Name: 2022 ViBilagare Nordic SUV Winter Tyre Test
Creator: Tyre Reviews
Published: 2022-10-27

We're going to let the test data do the talking for this one. The excellent Swedish testers at ViBilagare have tested eight SUV studless friction winter tyres, included the new Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV and new Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V3 using a Volvo V40 wearing 235/55 R18 tires. Fortunately, where the tyre patterns match those in the Tyre Reviews Nordic Winter Tyre Test, the results are very similar!

Which winter tyre is best? Check out the magazines excellent data and final results below!

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking: 80 → 5 km/h
Wet Braking: 80 → 5 km/h
Snow Braking: 35 → 5 km/h
Snow Traction: 5 → 25 km/h
Ice Braking: 25 → 5 km/h
Ice Traction: 5 → 15 km/h

Ice

On ice the new Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV offered the best braking, traction and handling, with the Michelin X Ice Snow SUV being the best of the rest.

Ice Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV	12.89 m	Best	0 km/h
2Michelin X Ice Snow SUV	13.37 m	+0.48 m	25 km/h
3Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2	13.66 m	+0.77 m	31 km/h
4Continental VikingContact 7	13.69 m	+0.80 m	31 km/h
5Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1	13.79 m	+0.90 m	33 km/h
6Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3	14.55 m	+1.66 m	44 km/h
7Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV	15.61 m	+2.72 m	54 km/h
8Mazzini Snowleopard LX	16.72 m	+3.83 m	62 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 29.7% (3.83 m ≈ 0.9 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Mazzini Snowleopard LX would still be travelling at 62 km/h when the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Ice Traction
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV	2.94 s	Best
2Michelin X Ice Snow SUV	3.05 s	+0.11 s
3Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1	3.11 s	+0.17 s
4Continental VikingContact 7	3.15 s	+0.21 s
5Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2	3.16 s	+0.22 s
6Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV	3.35 s	+0.41 s
7Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3	3.37 s	+0.43 s
8Mazzini Snowleopard LX	3.73 s	+0.79 s

The difference between best and worst was 26.9% (0.79 s).

Ice Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV	39.97 s	Best
2Continental VikingContact 7	40.85 s	+0.88 s
3Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1	40.89 s	+0.92 s
4Michelin X Ice Snow SUV	40.95 s	+0.98 s
5Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2	41.68 s	+1.71 s
6Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3	41.83 s	+1.86 s
7Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV	42.77 s	+2.80 s
8Mazzini Snowleopard LX	43.14 s	+3.17 s

The difference between best and worst was 7.9% (3.17 s).

Snow

Snow once again showed the Nokians winter credentials, with the R5 SUV leading in snow braking and snow handling, and second place in snow traction.

Snow Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV	10.94 m	Best	0 km/h
2Mazzini Snowleopard LX	11.16 m	+0.22 m	18 km/h
3Michelin X Ice Snow SUV	11.25 m	+0.31 m	22 km/h
4Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1	11.35 m	+0.41 m	25 km/h
5Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3	11.4 m	+0.46 m	26 km/h
6Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2	11.5 m	+0.56 m	29 km/h
7Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV	11.56 m	+0.62 m	30 km/h
8Continental VikingContact 7	11.6 m	+0.66 m	31 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 6% (0.66 m). From 130 km/h, the Continental VikingContact 7 would still be travelling at 31 km/h when the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Snow Traction
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Michelin X Ice Snow SUV	2.74 s	Best
2Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV	2.77 s	+0.03 s
2Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1	2.77 s	+0.03 s
4Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2	2.82 s	+0.08 s
5Mazzini Snowleopard LX	2.83 s	+0.09 s
6Continental VikingContact 7	2.85 s	+0.11 s
7Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3	2.86 s	+0.12 s
8Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV	3.03 s	+0.29 s

The difference between best and worst was 10.6% (0.29 s).

Snow Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV	72.84 s	Best
2Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1	73.26 s	+0.42 s
3Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3	73.41 s	+0.57 s
4Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2	73.45 s	+0.61 s
5Michelin X Ice Snow SUV	74.01 s	+1.17 s
6Continental VikingContact 7	74.02 s	+1.18 s
7Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV	76.8 s	+3.96 s
8Mazzini Snowleopard LX	77.29 s	+4.45 s

The difference between best and worst was 6.1% (4.45 s).

Wet

The Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2 was the best tyre in the wet grip tests, leading wet braking and wet handling. Nokian and Michelin, which did so well on ice and snow, struggled more in the wet showing creating a tyre which does everything well isn't yet possible.

