21.9 m	+0.20 m	12 km/h
2Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	21.9 m	+0.20 m	12 km/h
2Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	21.9 m	+0.20 m	12 km/h
8Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	22 m	+0.30 m	15 km/h
9Continental AllSeasonContact 2	22.1 m	+0.40 m	17 km/h
10Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	22.2 m	+0.50 m	20 km/h

All the tyres in the Snow Braking test finished less than 3% apart. From 130 km/h, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 would still be travelling at 20 km/h when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3, a winter tyre, provided the best snow traction with 3259 N of pulling force. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had the lowest traction at 3119 N, a difference of 140 N or about 4.5%. The best all-season tyre, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3, ranked third, again showing competitive performance in snowy conditions.

Snow Traction
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	3259 N	Best
2Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	3257 N	-2.00 N
3Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	3230 N	-29.00 N
4Continental AllSeasonContact 2	3226 N	-33.00 N
5Michelin Alpin 6	3217 N	-42.00 N
6Vredestein Wintrac Pro	3211 N	-48.00 N
7Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	3186 N	-73.00 N
8Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	3159 N	-100.00 N
9Hankook Winter I cept RS3	3141 N	-118.00 N
10Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	3119 N	-140.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 4.3% (140 N).

The Vredestein Wintrac Pro excelled in snow handling with a lap time of 65.7 seconds. The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 was the slowest at 68.5 seconds, a difference of 2.8 seconds or about 4.3%. This test clearly favored winter tyres, with all-season tyres occupying the bottom three positions.

Snow Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Vredestein Wintrac Pro	65.7 s	Best
2Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	66.2 s	+0.50 s
3Michelin Alpin 6	66.3 s	+0.60 s
3Hankook Winter I cept RS3	66.3 s	+0.60 s
5Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	66.4 s	+0.70 s
6Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	66.5 s	+0.80 s
7Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	67.9 s	+2.20 s
8Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	68.2 s	+2.50 s
9Continental AllSeasonContact 2	68.4 s	+2.70 s
10Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	68.5 s	+2.80 s

The difference between best and worst was 4.3% (2.8 s).

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 demonstrated the best lateral snow grip at 4.65 m/s². The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had the lowest grip at 4.54 m/s², a difference of 0.11 m/s² or about 2.4%. The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 was the best-performing all-season tyre, ranking second overall and showing that some all-season tyres can compete with winter tyres in snowy conditions.

Snow Circle
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	4.65 ms/2	Best
2Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	4.62 ms/2	-0.03 ms/2
2Continental AllSeasonContact 2	4.62 ms/2	-0.03 ms/2
4Vredestein Wintrac Pro	4.61 ms/2	-0.04 ms/2
5Michelin Alpin 6	4.59 ms/2	-0.06 ms/2
5Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	4.59 ms/2	-0.06 ms/2
7Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	4.57 ms/2	-0.08 ms/2
7Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	4.57 ms/2	-0.08 ms/2
9Hankook Winter I cept RS3	4.56 ms/2	-0.09 ms/2
10Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	4.54 ms/2	-0.11 ms/2

All the tyres in the Snow Circle test finished less than 3% apart.

Comfort

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM005, both winter tyres, were the quietest at 72.2 dB. The Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 was the loudest at 73.8 dB, a difference of 1.6 dB or about 2.2%. The quietest all-season tyre was the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 at 72.5 dB, suggesting that winter tyres may have a slight advantage in noise reduction.

Noise
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	72.2 dB	Best
1Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	72.2 dB	Best
3Continental AllSeasonContact 2	72.5 dB	+0.30 dB
4Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	72.7 dB	+0.50 dB
5Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	72.8 dB	+0.60 dB
6Hankook Winter I cept RS3	72.9 dB	+0.70 dB
7Vredestein Wintrac Pro	73.3 dB	+1.10 dB
7Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	73.3 dB	+1.10 dB
9Michelin Alpin 6	73.5 dB	+1.30 dB
10Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	73.8 dB	+1.60 dB

All the tyres in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

The Continental AllSeasonContact 2 had the lowest rolling resistance at 6.58 kg/t, while the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had the highest at 8.45 kg/t, a difference of 1.87 kg/t or about 28.4%. Interestingly, all-season tyres occupied both the top and bottom positions, with the best winter tyre (Continental WinterContact TS 870 P) ranking third overall.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
1Continental AllSeasonContact 2	6.58 kg/t	Best	£0
2Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3	7.1 kg/t	+0.52 kg/t	£35
3Continental WinterContact TS 870 P	7.26 kg/t	+0.68 kg/t	£46
4Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3	7.44 kg/t	+0.86 kg/t	£58
5Bridgestone Blizzak LM005	7.6 kg/t	+1.02 kg/t	£68
6Vredestein Wintrac Pro	7.92 kg/t	+1.34 kg/t	£90
7Michelin Alpin 6	8.14 kg/t	+1.56 kg/t	£105
8Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2	8.28 kg/t	+1.70 kg/t	£114
9Hankook Winter I cept RS3	8.31 kg/t	+1.73 kg/t	£116
10Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6	8.45 kg/t	+1.87 kg/t	£125

