Menu

Test Charts / Auto Zeitung

2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
215/55 R17
Tyres tested
10
Disciplines
12

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
38.3 m Best 0 km/h
40.4 m +2.10 m 30 km/h
41.8 m +3.50 m 38 km/h
43.2 m +4.90 m 44 km/h
43.3 m +5.00 m 44 km/h
44 m +5.70 m 47 km/h
44.4 m +6.10 m 48 km/h
44.8 m +6.50 m 50 km/h
44.9 m +6.60 m 50 km/h
44.9 m +6.60 m 50 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 17.2% (6.6 m ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 would still be travelling at 50 km/h when the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Dry Handling

Dry handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
71.9 s Best
72.5 s +0.60 s
72.8 s +0.90 s
73 s +1.10 s
73 s +1.10 s
73.4 s +1.50 s
73.8 s +1.90 s
74.2 s +2.30 s
74.4 s +2.50 s
74.5 s +2.60 s

The difference between best and worst was 3.6% (2.6 s).

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
48.9 m Best 0 km/h
49 m +0.10 m 6 km/h
49.8 m +0.90 m 17 km/h
51.2 m +2.30 m 28 km/h
51.5 m +2.60 m 29 km/h
51.9 m +3.00 m 31 km/h
52.5 m +3.60 m 34 km/h
53 m +4.10 m 36 km/h
53.3 m +4.40 m 37 km/h
53.7 m +4.80 m 39 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 9.8% (4.8 m ≈ 1.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Hankook Winter I cept RS3 would still be travelling at 39 km/h when the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling

Wet handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
86.5 s Best
86.6 s +0.10 s
86.8 s +0.30 s
86.9 s +0.40 s
87 s +0.50 s
87.3 s +0.80 s
87.6 s +1.10 s
88.3 s +1.80 s
88.5 s +2.00 s
88.9 s +2.40 s

All the tyres in the Wet Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

Wet Circle

Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Wet Circle
Position / TyreResultGap to best
12.18 s Best
12.21 s +0.03 s
12.33 s +0.15 s
12.39 s +0.21 s
12.46 s +0.28 s
12.47 s +0.29 s
12.48 s +0.30 s
12.5 s +0.32 s
12.59 s +0.41 s
12.69 s +0.51 s

The difference between best and worst was 4.2% (0.51 s).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
82.2 km/h Best
79.4 km/h -2.80 km/h
79.3 km/h -2.90 km/h
78.7 km/h -3.50 km/h
78.3 km/h -3.90 km/h
78.1 km/h -4.10 km/h
77.1 km/h -5.10 km/h
76.5 km/h -5.70 km/h
76.5 km/h -5.70 km/h
75.8 km/h -6.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 7.8% (6.4 Km/H).

Snow

4

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
21.7 m Best 0 km/h
21.9 m +0.20 m 12 km/h
21.9 m +0.20 m 12 km/h
21.9 m +0.20 m 12 km/h
21.9 m +0.20 m 12 km/h
21.9 m +0.20 m 12 km/h
21.9 m +0.20 m 12 km/h
22 m +0.30 m 15 km/h
22.1 m +0.40 m 17 km/h
22.2 m +0.50 m 20 km/h

All the tyres in the Snow Braking test finished less than 3% apart. From 130 km/h, the Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3 would still be travelling at 20 km/h when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3259 N Best
3257 N -2.00 N
3230 N -29.00 N
3226 N -33.00 N
3217 N -42.00 N
3211 N -48.00 N
3186 N -73.00 N
3159 N -100.00 N
3141 N -118.00 N
3119 N -140.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 4.3% (140 N).

Snow Handling

Snow handling time in seconds

Lower is better ↓
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
65.7 s Best
66.2 s +0.50 s
66.3 s +0.60 s
66.3 s +0.60 s
66.4 s +0.70 s
66.5 s +0.80 s
67.9 s +2.20 s
68.2 s +2.50 s
68.4 s +2.70 s
68.5 s +2.80 s

The difference between best and worst was 4.3% (2.8 s).

Snow Circle

Lateral snow grip in m/s squared

Higher is better ↑
Snow Circle
Position / TyreResultGap to best
4.65 ms/2 Best
4.62 ms/2 -0.03 ms/2
4.62 ms/2 -0.03 ms/2
4.61 ms/2 -0.04 ms/2
4.59 ms/2 -0.06 ms/2
4.59 ms/2 -0.06 ms/2
4.57 ms/2 -0.08 ms/2
4.57 ms/2 -0.08 ms/2
4.56 ms/2 -0.09 ms/2
4.54 ms/2 -0.11 ms/2

All the tyres in the Snow Circle test finished less than 3% apart.

Comfort

1

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
72.2 dB Best
72.2 dB Best
72.5 dB +0.30 dB
72.7 dB +0.50 dB
72.8 dB +0.60 dB
72.9 dB +0.70 dB
73.3 dB +1.10 dB
73.3 dB +1.10 dB
73.5 dB +1.30 dB
73.8 dB +1.60 dB

All the tyres in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
6.58 kg/t Best £0
7.1 kg/t +0.52 kg/t £35
7.26 kg/t +0.68 kg/t £46
7.44 kg/t +0.86 kg/t £58
7.6 kg/t +1.02 kg/t £68
7.92 kg/t +1.34 kg/t £90
8.14 kg/t +1.56 kg/t £105
8.28 kg/t +1.70 kg/t £114
8.31 kg/t +1.73 kg/t £116
8.45 kg/t +1.87 kg/t £125

The difference between best and worst was 28.4% (1.87 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 uses about 86 L (£125) more fuel than the Continental AllSeasonContact 2.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
50 → 0 km/h

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.