Falken Eurowinter HS01 Test Results
Tested 24 times by independent publications, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 averages a finish of 11th. Its strongest discipline is Straight Aqua, beating 79% of the field across 10 tests; its weakest is Rolling Resistance, at 5% across 10 tests.
- 24Independent tests
- 0Test wins
- 0Podium finishes
- 11thAverage finish
- 39%Field beaten on average
- 8Publications
24 tests, 2017 to 2022
- Test win
- Second
- Third
- Average 39%
Record by discipline
Where the Falken Eurowinter HS01 finished in each measured discipline, across every test that measured it against at least two other tyres. Field beaten is the share of the other tyres it outranked in that measurement.
| Discipline | Tests | Avg finish | Field beaten | Firsts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry | ||||
| Dry Braking | 10 | P6.6 of 14.4 | 58% | - |
| Dry Handling | 9 | P7.8 of 14.6 | 48% | - |
| Subj. Dry Handling | 1 | P3 of 14 | 85% | - |
| Wet | ||||
| Wet Braking | 14 | P12.3 of 24.5 | 53% | - |
| Wet Handling | 9 | P9.3 of 14.4 | 39% | - |
| Subj. Wet Handling | 1 | P9 of 14 | 38% | - |
| Wet Circle | 5 | P11.2 of 15.8 | 27% | - |
| Straight Aqua Strong | 10 | P4 of 14.5 | 79% | 3 |
| Curved Aquaplaning | 7 | P7.3 of 13.9 | 51% | 1 |
| Snow | ||||
| Snow Braking | 14 | P12 of 19.3 | 39% | - |
| Snow Traction | 8 | P11.9 of 13.9 | 15% | - |
| Snow Handling | 9 | P9.2 of 13.9 | 36% | - |
| Subj. Snow Handling | 1 | P9 of 14 | 38% | - |
| Snow Circle | 1 | P1 of 8 | 100% | 1 |
| Snow Slalom | 4 | P9.8 of 14.3 | 35% | - |
| Comfort | ||||
| Subj. Comfort | 1 | P9 of 14 | 38% | - |
| Noise | 9 | P9.6 of 14.4 | 36% | 1 |
| Value | ||||
| Wear | 3 | P11 of 20.3 | 49% | - |
| Value | 3 | P8.3 of 20.3 | 62% | - |
| Rolling Resistance Weak | 10 | P13.7 of 14.4 | 5% | - |
Head-to-head record
Overall finishing position against the tyres that have most often shared a test with the Falken Eurowinter HS01. Only tyres tested alongside it at least three times are listed.
| Rival | Shared tests | Ahead | Behind | Level | Finished ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | 0 | 16 | 1 | 0% | |
| 16 | 1 | 15 | - | 6% | |
| 13 | 0 | 13 | - | 0% | |
| 12 | 1 | 11 | - | 8% | |
| 12 | 1 | 11 | - | 8% | |
| 11 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 20% | |
| 11 | 1 | 10 | - | 9% | |
| 10 | 4 | 6 | - | 40% | |
| 10 | 0 | 10 | - | 0% | |
| 9 | 3 | 6 | - | 33% | |
| 9 | 0 | 9 | - | 0% | |
| 8 | 5 | 3 | - | 63% | |
| 7 | 3 | 4 | - | 43% | |
| 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 60% | |
| 6 | 5 | 1 | - | 83% | |
| 6 | 4 | 2 | - | 67% | |
| 6 | 3 | 3 | - | 50% | |
| 6 | 2 | 4 | - | 33% | |
| 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 20% | |
| 6 | 1 | 5 | - | 17% |
Against its own line
The same record for the tyre it replaced and the tyre that replaced it.
| Tyre | Tests | Wins | Avg finish | Field beaten |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Falken Eurowinter HS01 This tyre | 24 | 0 | 11th | 39% |
| Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Successor | 7 | 0 | 10th | 33% |
Performance Analysis
Drawn from 24 tests. Updated October 13, 2025.
Across 24 winter-focused tests, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 delivers mixed but recognizable patterns: strong aquaplaning resistance and occasional wet braking competence, offset by persistently high rolling resistance and inconsistent snow/wet handling. It often finishes mid-pack overall (average 10.6), with standout straight-line aquaplaning wins and frequent top-3 aquaplaning results. However, energy efficiency is a clear liability, and snow performance varies by size/type, sometimes dropping to the bottom group.
Overall, the HS01 suits drivers prioritizing hydroplaning safety and fair value, but it lags in efficiency and can trail leaders in cohesive wet/snow handling balance. Later tests hint at competitive dry/wet handling in UHP sizes, but the tyre is frequently penalized by rolling resistance and variability on snow.
