Menu

Continental VikingContact 7

The Continental VikingContact 7 is a premium Nordic-style winter tyre that delivers a very confident, well-rounded performance in real winter conditions. Drivers and independent tests alike highlight its reassuring snow ability, stable handling and impressively refined, quiet ride. It's particularly strong when the weather is changeable, offering predictable control and good comfort on longer journeys.

0.4
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews
High Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
68%
Wet Grip
70%
Road Feedback
69%
Handling
71%
Wear
61%
Comfort
85%
Buy again
70%
Snow Grip
88%
Ice Grip
73%
23 Reviews
73% Average
129,329 miles driven
9 Tests (avg: 2nd)
Continental VikingContact 7

Continental VikingContact 7

Winter Premium
BETA
0.4 / 10
Based on Professional Tests & User Reviews · High Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Snow
86.7
1.5x / 23 tests
Comfort
85.2
0.29x / 7 tests
Ice
82.1
1.26x / 22 tests
Value
78
0.38x / 8 tests
Dry
73.5
1.2x / 14 tests
Wet
65.6
2x / 22 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
82.4
34 tests
Traction
81.9
12 tests
Braking
74.6
28 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 9
Publications: 4
Period: 2019 - 2024
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 23
Avg Rating: 72.7%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.3
History Points: 6
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
The Best Studded / Friction Winter Tyres for 2024 Teknikens Varld 2024 225/50 R17 3/17 0 metrics
2023 Studless Friction Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2023 225/45 R17 1/8 13 metrics
2022 ViBilagare Nordic SUV Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2022 235/55 R18 3/8 14 metrics
2022/23 Tyre Reviews Studless Winter Tyre Test Tyre Reviews 2022 205/55 R16 1/9 20 metrics
2021 Studless and Studded Winter Tyre Test Teknikens Varld 2021 205/55 R16 1/16 11 metrics
2020 Vi Bilagare Nordic Friction Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2020 205/60 R16 1/8 12 metrics
The Best Winter Tyres for 2020 Tyre Reviews 2020 205/55 R16 1/19 0 metrics
2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test Test World 2020 205/55 R16 6/20 15 metrics
2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2019 225/50 R17 3/8 11 metrics
9
Tests
2nd
Average
1st
Best
6th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
The Continental ContiVikingContact 7, the previous year's winner, still showed strong performance, particularly in winter conditions. It maintained excellent grip on ice and snow, matching its successor in these crucial areas. However, its weaknesses became more apparent in this test, particularly in wet conditions and aquaplaning resistance. Despite these shortcomings, the CVC 7 still performed admirably overall, demonstrating good fuel efficiency and comfort. Its performance illustrates both the strengths of Continental's Nordic tyre design and the areas where improvement was needed in the newer model.
The VikingContact7, despite being one of the oldest tires on the market, still performs at the top. Following a third-place finish in last year's test of SUV sizes, Continental is once again number one. The tire manages to maintain steering grip even in really tight curves on ice. It also remains easy to control on snow with a stable rear without sliding tendencies under pressure. Despite its excellent characteristics on winter roads, Continental continues to convince in dry road conditions. The steering feel on asphalt is good; it handles understeering tests well and shows reasonable stopping distances on both wet and dry asphalt. Almost always being top three in every subtest earns it a well-deserved overall victory. The Continental is suitable for all types of winter needs.

To summarize, the VikingContact7 tire by Continental is praised for its exceptional performance across various conditions, from ice and snow to dry asphalt, showcasing its suitability for diverse winter requirements.
Excellent in all conditions, Best wet and dry handling lap times, shortest dry braking, very good wet braking, good in snow, best ice handling lap, very low noise levels and low rolling resistance.
Average aquaplaning resistance.
The Continental was the best in the dry and had a small advantage in the wet grip tests, but did struggle in the deeper water of the two aquaplaning tests. It was excellent in the snow and ice, had the lowest internal noise and was comfortable, but of the top three tyres it did have the highest rolling resistance, but even that was just 3.1% off the best.

