Menu
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV View Gallery (1)
215-315/35-70 R16-22 82 sizes 2018 Winter rated

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV

The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV is a Premium Touring Winter tyre designed to be fitted to SUV and 4x4s.

7.2
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
72%
Wet Grip
68%
Road Feedback
68%
Handling
68%
Wear
78%
Comfort
78%
Buy again
82%
Snow Grip
95%
Ice Grip
88%
6 Reviews
78% Average
23,390 miles driven
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV

Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV

Winter Mid-Range
BETA
7.2 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 6
Avg Rating: 77.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.68
History Points: 6
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV

Size Fuel Wet Noise
16 inch
215/70R16 100 R B E 72
17 inch
265/70R17 115 R B E 73
235/65R17 108 R XL B E 72
265/65R17 116 R XL B E 73
225/60R17 103 R XL B E 72
225/60R17 99 R D E 72
18 inch
235/60R18 107 R XL B E 72
20 inch
255/45R20 105 T XL B E 73
275/55R20 117 R XL B E 73
View All Sizes and EU Label Scores for the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV >>

Questions and Answers for the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV

Ask a question
Sorry, we don't currently have any questions and answers for the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV. Why not submit a question to our tyre experts using the form below!
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Top 3 Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV Reviews

Given 81% while driving a Subaru Outback (225/65 R17) on a combination of roads for 40 average miles
As a skier, I was looking for a tire that could handle PNW weather from October to April. At home close to sea level, the roads are typically above zero C and wet. So travelling up to 1,400 meters the weather goes from rain to freezing rain, sleet, then snow. With all the wintry road conditions you might imagine. These Hakka's on my Outback are superb. They are a little noisy at 100 kmph now in their 5th winter, (35 months) so I will likely replace them with the R5 SUV version in October 2025. Overall, for the price and the driving confidence, they are well worth the $37.00 CDN a month.
Ask a question | Helpful 651
March 23, 2025
Given 97% while driving a Kia Motors (215/55 R17) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
Excellent all around winter tire, i never buy anything else but Nokian
November 14, 2023
Given 90% while driving a Subaru Outback (225/65 R18) on mostly country roads for 50 spirited miles
Northern Ontario, Canada 2015 Subaru Outback Good winter tires. No issues. Had 2 sets. Lasted 4 seasons each, about 10,000km in winter per year. Daily driver. Rough roads, snow, ice. No issues. Replaced with new set of Nokian R5 this year.
November 29, 2022
Have you driven on the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV >

Latest Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 SUV Reviews

Given 72% while driving a Mercedes Benz EQC (235/55 R19) on a combination of roads for 9,300 average miles
Fitted in a staggered setup, tyres are good when there’s snow and ice but perform average in slush/wet conditions. Don’t get me wrong, you won’t drive off the road when there’s rain, you just have to adjust your speed a bit more. I had the LM005 on my bmw and they are superior on wet tarmac compared. Tyres are a bit soft in corners and there is a weird resonance noise when driving at 55-65kmph in our car. Have had these for 2 winters and there’s almost no wear (car has driven about 60% on these tyres). Nokian has never let me down, but they are not necessary the right tire for my use (as they usually come fitted by default when you buy a new car here and there’s only 2-3 weeks of snow on the road, then it’s just wet and salty).
October 2, 2022
Given 72% while driving a Volvo XC60 (225/45 R18) on mostly town for 8,000 easy going miles
Seems to have better dry and wet grip in colder temperatures, is a good allround tire for scandinavian conditions. Feels a bit soft and unprecice compared to continental, but not too much in it. Comfertable and seems to wear ok.
November 9, 2021
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!