Menu
Vredestein Ultrac Pro View Gallery (1)
205-355/25-55 R18-24 47 sizes 2024

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

The Vredestein Ultrac Pro is a Max Performance Summer tyre designed to be fitted to Passenger Cars.

8.1
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
93%
Wet Grip
88%
Road Feedback
83%
Handling
92%
Wear
53%
Comfort
82%
Buy again
75%
6 Reviews
81% Average
28,100 miles driven
11 Tests (avg: 8th)
Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Summer Mid-Range
BETA
8.1 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Comfort
82.4
0.32x / 12 tests
Wet
75
2x / 40 tests
Value
70.1
0.42x / 16 tests
Dry
68.1
1.8x / 23 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Braking
71.4
23 tests
Handling
69
20 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 11
Publications: 7
Period: 2024 - 2026
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 6
Avg Rating: 81%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.36
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2026 Summer Braking Super Tyre Test - How do 52 Tyres Perform in Wet and Dry Braking? Auto Bild 2026 245/45 R19 13/50 2 metrics
2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test Die Reifentester 2025 225/40 R18 8/8 8 metrics
2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test Tire Rack 2025 275/35 R19 4/10 9 metrics
2025 Autobild Sports Cars UUHP Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2025 295/30 R20 6/7 9 metrics
2025 Sports Cars Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2025 245/35 R19 5/8 9 metrics
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 13/21 12 metrics
2025 AZ Summer Tyre Test Auto Zeitung 2025 225/45 R18 6/10 12 metrics
2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test ADAC 2025 225/40 R18 5/18 10 metrics
2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout Auto Bild 2025 225/40 R18 18/52 2 metrics
2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test EVO 2024 235/35 R19 5/7 10 metrics
2024 Sports Car Tyre Test Auto Bild Sportscars 2024 295/30 R20 3/7 8 metrics
11
Tests
8th
Average
3rd
Best
18th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
The Vredestein Ultrac Pro features a harmoniously balanced driving behavior with short braking distances on dry roads. The tyre impressed with pleasant rolling comfort and low rolling resistance, making it the quietest tyre in the test. However, it showed a tendency to oversteer on wet surfaces, which affected its overall rating. While it performed well in aquaplaning tests, the Vredestein lacked stable lateral guidance on dry surfaces compared to the top performers. Its excellent rating for low noise and rolling resistance make it a good choice for those prioritizing comfort and efficiency.
18th/52

Questions and Answers for the Vredestein Ultrac Pro

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Vredestein Ultrac Pro. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 6 user reviews

Drivers largely praise the Vredestein Ultrac Pro for strong dry and wet grip, confident handling, and notably good ride comfort, with several noting premium feel and value. High-scoring reviews highlight short braking distances, stability, and decent wear for aggressive or heavy vehicles. A minority report concerns include poor performance in very cold (sub-5°C) conditions and one case of premature wear/delamination. Overall, the Ultrac Pro delivers balanced performance with comfort-focused tuning and attractive design.

Strengths
  • Dry grip
  • Wet grip
  • Handling/steering feel
  • Ride comfort
  • Value/price
  • Braking performance
  • Aesthetics/design
Areas for Improvement
  • Reduced grip in very cold temperatures

Top 3 Vredestein Ultrac Pro Reviews

Given 90% while driving a Mazda CX 5 turbo (235/55 R19) on mostly country roads for 6,000 spirited miles
Running on 4700 lb vehicle with turbo that's driven aggressively and this tire keeps contact and transmits that road surface feel to driver. Performance with ABS engagement is superbly jarring with an unbelievably short distance at low speed, giving a full stop! now effect that is transmitted audibly to wheel. This is my second season summer switch from Wintrac Pro tires these have very little signs of wear at 6000 miles; Will definitely buy newest version when replacing them. The built in Rim Protector is an excellent feature that has kept Curb Rash away so far.
June 2, 2025
Given 73% while driving a Alfa Romeo Giuiletta (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 6,500 average miles
After doing 6000 miles on a set of 4, the front nearside tyre worn unevenly at 4.3mm-5mm-5.3mm-5.3mm inside of the tyre to the outside. My tracking was out. Offside was a consistent 5.3mm all the way across.

Rear tyres are sitting around 5.3mm-4.9mm as my car has an aggressive camber/toe.

They're great tyres. Responsive, incredibly grippy in the dry, great in the wet. Fuel economy was stellar in both urban and motorway use.

One issue which has stopped me buying again, was that they just weren't very good below 5 degrees. I know they're a summer tyres but the PS5 and Asym 6 I've had previously didn't lose grip like this did in a non-icy morning. Going round a roundabout I'm turning at about 20mph and it's not biting, just skidding.