Size Fuel Wet Noise
14 inch
175/65 R 14 86 T XL D D 71
15 inch
185/65 R 15 92 T XL C D 70
195/55 R 15 89 T XL C D 71
195/65 R 15 95 T XL C D 72
185/65 R 15 92 T XL C D 71
185/65 R 15 92 T XL C D 70
16 inch
205/55 R 16 94 T XL C D 71
205/55 R 16 94 T XL C D 71
205/60 R 16 96 T XL C D 71
215/60 R 16 99 T XL C D 71
215/60 R 16 99 T XL C D 71
215/70 R 16 100 T C D 72
205/55 R 16 94 T XL C D 71
205/60 R 16 96 T XL C D 71
17 inch
205/50 R 17 93 T XL C D 71
215/45 R 17 91 T XL C D 72
215/55 R 17 98 T XL C D 72
215/55 R 17 98 T XL C D 72
225/45 R 17 94 T XL C D 72
225/50 R 17 98 T XL C D 72
225/60 R 17 103 T XL C D 72
235/65 R 17 108 T XL C D 72
265/65 R 17 116 T XL C D 72
215/55 R 17 98 T XL C D 72
18 inch
225/40 R 18 92 T XL C D 72
235/60 R 18 107 T XL C D 72
245/45 R 18 100 T XL C D 72
245/40 R 18 97 T XL C D 72
245/40 R 18 97 T XL C D 72
19 inch
235/35 R 19 91 T XL D D 72
235/35 R 19 91 T XL C D 72
20 inch
255/45 R 20 105 T XL C D 71
245/35 R 20 95 T XL C D 72
275/55 R 20 117 T XL B D 72
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Continental VikingContact 7 >>

Questions and Answers for the Continental VikingContact 7

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Continental VikingContact 7. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

YouTube Review

Review Summary

Based on 21 user reviews

Continental VikingContact 7 earns largely positive feedback, with many drivers praising its excellent snow traction, strong wet/slush grip, quiet ride, and stable, predictable handling for a winter tyre. High-scoring reviews consistently highlight confidence in mixed winter conditions and good steering feel, with several noting low noise and comfort at highway speeds. A minority report weaker ice braking versus top competitors and some concerns about faster treadwear in warmer or extended dry use. Overall, it's a confident, comfortable winter performer with a few trade-offs to watch.

Strengths
  • Excellent snow traction
  • Strong wet/slush grip
  • Quiet and comfortable ride
  • Predictable
  • Confidence-inspiring handling and steering
  • Good dry-road stability for a winter tyre
Areas for Improvement
  • Ice braking/ice grip weaker than top competitors
  • Faster treadwear/longevity concerns in warmer or extended dry use

Top 3 Continental VikingContact 7 Reviews

Given 62% while driving a BMW 340 m sport (255/35 R18) on mostly town for 7,000 average miles
So good grip in the winter
Ask a question | Helpful 1018
April 19, 2025
Given 93% while driving a Skoda Yeti 4 x 4 (215/70 R16) on mostly country roads for 5,000 easy going miles
Good solid grip at all times with traction especially good on cold slush. Comfortable ride possibly at the cost of sidewall strength.
August 10, 2025
Given 88% while driving a Volkswagen 2020 Tiguan 4Motion 2.0 TSI 180 PS (215/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Stopping on frozen snow or slippery surfaces is the tire's biggest drawback. The ABS engages immediately, but the car continues to slide mercilessly. I have them on a 2020 Tiguan 4Motion. Very disappointing. I can only advise reducing your speed very early at intersections and traffic lights, otherwise you'll slide mercilessly over them. Until recently, I had a Touareg with Nokian Nordman 7 tires. Something like that never happened to me.
March 29, 2025
Have you driven on the Continental VikingContact 7 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Continental VikingContact 7? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Continental VikingContact 7 >

