Well, this might cause a few arguments. A German magazine just published it's (very) in depth all terrain tyre test, and while this is a German magazine testing the A/T tyres on a van, these tyres are the same as available in the US market, and they're testing in the very all terrain 255/55 R18 size.

The test field consisted of five proper 3 peak (3PMSF winter rating) all terrain tyres, the BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2, Bridgestone Dueler A/T 002, Falken Wildpeak AT3 W/A, General Grabber AT3, and the Loder AT1. The Loder AT1 is particularly notable as it's specifically developed for motorhomes with a high load rating of 1320kg per tyre, making it suitable for vehicles up to approximately 4.5 tonnes.

The second group of tyres includes two tyres without winter rating: the new Goodyear Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure as a summer AT tyre, and the Continental Cross-Contact H/T as a more road-focused SUV tyre included for comparison.

AT tyre test

This test is possibly the best we've ever seen, as it has 6 different offroad tests, and dry testing, wet testing AND snow testing. Plus rolling resistance, noise, comfort. The only thing missing is wear.

So why might this test cause arguments. Well, the fan favourite BFGoodrich All Terrain KO2 finished last of the all terrain tyres, largely thanks to a poor on road performance. It had poor dry and wet grip (something we've commented on before), and was loud and bumpy, but it did do well offroad and in snow. It's key rivals, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and General Grabber AT3 both performed much better, with the magazine concluding that the Falken was the best all terrain tyre overall, no matter what % of offroad driving you do, and regardless of how much snow you see (we're not sure we agree on the snow part as in other tests the Falken has been further behind.)

Sadly the two 'extra' tyres were not tested in the snow, so you can't compare them overall, but you can in the individual tests. The Continental CrossContact HT lagged behind offroad, as expected from an all season tyre, however it was by far the best on the road, and had the best rolling resistance and best comfort. The non-winter rated Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure performed well on and off-road.

One final note, you might know that both the Falken and BFGoodrich have already been replaced, in fact we have a video comparing the two successors here. Sadly neither of them are available in Europe yet, hence the previous models.

As always, the data is the most important part for finding the best tyre for you, so please check it out below.

Test setup & methodology

The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.

Recorded test conditions

Dry Braking: 100 → 0 km/h
Wet Braking: 80 → 0 km/h
Gravel Braking: 40 → 0 km/h

Dry

The Bridgestone Dueler AT002 had the shortest dry braking distance at 42.3m, while the Loder AT1 required 45.5m to stop - a significant 3.2m difference. The road-focused Continental CrossContact HT performed well with 43.1m, beating most AT tyres and showing its road-biased design. The non-winter rated Goodyear placed mid-pack at 44.6m. Among winter-rated AT tyres, there was a clear split - the Bridgestone and Falken (43.9m) performed notably better than the BFGoodrich KO2 (44.7m) and Loder AT1.

Dry Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	42.3 m	Best	0 km/h
2Continental CrossContact HT	43.1 m	+0.80 m	18 km/h
3Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	43.9 m	+1.60 m	25 km/h
4General Grabber AT3	44.4 m	+2.10 m	28 km/h
5Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	44.6 m	+2.30 m	30 km/h
6BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	44.7 m	+2.40 m	30 km/h
7Loder Loder AT1	45.5 m	+3.20 m	34 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 7.6% (3.2 m ≈ 0.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Loder Loder AT1 would still be travelling at 34 km/h when the Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002 had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

In dry handling the Continental CrossContact HT led with an average speed of 90.2 km/h around the lap, while the BFGoodrich KO2 was slowest at 86.0 km/h - a 4.2 km/h difference highlighting the compromise between road and off-road performance. The non-winter rated Goodyear impressed with 89.0 km/h, nearly matching the Continental. Among winter-rated AT tyres, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W (88.2 km/h) and General Grabber AT3 (87.8 km/h) offered the best balance of dry handling performance.

Dry Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	90.2 km/h	Best
2Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	89.2 km/h	-1.00 km/h
3Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	89 km/h	-1.20 km/h
4Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	88.2 km/h	-2.00 km/h
5General Grabber AT3	87.8 km/h	-2.40 km/h
6Loder Loder AT1	87.1 km/h	-3.10 km/h
7BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	86 km/h	-4.20 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 4.7% (4.2 Km/H).

