Menu

Test source Auto Bild Sportscars

2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test

Joint test winnersHankook Winter i cept evo3 Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

The 2021 Auto Bild Sportscars winter tyre test has tested twelve of the best winter tyres in 245/40 R18 size using a Mercedes C Class, AND have included a summer and all season tyre as reference.This is exceptionally useful for those of us…

Tyres tested
13
Tested size
245/40 R18
Disciplines
13

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

13 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

Joint1st

Hankook Winter i cept evo3

+Excellent performance in the snow and rain, good aquaplaning resistance, dynamic handling and short braking distances on snowy and wet roads, very good value for money.

−None mentioned.

Read full verdict
Joint1st

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

+An excellent winter tyre with exemplary driving properties in all weather conditions, precise steering behavior, short braking distances.

−Expensive.

Read full verdict
3rd

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

+Convincing all-round talent with very good winter and wet qualities, stable wet and dry handling, low price level.

−Average ride comfort.

Read full verdict
4th

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

+Snow professional with convincing performance on wet and dry surfaces, short wet braking distances, precise wet and dry handling.

−Moderate aquaplaning properties.

Read full verdict
Joint5th

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

+Excellent performance in the snow, short wet and dry braking distances, pleasant comfort, low rolling resistance.

−Understeer in the dry.

Read full verdict
Joint5th

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+

+Winter specialist with sporty driving qualities on snow, good aquaplaning qualities, low rolling resistance.

−Understeer in the dry.

7th

Continental WinterContact TS 850 P

+Balanced winter tires with safe driving characteristics in all weather conditions, dynamic wet handling, short wet braking distances.

−Long dry and snow braking.

Read full verdict
8th

BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

+Winter king with the best driving properties on snow, quiet pass-by noise.

−Average wet grip, long wet braking.

Read full verdict
9th

Falken Eurowinter HS01

+Convincing driving characteristics on ice and snow, good aquaplaning resistance.

−Understeering handling and slow steering response in the wet.

Read full verdict
10th

Nexen WinGuard Sport 2

+Stable dry handling, low noise, low price.

−Long wet braking, poor snow grip.

Read full verdict
11th

Toyo Snowprox S954

+Good aquaplaning resistance, dynamic dry handling.

−Poor snow grip, understeer in the wet.

Read full verdict
12th

Nankang SV2

+Good aquaplaning resistance.

−Limited grip on ice and snow, dangerously long wet braking distances, severe understeer in the wet.

Read full verdict
13th

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

+Dynamic handling and short braking distances on dry slopes, precise steering.

−Limited snow performance, low aquaplaning resistance.

Read full verdict

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test · 245/40 R18

TyreHankook Winter i cept evo3Michelin Pilot Alpin 5Vredestein Wintrac ProBridgestone Blizzak LM005Dunlop Winter Sport 5Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+Continental WinterContact TS 850 PBFGoodrich gForce Winter 2Falken Eurowinter HS01Nexen WinGuard Sport 2Toyo Snowprox S954Nankang SV2Vredestein Quatrac Pro
PositionJoint 1stJoint 1st3rd4thJoint 5thJoint 5th7th8th9th10th11th12th13th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry96.2%100%96.9%97.4%95.7%95.7%95.4%95.5%95.8%96.1%97.6%95.7%99.2%
Wet98.7%98.2%97.5%98.7%95.2%95.7%97.6%92.9%94%92.6%96.3%85.6%94.6%
Snow96.7%96.2%95.5%94.3%96.4%95.5%92.6%99.8%95.3%88.7%84.5%84%86.2%
Comfort96.9%99.5%97.1%98.6%96%96.4%98%100%97.4%99.9%98.6%99.3%98.8%
Rolling Resistance90.5%93.8%84.3%100%93%93.5%88.8%92.2%77.4%89.5%86.2%88.8%90.6%
Keep researchingRead owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results
Read owner reviews
Test Results

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking
100 → 0 km/h
Snow Braking
50 → 0 km/h
The 2021 Auto Bild Sportscars winter tyre test has tested twelve of the best winter tyres in 245/40 R18 size using a Mercedes C Class, AND have included a summer and all season tyre as reference.

