Menu

Test source Auto Bild Sportscars

2025 Sports Cars Tyre Test

Overall test winnerContinental SportContact 7

Autobild Sports Cars tests are usually nice and simple. Fast car, the best of the UUHP tyres, put them together and see what's best.Thankfully, in the strange year of 2025 testing, Autobild have kept that formula and tested eight…

Tyres tested
8
Tested size
245/35 R19
Disciplines
9

At a glance

Tyre shortlist

8 Tyres tested

Published finishing positions, with the strengths and considerations from this test. Owner reviews cover other sizes and driving conditions.

1st

Continental SportContact 7

+The Continental SportContact 7 has the shortest dry and wet braking and the fastest dry and wet handling.

−It has the lowest comfort rating, is joint loudest and has the third-highest rolling resistance.

Read full verdict
2nd

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

+The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 is joint third for dry handling, third for wet handling and joint second for straight aquaplaning resistance.

−It has the joint fourth-highest comfort rating.

Read full verdict
3rd

Pirelli P Zero PZ4

+The Pirelli P Zero PZ4 has the second-shortest dry and wet braking and the second-fastest wet handling.

−It is third last for straight aquaplaning resistance and second last for curved aquaplaning resistance, with the highest rolling resistance.

Read full verdict
4th

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

+The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S has the third-shortest dry and wet braking and the second-fastest dry handling.

−It is second last for straight aquaplaning resistance, third last for curved aquaplaning resistance and joint loudest.

Read full verdict
5th

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

+The Vredestein Ultrac Pro is second for curved aquaplaning resistance and shares the top comfort rating.

−It has the third-longest dry braking.

Read full verdict
6th

Firestone Firehawk Sport

+The Firestone Firehawk Sport is joint second for straight aquaplaning resistance and has the lowest rolling resistance.

−It has the third-longest wet braking and is third last for dry and wet handling.

Read full verdict
7th

Triangle EffeXSport

+The Triangle EffeXSport has the best straight and curved aquaplaning resistance and shares the top comfort rating.

−It has the longest dry braking, the second-longest wet braking and is second last for dry and wet handling.

Read full verdict
8th

Double Coin DC 100

+The Double Coin DC 100 is the quietest tyre, shares the top comfort rating and is joint cheapest.

−It has the longest wet braking and the slowest dry and wet handling, plus the worst straight aquaplaning resistance.

Read full verdict

Tyre shortlist

Compare selected tyres

2025 Sports Cars Tyre Test · 245/35 R19

Explore the complete results →

The full test

The evidence behind the verdict

Autobild Sports Cars tests are usually nice and simple. Fast car, the best of the UUHP tyres, put them together and see what's best.

Thankfully, in the strange year of 2025 testing, Autobild have kept that formula and tested eight performance summer tyres in 245/35 R19 using an Audi TTS.

As this is a nice and simple test, we'll let the data do the talking.

Dry

The Continental SportContact 7 leads the field with the shortest dry braking distance of 35.5 meters from 100 km/h. The Pirelli P Zero PZ4 follows closely at 36 meters, showing strong performance in this critical safety test. There's a significant gap of nearly 6 meters between the best and worst performers, with the Triangle EffeXSport requiring 41.3 meters to stop.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
35.5 m Best
36 m +0.50 m
37.3 m +1.80 m
37.7 m +2.20 m
38 m +2.50 m
38.7 m +3.20 m
40.6 m +5.10 m
41.3 m +5.80 m

The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (5.8 m ≈ 1.3 Car Lengths).

Continental, Michelin, Goodyear, Pirelli and Vredestein delivered the fastest lap times and received the best subjective ratings. The testers say they perform at similar levels with the Continental slightly edging out the competition at 110 km/h, followed by Michelin at 109 km/h.

The subjective notes highlight "quick lap times and best subjective ratings" for these premium brands, indicating responsive steering feel and excellent balance during cornering.

Triangle and Double Coin show significantly reduced performance in dry conditions. The subjective assessment describes their handling as "noticeably less crisp" around corners. This aligns with their objectively lower speeds of 105.2 km/h and 104.4 km/h respectively.

The gap in dry handling performance between best and worst (5.6 km/h) is less dramatic than in wet conditions (18.6 km/h), indicating that while budget tyres struggle in all conditions, their deficiencies become much more pronounced and potentially dangerous in the wet.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
110 km/h Best
109 km/h -1.00 km/h
108.9 km/h -1.10 km/h
108.9 km/h -1.10 km/h
108 km/h -2.00 km/h
107.7 km/h -2.30 km/h
105.2 km/h -4.80 km/h
104.4 km/h -5.60 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.1% (5.6 Km/H).

