Menu

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV is a non-studded winter tire for passenger cars, crossovers and SUVs. Tailored to meet the needs of powerful and large vehicles, the Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV offers optimized stability, durability and wear resistance while managing the high wheel loads precisely and reliably.

9.3
Tyre Reviews Score Based on Professional Tests
Medium Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
70%
Wet Grip
70%
Road Feedback
70%
Handling
70%
Wear
80%
Comfort
100%
Buy again
90%
Snow Grip
100%
Ice Grip
100%
1 Reviews
83% Average
3,000 miles driven
2 Tests (avg: 3rd)
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
9.3 / 10
Based on Professional Tests · Medium Confidence · Updated 23 Feb 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Ice
94.5
1.2x / 6 tests
Snow
85.1
1.5x / 6 tests
Value
79.3
0.42x / 3 tests
Wet
75.1
1.93x / 6 tests
Dry
65.3
1.13x / 4 tests
Comfort
54.6
0.32x / 2 tests

Cross-category scores are derived metrics that combine data from multiple test disciplines to evaluate real-world performance characteristics.

Handling
85.9
8 tests
Braking
84.3
8 tests
Traction
83.6
4 tests
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 3
Publications: 2
Period: 2022 - 2025
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 1
Avg Rating: 83.3%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 0.51
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.9 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 12 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.75 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
combined_penalty_floor 0.2
Data Sources
TestPublicationDateSizePositionMetrics
2025 Friction Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2025 235/60 R18 4/8 13 metrics
The 7 BEST All Weather Tyres Tested Tyre Reviews 2025 225/65 R17 9/9 5 metrics
2022 ViBilagare Nordic SUV Winter Tyre Test Vi Bilagare 2022 235/55 R18 1/8 14 metrics

Videos

Which All Weather Tire is Best? Michelin vs Bridgestone vs Goodyear vs Nokian vs Pirelli etc

Which All Weather Tire is Best? Michelin vs Bridgestone vs Goodyear vs Nokian vs Pirelli etc

2
Tests
3rd
Average
1st
Best
4th
Worst
Latest Tyre Test Results
4th/8
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV has been criticized in previous tests for weak wet grip, and now comes the R5 with an update and new rubber compound intended to improve wet characteristics - but perhaps Nokian pulled its focus on wet roads a bit too far. The stopping distance on wet asphalt is by far the best in the test with a good margin. However, Nokian has lost some of its sharpness on ice, especially the cornering behavior on winter road surfaces. The grip is still good, but with eager steering responses on snow and ice, the tyre can lose grip more suddenly than before and becomes harder to balance at the grip limit. As a whole, Nokian has improved the balance between wet grip and winter characteristics, which is appreciated. The tyre performs well with decent grip levels on ice and snow and is more agile than the understeering Continental in tight corners, though it has lower ice grip and worse steering feel on asphalt than the best. In the tough competition, it settles for fourth place.
Best grip on ice, driving characteristics on all surfaces, rolling resistance.
Braking distance wet road, aquaplaning.
This year's big news in the segment is the Hakkapeliitta R5, which replaces the R3. Then newcomer immediately becomes the new yardstick for winter grip. The Nokian takes home all the available points in both snow and ice conditions. The cornering grip is most impressive on ice and the Nokian is the only friction tire that maintains good controllability on the wrong side of the grip limit.
The biggest improvement over the predecessor is on dry roads, mainly the noise level which is no longer affected by troublesome frequencies. The steering is slightly sharper and in the evasive maneuver tests the R5 reacts quickly with maintained stability. The rolling resistance is the lowest of the bunch. One the minus side we find braking on wet roads and low aquaplaning characteristics.
In total, the tests best winter grip gives the Nokian a clear victory.
Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
215/70R16 100 R C D 71
17 inch
265/70R17 115 R B D 71
225/60R17 103 R XL B D 71
235/65R17 108 R XL B D 71
265/65R17 116 R XL B D 71
18 inch
235/60R18 107 R XL B D 71
20 inch
275/55R20 117 R XL B D 71
255/45R20 105 T XL B D 71
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV >>

Questions and Answers for the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV

Ask a question
November 6, 2023

recommended tire pressure ?

Whatever the vehicle recommends, you can usually find it in your door shut or handbook.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

How would you rate the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV?

Click a star to start your review

Latest Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV Reviews

Given 83% while driving a Audi Q5 (235/60 R18) on mostly town for 3,000 easy going miles
This is a soft compound winter tyre, so my scores are reflecting it. It is designed mainly for roads covered in snow and ice and boy, it sure does deliver on these surfaces! Loads of grip on winter roads - braking on ice felt like a studded tyre from a couple generations ago! Very safe and predictable on winter roads - never had any grip issues with these tyres. Of course, it lacks grip on dry and wet roads, but if you drive without a rush, you will not have any problems. I have Michelin X-ice Snow fitted on my second car and they feel softer on dry surfaces and I have less confidence in them to push the carComfortable and quiet tyre although, when temperature goes above +5 C, it gets loud and grip drops significantly. I have covered 5000 kms on them and no signs of noticeable wear so far. Very happy with these tyres, considering what these tyres are designed for.
April 14, 2025
Rate the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5 SUV