Menu

2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
5 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Dry
  3. Wet
  4. Snow
  5. Environment
  6. Results
  7. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
  8. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
  9. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
  10. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
  11. Firestone Winterhawk 4
  12. Cooper Discoverer Winter
  13. Uniroyal WinterExpert
  14. Falken Eurowinter HS01

The first winter tyre test for 2022 is here, and it's the Auto Motor Und Sport UHP winter tyre test! This year AMS tested eight patterns in 245/45 R19 using an Audi A6 test vehicle.

Test Publication:
Auto Motor Und Sport
245/45 R19 8 tyres 5 categories
Test Publication:
Auto Motor Und Sport
Read the original test at Auto Motor Und Sport →
Test Size: 245/45 R19
Tyres Tested: 8 tyres
Test Categories:
5 categories (13 tests)
Similar Tests
Auto Motor Und Sport is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tyre Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.

There's almost nothing surprising about this test, it's nice when a test makes sense. At the front we have the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 and Continental WinterContact TS870P (two of Tyre Reviews favorite UHP Winter tyres), with the wet masters Vredestein and Bridgestone following them up in third and fourth places overall.

Falken will likely be disappointed with last place, however the replacement to the HS01, the HS02, is now new to market so we expect this new tyre to be vastly improved.

Read on for the full data!

Dry

Michelin winter tyres always perform well in the dry, and this test was no exception with the Pilot Alpin 5 having a significant lead in dry braking over the second placed Continental, which in turn had a significant lead over the rest of the group.

Dry Braking

Dry braking in meters (relative index, 100 = best in test)
  1. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    100 %
  2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    98 %
  3. Falken Eurowinter HS01
    96 %
  4. Cooper Discoverer Winter
    96 %
  5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    93 %
  6. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    92 %
  7. Firestone Winterhawk 4
    90 %
  8. Uniroyal WinterExpert
    89 %

Dry handling put the Continental back on top, with the Falken edging out the Michelin to second place.

Dry Handling

Dry Handling Average Speed (relative index, 100 = best in test)
  1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    100 %
  2. Falken Eurowinter HS01
    99 %
  3. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    99 %
  4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    99 %
  5. Firestone Winterhawk 4
    99 %
  6. Uniroyal WinterExpert
    99 %
  7. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    99 %
  8. Cooper Discoverer Winter
    98 %

Wet

The Vredestein Wintrac Pro had a 1.3 meter advantage during the wet braking test! Cooper and in particular Uniroyal struggled.

Wet Braking

Wet braking in meters (relative index, 100 = best in test)
  1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    100 %
  2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    96 %
  3. Falken Eurowinter HS01
    94 %
  4. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    92 %
  5. Firestone Winterhawk 4
    92 %
  6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    90 %
  7. Cooper Discoverer Winter
    83 %
  8. Uniroyal WinterExpert
    81 %

Vredestein held its lead in wet handling and Falken once again jumped up to second place, this time ahead of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 in third.

Wet Handling

Wet Handling Average Speed (relative index, 100 = best in test)
  1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    100 %
  2. Falken Eurowinter HS01
    99 %
  3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    98 %
  4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    98 %
  5. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    97 %
  6. Firestone Winterhawk 4
    97 %
  7. Cooper Discoverer Winter
    96 %
  8. Uniroyal WinterExpert
    92 %

Falken also had a large lead in the aquaplaning result.

Straight Aqua

Float Speed in Km/H (relative index, 100 = best in test)
  1. Falken Eurowinter HS01
    100 %
  2. Cooper Discoverer Winter
    97 %
  3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    97 %
  4. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    95 %
  5. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    95 %
  6. Firestone Winterhawk 4
    93 %
  7. Uniroyal WinterExpert
    93 %
  8. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    93 %

Snow

Snow braking was led by the new Firestone WinterHawk 4, with Vredestein once again proving it's ability at slowing the test car.

Snow Braking

Snow braking in meters (relative index, 100 = best in test)
  1. Firestone Winterhawk 4
    100 %
  2. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    98 %
  3. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    97 %
  4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    97 %
  5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    96 %
  6. Uniroyal WinterExpert
    94 %
  7. Cooper Discoverer Winter
    92 %
  8. Falken Eurowinter HS01
    83 %

Snow traction (figures in ms/2 not newtons) was led by Michelin, with Vredestein and Continental also performing well.