This is exceptionally useful for those of us wondering whether to fit winter or all season tyres for the bigger while size, and for a change Auto Bild named the all season tyre used, it's the Vredestein Quatrac Pro. 

There are however some drawbacks to the single reference tyre. The Quatrac Pro is an older patter now, and certainly not the best all season tyre on the market anymore. This means while it was good in the dry, it didn't beat all the winter tyres as you'd expect (the Michelin CrossClimate 2 certainly would have), it struggled in the wet, and if you'd expected it to come last in a group of winter tyres in the snow tests, you're also in for a surprise.

Sadly Auto Bild didn't name the summer reference tyre, but this was unusually good in aquaplaning, and one of the best in the dry and wet.

There were also some nice synergies between this test and the Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test, with the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 and Hankook Winter Icept Evo 3 performing amongst the best in both tests, and the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 being the wet specialist of the group.

Dry

As in the Tyre Reviews test, the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 was the best in both dry tests, beating even the all season tyre, but still significantly weaker than the summer reference which was nearly four meters ahead.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
36.5 m -4.90 m 0 km/h
41.4 m Best 0 km/h
41.9 m +0.50 m 14 km/h
43 m +1.60 m 25 km/h
43.1 m +1.70 m 26 km/h
43.2 m +1.80 m 27 km/h
43.5 m +2.10 m 29 km/h
43.6 m +2.20 m 29 km/h
43.9 m +2.50 m 31 km/h
43.9 m +2.50 m 31 km/h
44 m +2.60 m 32 km/h
44 m +2.60 m 32 km/h
44.2 m +2.80 m 33 km/h
44.6 m +3.20 m 35 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 22.2% (8.1 m ≈ 1.8 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Continental WinterContact TS 850 P would still be travelling at 35 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The order of results was also the same in dry handling, with the reference summer tyre leading Michelin and the all season Vredestein Quatrac Pro, with the Toyo SnowProx S954 in fourth.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
105 km/h +2.10 km/h
102.9 km/h Best
102.5 km/h -0.40 km/h
101.7 km/h -1.20 km/h
101.6 km/h -1.30 km/h
101.4 km/h -1.50 km/h
101 km/h -1.90 km/h
100.9 km/h -2.00 km/h
100.8 km/h -2.10 km/h
100.1 km/h -2.80 km/h
100.1 km/h -2.80 km/h
99.7 km/h -3.20 km/h
99.3 km/h -3.60 km/h
99 km/h -3.90 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.7% (6 Km/H).

Wet

Wet braking retained the summer tyres advantage, but this time the gap was closer at two meters shorter stopping distance. The difference between the best and worst winter tyre was fifteen meters from 100kph (62mph) which is a vast difference.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
RefReference Summer
47.1 m -1.90 m 0 km/h
49 m Best 0 km/h
49.7 m +0.70 m 15 km/h
49.8 m +0.80 m 16 km/h
50.2 m +1.20 m 20 km/h
50.5 m +1.50 m 22 km/h
51 m +2.00 m 26 km/h
51.4 m +2.40 m 28 km/h
52.1 m +3.10 m 32 km/h
52.4 m +3.40 m 33 km/h
52.6 m +3.60 m 34 km/h
55.5 m +6.50 m 44 km/h
56.7 m +7.70 m 48 km/h
65.4 m +16.40 m 65 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 38.9% (18.3 m ≈ 4.1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Nankang SV2 would still be travelling at 65 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 managed to edge out the summer tyre around the wet handling lap.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
72.9 km/h Best
RefReference Summer
72.4 km/h -0.50 km/h
72 km/h -0.90 km/h
71.9 km/h -1.00 km/h
71.9 km/h -1.00 km/h
71.7 km/h -1.20 km/h
70.5 km/h -2.40 km/h
70.3 km/h -2.60 km/h
70.3 km/h -2.60 km/h
70.1 km/h -2.80 km/h
69.9 km/h -3.00 km/h
69.2 km/h -3.70 km/h
68.2 km/h -4.70 km/h
62.7 km/h -10.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 14% (10.2 Km/H).