The difference between best and worst was 28.4% (1.87 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 uses about 86 L (£125) more fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Petrol/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

19,000 km

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

£1.45/L

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 excels in wet conditions with the shortest braking distance and responsive handling, while maintaining stability. It's easy to control even when pushed to its limits. On snow, it provides good traction and a balanced performance, although the steering feedback could be clearer. In dry conditions, it prioritizes comfort, providing the smoothest ride among the winter tyres tested. However, it does have a slightly longer braking distance. It handles corners effectively but is not the most eager to turn. Overall, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 emerges as the top performer among winter tyres, thanks to its exceptional wet grip. However, it delivers an average performance on dry surfaces.

Dry91.5%

Wet99.5%

Snow98.6%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance86.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	44.8 m	+6.50 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	7^th / 10	73.8 s	+1.90 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	49 m	+0.10 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	1^st / 10	86.5 s	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better	1^st / 10	12.18 s	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	7^th / 10	77.1 km/h	-5.10 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	21.9 m	+0.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	7^th / 10	3186 N	-73.00 N
Snow HandlingLower is better	6^th / 10	66.5 s	+0.80 s
Snow CircleHigher is better	5^th / 10	4.59 ms/2	-0.06 ms/2
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 10	72.2 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 10	7.6 kg/t	+1.02 kg/t

EU Label: C/A/71
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 9.7 kgs
Tread: 8.5 mm
Price: 750.00

The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 achieves the fastest lap time in dry conditions, thanks to its high grip levels and excellent handling. It delivers strong results across the board. In wet conditions, it demonstrates high grip levels, balanced performance, and clear transitions at its limits. However, its braking performance in wet conditions is only average. On snow, it surpasses some winter tyres, excelling in grip, feedback, and balanced handling. The Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 once again proves its exceptional capabilities, securing the top position among all-season tyres with a well-balanced performance.

Dry95.8%

Wet97.6%

Snow97.7%

Comfort99.3%

Rolling Resistance92.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	41.8 m	+3.50 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	1^st / 10	71.9 s	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	51.9 m	+3.00 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	2^nd / 10	86.6 s	+0.10 s
Wet CircleLower is better	2^nd / 10	12.21 s	+0.03 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	8^th / 10	76.5 km/h	-5.70 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	22.2 m	+0.50 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 10	3230 N	-29.00 N
Snow HandlingLower is better	10^th / 10	68.5 s	+2.80 s
Snow CircleHigher is better	7^th / 10	4.57 ms/2	-0.08 ms/2
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 10	72.7 dB	+0.50 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 10	7.1 kg/t	+0.52 kg/t

EU Label: A/B/71
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 9.1 kgs
Tread: 7.5 mm
Price: 720.00

The Continental AllseasonContact 2 is the most fuel-efficient among all tyres and the fastest in the slalom test in dry conditions. It provides good cornering support and stability while remaining agile. In wet conditions, it matches the score of the Continental winter tyre. It requires a bit more driver effort to achieve its full performance potential at the limit. On snow, it delivers a surprising performance by achieving slightly better results than the Continental WinterContact TS 870P. The Continental AllseasonContact 2 sets a new benchmark for all-season tyres by providing more grip on snow than the Continental winter tyre.

Dry96.8%

Wet98.4%

Snow98.1%

Comfort99.6%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	40.4 m	+2.10 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	3^rd / 10	72.8 s	+0.90 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 10	49.8 m	+0.90 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	4^th / 10	86.9 s	+0.40 s
Wet CircleLower is better	3^rd / 10	12.33 s	+0.15 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	8^th / 10	76.5 km/h	-5.70 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	22.1 m	+0.40 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	4^th / 10	3226 N	-33.00 N
Snow HandlingLower is better	9^th / 10	68.4 s	+2.70 s
Snow CircleHigher is better	2^nd / 10	4.62 ms/2	-0.03 ms/2
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 10	72.5 dB	+0.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 10	6.58 kg/t	Best in this discipline

EU Label: B/B/72
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 8.9 kgs
Tread: 7.5 mm
Price: 725.00

The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 offers strong braking, good comfort, and efficient rolling in dry conditions. It maintains stability in corners but can be a bit slow to respond to steering changes. In wet conditions, it demonstrates stability and a tendency to understeer, making it predictable but slightly less agile. On snow, it performs nearly on par with the Pirelli, providing slightly better traction and lateral grip. The Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 secures a strong position with its excellent snow grip and an overall well-balanced performance without any significant weaknesses.

