The 2021 Auto Bild Sportscars winter tyre test has tested twelve of the best winter tyres in 245/40 R18 size using a Mercedes C Class, AND have included a summer and all season tyre as reference.
This is exceptionally useful for those of us wondering whether to fit winter or all season tyres for the bigger while size, and for a change Auto Bild named the all season tyre used, it's the Vredestein Quatrac Pro.
There are however some drawbacks to the single reference tyre. The Quatrac Pro is an older patter now, and certainly not the best all season tyre on the market anymore. This means while it was good in the dry, it didn't beat all the winter tyres as you'd expect (the Michelin CrossClimate 2 certainly would have), it struggled in the wet, and if you'd expected it to come last in a group of winter tyres in the snow tests, you're also in for a surprise.
Sadly Auto Bild didn't name the summer reference tyre, but this was unusually good in aquaplaning, and one of the best in the dry and wet.
There were also some nice synergies between this test and the Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test, with the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 and Hankook Winter Icept Evo 3 performing amongst the best in both tests, and the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 being the wet specialist of the group.
Dry
As in the Tyre Reviews test, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was the best in both dry tests, beating even the all season tyre, but still significantly weaker than the summer reference which was nearly four meters ahead.
Dry Braking
Spread: 8.10 M (22.2%)|Avg: 42.91 M
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre
The order of results was also the same in dry handling, with the reference summer tyre leading Michelin and the all season Vredestein Quatrac Pro, with the Toyo SnowProx S954 in fourth.
Dry Handling
Spread: 6.00 Km/H (5.7%)|Avg: 101.14 Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Reference Summer
105.00 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
102.90 Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
102.50 Km/H
Toyo Snowprox S954
101.70 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
101.60 Km/H
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
101.40 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
101.00 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
100.90 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
100.80 Km/H
Nankang SV2
100.10 Km/H
Falken Eurowinter HS01
100.10 Km/H
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
99.70 Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
99.30 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plu
99.00 Km/H
Wet
Wet braking retained the summer tyres advantage, but this time the gap was closer at two meters shorter stopping distance. The difference between the best and worst winter tyre was fifteen meters from 100kph (62mph) which is a vast difference.
Wet Braking
Spread: 18.30 M (38.9%)|Avg: 52.39 M
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 managed to edge out the summer tyre around the wet handling lap.
Wet Handling
Spread: 10.20 Km/H (14%)|Avg: 70.29 Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
72.90 Km/H
Reference Summer
72.40 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
72.00 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
71.90 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
71.90 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
71.70 Km/H
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
70.50 Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
70.30 Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
70.30 Km/H
Toyo Snowprox S954
70.10 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plu
69.90 Km/H
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
69.20 Km/H
Falken Eurowinter HS01
68.20 Km/H
Nankang SV2
62.70 Km/H
The summer tyre regained its lead to be the best in straight aquaplaning, leading the best winter tyre by quite a margin.
Straight Aqua
Spread: 11.10 Km/H (10.9%)|Avg: 95.28 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
Reference Summer
101.50 Km/H
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
97.50 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
97.50 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
97.40 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
97.20 Km/H
Nankang SV2
96.80 Km/H
Falken Eurowinter HS01
96.60 Km/H
Toyo Snowprox S954
96.10 Km/H
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
94.70 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plu
94.10 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
93.60 Km/H
Nissan 350z
92.50 Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
92.50 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
90.80 Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
90.40 Km/H
Snow
Snow braking once again had the BF Goodrich gForce Winter being the best winter tyre on snow, leading the consistent Hankook Winter Icept evo 3 and Dunlop WinterSport 5.
Snow Braking
Spread: 26.50 M (86.3%)|Avg: 34.65 M
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Snow Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre
BFGoodrich continued its advantage during the snow traction test.
Snow Traction
Spread: 2265.00 N (76.1%)|Avg: 2521.43 N
Pulling Force in Newtons (Higher is better)
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
2975.00 N
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
2824.00 N
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
2800.00 N
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plu
2789.00 N
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
2727.00 N
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
2705.00 N
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
2688.00 N
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2687.00 N
Falken Eurowinter HS01
2684.00 N
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
2575.00 N
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
2419.00 N
Nankang SV2
2364.00 N
Toyo Snowprox S954
2353.00 N
Reference Summer
710.00 N
Snow handling rounded out the trio of wins for BFGoodrich, while the Nankang SV2 and Toyo Snowprox S954 continued to perform poorly in all snow tests.