Performance Strengths
-
Aquaplaning Resistance
Strong
in 8 of 16 tests
Details
- 1st place straight aquaplaning in 2022 Auto Bild SUV test (225/45 R19)
- 1st place straight and curved aquaplaning in 2022 AMS UHP test (245/45 R19)
- 1st place straight aquaplaning in 2018 Auto Bild Winter Test (195/65 R15)
Very decent wet performance with superior aquaplaning resistance
- 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test (2022)Good safety reserves for aquaplaning
- 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (2022)safe aquaplaning properties
- 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test (2022)very good safety reserves for aquaplaning
- 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (2022)good aquaplaning resistance
- 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test (2021)
-
Wet Braking (select sizes) and Overall Wet Safety
Moderate
Details
- 3rd place wet braking in 2022 Sports Car UHP test (+8.5% from best)
- 2nd place wet braking in 2021 AMS test (195/55 R16, +6.1% from best)
-
Dry Handling (UHP contexts) and Value
Moderate
Details
- 2nd place dry handling in 2022 AMS UHP test (245/45 R19, +0.6% from best)
- Top-5 dry braking in multiple tests (e.g., 4th/10 in 2022 UHP; 4th/14 in 2020 AZ)
- Competitive pricing positions (e.g., 2nd/8 in 2022 AMS; 3rd/13 in 2021 AB Sportscars)
-
Noise/Comfort (select tests)
Minor
Details
- 1st place lowest external noise in 2021 AMS (195/55 R16)
- Top-half noise results in 2022 UHP (4/10)
-
Snow traction
Strong
in 7 of 16 tests
Details
Good on snow and ice
- 2022 ADAC SUV Winter Tyre Test - 215/60 R16 (2022)Convincingly good winter qualities
- 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test (2022)Convincing driving characteristics on ice and snow
- 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test (2021)Acceptable snow and wet performance, good ride comfort
- 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test (2021)good ability on on snow and dry roads
- 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (2018)
-
Wet braking
Strong
in 4 of 16 tests
Details
short braking distances in any weather
- 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test (2022)short braking distances on wet and snowy slopes
- 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (2022)good wet braking result
- 2019 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test (2019)Good snow and wet braking
- 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test (2018)
-
Wet grip
Strong
in 4 of 16 tests
Details
Very decent wet performance with superior aquaplaning resistance
- 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test (2022)Balanced grip in the wet and dry
- 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (2021)Acceptable snow and wet performance, good ride comfort
- 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test (2021)Good in the wet
- 2020 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 (2020)
-
Dry handling
Strong
in 3 of 16 tests
Details
Safe, understeering, reliable driving dynamics on dry roads
- 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test (2022)stable dry handling
- 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test (2022)stable dry handling
- 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (2022)
Performance Weaknesses
-
Rolling Resistance / Efficiency
Strong
Details
- Last place rolling resistance in 2022 UHP (10/10, +27.6%)
- Last place in 2022 Auto Bild Winter Test (22/22, +48.8%)
- Last place in 2021 AB Sportscars (14/14, +29.2%)
- Bottom in 2022 SUV (11/11, +36.3%)
-
Snow Performance Consistency
Strong
Details
- Last in snow braking/traction/handling in 2022 AMS UHP (8/8; +18-21% from best)
- Bottom group snow metrics in 2022 SUV (10/11 braking, 10/11 traction, 10/11 slalom)
- Mid-to-lower snow results in 2021 AB Winter (19/22 braking, 20/22 traction)
-
Wet Handling Balance (non-UHP/mid sizes)
Moderate
Details
- 13/14 wet handling and 13/14 wet circle in 2021 AB Sportscars (+6-9% from best)
- 9/11 wet handling in 2022 SUV (+2.7% from best)
- 13/22 to 19/22 wet metrics in 2022 AB Winter (e.g., wet circle 19/22, +5.3%)
-
Rolling resistance
Strong
in 8 of 16 tests
Details
very high rolling resistance
- 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test (2022)very high rolling resistance
- 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (2022)increased rolling resistance
- 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (2022)high rolling resistance
- 2020 ACE Winter Tyre Test (2020)average fuel consumption
- 2020 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 205/55 R16 (2020)
-
Steering feel
Strong
in 4 of 16 tests
Details
sluggish steering response
- 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test (2022)Understeering handling and slow steering response in the wet
- 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test (2021)slow steering
- 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (2021)Not very precise steering, average dry grip
- 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test (2021)
-
Wet handling
Strong
in 4 of 16 tests
Details
Moderate cornering on snowy and wet slopes
- 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (2022)Understeering handling and slow steering response in the wet
- 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test (2021)poor handling in the wet
- 2020 ACE Winter Tyre Test (2020)low wet grip during the handling test
- 2019 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test (2019)
-
Road noise
Strong
in 3 of 16 tests
Details
Disturbing rolling noise in curves
- 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test (2022)increased pass-by noise
- 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (2022)Slightly noisy
- 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test (2018)
Do owners agree with the tests?
Every tester write-up on the Falken Eurowinter HS01 (16 tests) and 19 owner reviews were tagged for the aspects they judge. Where both have spoken, this is how they line up.
Where owners and testers agree
- Rolling resistance weakness in 8 of 16 tests 0 praise, 3 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews
- Wet braking strength in 4 of 16 tests 3 praise, 1 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews
- Ice grip strength in 3 of 16 tests 3 praise, 1 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews
- Ride comfort strength in 2 of 16 tests 3 praise, 0 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews
- Value for money strength in 1 of 16 tests 6 praise, 0 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews
Where they disagree
- Snow handling weakness in 1 of 16 tests 3 praise, 0 criticise of 19 reviews · Read those reviews
Flagged by testers, not mentioned by owners
- Behaviour at the limit weakness in 2 of 16 tests no owner mentions it
Every test, newest first 24
Strong = top two of the field in that measurement. Weak = bottom two.
2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test
Satisfying.
2022 ADAC SUV Winter Tyre Test - 215/60 R16
The FALKEN Eurowinter HS01 shows weaknesses on dry roads, which is why it is only just rated as satisfactory overall. He can convince in all other main criteria, but due to his pronounced lack of dryness, he does not get more than the rating “recommended” overall.
2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test
Sufficient.
2020 ACE Winter Tyre Test
Conditionally Recommended.
Back to the Falken Eurowinter HS01 overview
Owner reviews, sizes and EU label data, comparisons and the Tyre Reviews score. All Falken tyres