Wet

Continental continues its dominance in wet braking, stopping from 100 km/h in just 40.1 meters. Pirelli maintains its strong braking performance with a second-place result of 42.4 meters. The most alarming finding is the massive 29.6-meter gap between Continental and the Double Coin DC100, which needed a dangerous 69.7 meters to stop – nearly 70% more distance than the best performer. This test clearly demonstrates the crucial safety differences between premium and budget tyres, especially in wet conditions where grip is already compromised.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
40.1 m Best
42.4 m +2.30 m
43.7 m +3.60 m
44.2 m +4.10 m
44.8 m +4.70 m
49.4 m +9.30 m
50.6 m +10.50 m
69.7 m +29.60 m

The difference between best and worst was 73.8% (29.6 m ≈ 6.6 Car Lengths).

Continental SportContact 7 and Pirelli P Zero PZ4 demonstrate exceptional wet handling qualities. The testers note "unbelievably secure" performance on wet surfaces with both tyres. They maintain stable front-end grip while the TT's rear end remains predictable and controllable. The Continental achieved the highest average speed of 84.5 km/h, with Pirelli following at 82.7 km/h.

Goodyear, Vredestein and Michelin form the mid-pack with solid performance but noticeable step down from the leaders. They achieved average speeds between 79.7-80.4 km/h, maintaining good balance but without the exceptional grip of the top performers.

The Firestone and Triangle tyres show concerning performance deficiencies. The testers specifically mentions that these tyres provide "frighteningly little grip" on wet surfaces, with the subjective assessment stating they "slide over the watered handling course like on soap." This correlates with their significantly lower average speeds (74.5-74.9 km/h).

The Double Coin DC100 delivers dangerously poor wet handling at 65.9 km/h, almost 20 km/h slower than the Continental, confirming the subjective assessment of extremely limited grip and control.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
84.5 km/h Best
82.7 km/h -1.80 km/h
80.4 km/h -4.10 km/h
80.1 km/h -4.40 km/h
79.7 km/h -4.80 km/h
74.9 km/h -9.60 km/h
74.5 km/h -10.00 km/h
65.9 km/h -18.60 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 22% (18.6 Km/H).

In a surprising twist, the budget Triangle EffeXSport outperforms all premium brands in aquaplaning resistance, maintaining traction until 79.5 km/h.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
79.5 km/h Best
75 km/h -4.50 km/h
75 km/h -4.50 km/h
74.7 km/h -4.80 km/h
74.4 km/h -5.10 km/h
73.9 km/h -5.60 km/h
73.4 km/h -6.10 km/h
62.9 km/h -16.60 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 20.9% (16.6 Km/H).

Triangle maintains its impressive aquaplaning resistance in curved conditions, achieving the highest lateral acceleration of 3.44 m/s².

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.44 m/sec2 Best
3.37 m/sec2 -0.07 m/sec2
3.13 m/sec2 -0.31 m/sec2
3.12 m/sec2 -0.32 m/sec2
2.98 m/sec2 -0.46 m/sec2
2.9 m/sec2 -0.54 m/sec2
2.87 m/sec2 -0.57 m/sec2
2.43 m/sec2 -1.01 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 29.4% (1.01 m/sec2).

Comfort

The test shows an interesting inversion of performance when it comes to comfort. The comfort test reveals that subjective noise levels inside the vehicle had minimal to no noticeable differences among the tyres tested.

Vredestein, Triangle, and Double Coin all received the highest comfort scores of 8 points, despite their varying performance in handling and braking tests. This suggests their compounds and construction prioritize ride comfort and noise suppression. The PDF notes that "in the interior, subjectively no to few differences were audible," indicating that even with measured external noise differences, the cabin experience was relatively consistent.

Michelin, Pirelli, Goodyear, and Firestone all scored 7 points for comfort, placing them in the middle range. These tyres balance performance characteristics with reasonable comfort levels.

Continental, which dominated nearly all performance categories, received the lowest comfort score of 6 points. This aligns with a common trade-off in tyre design where maximum grip and performance often come at the expense of ride comfort.

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TyreResultGap to best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
7 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
6 Points -2.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 25% (2 Points).