Latest Continental VikingContact 7 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 84% while driving a BMW X3 (225/60 R18) on for 10,000 miles
Excellent in fresh snow, hard packed snow/icy roads, and good on dry and wet roads. Very quiet and comfortable.
February 2, 2026
Given 86% while driving a Hyundai Tucson (235/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 12,129 spirited miles
Great tire so far. I am now using them for my second season. When purchased, I opted for 17" which is -2 from OE for my 19" tire size - the result is the same size that would be found on the base gasoline-powered trim level of my car (a 2024 Hyundai Tucson Hybrid). Asthetically, the taller profile of the tires makes my car look a bit more aggressive and ready to pounce on the snow.

During my first season, I found the Vikings were as quiet as my OE Michelin Primacy tires. The tires also provided an unexpectedly slightly firmer ride vs. the Primacy tires, but this firmness seems to have softened up a bit in my second season. I'm running the tires at 36 psi. These tires have great grip in the snow - the grip loosens up predictably if you are going too quickly while accelerating in a corner. The car handles very well in the dry and wet.

The only downside I have noticed is that my fuel economy is slightly worsened by maybe 0.3 L/100 km more? Despite that, I highly recommend this tire!
December 21, 2025
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 90% while driving a Volkswagen Jetta 1.4 TSI (205/60 R16) on a combination of roads for 3,000 spirited miles
This is an excellent winter tire for mixed conditions and suits my VW Jetta Mk7 very well. The comfort and excellent grip in wet/slushy conditions are the standout characteristics for this category. The ride is exceptionally well damped with minimal harshness, just as good as the OE tire for this car. Impact noise is very sensitive on this car and thankfully the VikingContact 7 feels and sounds very well isolated. I find many other studless/nordic winter tires have poor wet grip, but the handling character of the VikingContact 7 is consistent and predictable across the range of dry, wet, slush, and snow conditions. There is also good steering feedback and a clear sense of straight ahead for a winter tire. This is a very pleasant and enjoyable tire for daily driving.

Snow and ice grip is excellent as expected for the category. There is useful feel in the steering and chassis, boosting confidence in snow. The VikingContact 7 also recovers quickly when the grip limits are exceeded. This feedback and forgiving character makes this more confident than other winter tires I have used.