Dry93.2%

Wet96.5%

Snow99.5%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance88.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	43.3 m	+5.00 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	6^th / 10	73.4 s	+1.50 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	52.5 m	+3.60 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	7^th / 10	87.6 s	+1.10 s
Wet CircleLower is better	8^th / 10	12.5 s	+0.32 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 10	79.4 km/h	-2.80 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	21.9 m	+0.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	1^st / 10	3259 N	Best in this discipline
Snow HandlingLower is better	5^th / 10	66.4 s	+0.70 s
Snow CircleHigher is better	1^st / 10	4.65 ms/2	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 10	72.2 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	4^th / 10	7.44 kg/t	+0.86 kg/t

EU Label: C/C/71
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 8.9 kgs
Tread: 8.35 mm
Price: 750.00

The Continental WinterContact TS 870P boasts the lowest rolling resistance and shortest braking distance among the winter tyres in dry conditions. It offers good comfort and handles corners with stability. In wet conditions, it is the second-best winter tyre, providing smooth handling, balanced performance, and the ability to maintain control even under braking and steering simultaneously. Surprisingly, it exhibits a weaker performance in snow, with lower-than-expected lateral grip and limited self-stabilizing capabilities when it starts to slide. Despite its weaker snow performance, the Continental WinterContact TS 870P delivers a strong overall performance.

Dry93.6%

Wet97.4%

Snow97.6%

Comfort99.2%

Rolling Resistance90.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	43.2 m	+4.90 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	4^th / 10	73 s	+1.10 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 10	51.2 m	+2.30 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	5^th / 10	87 s	+0.50 s
Wet CircleLower is better	5^th / 10	12.46 s	+0.28 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 10	78.3 km/h	-3.90 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	22 m	+0.30 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	8^th / 10	3159 N	-100.00 N
Snow HandlingLower is better	7^th / 10	67.9 s	+2.20 s
Snow CircleHigher is better	7^th / 10	4.57 ms/2	-0.08 ms/2
NoiseLower is better	5^th / 10	72.8 dB	+0.60 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 10	7.26 kg/t	+0.68 kg/t

EU Label: B/B/71
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 9.1 kgs
Tread: 8.2 mm
Price: 785.00

The Bridgestone Turanza Allseason 6 outperforms the competition with the shortest braking distance in dry conditions. However, it has the highest rolling resistance. It offers a smooth ride but is a bit louder. In wet conditions, it demonstrates slightly less grip than its winter counterpart when cornering, but compensates with the shortest braking distance among all tyres tested. Although it scores the fewest points on snow among the all-season tyres, it still provides sufficient grip for winter conditions. The Bridgestone Turanza Allseason 6 is a strong all-around performer with good snow performance despite being the weakest in its category. However, it does have high rolling resistance.

Dry99.6%

Wet98.7%

Snow97.1%

Comfort97.8%

Rolling Resistance77.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	38.3 m	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingLower is better	2^nd / 10	72.5 s	+0.60 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	48.9 m	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingLower is better	6^th / 10	87.3 s	+0.80 s
Wet CircleLower is better	7^th / 10	12.48 s	+0.30 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 10	79.3 km/h	-2.90 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	21.9 m	+0.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	10^th / 10	3119 N	-140.00 N
Snow HandlingLower is better	8^th / 10	68.2 s	+2.50 s
Snow CircleHigher is better	10^th / 10	4.54 ms/2	-0.11 ms/2
NoiseLower is better	10^th / 10	73.8 dB	+1.60 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	10^th / 10	8.45 kg/t	+1.87 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/70
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 9.6 kgs
Tread: 7.35 mm
Price: 650.00

The Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 displays lively handling and responsive feedback in dry conditions, but it's not as balanced as on wet surfaces. It has commendably low noise levels inside the cabin. In wet conditions, it has longer braking distances but exhibits a balanced and responsive handling in corners. On snow, it leads the winter tyre rankings, providing excellent grip and clear feedback. The Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2 is a good choice for snowy conditions, but its long wet braking distances and average dry performance hinder a higher overall ranking.