Snow Traction

Pulling Force in Newtons (relative index, 100 = best in test)
  1. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    100 %
  2. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    98 %
  3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    97 %
  4. Firestone Winterhawk 4
    97 %
  5. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    96 %
  6. Uniroyal WinterExpert
    95 %
  7. Cooper Discoverer Winter
    92 %
  8. Falken Eurowinter HS01
    81 %

Continental and Michelin led the group during the snow handling testing with Falken continuing to struggle.

Snow Handling

Snow handling average speed (relative index, 100 = best in test)
  1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    100 %
  2. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    99 %
  3. Firestone Winterhawk 4
    99 %
  4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    97 %
  5. Cooper Discoverer Winter
    97 %
  6. Uniroyal WinterExpert
    96 %
  7. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    96 %
  8. Falken Eurowinter HS01
    91 %

Environment

The Cooper Discoverer Winter claimed its first test win during external noise measuring.

Noise

External noise in dB (relative index, 100 = best in test)
  1. Cooper Discoverer Winter
    100 %
  2. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    100 %
  3. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    100 %
  4. Firestone Winterhawk 4
    99 %
  5. Uniroyal WinterExpert
    99 %
  6. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    98 %
  7. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    98 %
  8. Falken Eurowinter HS01
    97 %

Impressively the Conti had the lowest rolling resistance, with Falken once again struggling.

Rolling Resistance

Rolling resistance in kg t (relative index, 100 = best in test)
  1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    100 %
  2. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    96 %
  3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    96 %
  4. Uniroyal WinterExpert
    96 %
  5. Firestone Winterhawk 4
    95 %
  6. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    94 %
  7. Cooper Discoverer Winter
    87 %
  8. Falken Eurowinter HS01
    77 %

The Falken was however one of the cheapest tyres of the test.

Price

Price in local currency (relative index, 100 = best in test)
  1. Firestone Winterhawk 4
    100 %
  2. Falken Eurowinter HS01
    99 %
  3. Cooper Discoverer Winter
    97 %
  4. Uniroyal WinterExpert
    89 %
  5. Vredestein Wintrac Pro
    88 %
  6. Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
    76 %
  7. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
    73 %
  8. Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
    63 %

Results

1st

Michelin Pilot Alpin 5

245/45 R19 102V
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
  • EU Label: C/B/72
  • Weight: 11.51 kgs
  • Tread: 7.9 mm
Test # %
Dry Braking 1st 100%
Dry Handling 3rd 99.25%
Test # %
Wet Braking 4th 91.91%
Wet Handling 5th 97.21%
Straight Aqua 5th 94.93%
Curved Aquaplaning 7th 88.89%
Test # %
Snow Braking 3rd 96.89%
Snow Traction 1st 100%
Snow Handling 2nd 99.24%
Snow Circle 7th 76.72%
Test # %
Noise 2nd 99.57%
Test # %
Price 8th 63.43%
Rolling Resistance 6th 93.83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
  • EU Label: C/B/71
  • Weight: 10.81 kgs
  • Tread: 8.6 mm
Test # %
Dry Braking 2nd 98.42%
Dry Handling 1st 100%
Test # %
Wet Braking 6th 89.83%
Wet Handling 4th 98.14%
Straight Aqua 8th 92.52%
Curved Aquaplaning 3rd 98.92%
Test # %
Snow Braking 3rd 96.89%
Snow Traction 3rd 97.29%
Snow Handling 1st 100%
Snow Circle 4th 82.15%
Test # %
Noise 6th 98.44%
Test # %
Price 7th 72.59%
Rolling Resistance 1st 100%
3rd

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

245/45 R19 102W
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
  • EU Label: D/B/72
  • Weight: 12.46 kgs
  • Tread: 8.6 mm
Test # %
Dry Braking 6th 91.97%
Dry Handling 7th 98.51%
Test # %
Wet Braking 1st 100%
Wet Handling 1st 100%
Straight Aqua 4th 95.18%
Curved Aquaplaning 6th 94.62%
Test # %
Snow Braking 2nd 98.03%
Snow Traction 2nd 98.1%
Snow Handling 7th 96.03%
Snow Circle 4th 82.15%
Test # %
Noise 2nd 99.57%
Test # %
Price 5th 87.89%
Rolling Resistance 2nd 96.2%
4th

