Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Pattern-wise, the LM005 dominates the wet: it wins wet braking in every shared event (14/14) and usually edges wet handling and aquaplaning. The Pilot Alpin 5 counters with clear superiority in the dry and on snow, frequently topping overall rankings and offering better noise comfort and wear. Expect the Bridgestone to be the rain-season benchmark, and the Michelin to lead when the road is dry or snow-covered.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been sixteen tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 | five | |
| Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 | ten | |
| one draws in one tests | ||
While it might look like the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is better than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading wet braking and wet handling across tests (14/14 wet braking wins)
- Strong aquaplaning resistance (straight and curved) and low rolling resistance
- Competitive snow capability for a wet specialist; predictable, easy control
- Generally lower purchase price, strong value in rain-heavy climates
- Best-in-class on snow (braking, traction, handling) with precise steering
- Consistently shorter dry braking and higher dry handling speeds
- Lower noise and excellent wear/mileage, improving long-term value
- Balanced, dynamic feel suiting UHP vehicles and spirited driving
Dry Braking
Looking at data from twelve tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during eleven dry braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle in 4.96% less distance than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Dry Braking: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during three dry handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 1.49% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during seven dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 0.47% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scored 2.6% more points than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from fourteen tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during fourteen wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 stopped the vehicle in 6.09% less distance than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Cool
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during one wet braking - cool tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 stopped the vehicle in 6.69% less distance than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Wet Braking - Cool: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Wet Braking - Cool winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking - Worn
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during one wet braking - worn tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 stopped the vehicle in 12.1% less distance than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Wet Braking - Worn: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Wet Braking - Worn winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during three wet handling [s] tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was 1.48% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during eight wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was 1.3% faster around a wet lap than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scored 1.37% more points than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had 0.81% higher lateral wet grip than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from twelve tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during eight straight aqua tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 floated at a 0.51% higher speed than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Straight Aqua: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from ten tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during nine curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 slipped out at a 6.45% higher speed than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from fourteen tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during thirteen snow braking tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stopped the vehicle in 1.84% less distance than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Snow Braking: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during three snow traction tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 accelerated 4.88% faster than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Snow Traction: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during seven snow traction tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had 2.1% better snow traction than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Snow Traction: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [s]
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during three snow handling [s] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 2.83% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from nine tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during seven snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 1.85% faster around a lap than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Snow Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two subj. snow handling tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scored 7.73% more points than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 provided 2.68% more lateral grip than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Snow Circle: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during seven snow slalom tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was 5.98% faster through a slalom than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Snow Slalom: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scored 0.83% more points than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from eleven tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during ten noise tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 measured 1.34% quieter than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Noise: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during three wear tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is predicted to cover 23.83% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Wear: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was better during two value tests. On average the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 proved to have a 11.88% better value based on price/1000km than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Value: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during eight price tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 cost 14.8% less than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Price: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from twelve tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during ten rolling resistance tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had a 4.71% lower rolling resistance than the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Driver Reviews
Drivers of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 frequently praise its outstanding wet grip and braking, along with predictable, stable handling and good comfort when new. Many also find it capable in light-to-moderate snow. However, a significant number report rapid tread wear and a notable drop-off in snow/ice traction as the tyre ages, with some also noting rising noise levels over time. Overall sentiment is moderately positive, but durability and aged winter performance are recurring concerns.
Based on 104 reviews with an average rating of 71%
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 Driver Reviews
Drivers largely praise the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 for delivering near-summer-tyre performance in winter, with excellent dry and wet grip, precise handling, and strong stability. Snow traction is reported as confidently good (especially on packed or light snow), and several high-scoring reviews note impressive tread life. However, multiple users caution that ice traction and braking are weaker than dedicated snow/ice tyres, and the firm sidewall can make the ride feel harsh for some. Overall sentiment is strongly positive, especially for moderate winters and performance-oriented driving.
Based on 29 reviews with an average rating of 86%
Conclusion
If you drive performance cars or face regular snow, the Pilot Alpin 5 is the all-round athlete. It wins most dry braking/handling and the majority of snow tests, often by small but meaningful margins, and it's usually quieter with markedly better wear life (e.g., +80% in one UHP test). While its wet braking can be mid-pack, overall balance and longevity make it the stronger long-term value for drivers who see mixed or snowy winters and care about precision. The simple takeaway: LM005 for wet-winter confidence and economy; Pilot Alpin 5 for snow mastery, dry precision, and durability.
Key Differences
- Weather bias: LM005 is a wet-weather specialist; Pilot Alpin 5 excels in dry and snow.
- Braking trade-off: LM005 stops shorter in the wet; Pilot Alpin 5 stops shorter in the dry and on snow.
- Aquaplaning: LM005 usually offers better straight/curved aquaplaning resistance.
- Handling character: LM005 is secure and neutral; Pilot Alpin 5 is more precise and dynamic with better feedback.
- Efficiency and wear: LM005 often has lower rolling resistance; Pilot Alpin 5 delivers significantly longer tread life.
- Cost profile: LM005 is usually cheaper up front; Pilot Alpin 5 can be better long-term value thanks to longevity.
Overall Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.