The Double Coin DC100 produces the lowest external noise at 73.3 dB, followed closely by Goodyear at 73.4 dB. The results in this test are tightly clustered, with all tyres within a 1.7 dB range. Continental and Michelin generate the most noise at 75.0 dB, again demonstrating that performance-focused tyres often compromise somewhat on refinement characteristics.

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
73.3 dB Best
73.4 dB +0.10 dB
73.9 dB +0.60 dB
74 dB +0.70 dB
74.5 dB +1.20 dB
74.9 dB +1.60 dB
75 dB +1.70 dB
75 dB +1.70 dB

All the tyres in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

Firestone Firehawk Sport leads in fuel efficiency with the lowest rolling resistance of 7.2 kg/t, followed by Michelin at 7.8 kg/t and Double Coin at 8.1 kg/t. Pirelli has the highest resistance at 10.6 kg/t, while Continental places sixth at 9.5 kg/t.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.2 kg/t Best £0
7.8 kg/t +0.60 kg/t £37
8.1 kg/t +0.90 kg/t £55
8.6 kg/t +1.40 kg/t £86
8.8 kg/t +1.60 kg/t £98
9.5 kg/t +2.30 kg/t £141
10 kg/t +2.80 kg/t £171
10.6 kg/t +3.40 kg/t £208

The difference between best and worst was 47.2% (3.4 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Pirelli P Zero PZ4 uses about 144 L (£208) more fuel than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

1st

Continental SportContact 7

245/35 R19 93Y XL
Continental SportContact 7
The test winner delivered excellent grip in both wet and dry conditions. It showed outstanding handling qualities with precise steering response and short braking distances in all conditions. The SportContact 7 performed particularly well in wet handling tests, maintaining stability and control. Its only minor drawback was a slightly higher rolling resistance. The tyre showed some wear after 5-6 fast laps, likely due to its softer compound that helps deliver maximum grip.
Dry100%
Wet97.7%
Comfort86.4%
Rolling Resistance75.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better1st / 835.5 mBest in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better1st / 8110 km/hBest in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better1st / 840.1 mBest in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better1st / 884.5 km/hBest in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better5th / 874.4 km/h-5.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better3rd / 83.13 m/sec2-0.31 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better8th / 86 Points-2.00 Points
NoiseLower is better7th / 875 dB+1.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better6th / 89.5 kg/t+2.30 kg/t
EU Label
D/A/72
Price
840.00
2nd

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6

245/35 R19 93Y XL
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6
This tyre showed strong all-round performance with direct, progressive steering response and good safety reserves during aquaplaning. It recorded very quiet external noise levels and solid handling in dry conditions. Its wet braking performance was mid-range compared to the top performers. The Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6 provides balanced performance across all testing categories.
Dry96.2%
Wet92.8%
Comfort93.7%
Rolling Resistance83.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better5th / 838 m+2.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 8108.9 km/h-1.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better4th / 844.2 m+4.10 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better3rd / 880.4 km/h-4.10 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 875 km/h-4.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better4th / 83.12 m/sec2-0.32 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 87 Points-1.00 Points
NoiseLower is better2nd / 873.4 dB+0.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better4th / 88.6 kg/t+1.40 kg/t
EU Label
C/A/70
Price
800.00
3rd

Pirelli P Zero PZ4

245/35 R19 93Y XL
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
The Pirelli impressed with balanced handling in both wet and dry conditions. It features precise turn-in behaviour, stable lateral grip, and short braking distances. The tyre achieved nearly the same wet braking performance as the Continental. The P Zero PZ4 showed minor weakness in the curved aquaplaning test but otherwise performed at the highest level. It was the most expensive tyre in the test at approximately €1,080 per set.
Dry98.8%
Wet93.8%
Comfort92.7%
Rolling Resistance67.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better2nd / 836 m+0.50 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better3rd / 8108.9 km/h-1.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better2nd / 842.4 m+2.30 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better2nd / 882.7 km/h-1.80 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better6th / 873.9 km/h-5.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better7th / 82.87 m/sec2-0.57 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 87 Points-1.00 Points
NoiseLower is better6th / 874.9 dB+1.60 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better8th / 810.6 kg/t+3.40 kg/t
EU Label
D/A/72
Price
1080.00
4th