Bridgestone Blizzak LM005

245/45 R19 102V
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
  • EU Label: C/A/72
  • Weight: 11.94 kgs
  • Tread: 8.0 mm
Test # %
Dry Braking 5th 93.35%
Dry Handling 4th 99.09%
Test # %
Wet Braking 2nd 96.07%
Wet Handling 3rd 98.27%
Straight Aqua 3rd 96.58%
Curved Aquaplaning 4th 98.57%
Test # %
Snow Braking 5th 95.77%
Snow Traction 5th 95.93%
Snow Handling 4th 97.35%
Snow Circle 6th 79.24%
Test # %
Noise 7th 98.3%
Test # %
Price 6th 76.26%
Rolling Resistance 2nd 96.2%
5th

Firestone Winterhawk 4

245/45 R19 102V
Firestone Winterhawk 4
  • EU Label: C/B/71
  • Weight: 11.92 kgs
  • Tread: 7.9 mm
Test # %
Dry Braking 7th 89.69%
Dry Handling 5th 98.92%
Test # %
Wet Braking 5th 91.64%
Wet Handling 6th 96.54%
Straight Aqua 6th 92.78%
Curved Aquaplaning 8th 80.29%
Test # %
Snow Braking 1st 100%
Snow Traction 4th 97.02%
Snow Handling 3rd 99.05%
Snow Circle 8th 76.34%
Test # %
Noise 4th 99.14%
Test # %
Price 1st 100%
Rolling Resistance 5th 95%
6th

Cooper Discoverer Winter

245/45 R19 102V
Cooper Discoverer Winter
  • EU Label: C/B/71
  • Weight: 11.75 kgs
  • Tread: 7.9 mm
Test # %
Dry Braking 4th 96.24%
Dry Handling 8th 98.42%
Test # %
Wet Braking 7th 82.6%
Wet Handling 7th 95.88%
Straight Aqua 2nd 97.21%
Curved Aquaplaning 2nd 99.64%
Test # %
Snow Braking 7th 92.22%
Snow Traction 7th 92.14%
Snow Handling 5th 96.6%
Snow Circle 2nd 96.9%
Test # %
Noise 1st 100%
Test # %
Price 3rd 96.55%
Rolling Resistance 7th 87.36%
6th

Uniroyal WinterExpert

245/45 R19 102V
Uniroyal WinterExpert
  • EU Label: C/C/72
  • Weight: 12.46 kgs
  • Tread: 8.8 mm
Test # %
Dry Braking 8th 88.78%
Dry Handling 5th 98.92%
Test # %
Wet Braking 8th 80.51%
Wet Handling 8th 92.42%
Straight Aqua 6th 92.78%
Curved Aquaplaning 5th 96.77%
Test # %
Snow Braking 6th 94.32%
Snow Traction 6th 94.58%
Snow Handling 6th 96.41%
Snow Circle 3rd 84.14%
Test # %
Noise 5th 98.58%
Test # %
Price 4th 89.09%
Rolling Resistance 2nd 96.2%
6th

Falken Eurowinter HS01

245/45 R19 102V
Falken Eurowinter HS01
  • EU Label: D/B/72
  • Weight: 13.84 kgs
  • Tread: 8.9 mm
Test # %
Dry Braking 3rd 96.45%
Dry Handling 2nd 99.42%
Test # %
Wet Braking 3rd 93.53%
Wet Handling 2nd 99.07%
Straight Aqua 1st 100%
Curved Aquaplaning 1st 100%
Test # %
Snow Braking 8th 83%
Snow Traction 8th 81.3%
Snow Handling 8th 91.12%
Snow Circle 1st 100%
Test # %
Noise 8th 97.07%
Test # %
Price 2nd 99.49%
Rolling Resistance 8th 76.77%

Discussion

  1. No comments yet — be the first.
Rate your tyres