The first winter tyre test for 2022 is here, and it's the Auto Motor Und Sport UHP winter tyre test! This year AMS tested eight patterns in 245/45 R19 using an Audi A6 test vehicle.
There's almost nothing surprising about this test, it's nice when a test makes sense. At the front we have the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 and Continental WinterContact TS870P (two of Tyre Reviews favorite UHP Winter tyres), with the wet masters Vredestein and Bridgestone following them up in third and fourth places overall.
Falken will likely be disappointed with last place, however the replacement to the HS01, the HS02, is now new to market so we expect this new tyre to be vastly improved.
Read on for the full data!
Dry
Michelin winter tyres always perform well in the dry, and this test was no exception with the Pilot Alpin 5 having a significant lead in dry braking over the second placed Continental, which in turn had a significant lead over the rest of the group.
Dry Braking
Spread: 5.50 M (12.6%)|Avg: 46.18 M
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
43.50 M
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
44.20 M
Falken Eurowinter HS01
45.10 M
Cooper Discoverer Winter
45.20 M
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
46.60 M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
47.30 M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
48.50 M
Uniroyal WinterExpert
49.00 M
Dry handling put the Continental back on top, with the Falken edging out the Michelin to second place.
Dry Handling
Spread: 1.90 Km/H (1.6%)|Avg: 119.38 Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
120.50 Km/H
Falken Eurowinter HS01
119.80 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
119.60 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
119.40 Km/H
Firestone Winterhawk 4
119.20 Km/H
Uniroyal WinterExpert
119.20 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
118.70 Km/H
Cooper Discoverer Winter
118.60 Km/H
Wet
The Vredestein Wintrac Pro had a 1.3 meter advantage during the wet braking test! Cooper and in particular Uniroyal struggled.
Wet Braking
Spread: 7.70 M (24.2%)|Avg: 35.20 M
Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
31.80 M
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
33.10 M
Falken Eurowinter HS01
34.00 M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
34.60 M
Firestone Winterhawk 4
34.70 M
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
35.40 M
Cooper Discoverer Winter
38.50 M
Uniroyal WinterExpert
39.50 M
Vredestein held its lead in wet handling and Falken once again jumped up to second place, this time ahead of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 in third.
Wet Handling
Spread: 5.70 Km/H (7.6%)|Avg: 73.09 Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
75.20 Km/H
Falken Eurowinter HS01
74.50 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
73.90 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
73.80 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
73.10 Km/H
Firestone Winterhawk 4
72.60 Km/H
Cooper Discoverer Winter
72.10 Km/H
Uniroyal WinterExpert
69.50 Km/H
Falken also had a large lead in the aquaplaning result.
Straight Aqua
Spread: 5.90 Km/H (7.5%)|Avg: 75.15 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
Falken Eurowinter HS01
78.90 Km/H
Cooper Discoverer Winter
76.70 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
76.20 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
75.10 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
74.90 Km/H
Firestone Winterhawk 4
73.20 Km/H
Uniroyal WinterExpert
73.20 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
73.00 Km/H
Snow
Snow braking was led by the new Firestone WinterHawk 4, with Vredestein once again proving it's ability at slowing the test car.
Snow Braking
Spread: 5.10 M (20.5%)|Avg: 26.39 M
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Firestone Winterhawk 4
24.90 M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
25.40 M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
25.70 M
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
25.70 M
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
26.00 M
Uniroyal WinterExpert
26.40 M
Cooper Discoverer Winter
27.00 M
Falken Eurowinter HS01
30.00 M
Snow traction (figures in ms/2 not newtons) was led by Michelin, with Vredestein and Continental also performing well.
Snow Traction
Spread: 0.69 N (18.7%)|Avg: 3.49 N
Pulling Force in Newtons (Higher is better)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
3.69 N
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
3.62 N
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
3.59 N
Firestone Winterhawk 4
3.58 N
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
3.54 N
Uniroyal WinterExpert
3.49 N
Cooper Discoverer Winter
3.40 N
Falken Eurowinter HS01
3.00 N
Continental and Michelin led the group during the snow handling testing with Falken continuing to struggle.
Snow Handling
Spread: 4.70 Km/H (8.9%)|Avg: 51.30 Km/H
Snow handling average speed (Higher is better)
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
52.90 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
52.50 Km/H
Firestone Winterhawk 4
52.40 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
51.50 Km/H
Cooper Discoverer Winter
51.10 Km/H
Uniroyal WinterExpert
51.00 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
50.80 Km/H
Falken Eurowinter HS01
48.20 Km/H
Environment
The Cooper Discoverer Winter claimed its first test win during external noise measuring.
Noise
Spread: 2.10 dB (3%)|Avg: 70.33 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
Cooper Discoverer Winter
69.50 dB
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
69.80 dB
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
69.80 dB
Firestone Winterhawk 4
70.10 dB
Uniroyal WinterExpert
70.50 dB
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
70.60 dB
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
70.70 dB
Falken Eurowinter HS01
71.60 dB
Impressively the Conti had the lowest rolling resistance, with Falken once again struggling.
Rolling Resistance
Spread: 2.30 kg / t (30.3%)|Avg: 8.25 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
7.60 kg / t
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
7.90 kg / t
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
7.90 kg / t
Uniroyal WinterExpert
7.90 kg / t
Firestone Winterhawk 4
8.00 kg / t
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
8.10 kg / t
Cooper Discoverer Winter
8.70 kg / t
Falken Eurowinter HS01
9.90 kg / t
The Falken was however one of the cheapest tyres of the test.
Excellent driving dynamics with direct steering response, high level of grip and the best balance on snow. Shortest braking distances, high cornering stability and great steering precision on dry roads.
Deficits when braking in the wet, low aquaplaning resistance, faintly audible noise when cornering.
Despite small deficits in cornering grip, very easy to control handling on snow with wide reserves. Balanced in the wet, short braking distances, neutral and precise grip on dry roads.
Comparatively weak on wet roads with limited braking, low aquaplaning resistance and reduced grip in curves.
Very good traction and braking on snow. Quite balanced wet properties, safe lane changes.
Unexpectedly low lateral grip on snow. Limited controllability in the wet at the limit of grip. Long dry braking with sensitive handling and lower grip during dry handling. Disturbing noise when cornering.
Very balanced, reliable and easy to control on snow. Very short braking distances thanks to very good grip in the wet. Dynamic, spontaneous steering and agile on dry roads.
Longer dry braking distances, oversteer balance when driving fast in the dry.
Easy to control with very good driving dynamics, high level of grip and generous reserves on snow. Balanced cornering dynamics dry at a reduced level.
Weak braking and limited liability reserves, plus sensitive to load changes in the wet, increased risk of aquaplaning. Long braking distances even on dry tracks. Audible internal noise and low levels of comfort.
Still decent braking and traction on snow. Very quiet and quite comfortable tyre.
Unexpectedly low cornering on snow with respectable traction and braking grip. Poor performance with risk of oversteer in the wet and less secure balance in dry corners. High rolling resistance.
Still decent traction in snow, good cornering ability on dry asphalt.
Poor driving stability and poor grip in the wet. Too long braking distances on wet and dry asphalt. Sensitive to load changes in fast corners. Audible rolling noises in the interior
when cornering.
Very decent wet performance with superior aquaplaning resistance but small limitations in cornering grip. Safe, understeering, reliable driving dynamics on dry roads, high levels of comfort.
Long braking distances, sluggish steering response and little grip on snow. Disturbing rolling noise in curves.