The summer tyre regained its lead to be the best in straight aquaplaning, leading the best winter tyre by quite a margin.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
RefReference Summer
101.5 km/h +4.00 km/h
97.5 km/h Best
97.5 km/h Best
97.4 km/h -0.10 km/h
97.2 km/h -0.30 km/h
96.8 km/h -0.70 km/h
96.6 km/h -0.90 km/h
96.1 km/h -1.40 km/h
94.7 km/h -2.80 km/h
94.1 km/h -3.40 km/h
93.6 km/h -3.90 km/h
11
92.5 km/h -5.00 km/h
92.5 km/h -5.00 km/h
90.8 km/h -6.70 km/h
90.4 km/h -7.10 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 10.9% (11.1 Km/H).

Snow

Snow braking once again had the BF Goodrich gForce Winter being the best winter tyre on snow, leading the consistent Hankook Winter Icept evo 3 and Dunlop WinterSport 5.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)

Lower is better ↓
Snow Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to bestResidual speed
30.7 m Best 0 km/h
31.7 m +1.00 m 23 km/h
31.8 m +1.10 m 24 km/h
31.9 m +1.20 m 25 km/h
32 m +1.30 m 26 km/h
32.1 m +1.40 m 27 km/h
32.2 m +1.50 m 28 km/h
32.3 m +1.60 m 29 km/h
32.7 m +2.00 m 32 km/h
33.5 m +2.80 m 38 km/h
34.7 m +4.00 m 44 km/h
35.4 m +4.70 m 47 km/h
36.9 m +6.20 m 53 km/h
RefReference Summer
57.2 m +26.50 m 88 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 86.3% (26.5 m ≈ 5.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Nankang SV2 would still be travelling at 53 km/h when the BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

BFGoodrich continued its advantage during the snow traction test.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons

Higher is better ↑
Snow Traction
Position / TyreResultGap to best
2975 N Best
2824 N -151.00 N
2800 N -175.00 N
2789 N -186.00 N
2727 N -248.00 N
2705 N -270.00 N
2688 N -287.00 N
2687 N -288.00 N
2684 N -291.00 N
2575 N -400.00 N
2419 N -556.00 N
2364 N -611.00 N
2353 N -622.00 N
RefReference Summer
710 N -2,265.00 N

The difference between best and worst was 76.1% (2,265 N).

Snow handling rounded out the trio of wins for BFGoodrich, while the Nankang SV2 and Toyo Snowprox S954 continued to perform poorly in all snow tests.

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed

Higher is better ↑
Snow Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
44.7 km/h Best
44.6 km/h -0.10 km/h
44.3 km/h -0.40 km/h
44.1 km/h -0.60 km/h
44 km/h -0.70 km/h
44 km/h -0.70 km/h
43.7 km/h -1.00 km/h
43 km/h -1.70 km/h
42.7 km/h -2.00 km/h
41.3 km/h -3.40 km/h
40.7 km/h -4.00 km/h
39.9 km/h -4.80 km/h
39.3 km/h -5.40 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 12.1% (5.4 Km/H).

Environment

The BFGoodrich was also the quietest tyre on test, with the Nexen WinGuard Sport 2 following closely. In this test, every winter and all season tyre were quieter than the summer tyre.