Visually beautiful tyres though.

Replaced the front axle with Pirelli PZ5 tyres.
May 12, 2025
Given 97% while driving a Audi S6 (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 300 spirited miles
I do a lot of research when I buy tires , I looked all around for a premium summer tire which would be suitable for my driving style, and for the condition of the roads in my country - Eastern Europe. I looked at the PilotSport 5, ContiSportContact 7 , Eagle F1 Assymetric - all of which have a very high rating overrall, but I felt that they weren't suitable for the road conditions - lots of bumps ,cracks on the roads, patches and lets never forget about the potholes. They say the PS5 doesn't really absorb much of the bumps and has a low aquaplaning score, which doesn't do the job for me. I need to know that when im overtaking on country roads, or if I hit a pothole in the city im not going to bend my rims all the time. Same goes for the ContiSportContact 7 which this year is a banger and is the tire I would have chosen between the two, but with those large blocks on the tread + UUHP rating I also felt that it was too dedicated for good and even roads. I kept searching for a premuim tire more suitable for driving fast over these uneven roads. I had heard good things about Vredestein from people in my country which are competent about what they are talking about, so I looked at their current tires ,saw that they had a brand new model and decided to give them a try, they were also 20-30% cheaper than other premium tires. Upon arrival, touching the tires they feel that they are of an excellent rubber compound; they have a good , solid feel to them and overrall superb quality product. Made in The Netherlands! How's that for quality control! They also make them in Hungary however keep in mind.
The tires feel great, they do exactly what I wanted from them , even coming from winter tires - the ride quality and comfort improved, braking increased significantly and grip is through the roof .The ride itself is superb for summer tires, they feel soft and bouncy at low speed while at higher speeds they feel firm and planted to the ground, unlike my previous summer tires which felt as if I was going to bounce and fly off the road if I hit dent. These tires have MEAT they feel PREMIUM. Dry grip is superb and when pushed hard they almost don't squeal they just stick to the road, really no comments on dry grip. Wet grip feels super solid but I don't push my car in wet conditions. When pushed in the corners grip is more than enough to feel comfortable going fast around it, I dont feel any issues, and I drive hard.
I just have to emphasize the ride comfort and solid feel of these tires. Definitely going to look into getting a pair of winter tires from Vredestein.
June 17, 2024

How would you rate the Vredestein Ultrac Pro?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Vredestein Ultrac Pro Reviews

Given 67% while driving a Mercedes Benz E Class (245/40 R20) on a combination of roads for 11,000 average miles
I drove this tyre for 18.000km (11.000 miles US).
Dry/wet grip, handling, noise and fuel consumption were all ok, but the front tyres (245/40/20) started to delaminate after about 12.000km (when I put them on for the second summer season). After 18.000km I had to replace them because there were parts of tyre missing, they were ripped off (chipped off) all across the width of the tyre on both front tyres. The rears which were 275/35/20 wore down evenly without chip offs but had max 3.000-5.000km of life left in them.
Very disapointing, good performance but a tyre with the shortest life I have ever driven, both summer and winter.
It was mostly city driving with some highway and less than usual spirited open road driving.
Changed to Hankook Ventus Evo, and will write a review for them after some milage driven.
August 23, 2025
Given 91% while driving a Jaguar XF (255/35 R20) on a combination of roads for 1,300 average miles
I was looking for Driving dynamics of CSportContact 7 but with longer lasting lifespan ( 240 on CSC7 compared to 320 on Ultrac Pro) and comfort over road imperfections. So, even after putting them I felt - soft & sporty feel although not too sporty - just enough. We understand that it was designed to fit the middle ground of everything, security, comfort & life span.

The only thing I wish for - the increase rim protection. On my 20's inch the rim protection is smaller on the outside than on the inside of the alloy. But at least it's at a minimum.

I pump them to 2.5 bar on R20.
July 2, 2024
Given 83% while driving a BMW 325d M Sport (225/45 R18) on mostly motorways for 3,000 spirited miles
Firstly, the Ultrac Pro is a sexy tire. The sidewall is designed by italodesign, and it really looks good. Dry grip (intermediate temps ~10-20°C) is very good. The car feels to have endless grip and you really feel comfortable pushing some twisty roads. Obviously, the warmer it got, the stickier the tire was. The Ultrac Pro seems to like temperature.
Wet grip is also very handsome. You really feel comfortable driving in heavy rain, and the grip is also very reassuring. Especially in the wet
March 27, 2024
Rate the Vredestein Ultrac Pro