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

245/35 R19 93Y XL
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
This tyre demonstrated sporty, dynamic handling with stable lateral grip on both wet and dry surfaces. It offers direct steering response and good feedback to the driver. The Pilot Sport 4S needed about two meters more stopping distance than the Continental in wet braking tests and showed some limitations in the curved aquaplaning test.
Dry97.1%
Wet91.6%
Comfort92.6%
Rolling Resistance92.3%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better3rd / 837.3 m+1.80 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better2nd / 8109 km/h-1.00 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better3rd / 843.7 m+3.60 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better5th / 879.7 km/h-4.80 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better7th / 873.4 km/h-6.10 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better6th / 82.9 m/sec2-0.54 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 87 Points-1.00 Points
NoiseLower is better7th / 875 dB+1.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better2nd / 87.8 kg/t+0.60 kg/t
EU Label
D/A/71
Price
1000.00
5th

Vredestein Ultrac Pro

245/35 R19 93Y XL
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
A well-balanced all-rounder with excellent aquaplaning resistance, good braking distances, and secure handling on both wet and dry surfaces. The Ultrac Pro offered good comfort and quiet rolling noise. Its only comparative weakness was mid-range performance in wet braking tests. Priced at approximately €760 per set, it provides good value among the premium brands.
Dry95%
Wet93.3%
Comfort99.5%
Rolling Resistance81.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better6th / 838.7 m+3.20 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better5th / 8108 km/h-2.00 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better5th / 844.8 m+4.70 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better4th / 880.1 km/h-4.40 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better4th / 874.7 km/h-4.80 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better2nd / 83.37 m/sec2-0.07 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 88 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better4th / 874 dB+0.70 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better5th / 88.8 kg/t+1.60 kg/t
EU Label
D/A/72
Price
760.00
6th

Firestone Firehawk Sport

245/35 R19 93Y XL
Firestone Firehawk Sport
This tyre showed precise steering response with good feedback on dry surfaces. It offers good comfort and low rolling resistance, which helps with fuel economy. However, it demonstrated limited performance in wet handling and wet braking, with significantly longer stopping distances in the wet compared to the top performers.
Dry96%
Wet86.6%
Comfort93.3%
Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better4th / 837.7 m+2.20 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better6th / 8107.7 km/h-2.30 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better6th / 849.4 m+9.30 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better6th / 874.9 km/h-9.60 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better2nd / 875 km/h-4.50 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better5th / 82.98 m/sec2-0.46 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better4th / 87 Points-1.00 Points
NoiseLower is better3rd / 873.9 dB+0.60 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better1st / 87.2 kg/tBest in this discipline
EU Label
B/A/70
Price
640.00
7th

Triangle EffeXSport

245/35 R19 93Y XL
Triangle EffeXSport
This budget tyre performed surprisingly well in aquaplaning tests, matching or exceeding some premium brands. It also delivered decent wet handling at the level of premium tyres and featured good rolling resistance. Its major weakness was in wet braking, where it needed about 10 meters more stopping distance than the best tyre in the test. Manufactured in China.
Dry90.8%
Wet88.6%
Comfort99.2%
Rolling Resistance72%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better8th / 841.3 m+5.80 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better7th / 8105.2 km/h-4.80 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better7th / 850.6 m+10.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better7th / 874.5 km/h-10.00 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better1st / 879.5 km/hBest in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better1st / 83.44 m/sec2Best in this discipline
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 88 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better5th / 874.5 dB+1.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better7th / 810 kg/t+2.80 kg/t
EU Label
D/A/72
Price
300.00
8th

Double Coin DC 100

245/35 R19 93Y XL
Double Coin DC 100
The poorest performer in the test, this budget tyre only excelled in rolling noise. It showed dangerous handling characteristics including delayed turn-in with poor balance and unpredictable oversteer on wet surfaces. Braking distances were alarmingly long - nearly 30 meters more than the Continental in wet conditions. The Double Coin also failed the high-speed durability test. Despite its low price the testers deemed it not recommended due to safety concerns.
Dry91.2%
Wet69.9%
Comfort100%
Rolling Resistance88.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (9)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

TestPosition in disciplineResultGap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better7th / 840.6 m+5.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better8th / 8104.4 km/h-5.60 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better8th / 869.7 m+29.60 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better8th / 865.9 km/h-18.60 km/h
Straight AquaHigher is better8th / 862.9 km/h-16.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better8th / 82.43 m/sec2-1.01 m/sec2
Subj. ComfortHigher is better1st / 88 PointsBest in this discipline
NoiseLower is better1st / 873.3 dBBest in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better3rd / 88.1 kg/t+0.90 kg/t
EU Label
C/C/70
Price
300.00

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Discussion

1 comment
  1. 4cvg archived

    Hopefully they'll do a Klassik tyre test this year.

    #10039
Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.