Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 50 → 0 km/h
This is exceptionally useful for those of us wondering whether to fit winter or all season tyres for the bigger while size, and for a change Auto Bild named the all season tyre used, it's the Vredestein Quatrac Pro.
There are however some drawbacks to the single reference tyre. The Quatrac Pro is an older patter now, and certainly not the best all season tyre on the market anymore. This means while it was good in the dry, it didn't beat all the winter tyres as you'd expect (the Michelin CrossClimate 2 certainly would have), it struggled in the wet, and if you'd expected it to come last in a group of winter tyres in the snow tests, you're also in for a surprise.
Sadly Auto Bild didn't name the summer reference tyre, but this was unusually good in aquaplaning, and one of the best in the dry and wet.
There were also some nice synergies between this test and the Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test, with the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 and Hankook Winter Icept Evo 3 performing amongst the best in both tests, and the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 being the wet specialist of the group.
Dry
As in the Tyre Reviews test, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was the best in both dry tests, beating even the all season tyre, but still significantly weaker than the summer reference which was nearly four meters ahead.
Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
36.5 m | -4.90 m | 0 km/h |
| 41.4 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 41.9 m | +0.50 m | 14 km/h | |
| 43 m | +1.60 m | 25 km/h | |
| 43.1 m | +1.70 m | 26 km/h | |
| 43.2 m | +1.80 m | 27 km/h | |
| 43.5 m | +2.10 m | 29 km/h | |
| 43.6 m | +2.20 m | 29 km/h | |
| 43.9 m | +2.50 m | 31 km/h | |
| 43.9 m | +2.50 m | 31 km/h | |
| 44 m | +2.60 m | 32 km/h | |
| 44 m | +2.60 m | 32 km/h | |
| 44.2 m | +2.80 m | 33 km/h | |
| 44.6 m | +3.20 m | 35 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 22.2% (8.1 m ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Continental WinterContact TS 850 P would still be travelling at 35 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
The order of results was also the same in dry handling, with the reference summer tyre leading Michelin and the all season Vredestein Quatrac Pro, with the Toyo SnowProx S954 in fourth.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
105 km/h | +2.10 km/h |
| 102.9 km/h | Best | |
| 102.5 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 101.7 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 101.6 km/h | -1.30 km/h | |
| 101.4 km/h | -1.50 km/h | |
| 101 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 100.9 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 100.8 km/h | -2.10 km/h | |
| 100.1 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 100.1 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 99.7 km/h | -3.20 km/h | |
| 99.3 km/h | -3.60 km/h | |
| 99 km/h | -3.90 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 5.7% (6 Km/H).
Wet
Wet braking retained the summer tyres advantage, but this time the gap was closer at two meters shorter stopping distance. The difference between the best and worst winter tyre was fifteen meters from 100kph (62mph) which is a vast difference.
Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
47.1 m | -1.90 m | 0 km/h |
| 49 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 49.7 m | +0.70 m | 15 km/h | |
| 49.8 m | +0.80 m | 16 km/h | |
| 50.2 m | +1.20 m | 20 km/h | |
| 50.5 m | +1.50 m | 22 km/h | |
| 51 m | +2.00 m | 26 km/h | |
| 51.4 m | +2.40 m | 28 km/h | |
| 52.1 m | +3.10 m | 32 km/h | |
| 52.4 m | +3.40 m | 33 km/h | |
| 52.6 m | +3.60 m | 34 km/h | |
| 55.5 m | +6.50 m | 44 km/h | |
| 56.7 m | +7.70 m | 48 km/h | |
| 65.4 m | +16.40 m | 65 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 38.9% (18.3 m ≈ 4.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Nankang SV2 would still be travelling at 65 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 managed to edge out the summer tyre around the wet handling lap.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 72.9 km/h | Best | |
RefReference Summer |
72.4 km/h | -0.50 km/h |
| 72 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 71.9 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 71.9 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 71.7 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 70.5 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 70.3 km/h | -2.60 km/h | |
| 70.3 km/h | -2.60 km/h | |
| 70.1 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 69.9 km/h | -3.00 km/h | |
| 69.2 km/h | -3.70 km/h | |
| 68.2 km/h | -4.70 km/h | |
| 62.7 km/h | -10.20 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 14% (10.2 Km/H).
