Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 vs Falken Eurowinter HS01
Across multiple sizes and publishers, the LM005 consistently dominates objective wet and snow performance and often sets the benchmark for steering precision. The HS01 counters with a lower purchase price, better straight-line aquaplaning resistance, and stronger projected mileage, creating a compelling value angle for budget-conscious drivers.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been seventeen tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 | sixteen | |
| one draws in one tests | ||
While it might look like the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is better than the Falken Eurowinter HS01 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Class-leading wet braking and wet grip (wins 12/12 wet braking categories)
- Strong snow traction and braking with precise steering
- Low rolling resistance for better fuel economy
- Consistently high overall test rankings and balanced handling
- Lower purchase price and strong value scores
- Good straight-line aquaplaning resistance
- Quieter/comfortable in some sizes
- Better wear/mileage in several tests
Dry Braking
Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 was better during four dry braking tests. On average the Falken Eurowinter HS01 stopped the vehicle in 0.64% less distance than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Dry Braking: Falken Eurowinter HS01
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during six dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was 0.9% faster around a lap than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during one subj. dry handling tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scored 11.11% more points than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from twelve tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during twelve wet braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 stopped the vehicle in 8.44% less distance than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Wet Braking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during six wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was 2.39% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scored 66.67% more points than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during five wet circle tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was 3.67% faster around a wet circle than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Wet Circle: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 was better during six straight aqua tests. On average the Falken Eurowinter HS01 floated at a 1.71% higher speed than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Straight Aqua: Falken Eurowinter HS01
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during six curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 slipped out at a 4.27% higher speed than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from twelve tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during nine snow braking tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 stopped the vehicle in 3.95% less distance than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Snow Braking: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during eight snow traction tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had 5.23% better snow traction than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Snow Traction: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during four snow handling [km/h] tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was 1.62% faster around a lap than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Snow Handling [Km/H]: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Snow Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scored 60% more points than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Snow Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 was better during one snow circle tests. On average the Falken Eurowinter HS01 was 20.76% faster around a snow circle than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Snow Circle: Falken Eurowinter HS01
See how the Snow Circle winner was calculated >>
Snow Slalom
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during three snow slalom tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was 2.53% faster through a slalom than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Snow Slalom: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Snow Slalom winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scored 33.33% more points than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from seven tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during four noise tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 measured 0.68% quieter than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Noise: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Wear
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 was better during two wear tests. On average the Falken Eurowinter HS01 is predicted to cover 13.83% miles before reaching 1.6mm than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Wear: Falken Eurowinter HS01
See how the Wear winner was calculated >>
Value
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 was better during two value tests. On average the Falken Eurowinter HS01 proved to have a 18.86% better value based on price/1000km than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Value: Falken Eurowinter HS01
See how the Value winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Falken Eurowinter HS01 was better during seven price tests. On average the Falken Eurowinter HS01 cost 14.53% less than the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005.
Best In Price: Falken Eurowinter HS01
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from eight tyre tests, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 was better during eight rolling resistance tests. On average the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 had a 17.64% lower rolling resistance than the Falken Eurowinter HS01.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 Driver Reviews
Drivers of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 frequently praise its outstanding wet grip and braking, along with predictable, stable handling and good comfort when new. Many also find it capable in light-to-moderate snow. However, a significant number report rapid tread wear and a notable drop-off in snow/ice traction as the tyre ages, with some also noting rising noise levels over time. Overall sentiment is moderately positive, but durability and aged winter performance are recurring concerns.
Based on 104 reviews with an average rating of 71%
Falken Eurowinter HS01 Driver Reviews
Most drivers rate the Falken Eurowinter HS01 highly, praising its excellent wet grip, strong snow performance, safe dry handling, and good value. Noise is generally acceptable to low for a winter tyre, comfort is good, and wear appears slow for many users. A minority report higher rolling resistance/fuel use, some noise at high speed, and occasional instability or weaker wet braking on very slick surfaces. Overall, the HS01 delivers confident winter performance with standout wet and snow traction for the price.
Based on 22 reviews with an average rating of 85%
Conclusion
The Eurowinter HS01 shines on value, comfort/noise in some sizes, straight aquaplaning safety margins, and longer tread life. However, it trails the LM005 meaningfully in wet braking and snow traction/braking across most tests-differences that matter in real-world winter safety. If you prioritize maximum grip and control in typical Western European winters (wet, cold, variable snow), choose the Bridgestone. If budget, mileage, and aquaplaning resistance are your top priorities and you encounter less severe snow, the Falken is a sensible, cost-effective alternative.
Key Differences
- Overall results: LM005 wins 16 tests; HS01 has 0 wins
- Wet braking: LM005 leads by ~9-18% in headline comparisons (e.g., 32.8 m vs 36.3 m; 30.3 m vs 37 m)
- Snow traction/braking: LM005 generally ahead (e.g., +7-18% traction/braking advantages in several tests)
- Aquaplaning: HS01 usually better in straight-line; LM005 better in curved aquaplaning
- Efficiency: LM005 significantly lower rolling resistance (often 15-22% advantage)
- Value and wear: HS01 typically cheaper with longer mileage and better value scores
Overall Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Falken Eurowinter HS01 Top Comparisons
No other comparisons available for this tyre.
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.