Wet

The differences in wet braking were dramatic. The road-focused Continental CrossContact HT demonstrated its wet weather advantage with a stopping distance of 32.5m, while the Loder AT1 needed 49.0m - an alarming 16.5m difference that could be crucial in emergency situations. The non-winter rated Goodyear placed mid-pack at 40.5m. Among winter-rated AT tyres, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W performed best at 37.7m, while the BFGoodrich KO2 struggled with 45.9m, showing significant compromises in wet weather performance.

Wet Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Residual speed
1Continental CrossContact HT	32.5 m	Best	0 km/h
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	37.7 m	+5.20 m	48 km/h
3General Grabber AT3	39.7 m	+7.20 m	55 km/h
4Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	40.5 m	+8.00 m	58 km/h
4Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	40.5 m	+8.00 m	58 km/h
6BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	45.9 m	+13.40 m	70 km/h
7Loder Loder AT1	49 m	+16.50 m	75 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 50.8% (16.5 m ≈ 3.7 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Loder Loder AT1 would still be travelling at 75 km/h when the Continental CrossContact HT had stopped.

Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.

The Continental CrossContact HT again dominated wet handling with an average speed of 80.4 km/h, while the Loder AT1 was slowest at 69.6 km/h - a substantial 10.8 km/h difference. The General Grabber AT3 (76.8 km/h) and Falken Wildpeak AT3W (76.6 km/h) performed admirably for AT tyres, showing less compromise in wet handling than might be expected. The non-winter rated Goodyear achieved 75.3 km/h, demonstrating competitive wet handling despite lacking winter certification.

Wet Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	80.4 km/h	Best
2General Grabber AT3	76.8 km/h	-3.60 km/h
3Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	76.6 km/h	-3.80 km/h
4Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	75.3 km/h	-5.10 km/h
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	75 km/h	-5.40 km/h
6BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	72.1 km/h	-8.30 km/h
7Loder Loder AT1	69.6 km/h	-10.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 13.4% (10.8 Km/H).

The Continental CrossContact HT resisted aquaplaning up to 69.7 km/h, while the General Grabber AT3 began floating at 59.4 km/h - a significant 10.3 km/h difference. The Falken Wildpeak AT3W again led the AT tyres at 68.0 km/h, showing remarkable resistance to aquaplaning. The non-winter rated Goodyear struggled more in deep water, floating at 60.7 km/h.

Straight Aqua
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	69.7 km/h	Best
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	68 km/h	-1.70 km/h
3Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	66.1 km/h	-3.60 km/h
3Loder Loder AT1	66.1 km/h	-3.60 km/h
5BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	60.9 km/h	-8.80 km/h
6Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	60.7 km/h	-9.00 km/h
7General Grabber AT3	59.4 km/h	-10.30 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 14.8% (10.3 Km/H).

The Continental CrossContact HT maintained 10.32 m/s² of lateral acceleration in the wet curve, while the Loder AT1 managed only 8.62. m/s². The Falken Wildpeak AT3W nearly matched the Continental with 10.26 m/s², while the non-winter rated Goodyear achieved 6.41 m/s².

Curved Aquaplaning
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	10.32 m/sec2	Best
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	10.26 m/sec2	-0.06 m/sec2
3Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	9.39 m/sec2	-0.93 m/sec2
4Loder Loder AT1	8.62 m/sec2	-1.70 m/sec2
5BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	7.9 m/sec2	-2.42 m/sec2
6General Grabber AT3	7.77 m/sec2	-2.55 m/sec2
7Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	6.41 m/sec2	-3.91 m/sec2

The difference between best and worst was 37.9% (3.91 m/sec2).

Snow

The BFGoodrich KO2 showed its strength with a stopping distance of 26.8m, while the Bridgestone Dueler AT002 required 36.0m - a substantial 9.2m difference that represents a complete reversal of their dry performance. The Loder AT1 (27.1m) and General Grabber AT3 (27.3m) also performed well, while the Falken Wildpeak AT3W was mid-pack at 30.1m.

Snow Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	26.8 m	Best
2Loder Loder AT1	27.1 m	+0.30 m
3General Grabber AT3	27.3 m	+0.50 m
4Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	30.1 m	+3.30 m
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	36 m	+9.20 m

The difference between best and worst was 34.3% (9.2 m ≈ 2 Car Lengths).