Wet Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2	36.42 m	Best	0 km/h
2Mazzini Snowleopard LX	37.3 m	+0.88 m	20 km/h
3Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV	38.29 m	+1.87 m	29 km/h
4Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1	38.38 m	+1.96 m	29 km/h
5Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3	38.86 m	+2.44 m	33 km/h
6Continental VikingContact 7	38.98 m	+2.56 m	33 km/h
7Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV	39.51 m	+3.09 m	36 km/h
8Michelin X Ice Snow SUV	40.76 m	+4.34 m	42 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 11.9% (4.34 m ≈ 1 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Michelin X Ice Snow SUV would still be travelling at 42 km/h when the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

Wet Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2	41.88 s	Best
2Continental VikingContact 7	42.05 s	+0.17 s
3Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV	42.11 s	+0.23 s
4Michelin X Ice Snow SUV	42.4 s	+0.52 s
5Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1	42.63 s	+0.75 s
6Mazzini Snowleopard LX	42.67 s	+0.79 s
7Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV	42.97 s	+1.09 s
8Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3	43.06 s	+1.18 s

All the tyres in the Wet Handling test finished less than 3% apart.

The deep water test of aquaplaning was led by the Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV.

Straight Aqua
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV	70.6 km/h	Best
2Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2	70.2 km/h	-0.40 km/h
3Mazzini Snowleopard LX	69 km/h	-1.60 km/h
4Continental VikingContact 7	68 km/h	-2.60 km/h
5Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1	62.1 km/h	-8.50 km/h
6Michelin X Ice Snow SUV	61.9 km/h	-8.70 km/h
6Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3	61.9 km/h	-8.70 km/h
8Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV	60.3 km/h	-10.30 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 14.6% (10.3 Km/H).

Dry

The Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V3 offered the shortest dr braking, followed by the Falken Winterpeak F-Snow.

Dry Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3	33.29 m	Best	0 km/h
2Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1	33.59 m	+0.30 m	12 km/h
3Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2	33.85 m	+0.56 m	17 km/h
4Continental VikingContact 7	34.2 m	+0.91 m	21 km/h
5Michelin X Ice Snow SUV	34.46 m	+1.17 m	24 km/h
5Mazzini Snowleopard LX	34.46 m	+1.17 m	24 km/h
7Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV	34.77 m	+1.48 m	27 km/h
8Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV	35.12 m	+1.83 m	30 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (1.83 m ≈ 0.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV would still be travelling at 30 km/h when the Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

While the magazine didn't publish dry handling times, they did rate the tyres on how easy they were to drive in the dry with the Goodyear and Nokian leading the way.

Subj. Dry Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2	5 Points	Best
2Continental VikingContact 7	4 Points	-1.00 Points
2Michelin X Ice Snow SUV	4 Points	-1.00 Points
2Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV	4 Points	-1.00 Points
2Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV	4 Points	-1.00 Points
6Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3	3 Points	-2.00 Points
7Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1	2 Points	-3.00 Points
8Mazzini Snowleopard LX	1 Points	-4.00 Points

The difference between best and worst was 80% (4 Points).

Environment

The Goodyear had the lowest internal noise measured of all the tyres.

Noise
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2	73.5 dB	Best
2Michelin X Ice Snow SUV	74.9 dB	+1.40 dB
3Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1	75.1 dB	+1.60 dB
4Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3	75.3 dB	+1.80 dB
5Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV	75.4 dB	+1.90 dB
6Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV	75.5 dB	+2.00 dB
6Mazzini Snowleopard LX	75.5 dB	+2.00 dB
8Continental VikingContact 7	75.6 dB	+2.10 dB

All the tyres in the Noise test finished less than 3% apart.

Naturally the budget Mazzini was the cheapest SUV winter tyre of the group, with the Michelin the most expensive.

The new Nokian offered the lowest fuel use.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
1Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV	5.58 kg/t	Best	£0
2Continental VikingContact 7	5.71 kg/t	+0.13 kg/t	£10
2Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2	5.71 kg/t	+0.13 kg/t	£10
4Michelin X Ice Snow SUV	5.79 kg/t	+0.21 kg/t	£17
5Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV	5.81 kg/t	+0.23 kg/t	£18
6Mazzini Snowleopard LX	5.85 kg/t	+0.27 kg/t	£21
7Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1	6.19 kg/t	+0.61 kg/t	£48
8Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3	6.22 kg/t	+0.64 kg/t	£51

The difference between best and worst was 11.5% (0.64 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3 uses about 35 L (£51) more fuel than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Petrol/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

19,000 km

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

£1.45/L

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

This year's big news in the segment is the Hakkapeliitta R5, which replaces the R3. Then newcomer immediately becomes the new yardstick for winter grip. The Nokian takes home all the available points in both snow and ice conditions. The cornering grip is most impressive on ice and the Nokian is the only friction tire that maintains good controllability on the wrong side of the grip limit.
The biggest improvement over the predecessor is on dry roads, mainly the noise level which is no longer affected by troublesome frequencies. The steering is slightly sharper and in the evasive maneuver tests the R5 reacts quickly with maintained stability. The rolling resistance is the lowest of the bunch. One the minus side we find braking on wet roads and low aquaplaning characteristics.
In total, the tests best winter grip gives the Nokian a clear victory.