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
72.4 dB Best
72.5 dB +0.10 dB
72.8 dB +0.40 dB
72.9 dB +0.50 dB
73.3 dB +0.90 dB
73.4 dB +1.00 dB
73.4 dB +1.00 dB
73.9 dB +1.50 dB
74.3 dB +1.90 dB
74.6 dB +2.20 dB
74.7 dB +2.30 dB
75.1 dB +2.70 dB
75.4 dB +3.00 dB
RefReference Summer
75.5 dB +3.10 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.3% (3.1 dB).

The Bridgestone had the lowest rolling resistance on test, beating the summer tyre. The all season tyre finished midpack.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.91 kg/t Best £0
RefReference Summer
8.03 kg/t +0.12 kg/t £7
8.43 kg/t +0.52 kg/t £29
8.46 kg/t +0.55 kg/t £31
8.51 kg/t +0.60 kg/t £33
8.58 kg/t +0.67 kg/t £37
8.73 kg/t +0.82 kg/t £46
8.74 kg/t +0.83 kg/t £46
8.84 kg/t +0.93 kg/t £52
8.91 kg/t +1.00 kg/t £56
8.91 kg/t +1.00 kg/t £56
9.18 kg/t +1.27 kg/t £71
9.38 kg/t +1.47 kg/t £82
10.22 kg/t +2.31 kg/t £129

The difference between best and worst was 29.2% (2.31 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 uses about 89 L (£129) more fuel than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

There was a difference of 270 euros between the cheapest and most expensive tyres, and as always, the cheapest were amongst the worst performing on test.

Results

Joint 1st

Hankook Winter i cept evo3

245/40 R18 97V XL
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
Dry96.2%
Wet98.7%
Snow96.7%
Comfort96.9%
Rolling Resistance90.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 1343.9 m+2.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 13101 km/h-1.90 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 1349.7 m+0.70 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1371.9 km/h-1.00 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better5th / 1312.65 s+0.24 s
Straight AquaHigher is better3rd / 1397.4 km/h-0.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 134.22 m/sec2Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better2nd / 1331.7 m+1.00 m
Snow TractionHigher is better3rd / 132800 N-175.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1344.6 km/h-0.10 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better5th / 133.73 m/sec2-0.16 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better11th / 1374.7 dB+2.30 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 138.74 kg/t+0.83 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/72
Price
495.00
Joint 1st

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

245/40 R18 97V XL
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
Dry100%
Wet98.2%
Snow96.2%
Comfort99.5%
Rolling Resistance93.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 1341.4 mBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 13102.9 km/hBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 1349.8 m+0.80 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 1372 km/h-0.90 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better4th / 1312.57 s+0.16 s
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 1397.5 km/hBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better5th / 133.82 m/sec2-0.40 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better5th / 1332 m+1.30 m
Snow TractionHigher is better8th / 132687 N-288.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1344.3 km/h-0.40 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better1st / 133.89 m/sec2Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better3rd / 1372.8 dB+0.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 138.43 kg/t+0.52 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/70
Price
700.00
3rd

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

245/40 R18 97V XL
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Dry96.9%
Wet97.5%
Snow95.5%
Comfort97.1%
Rolling Resistance84.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 1343.2 m+1.80 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better8th / 13100.8 km/h-2.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 1351 m+2.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better5th / 1371.7 km/h-1.20 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better6th / 1312.67 s+0.26 s
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 1397.2 km/h-0.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 134.04 m/sec2-0.18 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better8th / 1332.3 m+1.60 m
Snow TractionHigher is better6th / 132705 N-270.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better5th / 1344 km/h-0.70 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better3rd / 133.81 m/sec2-0.08 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better10th / 1374.6 dB+2.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better12th / 139.38 kg/t+1.47 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/72
Price
535.00
4th