Snow Handling
Spread: 5.40 Km/H (12.1%)|Avg: 42.79 Km/H
Snow handling average speed (Higher is better)
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
44.70 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
44.60 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
44.30 Km/H
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
44.10 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
44.00 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plu
44.00 Km/H
Falken Eurowinter HS01
43.70 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
43.00 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
42.70 Km/H
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
41.30 Km/H
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
40.70 Km/H
Nankang SV2
39.90 Km/H
Toyo Snowprox S954
39.30 Km/H
Environment
The BFGoodrich was also the quietest tyre on test, with the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 following closely. In this test, every winter and all season tyre were quieter than the summer tyre.
Noise
Spread: 3.10 dB (4.3%)|Avg: 73.87 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
72.40 dB
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
72.50 dB
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
72.80 dB
Nankang SV2
72.90 dB
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
73.30 dB
Toyo Snowprox S954
73.40 dB
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
73.40 dB
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
73.90 dB
Falken Eurowinter HS01
74.30 dB
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
74.60 dB
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
74.70 dB
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plu
75.10 dB
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
75.40 dB
Reference Summer
75.50 dB
The Bridgestone had the lowest rolling resistance on test, beating the summer tyre. The all season tyre finished midpack.
Rolling Resistance
Spread: 2.31 kg / t (29.2%)|Avg: 8.77 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
7.91 kg / t
Reference Summer
8.03 kg / t
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
8.43 kg / t
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plu
8.46 kg / t
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
8.51 kg / t
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
8.58 kg / t
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
8.73 kg / t
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
8.74 kg / t
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
8.84 kg / t
Nankang SV2
8.91 kg / t
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
8.91 kg / t
Toyo Snowprox S954
9.18 kg / t
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
9.38 kg / t
Falken Eurowinter HS01
10.22 kg / t
19,000 km
£1.45/L
8.0 L/100km
--
Annual Difference
--
Lifetime Savings
--
Extra Fuel/Energy
--
Extra CO2
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.
There was a difference of 270 euros between the cheapest and most expensive tyres, and as always, the cheapest were amongst the worst performing on test.
Excellent performance in the snow and rain, good aquaplaning resistance, dynamic handling and short braking distances on snowy and wet roads, very good value for money.
it is the second winter i am having gForce Winter 2 and i am really amazed by his snow performance. It lacks performance at the dry, but what a snow tyre!
Coincidentally, I came here to ask a very similar question, to the question below. I'm really trying to compare the CC2 to the Wintrac Pro for my winter setup. Particularly for wet performance, I assumed that all weather would do better. While there is no direct test, I noticed the Quatrac Pro did better than the CC2 in the wet in autobild all season test. And the Quatrac Pro did worse the the Wintrac pro in the wet in this test. Can I then assume that the Wintrac Pro will do better than the CC2 in the wet?
However if you saying below that quiet updates happen all the time, my assumptions are vulnerable.
Even more so, the older model performance winters tires we get in North America ( Sotto3, Wintrac Pro, PA4 ). I was using the test data from older European tests to make my decisions. Can I no longer assume that the pilot Alpine PA4 or the wintrac Pro, in the American marketplace are the same as what was available in Europe 5 years ago? Tires are complicated man.
Tyres are complicated, even more so when you start getting to tyres vs tires as the same names can be different tyres (North American CC2 is different from European CC2).
Indeed, but in the end, selecting a good tire is not difficult, trying to figure out what the best is for your situation is what's difficult so it's not really much of a problem is it.
These are some interesting results! In wet braking and wet handling the reference Vredestein Quatrac Pro all-season tyre scores worse than almost every winter tyre. In the all-season test Autobild did earlier, the exact same tyre (Vredestein Quatrac Pro) achieved the best score in wet braking and wet handling beating other all-season tyres and interestingly also beating the (anonymous) reference winter tyre in that test. What would cause that difference? Why is the same tyre in this test worse in wet than the winter tyres and better than a reference winter tyre (and every other all-season tyre) in another test? Would this be because of the size (in this test 18 inch, in the all-season test 17 inch)? Maybe the reference winter tyre in the all-season test was just a shitty tyre? Or the temperatures (22 degrees in the all-season test, unknown in this test)?