The summer tyre regained its lead to be the best in straight aquaplaning, leading the best winter tyre by quite a margin.
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
101.5 km/h | +4.00 km/h |
| 97.5 km/h | Best | |
| 97.5 km/h | Best | |
| 97.4 km/h | -0.10 km/h | |
| 97.2 km/h | -0.30 km/h | |
| 96.8 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 96.6 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 96.1 km/h | -1.40 km/h | |
| 94.7 km/h | -2.80 km/h | |
| 94.1 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
| 93.6 km/h | -3.90 km/h | |
| 92.5 km/h | -5.00 km/h | |
| 92.5 km/h | -5.00 km/h | |
| 90.8 km/h | -6.70 km/h | |
| 90.4 km/h | -7.10 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 10.9% (11.1 Km/H).
Snow
Snow braking once again had the BF Goodrich gForce Winter being the best winter tyre on snow, leading the consistent Hankook Winter Icept evo 3 and Dunlop WinterSport 5.
Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30.7 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 31.7 m | +1.00 m | 23 km/h | |
| 31.8 m | +1.10 m | 24 km/h | |
| 31.9 m | +1.20 m | 25 km/h | |
| 32 m | +1.30 m | 26 km/h | |
| 32.1 m | +1.40 m | 27 km/h | |
| 32.2 m | +1.50 m | 28 km/h | |
| 32.3 m | +1.60 m | 29 km/h | |
| 32.7 m | +2.00 m | 32 km/h | |
| 33.5 m | +2.80 m | 38 km/h | |
| 34.7 m | +4.00 m | 44 km/h | |
| 35.4 m | +4.70 m | 47 km/h | |
| 36.9 m | +6.20 m | 53 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
57.2 m | +26.50 m | 88 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 86.3% (26.5 m ≈ 5.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Nankang SV2 would still be travelling at 53 km/h when the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
BFGoodrich continued its advantage during the snow traction test.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 2975 N | Best | |
| 2824 N | -151.00 N | |
| 2800 N | -175.00 N | |
| 2789 N | -186.00 N | |
| 2727 N | -248.00 N | |
| 2705 N | -270.00 N | |
| 2688 N | -287.00 N | |
| 2687 N | -288.00 N | |
| 2684 N | -291.00 N | |
| 2575 N | -400.00 N | |
| 2419 N | -556.00 N | |
| 2364 N | -611.00 N | |
| 2353 N | -622.00 N | |
RefReference Summer |
710 N | -2,265.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 76.1% (2,265 N).
Snow handling rounded out the trio of wins for BFGoodrich, while the Nankang SV2 and Toyo Snowprox S954 continued to perform poorly in all snow tests.
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 44.7 km/h | Best | |
| 44.6 km/h | -0.10 km/h | |
| 44.3 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 44.1 km/h | -0.60 km/h | |
| 44 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 44 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 43.7 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 43 km/h | -1.70 km/h | |
| 42.7 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 41.3 km/h | -3.40 km/h | |
| 40.7 km/h | -4.00 km/h | |
| 39.9 km/h | -4.80 km/h | |
| 39.3 km/h | -5.40 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 12.1% (5.4 Km/H).
Environment
The BFGoodrich was also the quietest tyre on test, with the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 following closely. In this test, every winter and all season tyre were quieter than the summer tyre.
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 72.4 dB | Best | |
| 72.5 dB | +0.10 dB | |
| 72.8 dB | +0.40 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +0.50 dB | |
| 73.3 dB | +0.90 dB | |
| 73.4 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 73.4 dB | +1.00 dB | |
| 73.9 dB | +1.50 dB | |
| 74.3 dB | +1.90 dB | |
| 74.6 dB | +2.20 dB | |
| 74.7 dB | +2.30 dB | |
| 75.1 dB | +2.70 dB | |
| 75.4 dB | +3.00 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
75.5 dB | +3.10 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 4.3% (3.1 dB).
