The 2023 Sport Auto winter tyre test has tested ten uhp winter tyres using and Audi S3.
Why do you only see nine in the results below? The Kumho WinterCraft WP 52 was part of the tyre test but was eventually disqualified due to specific issues. While it showed moderate performance on snow and impressive braking capabilities on wet surfaces, it had a tendency to quickly lose grip in curves. The test tyres provided by the manufacturer demonstrated strong grip and a neutral, active behavior in wet conditions, along with very short braking distances on dry surfaces. However, the tyres displayed a lack of grip and steering precision on snow, and were sensitive to puddles in curves, leading to aquaplaning. The tyre was disqualified from the test due to significant deficits in the properties of the currently available tyres with the latest manufacturing dates in comparison to the tested product. These discrepancies between the provided test tyres and the commercially available products ultimately led to the tyre's disqualification.
The Continental and Michelin tires demonstrate impressive capabilities. Both brands don't specialize in comfort, and the TS 870 P from Continental somewhat lacks braking connection with the leading group. However, the German tyre excels in all other dry criteria, providing the most feedback through the steering wheel and the highest safety reserves for spontaneous evasive maneuvers at highway speeds. Both Goodyear and Hankook also deliver consistently good to very good dry performance. In contrast, Bridgestone and Vredestein respond more sluggishly to steering commands.
Dry Braking
Spread: 2.10 M (4.8%)|Avg: 44.29 M
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
43.60 M
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
43.70 M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
44.00 M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
44.00 M
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
44.00 M
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
44.10 M
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
44.40 M
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
45.10 M
Giti GitiWinterW2
45.70 M
Dry Handling
Spread: 2.80 Km/H (2.3%)|Avg: 122.19 Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
123.70 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
123.00 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
122.60 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
122.20 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
122.10 Km/H
Giti GitiWinterW2
122.00 Km/H
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
121.80 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
121.40 Km/H
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
120.90 Km/H
Wet
In wet conditions, Bridgestone shines with its consistently foolproof handling, creating an illusion of driving on a dry track. The new tyre from Goodyear and Vredestein's Wintrac Pro also perform strongly, though they struggle with lateral aquaplaning, as do Michelin, Falken, and Pirelli. Hankook's Winter icept evo3 stands out for its water drainage capabilities, while the excluded Kumho tyre is notably quick in wet conditions. While safety is paramount in these tests, efficiency also plays a crucial role. The laboratory tests for rolling resistance reveal that the Bridgestone Blizzak LM 005 successfully combines excellent wet grip with low rolling resistance, making it the test winner. Close behind are the very balanced Goodyear, the snow-reliable dry king Michelin, and the efficient, grippy Continental.
Wet Braking
Spread: 2.00 M (6.2%)|Avg: 33.42 M
Wet braking in meters (80 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
32.30 M
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
32.70 M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
33.20 M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
33.20 M
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
33.20 M
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
33.60 M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
34.10 M
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
34.20 M
Giti GitiWinterW2
34.30 M
Wet Handling
Spread: 2.00 Km/H (2.5%)|Avg: 79.53 Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
80.10 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
80.00 Km/H
Giti GitiWinterW2
80.00 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
80.00 Km/H
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
79.60 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
79.40 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
79.40 Km/H
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
79.20 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
78.10 Km/H
Wet Circle
Spread: 0.16 m/s (2.2%)|Avg: 7.34 m/s
Lateral wet grip in m/s squared (Higher is better)
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
7.41 m/s
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
7.41 m/s
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
7.38 m/s
Giti GitiWinterW2
7.36 m/s
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
7.36 m/s
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
7.35 m/s
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
7.30 m/s
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
7.28 m/s
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
7.25 m/s
Straight Aqua
Spread: 6.20 Km/H (8.1%)|Avg: 72.52 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
Giti GitiWinterW2
76.30 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
74.10 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
73.50 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
73.40 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
72.20 Km/H
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
71.60 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71.00 Km/H
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
70.50 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
70.10 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
Spread: 0.83 m/sec2 (25.5%)|Avg: 2.70 m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
3.25 m/sec2
Giti GitiWinterW2
2.92 m/sec2
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
2.88 m/sec2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
2.77 m/sec2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
2.64 m/sec2
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
2.54 m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
2.46 m/sec2
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
2.46 m/sec2
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
2.42 m/sec2
Snow
The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 stands out as extremely fast and safe, leading the pack, followed by Bridgestone (highest subjective rating, but only satisfactory lateral support objectively), Continental (very balanced), and the new Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 (best traction). Notably, all four profiles decelerate almost equally strong and harmonize well with the Audi's ABS system.
In the midfield, Pirelli (fast and safe driving, but weaknesses in deceleration), Vredestein (consistently good performance), and Hankook (prompt, safe handling, but objectively weaker lateral support) are found. Falken and Giti show less compatibility with snow, with the new Falken Eurowinter HS 02 Pro falling so clearly behind in the direct handling comparison that it is downgraded by one grade in this chapter.
Snow Braking
Spread: 1.40 M (4.7%)|Avg: 30.32 M
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
29.60 M
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
29.70 M
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
29.70 M
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
29.80 M
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
30.50 M
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
30.70 M
Giti GitiWinterW2
30.90 M
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
31.00 M
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
31.00 M
Snow Traction
Spread: 0.12 N (7.8%)|Avg: 1.46 N
Pulling Force in Newtons (Higher is better)
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
1.53 N
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
1.52 N
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
1.49 N
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
1.46 N
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
1.45 N
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
1.45 N
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
1.44 N
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
1.42 N
Giti GitiWinterW2
1.41 N
Snow Handling
Spread: 2.70 Km/H (5%)|Avg: 53.72 Km/H
Snow handling average speed (Higher is better)
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
54.40 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
54.30 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
54.20 Km/H
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
54.20 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
54.10 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
54.10 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
54.00 Km/H
Giti GitiWinterW2
52.50 Km/H
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
51.70 Km/H
Snow Slalom
Spread: 0.36 m/sec2 (8%)|Avg: 4.33 m/sec2
Lateral acceleration (Higher is better)
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
4.48 m/sec2
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
4.43 m/sec2
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
4.40 m/sec2
Giti GitiWinterW2
4.39 m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
4.36 m/sec2
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
4.34 m/sec2
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
4.27 m/sec2
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
4.15 m/sec2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
4.12 m/sec2
Comfort
The Michelin had the lowest external noise, with the Hankook proving to be quite a noisy tyre.
Noise
Spread: 2.70 dB (3.8%)|Avg: 72.30 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
71.50 dB
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
71.50 dB
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
71.70 dB
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
71.80 dB
Giti GitiWinterW2
71.80 dB
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
72.50 dB
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
72.70 dB
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
73.00 dB
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
74.20 dB
Value
The Giti and Falken were the cheapest to buy, whereas the Michelin was the most expensive.
Price
Spread: 46.00 (38%)|Avg: 140.11
Price in local currency (Lower is better)
Giti GitiWinterW2
121.00
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 Pro
121.00
Hankook Winter i cept evo3
134.00
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
135.00
Pirelli Cinturato Winter 2
139.00
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
143.00
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3
145.00
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
156.00
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
167.00
As seen in other tests this year, the Continental and Bridgsetone had the lowest rolling resistance of the group.