My guess would be that the 17" in the all season test would have received an update, where as the 18" here hasn't yet. But I'll pass on the question to Vred and see what they say.
That's another possibility I didn't think of! But if the Vredestein tyre received such an update that has a significant impact, would Vredestein not called it Quatrac Pro 2, Quatrac Pro S or Quatrac Pro Evo or something? If I had to guess, I'd put my money on difference in temperature. The all-seasons were tested at too high temperatures (22c) and maybe the winter tyres were tested at or below freezing? Maybe I should ask AutoBild. Would love to see a test similar to the test you did a few years ago with tyres at different temperatures but then with more tyres. Four of the best tyres in categories of summer, winter and all-season at different temperatures in wet and dry to see when what tyres performance best.
If you do ask Auto Bild let me know if you get a reply!
I'm not sure why names don't change with updates, but it's not uncommon for tyres to get silently updated a number of times in their life, sometimes they're significant updates too. The only way to tell is that the EAN changes, but that's not usually easy to find data.
it is the second winter i am having gForce Winter 2 and i am really amazed by his snow performance. It lacks performance at the dry, but what a snow tyre!
Coincidentally, I came here to ask a very similar question, to the question below. I'm really trying to compare the CC2 to the Wintrac Pro for my winter setup. Particularly for wet performance, I assumed that all weather would do better. While there is no direct test, I noticed the Quatrac Pro did better than the CC2 in the wet in autobild all season test. And the Quatrac Pro did worse the the Wintrac pro in the wet in this test. Can I then assume that the Wintrac Pro will do better than the CC2 in the wet?
However if you saying below that quiet updates happen all the time, my assumptions are vulnerable.
Even more so, the older model performance winters tires we get in North America ( Sotto3, Wintrac Pro, PA4 ). I was using the test data from older European tests to make my decisions. Can I no longer assume that the pilot Alpine PA4 or the wintrac Pro, in the American marketplace are the same as what was available in Europe 5 years ago? Tires are complicated man.
Tyres are complicated, even more so when you start getting to tyres vs tires as the same names can be different tyres (North American CC2 is different from European CC2).
It's a headache for me.
Indeed, but in the end, selecting a good tire is not difficult, trying to figure out what the best is for your situation is what's difficult so it's not really much of a problem is it.
"Tyre vs Tire" subtle, clever.
These are some interesting results! In wet braking and wet handling the reference Vredestein Quatrac Pro all-season tyre scores worse than almost every winter tyre. In the all-season test Autobild did earlier, the exact same tyre (Vredestein Quatrac Pro) achieved the best score in wet braking and wet handling beating other all-season tyres and interestingly also beating the (anonymous) reference winter tyre in that test. What would cause that difference? Why is the same tyre in this test worse in wet than the winter tyres and better than a reference winter tyre (and every other all-season tyre) in another test? Would this be because of the size (in this test 18 inch, in the all-season test 17 inch)? Maybe the reference winter tyre in the all-season test was just a shitty tyre? Or the temperatures (22 degrees in the all-season test, unknown in this test)?
That's a good bunch of questions :D
My guess would be that the 17" in the all season test would have received an update, where as the 18" here hasn't yet. But I'll pass on the question to Vred and see what they say.
Of course, only auto bild really know the answer.
That's another possibility I didn't think of! But if the Vredestein tyre received such an update that has a significant impact, would Vredestein not called it Quatrac Pro 2, Quatrac Pro S or Quatrac Pro Evo or something? If I had to guess, I'd put my money on difference in temperature. The all-seasons were tested at too high temperatures (22c) and maybe the winter tyres were tested at or below freezing? Maybe I should ask AutoBild.
Would love to see a test similar to the test you did a few years ago with tyres at different temperatures but then with more tyres. Four of the best tyres in categories of summer, winter and all-season at different temperatures in wet and dry to see when what tyres performance best.
If you do ask Auto Bild let me know if you get a reply!
I'm not sure why names don't change with updates, but it's not uncommon for tyres to get silently updated a number of times in their life, sometimes they're significant updates too. The only way to tell is that the EAN changes, but that's not usually easy to find data.