Dry93.1%

Wet94.6%

Snow99.6%

Ice100%

Comfort97.4%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 8	34.77 m	+1.48 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 8	4 Points	-1.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 8	39.51 m	+3.09 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	3^rd / 8	42.11 s	+0.23 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	8^th / 8	60.3 km/h	-10.30 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 8	10.94 m	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionLower is better	2^nd / 8	2.77 s	+0.03 s
Snow HandlingLower is better	1^st / 8	72.84 s	Best in this discipline
Ice BrakingLower is better	1^st / 8	12.89 m	Best in this discipline
Ice TractionLower is better	1^st / 8	2.94 s	Best in this discipline
Ice HandlingLower is better	1^st / 8	39.97 s	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 8	75.5 dB	+2.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 8	5.58 kg/t	Best in this discipline

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 2574.00

UltraGrip Ice 2 is the best choice for those who drive mostly on asphalt ground in milder winter conditions. It is superior on wet asphalt, that is otherwise a problem for Nordic friction tires. Goodyear handles aquaplaning well and also has good cornering grip and shortest braking distance on wet roads. You will also find the best stability and steering response on dry roads. In addition, the interior noise level is the lowest.
Despite the good asphalt properties, Goodyear performs well in the winter rounds. The braking distances are right up there with the best. The disadvantage is slightly worse cornering grip on snow and ice, where the grip disappears relatively suddenly and without warning.
In terms of points, it will be second overall, but Goodyear is the clear winner in wetter climates.

Dry98.6%

Wet99.9%

Snow97.3%

Ice94.4%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance97.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 8	33.85 m	+0.56 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 8	5 Points	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 8	36.42 m	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingLower is better	1^st / 8	41.88 s	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 8	70.2 km/h	-0.40 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	6^th / 8	11.5 m	+0.56 m
Snow TractionLower is better	4^th / 8	2.82 s	+0.08 s
Snow HandlingLower is better	4^th / 8	73.45 s	+0.61 s
Ice BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 8	13.66 m	+0.77 m
Ice TractionLower is better	5^th / 8	3.16 s	+0.22 s
Ice HandlingLower is better	5^th / 8	41.68 s	+1.71 s
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 8	73.5 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 8	5.71 kg/t	+0.13 kg/t

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 2416.00

VikingContact7 has several victories from our tests of traditional passenger car tires in the bag. Now it collects a bronze medal.
To adapt to the higher weight of the SUVs, Continental has made a stiffer tire with a harder rubber compound. It provides slightly less convincing driver properties on ice and snow, with longer sliding phases than we previously experienced from VC7. However, the level of grip is still good compared to the competition.
The upside is that the tire in this larger dimension, with a more open pattern, handles aquaplaning really well. It also has fine stability on asphalt with maintained steering precision in the evasive maneuver tests.
Never the best but often at the top, regardless of the surface, results a well-deserved podium.

Dry94.4%

Wet96.5%

Snow96.4%

Ice95.1%

Comfort97.2%

Rolling Resistance97.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 8	34.2 m	+0.91 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 8	4 Points	-1.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 8	38.98 m	+2.56 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	2^nd / 8	42.05 s	+0.17 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	4^th / 8	68 km/h	-2.60 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	8^th / 8	11.6 m	+0.66 m
Snow TractionLower is better	6^th / 8	2.85 s	+0.11 s
Snow HandlingLower is better	6^th / 8	74.02 s	+1.18 s
Ice BrakingLower is better	4^th / 8	13.69 m	+0.80 m
Ice TractionLower is better	4^th / 8	3.15 s	+0.21 s
Ice HandlingLower is better	2^nd / 8	40.85 s	+0.88 s
NoiseLower is better	8^th / 8	75.6 dB	+2.10 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 8	5.71 kg/t	+0.13 kg/t

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 2442.00

One of the tires that benefited most from the switch to SUV size is Michelin. X-Ice Snow has previously been one of the stiffer tires that gave good stability on asphalt but was not as compliant on winter surfaces.
This time Michelin is one of the very best on ice. The slightly more open pattern also provides good grip on snow. However, Michelin has prioritized longitudinal grip - start and brake - and does not have quite as good lateral grip as the best in the winter rounds.
The X-Ice Snow behaves all the better in the curves in the asphalt tests where it can handle high lateral forces and has good steering response.
The minus item is the wet grip, which is the poorest in the test This means that Michelin ends up just outside the podium.