The Loder AT1 provided the best traction at 3.75N of pulling force, while the Bridgestone Dueler AT002 generated only 3.22N - a 0.53N difference. The General Grabber AT3 performed strongly with 3.70N, followed by the BFGoodrich KO2 at 3.60N. The Falken Wildpeak AT3W was slightly behind at 3.51N, though still notably better than the Bridgestone.

Snow Traction
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Loder Loder AT1	3.75 N	Best
2General Grabber AT3	3.7 N	-0.05 N
3BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	3.6 N	-0.15 N
4Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	3.51 N	-0.24 N
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	3.22 N	-0.53 N

The difference between best and worst was 14.1% (0.53 N).

During snow handling, the BFGoodrich KO2 achieved the highest average speed at 66.5 km/h, while the Bridgestone Dueler AT002 managed only 55.7 km/h - a significant 10.8 km/h difference. The Loder AT1 performed nearly as well as the BFGoodrich at 66.2 km/h, and the General Grabber AT3 was strong at 64.7 km/h. The Falken Wildpeak AT3W showed more compromise here at 58.8 km/h.

Snow Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	66.5 km/h	Best
2Loder Loder AT1	66.2 km/h	-0.30 km/h
3General Grabber AT3	64.7 km/h	-1.80 km/h
4Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	58.8 km/h	-7.70 km/h
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	55.7 km/h	-10.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 16.2% (10.8 Km/H).

A clear pattern emerged in snow testing - the Bridgestone Dueler AT002, despite its winter rating, consistently underperformed compared to other winter-rated AT tyres. The BFGoodrich KO2 and Loder AT1 showed particular strength in snow conditions, while the General Grabber AT3 maintained consistent performance across all snow tests.

Off road

The Falken Wildpeak AT3W led the gravel handling lap with an average speed of 66.0 km/h, while the Continental CrossContact HT was slowest at 62.2 km/h - a 3.8 km/h difference showing how specialized tread patterns benefit loose surface performance. The BFGoodrich KO2 performed strongly at 65.4 km/h, followed by the Bridgestone Dueler AT002 at 65.0 km/h. The non-winter rated Goodyear matched the Loder AT1 at 64.2 km/h, showing competitive off-road capability despite its summer focus.

Gravel Handling
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	66 km/h	Best
2BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	65.4 km/h	-0.60 km/h
3Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	65 km/h	-1.00 km/h
4Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	64.2 km/h	-1.80 km/h
4Loder Loder AT1	64.2 km/h	-1.80 km/h
6General Grabber AT3	62.9 km/h	-3.10 km/h
7Continental CrossContact HT	62.2 km/h	-3.80 km/h

The difference between best and worst was 5.8% (3.8 Km/H).

Interestingly, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W had the shortest stopping distance at 11.2m, while the Bridgestone Dueler AT002 required 12.1m - a 0.9m difference. The Continental CrossContact HT performed surprisingly well at 11.7m, matching the General Grabber AT3. The BFGoodrich KO2 was strong at 11.3m, while the non-winter rated Goodyear needed 11.8m to stop.

Gravel Braking
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	11.2 m	Best
2BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	11.3 m	+0.10 m
3General Grabber AT3	11.7 m	+0.50 m
3Continental CrossContact HT	11.7 m	+0.50 m
5Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	11.8 m	+0.60 m
6Loder Loder AT1	12 m	+0.80 m
7Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	12.1 m	+0.90 m

The difference between best and worst was 8% (0.9 m).

Gravel traction was measured in m/s2, not newtons as listed. The Bridgestone Dueler AT002 generated the most traction at 4.23 m/s², while the Continental CrossContact HT produced 4.09 m/s² - a relatively small 0.14 m/s² difference. The Falken Wildpeak AT3W (4.22 m/s²) and BFGoodrich KO2 (4.20 m/s²) performed strongly, while the non-winter rated Goodyear matched the General Grabber AT3 at 4.15 m/s².

Gravel Traction
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	4.23 N	Best
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	4.22 N	-0.01 N
3BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	4.2 N	-0.03 N
3Loder Loder AT1	4.2 N	-0.03 N
5General Grabber AT3	4.15 N	-0.08 N
5Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	4.15 N	-0.08 N
7Continental CrossContact HT	4.09 N	-0.14 N

The difference between best and worst was 3.3% (0.14 N).

