Menu

Test Charts / Auto Bild Sportscars

2025 Sports Cars Tyre Test

Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.

Tested size
245/35 R19
Tyres tested
8
Disciplines
9

Read the measurements, not just the rank

Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.

Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.

Dry

2

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Dry Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
35.5 m Best
36 m +0.50 m
37.3 m +1.80 m
37.7 m +2.20 m
38 m +2.50 m
38.7 m +3.20 m
40.6 m +5.10 m
41.3 m +5.80 m

The difference between best and worst was 16.3% (5.8 m ≈ 1.3 Car Lengths).

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Dry Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
110 km/h Best
109 km/h -1.00 km/h
108.9 km/h -1.10 km/h
108.9 km/h -1.10 km/h
108 km/h -2.00 km/h
107.7 km/h -2.30 km/h
105.2 km/h -4.80 km/h
104.4 km/h -5.60 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.1% (5.6 Km/H).

Wet

4

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters

Lower is better ↓
Wet Braking
Position / TyreResultGap to best
40.1 m Best
42.4 m +2.30 m
43.7 m +3.60 m
44.2 m +4.10 m
44.8 m +4.70 m
49.4 m +9.30 m
50.6 m +10.50 m
69.7 m +29.60 m

The difference between best and worst was 73.8% (29.6 m ≈ 6.6 Car Lengths).

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed

Higher is better ↑
Wet Handling
Position / TyreResultGap to best
84.5 km/h Best
82.7 km/h -1.80 km/h
80.4 km/h -4.10 km/h
80.1 km/h -4.40 km/h
79.7 km/h -4.80 km/h
74.9 km/h -9.60 km/h
74.5 km/h -10.00 km/h
65.9 km/h -18.60 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 22% (18.6 Km/H).

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H

Higher is better ↑
Straight Aqua
Position / TyreResultGap to best
79.5 km/h Best
75 km/h -4.50 km/h
75 km/h -4.50 km/h
74.7 km/h -4.80 km/h
74.4 km/h -5.10 km/h
73.9 km/h -5.60 km/h
73.4 km/h -6.10 km/h
62.9 km/h -16.60 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 20.9% (16.6 Km/H).

Curved Aquaplaning

Remaining lateral acceleration

Higher is better ↑
Curved Aquaplaning
Position / TyreResultGap to best
3.44 m/sec2 Best
3.37 m/sec2 -0.07 m/sec2
3.13 m/sec2 -0.31 m/sec2
3.12 m/sec2 -0.32 m/sec2
2.98 m/sec2 -0.46 m/sec2
2.9 m/sec2 -0.54 m/sec2
2.87 m/sec2 -0.57 m/sec2
2.43 m/sec2 -1.01 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 29.4% (1.01 m/sec2).

Comfort

2

Subj. Comfort

Subjective Comfort Score

Higher is better ↑
Subj. Comfort
Position / TyreResultGap to best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
8 Points Best
7 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
7 Points -1.00 Points
6 Points -2.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 25% (2 Points).

Noise

External noise in dB

Lower is better ↓
Noise
Position / TyreResultGap to best
73.3 dB Best
73.4 dB +0.10 dB
73.9 dB +0.60 dB
74 dB +0.70 dB
74.5 dB +1.20 dB
74.9 dB +1.60 dB
75 dB +1.70 dB
75 dB +1.70 dB

All the tyres in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Value

1

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t

Lower is better ↓
Rolling Resistance
Position / TyreResultGap to bestExtra fuel / year
7.2 kg/t Best £0
7.8 kg/t +0.60 kg/t £37
8.1 kg/t +0.90 kg/t £55
8.6 kg/t +1.40 kg/t £86
8.8 kg/t +1.60 kg/t £98
9.5 kg/t +2.30 kg/t £141
10 kg/t +2.80 kg/t £171
10.6 kg/t +3.40 kg/t £208

The difference between best and worst was 47.2% (3.4 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Pirelli P Zero PZ4 uses about 144 L (£208) more fuel than the Firestone Firehawk Sport.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.

19,000 km
£1.45/L
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

More tyre tests

Cross-check this test

All tyre tests

Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.

Rate your tyres

My tyres

Saved in this browser on this site. No account needed. Clearing browser data removes your choices.

Vehicle and size

Check the size, load and speed ratings on your vehicle. Saving a size does not confirm fitment.

Saved tyres

Save tyres from a tyre page, test or comparison to keep them here.

Select 2–8 saved tyres. Ranked comparisons require at least two shared tests.