The Bridgestone had the lowest rolling resistance on test, beating the summer tyre. The all season tyre finished midpack.
Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.91 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
RefReference Summer |
8.03 kg/t | +0.12 kg/t | £7 |
| 8.43 kg/t | +0.52 kg/t | £29 | |
| 8.46 kg/t | +0.55 kg/t | £31 | |
| 8.51 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | £33 | |
| 8.58 kg/t | +0.67 kg/t | £37 | |
| 8.73 kg/t | +0.82 kg/t | £46 | |
| 8.74 kg/t | +0.83 kg/t | £46 | |
| 8.84 kg/t | +0.93 kg/t | £52 | |
| 8.91 kg/t | +1.00 kg/t | £56 | |
| 8.91 kg/t | +1.00 kg/t | £56 | |
| 9.18 kg/t | +1.27 kg/t | £71 | |
| 9.38 kg/t | +1.47 kg/t | £82 | |
| 10.22 kg/t | +2.31 kg/t | £129 |
The difference between best and worst was 29.2% (2.31 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 uses about 89 L (£129) more fuel than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.
There was a difference of 270 euros between the cheapest and most expensive tyres, and as always, the cheapest were amongst the worst performing on test.
Results
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
245/40 R18 97V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (13)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 8th / 13 | 43.9 m | +2.50 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 13 | 101 km/h | -1.90 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 13 | 49.7 m | +0.70 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 13 | 71.9 km/h | -1.00 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 5th / 13 | 12.65 s | +0.24 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 3rd / 13 | 97.4 km/h | -0.10 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 1st / 13 | 4.22 m/sec2 | Best in this discipline |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 13 | 31.7 m | +1.00 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 3rd / 13 | 2800 N | -175.00 N |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 13 | 44.6 km/h | -0.10 km/h |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 5th / 13 | 3.73 m/sec2 | -0.16 m/sec2 |
| NoiseLower is better | 11th / 13 | 74.7 dB | +2.30 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 7th / 13 | 8.74 kg/t | +0.83 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/72
- Price
- 495.00
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
245/40 R18 97V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (13)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 1st / 13 | 41.4 m | Best in this discipline |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 13 | 102.9 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 13 | 49.8 m | +0.80 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 13 | 72 km/h | -0.90 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 4th / 13 | 12.57 s | +0.16 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 1st / 13 | 97.5 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 5th / 13 | 3.82 m/sec2 | -0.40 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 5th / 13 | 32 m | +1.30 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 8th / 13 | 2687 N | -288.00 N |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 13 | 44.3 km/h | -0.40 km/h |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 1st / 13 | 3.89 m/sec2 | Best in this discipline |
| NoiseLower is better | 3rd / 13 | 72.8 dB | +0.40 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 2nd / 13 | 8.43 kg/t | +0.52 kg/t |
- EU Label
- D/B/70
- Price
- 700.00
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
245/40 R18 97V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (13)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 5th / 13 | 43.2 m | +1.80 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 13 | 100.8 km/h | -2.10 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 6th / 13 | 51 m | +2.00 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 13 | 71.7 km/h | -1.20 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 6th / 13 | 12.67 s | +0.26 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 4th / 13 | 97.2 km/h | -0.30 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 2nd / 13 | 4.04 m/sec2 | -0.18 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 8th / 13 | 32.3 m | +1.60 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 6th / 13 | 2705 N | -270.00 N |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 13 | 44 km/h | -0.70 km/h |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 3rd / 13 | 3.81 m/sec2 | -0.08 m/sec2 |
| NoiseLower is better | 10th / 13 | 74.6 dB | +2.20 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 12th / 13 | 9.38 kg/t | +1.47 kg/t |
- EU Label
- D/B/72
- Price
- 535.00
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
245/40 R18 97V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (13)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 4th / 13 | 43.1 m | +1.70 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 13 | 101.6 km/h | -1.30 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 1st / 13 | 49 m | Best in this discipline |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 13 | 72.9 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 1st / 13 | 12.41 s | Best in this discipline |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 12th / 13 | 90.8 km/h | -6.70 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 8th / 13 | 3.73 m/sec2 | -0.49 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 7th / 13 | 32.2 m | +1.50 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 7th / 13 | 2688 N | -287.00 N |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 8th / 13 | 43 km/h | -1.70 km/h |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 6th / 13 | 3.72 m/sec2 | -0.17 m/sec2 |