Dry93.8%

Wet93.3%

Snow98.6%

Ice96.8%

Comfort98.1%

Rolling Resistance96.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 8	34.46 m	+1.17 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 8	4 Points	-1.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	8^th / 8	40.76 m	+4.34 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	4^th / 8	42.4 s	+0.52 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 8	61.9 km/h	-8.70 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 8	11.25 m	+0.31 m
Snow TractionLower is better	1^st / 8	2.74 s	Best in this discipline
Snow HandlingLower is better	5^th / 8	74.01 s	+1.17 s
Ice BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 8	13.37 m	+0.48 m
Ice TractionLower is better	2^nd / 8	3.05 s	+0.11 s
Ice HandlingLower is better	4^th / 8	40.95 s	+0.98 s
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 8	74.9 dB	+1.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	4^th / 8	5.79 kg/t	+0.21 kg/t

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 2740.00

Another novelty among the friction tires is the F-Snow 1, which is part of Falken's new Winterpeak family. Just like the studded sibling F-Ice 1, the friction tire has a very soft rubber compound that provides good grip on snow and ice. The tyre construction is also on the softer side, which contributes to compliant behavior on winter roads with a steady rear end without any skidding tendencies under pressure.
The soft rubber also provides short braking distances on dry roads. The disadvantage is slow steering reactions and strong understeer in evasive maneuver tests on dry roads and in curves on wet roads. A bit numb steering feel also reduces the impression on bare ground.
Overall, the Falken is an affordable option for those who prioritize high winter grip.

Dry89.1%

Wet95.6%

Snow98.3%

Ice95.2%

Comfort97.9%

Rolling Resistance90.2%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 8	33.59 m	+0.30 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 8	2 Points	-3.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 8	38.38 m	+1.96 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	5^th / 8	42.63 s	+0.75 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 8	62.1 km/h	-8.50 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 8	11.35 m	+0.41 m
Snow TractionLower is better	2^nd / 8	2.77 s	+0.03 s
Snow HandlingLower is better	2^nd / 8	73.26 s	+0.42 s
Ice BrakingLower is better	5^th / 8	13.79 m	+0.90 m
Ice TractionLower is better	3^rd / 8	3.11 s	+0.17 s
Ice HandlingLower is better	3^rd / 8	40.89 s	+0.92 s
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 8	75.1 dB	+1.60 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 8	6.19 kg/t	+0.61 kg/t

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 2239.00

DM-V3 is the name of the SUV version of Bridgestone's classic friction tire Blizzak. In terms of results, the tire ends up in something of a no-man's land. It achieves few top results in the test rounds, but it does not fall through negatively in any round.
Its advantages are good sound comfort, short braking distance on dry roads and well-balanced driving characteristics with good cornering grip on snow.
Unfortunately, for a Nordic winter tyre, it has some grip problems on the ice where it falls behind the other well-known premium names.
Despite four longitudinal drainage channels, the aquaplaning ability does not impress either.
Without any real top scoring results, it’s a modest point harvest and a sixth place overall.

Dry93.2%

Wet94.6%

Snow97%

Ice90.4%

Comfort97.6%

Rolling Resistance89.7%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 8	33.29 m	Best in this discipline
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 8	3 Points	-2.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	5^th / 8	38.86 m	+2.44 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	8^th / 8	43.06 s	+1.18 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 8	61.9 km/h	-8.70 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 8	11.4 m	+0.46 m
Snow TractionLower is better	7^th / 8	2.86 s	+0.12 s
Snow HandlingLower is better	3^rd / 8	73.41 s	+0.57 s
Ice BrakingLower is better	6^th / 8	14.55 m	+1.66 m
Ice TractionLower is better	7^th / 8	3.37 s	+0.43 s
Ice HandlingLower is better	6^th / 8	41.83 s	+1.86 s
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 8	75.3 dB	+1.80 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	8^th / 8	6.22 kg/t	+0.64 kg/t

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 2545.00

WS51 is the SUV version of Kumho's latest friction tire Wi51. It's the stiffest tire here, with high priority on asphalt rounds, not winter grip. On ice it performs far from the best. The WS51 is difficult to master under pressure on both snow and ice, where all grip suddenly disappears at once and without warning.
It does a lot better against aquaplaning where Kumho is the best of the bunch. The braking distance on wet asphalt is also good, and the steering feel for small steering movements as well.
Unfortunately, the WS51 has problems with a loose rear-end both wet and dry roads with a skidding behavior in the evasive maneuvers and especially in wet corners. Nor is the noise level impressive. Difficult to control on the limit and poor winter grip result in a low score.

