Test Charts / Auto Bild Sportscars
2025 Sports Cars Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 245/35 R19
- Tyres tested
- 8
- Disciplines
- 9
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 35.5 m | Best | |
| 36 m | +0.50 m | |
| 37.3 m | +1.80 m | |
| 37.7 m | +2.20 m | |
| 38 m | +2.50 m | |
| 38.7 m | +3.20 m | |
| 40.6 m | +5.10 m | |
| 41.3 m | +5.80 m |
The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (5.8 m ≈ 1.3 Car Lengths).
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 110 km/h | Best | |
| 109 km/h | -1.00 km/h | |
| 108.9 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 108.9 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 108 km/h | -2.00 km/h | |
| 107.7 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 105.2 km/h | -4.80 km/h | |
| 104.4 km/h | -5.60 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 5.1% (5.6 Km/H).
Wet
4Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 40.1 m | Best | |
| 42.4 m | +2.30 m | |
| 43.7 m | +3.60 m | |
| 44.2 m | +4.10 m | |
| 44.8 m | +4.70 m | |
| 49.4 m | +9.30 m | |
| 50.6 m | +10.50 m | |
| 69.7 m | +29.60 m |
The difference between best and worst was 73.8% (29.6 m ≈ 6.6 Car Lengths).
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 84.5 km/h | Best | |
| 82.7 km/h | -1.80 km/h | |
| 80.4 km/h | -4.10 km/h | |
| 80.1 km/h | -4.40 km/h | |
| 79.7 km/h | -4.80 km/h | |
| 74.9 km/h | -9.60 km/h | |
| 74.5 km/h | -10.00 km/h | |
| 65.9 km/h | -18.60 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 22% (18.6 Km/H).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 79.5 km/h | Best | |
| 75 km/h | -4.50 km/h | |
| 75 km/h | -4.50 km/h | |
| 74.7 km/h | -4.80 km/h | |
| 74.4 km/h | -5.10 km/h | |
| 73.9 km/h | -5.60 km/h | |
| 73.4 km/h | -6.10 km/h | |
| 62.9 km/h | -16.60 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 20.9% (16.6 Km/H).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 3.44 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.37 m/sec2 | -0.07 m/sec2 | |
| 3.13 m/sec2 | -0.31 m/sec2 | |
| 3.12 m/sec2 | -0.32 m/sec2 | |
| 2.98 m/sec2 | -0.46 m/sec2 | |
| 2.9 m/sec2 | -0.54 m/sec2 | |
| 2.87 m/sec2 | -0.57 m/sec2 | |
| 2.43 m/sec2 | -1.01 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 29.4% (1.01 m/sec2).
Comfort
2Subj. Comfort
Subjective Comfort Score
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 8 Points | Best | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 7 Points | -1.00 Points | |
| 6 Points | -2.00 Points |
The difference between best and worst was 25% (2 Points).
Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 73.3 dB | Best | |
| 73.4 dB | +0.10 dB | |
| 73.9 dB | +0.60 dB | |
| 74 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 74.5 dB | +1.20 dB | |
| 74.9 dB | +1.60 dB | |
| 75 dB | +1.70 dB | |
| 75 dB | +1.70 dB |
All the tyres in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.2 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.8 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | £37 | |
| 8.1 kg/t | +0.90 kg/t | £55 | |
| 8.6 kg/t | +1.40 kg/t | £86 | |
| 8.8 kg/t | +1.60 kg/t | £98 | |
| 9.5 kg/t | +2.30 kg/t | £141 | |
| 10 kg/t | +2.80 kg/t | £171 | |
| 10.6 kg/t | +3.40 kg/t | £208 |
The difference between best and worst was 47.2% (3.4 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Pirelli P Zero PZ4 uses about 144 L (£208) more fuel than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test
225/40 R1818 tyres tested
5 of these 8 tyres tested again
2023 Sport Auto UHP Tyre Test
225/40 R1811 tyres tested
5 of these 8 tyres tested again
2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test
225/40 R1820 tyres tested
4 of these 8 tyres tested again