Dry91.8%

Wet96.7%

Snow99.4%

Comfort98.5%

Rolling Resistance79.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 10	44 m	+5.70 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	9^th / 10	74.4 s	+2.50 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 10	53 m	+4.10 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	3^rd / 10	86.8 s	+0.30 s
Wet CircleLower is better	4^th / 10	12.39 s	+0.21 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	4^th / 10	78.7 km/h	-3.50 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	21.9 m	+0.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 10	3257 N	-2.00 N
Snow HandlingLower is better	2^nd / 10	66.2 s	+0.50 s
Snow CircleHigher is better	2^nd / 10	4.62 ms/2	-0.03 ms/2
NoiseLower is better	7^th / 10	73.3 dB	+1.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8^th / 10	8.28 kg/t	+1.70 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/71
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 9.8 kgs
Tread: 8.8 mm
Price: 735.00

The Hankook Winter icept RS3 W462 has a firm ride on uneven roads in dry conditions. Its rolling resistance and braking performance are acceptable but are not the best in this test. While offering excellent protection against aquaplaning in wet conditions, it has the longest braking distance. It requires larger steering inputs when cornering. On snow, it delivers a decent performance, with good grip but less clear feedback near its grip limits. Although the Hankook Winter icept RS3 W462 performs well on snow, its long braking distances on wet and dry surfaces prevent it from ranking higher.

Dry91.9%

Wet95.5%

Snow98.1%

Comfort99%

Rolling Resistance79.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	44.9 m	+6.60 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	4^th / 10	73 s	+1.10 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	10^th / 10	53.7 m	+4.80 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	9^th / 10	88.5 s	+2.00 s
Wet CircleLower is better	9^th / 10	12.59 s	+0.41 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 10	82.2 km/h	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	21.9 m	+0.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	9^th / 10	3141 N	-118.00 N
Snow HandlingLower is better	3^rd / 10	66.3 s	+0.60 s
Snow CircleHigher is better	9^th / 10	4.56 ms/2	-0.09 ms/2
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 10	72.9 dB	+0.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	9^th / 10	8.31 kg/t	+1.73 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/72
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 9.6 kgs
Tread: 7.85 mm
Price: 585.00

The Michelin Alpin 6 exhibits pronounced understeer in dry conditions, limiting its sporty handling. Its braking distance is acceptable but on the longer side. It does offer a smooth ride over bumps. In wet conditions, it provides smooth transitions at its grip limits, but it tends to push wide in corners earlier than its competitors. On snow, it achieves a good rating, handling well but requiring larger steering inputs to maximize cornering grip. The Michelin Alpin 6's strong snow performance is overshadowed by its weaker performance on dry surfaces.

Dry91.1%

Wet96%

Snow98.9%

Comfort98.2%

Rolling Resistance80.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	44.9 m	+6.60 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	8^th / 10	74.2 s	+2.30 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 10	51.5 m	+2.60 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	10^th / 10	88.9 s	+2.40 s
Wet CircleLower is better	10^th / 10	12.69 s	+0.51 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 10	78.1 km/h	-4.10 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 10	21.9 m	+0.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	5^th / 10	3217 N	-42.00 N
Snow HandlingLower is better	3^rd / 10	66.3 s	+0.60 s
Snow CircleHigher is better	5^th / 10	4.59 ms/2	-0.06 ms/2
NoiseLower is better	9^th / 10	73.5 dB	+1.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 10	8.14 kg/t	+1.56 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/69
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 9.2 kgs
Tread: 7.8 mm
Price: 915.00

The Vredestein Wintrac Pro delivers an average performance in dry conditions. It's the slowest in the slalom test but offers a comfortable ride. In wet conditions, it exhibits low precision, strong understeer, and a long braking distance, resulting in the lowest ranking for this category. On snow, it achieves the shortest braking distance. However, its handling can be sensitive to weight transfer, which may not suit all drivers. The Vredestein Wintrac Pro prioritizes snow grip but falls short in wet conditions. Its dry performance is also unremarkable.

Dry91.4%

Wet95.5%

Snow99.4%

Comfort98.5%

Rolling Resistance83.1%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (12)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 10	44.4 m	+6.10 m
Dry HandlingLower is better	10^th / 10	74.5 s	+2.60 s
Wet BrakingLower is better	9^th / 10	53.3 m	+4.40 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	8^th / 10	88.3 s	+1.80 s
Wet CircleLower is better	6^th / 10	12.47 s	+0.29 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	10^th / 10	75.8 km/h	-6.40 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 10	21.7 m	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	6^th / 10	3211 N	-48.00 N
Snow HandlingLower is better	1^st / 10	65.7 s	Best in this discipline
Snow CircleHigher is better	4^th / 10	4.61 ms/2	-0.04 ms/2
NoiseLower is better	7^th / 10	73.3 dB	+1.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 10	7.92 kg/t	+1.34 kg/t

EU Label: C/B/72
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 9.5 kgs
Tread: 8.2 mm
Price: 620.00

Menu

Tyre shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Dry

Wet

Snow

Comfort

Value

Results

Cross-check this test