Dry92.3%

Wet96.7%

Snow93.2%

Ice87.9%

Comfort97.5%

Rolling Resistance96%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	8^th / 8	35.12 m	+1.83 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 8	4 Points	-1.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 8	38.29 m	+1.87 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	7^th / 8	42.97 s	+1.09 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 8	70.6 km/h	Best in this discipline
Snow BrakingLower is better	7^th / 8	11.56 m	+0.62 m
Snow TractionLower is better	8^th / 8	3.03 s	+0.29 s
Snow HandlingLower is better	7^th / 8	76.8 s	+3.96 s
Ice BrakingLower is better	7^th / 8	15.61 m	+2.72 m
Ice TractionLower is better	6^th / 8	3.35 s	+0.41 s
Ice HandlingLower is better	7^th / 8	42.77 s	+2.80 s
NoiseLower is better	5^th / 8	75.4 dB	+1.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 8	5.81 kg/t	+0.23 kg/t

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 1898.00

One of the cheapest tires on the market is the Snowleopard LX from Chinese Mazzini. It is notable by an unusually rough pattern. In addition to good aquaplaning properties, it provides good grip in the snow - in any case, starting grip and braking distance. The cornering grip, on the other hand, is far from the best, but the tire is honest and warn early on about the poor grip. On ice the grip is close to non-existing. The braking distance is long and it looses the grip early already at very low cornering speeds.
In the dry, the steering feel is better than feared the open pattern considered, although in a crisis situation the tire can only turn in one direction. When you have to steer back, the pattern has folded and gives strong understeering.
Loud road noise that grows to high pattern singing with light steering, cementing an already clear last place.

Dry83.6%

Wet97.9%

Snow96.3%

Ice82.8%

Comfort97.4%

Rolling Resistance95.4%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (13)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 8	34.46 m	+1.17 m
Subj. Dry HandlingHigher is better	8^th / 8	1 Points	-4.00 Points
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 8	37.3 m	+0.88 m
Wet HandlingLower is better	6^th / 8	42.67 s	+0.79 s
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 8	69 km/h	-1.60 km/h
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 8	11.16 m	+0.22 m
Snow TractionLower is better	5^th / 8	2.83 s	+0.09 s
Snow HandlingLower is better	8^th / 8	77.29 s	+4.45 s
Ice BrakingLower is better	8^th / 8	16.72 m	+3.83 m
Ice TractionLower is better	8^th / 8	3.73 s	+0.79 s
Ice HandlingLower is better	8^th / 8	43.14 s	+3.17 s
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 8	75.5 dB	+2.00 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 8	5.85 kg/t	+0.27 kg/t

3PMSF: Yes
Price: 1684.00

Tyre	Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV	Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 2	Continental VikingContact 7	Michelin X Ice Snow SUV	Falken Winterpeak F Snow 1	Bridgestone Blizzak DM V3	Kumho WinterCraft WS51 SUV	Mazzini Snowleopard LX
Position	1^st	2^nd	3^rd	4^th	5^th	6^th	7^th	8^th
Category scores (% of best)
Dry	93.1%	98.6%	94.4%	93.8%	89.1%	93.2%	92.3%	83.6%
Wet	94.6%	99.9%	96.5%	93.3%	95.6%	94.6%	96.7%	97.9%
Snow	99.6%	97.3%	96.4%	98.6%	98.3%	97%	93.2%	96.3%
Ice	100%	94.4%	95.1%	96.8%	95.2%	90.4%	87.9%	82.8%
Comfort	97.4%	100%	97.2%	98.1%	97.9%	97.6%	97.5%	97.4%
Rolling Resistance	100%	97.7%	97.7%	96.4%	90.2%	89.7%	96%	95.4%
Keep researching	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results	Read owner reviews Test Results

Menu

Tyre shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Ice

Snow

Wet

Dry

Environment

Results

Cross-check this test