| NoiseLower is better | 6th / 13 | 73.4 dB | +1.00 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 1st / 13 | 7.91 kg/t | Best in this discipline |
- EU Label
- C/A/72
- Price
- 615.00
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
245/40 R18 97V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (13)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 7th / 13 | 43.6 m | +2.20 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 12th / 13 | 99.3 km/h | -3.60 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 9th / 13 | 52.4 m | +3.40 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 13 | 70.3 km/h | -2.60 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 8th / 13 | 12.73 s | +0.32 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 13th / 13 | 90.4 km/h | -7.10 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 4th / 13 | 3.84 m/sec2 | -0.38 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 13 | 31.8 m | +1.10 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 2nd / 13 | 2824 N | -151.00 N |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 4th / 13 | 44.1 km/h | -0.60 km/h |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 7th / 13 | 3.71 m/sec2 | -0.18 m/sec2 |
| NoiseLower is better | 13th / 13 | 75.4 dB | +3.00 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 4th / 13 | 8.51 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/72
- Price
- 590.00
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+
245/40 R18 97V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (13)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 6th / 13 | 43.5 m | +2.10 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 13th / 13 | 99 km/h | -3.90 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 8th / 13 | 52.1 m | +3.10 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 10th / 13 | 69.9 km/h | -3.00 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 7th / 13 | 12.7 s | +0.29 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 9th / 13 | 94.1 km/h | -3.40 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 3rd / 13 | 3.92 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 6th / 13 | 32.1 m | +1.40 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 4th / 13 | 2789 N | -186.00 N |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 13 | 44 km/h | -0.70 km/h |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 8th / 13 | 3.66 m/sec2 | -0.23 m/sec2 |
| NoiseLower is better | 12th / 13 | 75.1 dB | +2.70 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 3rd / 13 | 8.46 kg/t | +0.55 kg/t |
- EU Label
- D/C/72
- Price
- 590.00
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
245/40 R18 97V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (13)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 13th / 13 | 44.6 m | +3.20 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 13 | 100.9 km/h | -2.00 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 4th / 13 | 50.2 m | +1.20 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 13 | 71.9 km/h | -1.00 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 2nd / 13 | 12.44 s | +0.03 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 10th / 13 | 93.6 km/h | -3.90 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 11th / 13 | 3.62 m/sec2 | -0.60 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 9th / 13 | 32.7 m | +2.00 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 5th / 13 | 2727 N | -248.00 N |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 13 | 42.7 km/h | -2.00 km/h |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 9th / 13 | 3.46 m/sec2 | -0.43 m/sec2 |
| NoiseLower is better | 8th / 13 | 73.9 dB | +1.50 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 9th / 13 | 8.91 kg/t | +1.00 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/A/72
- Price
- 700.00
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
245/40 R18 97V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (13)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 10th / 13 | 44 m | +2.60 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 13 | 99.7 km/h | -3.20 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 11th / 13 | 55.5 m | +6.50 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 13 | 69.2 km/h | -3.70 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 11th / 13 | 13.05 s | +0.64 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 1st / 13 | 97.5 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 9th / 13 | 3.68 m/sec2 | -0.54 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 1st / 13 | 30.7 m | Best in this discipline |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 1st / 13 | 2975 N | Best in this discipline |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 1st / 13 | 44.7 km/h | Best in this discipline |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 2nd / 13 | 3.85 m/sec2 | -0.04 m/sec2 |