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

245/40 R18 97V XL
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Dry97.4%
Wet98.7%
Snow94.3%
Comfort98.6%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 1343.1 m+1.70 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better4th / 13101.6 km/h-1.30 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 1349 mBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 1372.9 km/hBest in this discipline
Wet CircleLower is better1st / 1312.41 sBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better12th / 1390.8 km/h-6.70 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 133.73 m/sec2-0.49 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better7th / 1332.2 m+1.50 m
Snow TractionHigher is better7th / 132688 N-287.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better8th / 1343 km/h-1.70 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better6th / 133.72 m/sec2-0.17 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better6th / 1373.4 dB+1.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 137.91 kg/tBest in this discipline
EU Label
C/A/72
Price
615.00
Joint 5th

Dunlop Winter Sport 5

245/40 R18 97V XL
Dunlop Winter Sport 5
Dry95.7%
Wet95.2%
Snow96.4%
Comfort96%
Rolling Resistance93%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 1343.6 m+2.20 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better12th / 1399.3 km/h-3.60 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better9th / 1352.4 m+3.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 1370.3 km/h-2.60 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better8th / 1312.73 s+0.32 s
Straight AquaHigher is better13th / 1390.4 km/h-7.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 133.84 m/sec2-0.38 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better3rd / 1331.8 m+1.10 m
Snow TractionHigher is better2nd / 132824 N-151.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better4th / 1344.1 km/h-0.60 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better7th / 133.71 m/sec2-0.18 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better13th / 1375.4 dB+3.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 138.51 kg/t+0.60 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/72
Price
590.00
Joint 5th

Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+

245/40 R18 97V XL
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+
Dry95.7%
Wet95.7%
Snow95.5%
Comfort96.4%
Rolling Resistance93.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 1343.5 m+2.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better13th / 1399 km/h-3.90 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 1352.1 m+3.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better10th / 1369.9 km/h-3.00 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better7th / 1312.7 s+0.29 s
Straight AquaHigher is better9th / 1394.1 km/h-3.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 133.92 m/sec2-0.30 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better6th / 1332.1 m+1.40 m
Snow TractionHigher is better4th / 132789 N-186.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better5th / 1344 km/h-0.70 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better8th / 133.66 m/sec2-0.23 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better12th / 1375.1 dB+2.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 138.46 kg/t+0.55 kg/t
EU Label
D/C/72
Price
590.00
7th

Continental WinterContact TS 850 P

245/40 R18 97V XL
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
Dry95.4%
Wet97.6%
Snow92.6%
Comfort98%
Rolling Resistance88.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better13th / 1344.6 m+3.20 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 13100.9 km/h-2.00 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 1350.2 m+1.20 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 1371.9 km/h-1.00 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better2nd / 1312.44 s+0.03 s
Straight AquaHigher is better10th / 1393.6 km/h-3.90 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better11th / 133.62 m/sec2-0.60 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better9th / 1332.7 m+2.00 m
Snow TractionHigher is better5th / 132727 N-248.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better9th / 1342.7 km/h-2.00 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better9th / 133.46 m/sec2-0.43 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better8th / 1373.9 dB+1.50 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 138.91 kg/t+1.00 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/72
Price
700.00
8th

BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2

245/40 R18 97V XL
BFGoodrich gForce Winter 2
Dry95.5%
Wet92.9%
Snow99.8%
Comfort100%
Rolling Resistance92.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 1344 m+2.60 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better11th / 1399.7 km/h-3.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better11th / 1355.5 m+6.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better11th / 1369.2 km/h-3.70 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better11th / 1313.05 s+0.64 s
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 1397.5 km/hBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better9th / 133.68 m/sec2-0.54 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better1st / 1330.7 mBest in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better1st / 132975 NBest in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better1st / 1344.7 km/hBest in this discipline
Snow SlalomHigher is better2nd / 133.85 m/sec2-0.04 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better1st / 1372.4 dBBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 138.58 kg/t+0.67 kg/t
EU Label
C/B/69
Price
560.00
9th