After 3000 miles there is minimal wear to report, about 1/32nd lost on the tires that have been on the front axle longer.
December 10, 2025
Given 79% while driving a Toyota Corolla (195/65 R15) on a combination of roads for 800 average miles
I live at the Minnesota/Manitoba border where as I type this it’s 5 degrees fahrenheit. I’ve found this tire to be very well rounded. The dry grip is impressive and shocked me. I truly don’t want to take these off in the spring they felt so good in the 40/50 degree weather of our warm October. Practically zero noise, still can get upwards of 44mpg on the highway at around 65mph. But of course these are snow tires. The snow handling is probably as good as it gets. They feel like summer tires in the middle of July while driving through an inch of snow. Their true specialty imo is ice traction however. I’ve hit a couple icy intersections while making turns and I could feel the car start to lose control and skid, but it’s a controlled and slow motion sliding due to the rolling resistance of tires. It’s easy to correct the vehicle and get back on course. Perhaps Hakkas are a bit better on snow and ice, but these are a better tier overall. I’m sold on the VK line.
December 2, 2025
Given 70% while driving a Porsche Macan GTS (265/40 R20) on mostly town for 1,000 average miles
Ice performance as expected is bit worse compared to studded tires, but considering these days, most of the winter in the Northern hemisphere, we just have ice melted by salt to slush, it's perfect. Driving in the dry or snow, it performs great.
December 1, 2025
Given 60% while driving a Kia Motors Rondo (Caren) (205/55 R16) on a combination of roads for 15,000 average miles
This is my 3rd winter with them and they seem to have changed since I first installed them. I drive a 2014 Kia Rondo and last year I parked the car for 3 months due to surgery and they now vibrate weirdly and have become very noisy. Grip on dry and wet was always great, I live in Montreal and most of our winter is cold and wet rather than snowy and icy. They perform really nicely on the highway when not on snow or ice. In the snow, even a few centimeters, they tend to be slippery when changing direction. I feel the car drifting a lot even when they were new and the ABS or traction control comes on a lot in these moments. I definitely do not push them hard in these conditions but I have become good at controlling the car when in a slide. On hard packed snow at the cottage they feel like I was on dry cement and I dont worry but any soft snow and things get loosy goosey. They seem to be wearing well, I have not measured them yet but they look fine however these are the first winter tyres I have ever owned so I dont have much to compare them with.
December 1, 2025
Given 85% while driving a Mazda MX5 2.0 Manual (215/45 R16) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
Very good steering feel and handling. These feel more like a good all season or summer tire than a winter tire, none of the mushy feeling you get with Blizzaks. Did quite well in the snow, had some slides on ice but you can only expect so much from a non-studded tire.
October 18, 2025
Given 54% while driving a Ford Kuga (235/55 R18) on a combination of roads for 0 easy going miles
Strange, but this tire worked well 1,5 winter season, then they not like everywhere reviewed... My tires compound goes very hard, very uncomfortable to drive in potholed road(feel like car have sportcar suspension). In 2 season tire was good in dry, wet, snow, slush...but in icy road drive dangerous compared first season. Some people write they are low noise, no they like other winter tires! I never had that kind change with other tires, i allraedy thinking no more studded tires... But reality come back after 1,5 season.
March 24, 2024
Given 47% while driving a Mazda MX5 (205/50 R16) on a combination of roads for 5,000 spirited miles
the VikingContact is most at home in snow. Dry traction is poor compared to non-winter tires, and worse than any other winter tire I have used. For example, I accelerated hard from 30mph and spun my rear wheels - in a miata (a miata is no mustang, and should never be unable to do this - 167 hp)
Snow traction is good, but ice traction is not nearly as good as a Blizzak ws-80. If you have ice, get Blizzak. Viking lasted longer than Blizzak, but was a worse performer in everything except soft snow. I would only buy these again if I lived in an area where the roads were always freshly snowed upon
March 16, 2024
Given 90% while driving a Mazda 121 (225/45 R18) on mostly country roads for 2,000 average miles
We have these tires on our electric mazda mx30 during winter in Sweden. Mostly girlfriend commuting 100km per day. Never had any issues on dry, wet, snowy or icy roads. She feel really confident during winter with these on and she drives like she stole the car most of the times. Good comfort and second winter with them and no excessive wear. Other than being pricey, no other downside. Recommend.
February 20, 2024
Given 63% while driving a Jaguar I Pace (245/50 R20) on mostly town for 14,000 average miles
Tires have mostly worn out after only 20,000 km. Unacceptable! They’re great running tires but lifespan is too short to recomnend.
February 18, 2023
Given 63% while driving a Mercury Grand marquis (255/40 R19) on mostly motorways for 1,000 easy going miles
I scored a used set of VC7’s with only 200 miles on them. They still had the ink stripes on the treads. I have them mounted on my mercury grand marquis which is identical to a Ford crown Victoria, a rear wheel drive open diff 2 ton behemoth. Coming from all seasons that were down to the wear indicators, snow was a white knuckle ride. I moved to a rural area that averages freezing temps 4 months out of the year and has roads that aren’t plowed clean during snow fall. I am a little biased because of what I paid for these tires and how good they are coming from all seasons. My car is horrible in the snow but with the vc7’s I was able to climb up my steep driveway with 4 inches of fresh snow with little to no wheel spin. I am blown away by how well these snow tires work, especially on a car that is notoriously bad in snow. I will be switching back to my all seasons soon as the winter is over, so hopefully I can get a few seasons out of these tires. All in all even if I had to pay msrp for these tires I would buy them again. They are buttery smooth, cruise well, and are very quiet.
December 12, 2022