| NoiseLower is better | 1st / 13 | 72.4 dB | Best in this discipline |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 5th / 13 | 8.58 kg/t | +0.67 kg/t |
- EU Label
- C/B/69
- Price
- 560.00
Falken Eurowinter HS01
245/40 R18 97V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (13)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 8th / 13 | 43.9 m | +2.50 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 13 | 100.1 km/h | -2.80 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 7th / 13 | 51.4 m | +2.40 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 12th / 13 | 68.2 km/h | -4.70 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 12th / 13 | 13.23 s | +0.82 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 6th / 13 | 96.6 km/h | -0.90 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 10th / 13 | 3.63 m/sec2 | -0.59 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 4th / 13 | 31.9 m | +1.20 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 9th / 13 | 2684 N | -291.00 N |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 13 | 43.7 km/h | -1.00 km/h |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 4th / 13 | 3.79 m/sec2 | -0.10 m/sec2 |
| NoiseLower is better | 9th / 13 | 74.3 dB | +1.90 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 13th / 13 | 10.22 kg/t | +2.31 kg/t |
- EU Label
- E/B/72
- Price
- 475.00
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
245/40 R18 97V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (13)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 12th / 13 | 44.2 m | +2.80 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 5th / 13 | 101.4 km/h | -1.50 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 12th / 13 | 56.7 m | +7.70 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 6th / 13 | 70.5 km/h | -2.40 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 10th / 13 | 12.87 s | +0.46 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 8th / 13 | 94.7 km/h | -2.80 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 12th / 13 | 3.43 m/sec2 | -0.79 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 10th / 13 | 33.5 m | +2.80 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 10th / 13 | 2575 N | -400.00 N |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 10th / 13 | 41.3 km/h | -3.40 km/h |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 11th / 13 | 3.27 m/sec2 | -0.62 m/sec2 |
| NoiseLower is better | 2nd / 13 | 72.5 dB | +0.10 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 8th / 13 | 8.84 kg/t | +0.93 kg/t |
- EU Label
- D/B/71
- Price
- 430.00
Toyo Snowprox S954
245/40 R18 97V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (13)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 3rd / 13 | 43 m | +1.60 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 3rd / 13 | 101.7 km/h | -1.20 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 5th / 13 | 50.5 m | +1.50 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 13 | 70.1 km/h | -2.80 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 9th / 13 | 12.81 s | +0.40 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 7th / 13 | 96.1 km/h | -1.40 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 7th / 13 | 3.74 m/sec2 | -0.48 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 12th / 13 | 35.4 m | +4.70 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 13th / 13 | 2353 N | -622.00 N |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 13th / 13 | 39.3 km/h | -5.40 km/h |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 10th / 13 | 3.29 m/sec2 | -0.60 m/sec2 |
| NoiseLower is better | 6th / 13 | 73.4 dB | +1.00 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 11th / 13 | 9.18 kg/t | +1.27 kg/t |
- EU Label
- D/B/71
- Price
- 525.00
Nankang SV2
245/40 R18 97V XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (13)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 10th / 13 | 44 m | +2.60 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 9th / 13 | 100.1 km/h | -2.80 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 13th / 13 | 65.4 m | +16.40 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 13th / 13 | 62.7 km/h | -10.20 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 13th / 13 | 13.53 s | +1.12 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 5th / 13 | 96.8 km/h | -0.70 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 6th / 13 | 3.79 m/sec2 | -0.43 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 13th / 13 | 36.9 m | +6.20 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 12th / 13 | 2364 N | -611.00 N |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 12th / 13 | 39.9 km/h | -4.80 km/h |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 11th / 13 | 3.27 m/sec2 | -0.62 m/sec2 |
| NoiseLower is better | 4th / 13 | 72.9 dB | +0.50 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 9th / 13 | 8.91 kg/t | +1.00 kg/t |
- EU Label
- E/C/71
- Price
- 450.00
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
245/40 R18 97Y XLCategory scores (% of best)
All discipline results (13)
Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.