Falken Eurowinter HS01

245/40 R18 97V XL
Falken Eurowinter HS01
Dry95.8%
Wet94%
Snow95.3%
Comfort97.4%
Rolling Resistance77.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 1343.9 m+2.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better9th / 13100.1 km/h-2.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 1351.4 m+2.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better12th / 1368.2 km/h-4.70 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better12th / 1313.23 s+0.82 s
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 1396.6 km/h-0.90 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better10th / 133.63 m/sec2-0.59 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better4th / 1331.9 m+1.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better9th / 132684 N-291.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better7th / 1343.7 km/h-1.00 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better4th / 133.79 m/sec2-0.10 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better9th / 1374.3 dB+1.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better13th / 1310.22 kg/t+2.31 kg/t
EU Label
E/B/72
Price
475.00
10th

Nexen WinGuard Sport 2

245/40 R18 97V XL
Nexen WinGuard Sport 2
Dry96.1%
Wet92.6%
Snow88.7%
Comfort99.9%
Rolling Resistance89.5%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better12th / 1344.2 m+2.80 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 13101.4 km/h-1.50 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better12th / 1356.7 m+7.70 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 1370.5 km/h-2.40 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better10th / 1312.87 s+0.46 s
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 1394.7 km/h-2.80 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better12th / 133.43 m/sec2-0.79 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better10th / 1333.5 m+2.80 m
Snow TractionHigher is better10th / 132575 N-400.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better10th / 1341.3 km/h-3.40 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better11th / 133.27 m/sec2-0.62 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better2nd / 1372.5 dB+0.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 138.84 kg/t+0.93 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/71
Price
430.00
11th

Toyo Snowprox S954

245/40 R18 97V XL
Toyo Snowprox S954
Dry97.6%
Wet96.3%
Snow84.5%
Comfort98.6%
Rolling Resistance86.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 1343 m+1.60 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 13101.7 km/h-1.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 1350.5 m+1.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better9th / 1370.1 km/h-2.80 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better9th / 1312.81 s+0.40 s
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 1396.1 km/h-1.40 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better7th / 133.74 m/sec2-0.48 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better12th / 1335.4 m+4.70 m
Snow TractionHigher is better13th / 132353 N-622.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better13th / 1339.3 km/h-5.40 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better10th / 133.29 m/sec2-0.60 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better6th / 1373.4 dB+1.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better11th / 139.18 kg/t+1.27 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/71
Price
525.00
12th

Nankang SV2

245/40 R18 97V XL
Nankang SV2
Dry95.7%
Wet85.6%
Snow84%
Comfort99.3%
Rolling Resistance88.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better10th / 1344 m+2.60 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better9th / 13100.1 km/h-2.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better13th / 1365.4 m+16.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better13th / 1362.7 km/h-10.20 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better13th / 1313.53 s+1.12 s
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 1396.8 km/h-0.70 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better6th / 133.79 m/sec2-0.43 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better13th / 1336.9 m+6.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better12th / 132364 N-611.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better12th / 1339.9 km/h-4.80 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better11th / 133.27 m/sec2-0.62 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better4th / 1372.9 dB+0.50 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better9th / 138.91 kg/t+1.00 kg/t
EU Label
E/C/71
Price
450.00
13th

Vredestein Quatrac Pro

245/40 R18 97Y XL
Vredestein Quatrac Pro
Dry99.2%
Wet94.6%
Snow86.2%
Comfort98.8%
Rolling Resistance90.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 1341.9 m+0.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 13102.5 km/h-0.40 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better10th / 1352.6 m+3.60 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 1370.3 km/h-2.60 km/h
Wet CircleLower is better3rd / 1312.51 s+0.10 s
Straight AquaHigher is better11th / 1392.5 km/h-5.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better13th / 133.13 m/sec2-1.09 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better11th / 1334.7 m+4.00 m
Snow TractionHigher is better11th / 132419 N-556.00 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better11th / 1340.7 km/h-4.00 km/h
Snow SlalomHigher is better13th / 133.26 m/sec2-0.63 m/sec2
NoiseLower is better5th / 1373.3 dB+0.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 138.73 kg/t+0.82 kg/t
EU Label
D/B/71
Price
535.00

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

8 comments
  1. Vasilis Machairas archived

    it is the second winter i am having gForce Winter 2 and i am really amazed by his snow performance. It lacks performance at the dry, but what a snow tyre!

    #7775
  2. Marc Valme archived

    Coincidentally, I came here to ask a very similar question, to the question below. I'm really trying to compare the CC2 to the Wintrac Pro for my winter setup. Particularly for wet performance, I assumed that all weather would do better. While there is no direct test, I noticed the Quatrac Pro did better than the CC2 in the wet in autobild all season test. And the Quatrac Pro did worse the the Wintrac pro in the wet in this test. Can I then assume that the Wintrac Pro will do better than the CC2 in the wet?

    However if you saying below that quiet updates ​happen all the time, my assumptions are vulnerable.

    Even more so, the older model performance winters tires we get in North America ( Sotto3, Wintrac Pro, PA4 ). I was using the test data from older European tests to make my decisions. Can I no longer assume that the pilot Alpine PA4 or the wintrac Pro, in the American marketplace are the same as what was available in Europe 5 years ago? Tires are complicated man.

    #7714
    1. TyreReviews Marc Valme archived

      Tyres are complicated, even more so when you start getting to tyres vs tires as the same names can be different tyres (North American CC2 is different from European CC2).

      It's a headache for me.

      #7715
      1. Marc Valme TyreReviews archived

        Indeed, but in the end, selecting a good tire is not difficult, trying to figure out what the best is for your situation is what's difficult so it's not really much of a problem is it.

        "Tyre vs Tire" subtle, clever.

        #7716
  3. Roel archived

    These are some interesting results! In wet braking and wet handling the reference Vredestein Quatrac Pro all-season tyre scores worse than almost every winter tyre. In the all-season test Autobild did earlier, the exact same tyre (Vredestein Quatrac Pro) achieved the best score in wet braking and wet handling beating other all-season tyres and interestingly also beating the (anonymous) reference winter tyre in that test. What would cause that difference? Why is the same tyre in this test worse in wet than the winter tyres and better than a reference winter tyre (and every other all-season tyre) in another test? Would this be because of the size (in this test 18 inch, in the all-season test 17 inch)? Maybe the reference winter tyre in the all-season test was just a shitty tyre? Or the temperatures (22 degrees in the all-season test, unknown in this test)?

    #7708
    1. TyreReviews Roel archived

      That's a good bunch of questions :D

      My guess would be that the 17" in the all season test would have received an update, where as the 18" here hasn't yet. But I'll pass on the question to Vred and see what they say.

      Of course, only auto bild really know the answer.

      #7709
      1. Roel TyreReviews archived

        That's another possibility I didn't think of! But if the Vredestein tyre received such an update that has a significant impact, would Vredestein not called it Quatrac Pro 2, Quatrac Pro S or Quatrac Pro Evo or something? If I had to guess, I'd put my money on difference in temperature. The all-seasons were tested at too high temperatures (22c) and maybe the winter tyres were tested at or below freezing? Maybe I should ask AutoBild.
        Would love to see a test similar to the test you did a few years ago with tyres at different temperatures but then with more tyres. Four of the best tyres in categories of summer, winter and all-season at different temperatures in wet and dry to see when what tyres performance best.

        #7712
        1. TyreReviews Roel archived

          If you do ask Auto Bild let me know if you get a reply!

          I'm not sure why names don't change with updates, but it's not uncommon for tyres to get silently updated a number of times in their life, sometimes they're significant updates too. The only way to tell is that the EAN changes, but that's not usually easy to find data.

          #7713
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.

Where to buy

Affiliate links: if you buy, we may earn a commission. It never changes our tests, scores or recommendations. How we stay independent