| Test | Position in discipline | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry BrakingLower is better | 2nd / 13 | 41.9 m | +0.50 m |
| Dry HandlingHigher is better | 2nd / 13 | 102.5 km/h | -0.40 km/h |
| Wet BrakingLower is better | 10th / 13 | 52.6 m | +3.60 m |
| Wet HandlingHigher is better | 7th / 13 | 70.3 km/h | -2.60 km/h |
| Wet CircleLower is better | 3rd / 13 | 12.51 s | +0.10 s |
| Straight AquaHigher is better | 11th / 13 | 92.5 km/h | -5.00 km/h |
| Curved AquaplaningHigher is better | 13th / 13 | 3.13 m/sec2 | -1.09 m/sec2 |
| Snow BrakingLower is better | 11th / 13 | 34.7 m | +4.00 m |
| Snow TractionHigher is better | 11th / 13 | 2419 N | -556.00 N |
| Snow HandlingHigher is better | 11th / 13 | 40.7 km/h | -4.00 km/h |
| Snow SlalomHigher is better | 13th / 13 | 3.26 m/sec2 | -0.63 m/sec2 |
| NoiseLower is better | 5th / 13 | 73.3 dB | +0.90 dB |
| Rolling ResistanceLower is better | 6th / 13 | 8.73 kg/t | +0.82 kg/t |
- EU Label
- D/B/71
- Price
- 535.00

it is the second winter i am having gForce Winter 2 and i am really amazed by his snow performance. It lacks performance at the dry, but what a snow tyre!
Coincidentally, I came here to ask a very similar question, to the question below. I'm really trying to compare the CC2 to the Wintrac Pro for my winter setup. Particularly for wet performance, I assumed that all weather would do better. While there is no direct test, I noticed the Quatrac Pro did better than the CC2 in the wet in autobild all season test. And the Quatrac Pro did worse the the Wintrac pro in the wet in this test. Can I then assume that the Wintrac Pro will do better than the CC2 in the wet?
However if you saying below that quiet updates happen all the time, my assumptions are vulnerable.
Even more so, the older model performance winters tires we get in North America ( Sotto3, Wintrac Pro, PA4 ). I was using the test data from older European tests to make my decisions. Can I no longer assume that the pilot Alpine PA4 or the wintrac Pro, in the American marketplace are the same as what was available in Europe 5 years ago? Tires are complicated man.
Tyres are complicated, even more so when you start getting to tyres vs tires as the same names can be different tyres (North American CC2 is different from European CC2).
It's a headache for me.
Indeed, but in the end, selecting a good tire is not difficult, trying to figure out what the best is for your situation is what's difficult so it's not really much of a problem is it.
"Tyre vs Tire" subtle, clever.
These are some interesting results! In wet braking and wet handling the reference Vredestein Quatrac Pro all-season tyre scores worse than almost every winter tyre. In the all-season test Autobild did earlier, the exact same tyre (Vredestein Quatrac Pro) achieved the best score in wet braking and wet handling beating other all-season tyres and interestingly also beating the (anonymous) reference winter tyre in that test. What would cause that difference? Why is the same tyre in this test worse in wet than the winter tyres and better than a reference winter tyre (and every other all-season tyre) in another test? Would this be because of the size (in this test 18 inch, in the all-season test 17 inch)? Maybe the reference winter tyre in the all-season test was just a shitty tyre? Or the temperatures (22 degrees in the all-season test, unknown in this test)?
That's a good bunch of questions :D
My guess would be that the 17" in the all season test would have received an update, where as the 18" here hasn't yet. But I'll pass on the question to Vred and see what they say.
Of course, only auto bild really know the answer.
That's another possibility I didn't think of! But if the Vredestein tyre received such an update that has a significant impact, would Vredestein not called it Quatrac Pro 2, Quatrac Pro S or Quatrac Pro Evo or something? If I had to guess, I'd put my money on difference in temperature. The all-seasons were tested at too high temperatures (22c) and maybe the winter tyres were tested at or below freezing? Maybe I should ask AutoBild.
Would love to see a test similar to the test you did a few years ago with tyres at different temperatures but then with more tyres. Four of the best tyres in categories of summer, winter and all-season at different temperatures in wet and dry to see when what tyres performance best.
If you do ask Auto Bild let me know if you get a reply!
I'm not sure why names don't change with updates, but it's not uncommon for tyres to get silently updated a number of times in their life, sometimes they're significant updates too. The only way to tell is that the EAN changes, but that's not usually easy to find data.