The General Grabber AT3 led with 1.90N of uphill dirt road traction, while the Continental CrossContact HT produced 1.78N - a 0.12N difference. The BFGoodrich KO2 and Loder AT1 tied at 1.88N, showing strong loose surface capability. The non-winter rated Goodyear impressed at 1.87N, nearly matching the best AT tyres. The Falken Wildpeak AT3W and Bridgestone Dueler AT002 tied at 1.85N.

Sand Traction
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1General Grabber AT3	1.9 N	Best
2BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	1.88 N	-0.02 N
2Loder Loder AT1	1.88 N	-0.02 N
4Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	1.87 N	-0.03 N
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	1.85 N	-0.05 N
5Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	1.85 N	-0.05 N
7Continental CrossContact HT	1.78 N	-0.12 N

The difference between best and worst was 6.3% (0.12 N).

The non-winter rated Goodyear Wrangler surprisingly led the mud traction test with 1.01N of traction, while the Continental CrossContact HT struggled with only 0.58N - a substantial 0.43N difference that clearly shows the limitations of road-focused tyres in challenging off-road conditions. Among winter-rated AT tyres, the Falken Wildpeak AT3W performed best at 0.97N, followed by the BFGoodrich KO2 at 0.95N. The General Grabber AT3 (0.94N), Loder AT1 (0.93N), and Bridgestone Dueler AT002 (0.92N) all performed similarly.

Mud Traction
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	1.01 N	Best
2Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	0.97 N	-0.04 N
3BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	0.95 N	-0.06 N
4General Grabber AT3	0.94 N	-0.07 N
5Loder Loder AT1	0.93 N	-0.08 N
6Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	0.92 N	-0.09 N
7Continental CrossContact HT	0.58 N	-0.43 N

The difference between best and worst was 42.6% (0.43 N).

Comfort

The Continental CrossContact HT was quietest at 70.5 dB, while the BFGoodrich KO2 and Falken Wildpeak AT3W were loudest at 73.4 dB - a 2.9 dB difference that would be noticeable in daily driving. The non-winter rated Goodyear impressed with 70.7 dB, nearly matching the road-focused Continental. Among winter-rated AT tyres, the General Grabber AT3 was notably quiet at 70.9 dB, while the Bridgestone Dueler AT002 generated 72.9 dB.

Noise
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best
1Continental CrossContact HT	70.5 dB	Best
2Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	70.7 dB	+0.20 dB
3General Grabber AT3	70.9 dB	+0.40 dB
4Loder Loder AT1	71.9 dB	+1.40 dB
5Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	72.9 dB	+2.40 dB
6BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	73.4 dB	+2.90 dB
6Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	73.4 dB	+2.90 dB

The difference between best and worst was 4.1% (2.9 dB).

Value

The Continental CrossContact HT was most efficient at 8.0 kg/t, while the BFGoodrich KO2 required significantly more energy at 10.7 kg/t - a 2.7 kg/t difference that would notably impact fuel consumption. The Loder AT1 showed surprising efficiency at 8.9 kg/t, followed by the Falken Wildpeak AT3W and Bridgestone Dueler AT002 both at 9.0 kg/t. The non-winter rated Goodyear was relatively inefficient at 9.8 kg/t, while the General Grabber AT3 sat in the middle at 9.3 kg/t.

Rolling Resistance
Position / Tyre	Result	Gap to best	Extra fuel / year
1Continental CrossContact HT	8 kg/t	Best	£0
2Loder Loder AT1	8.9 kg/t	+0.90 kg/t	£50
3Bridgestone Dueler All Terrain AT002	9 kg/t	+1.00 kg/t	£55
3Falken Wildpeak AT AT3WA	9 kg/t	+1.00 kg/t	£55
5General Grabber AT3	9.3 kg/t	+1.30 kg/t	£72
6Goodyear Wrangler All Terrain Adventure	9.8 kg/t	+1.80 kg/t	£99
7BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2	10.7 kg/t	+2.70 kg/t	£149

The difference between best and worst was 33.8% (2.7 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the BFGoodrich All Terrain TA KO2 uses about 103 L (£149) more fuel than the Continental CrossContact HT.

Adjust the assumptions

Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions.

Petrol/Diesel Electric

Annual Mileage

19,000 km

km (L)

miles (US gal)

Fuel Price

£1.45/L

GBP (£)

EUR (€)

USD ($)

Set my vehicle consumption

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Results

Key Patterns Across All Tests

The Continental CrossContact HT dominated on-road tests but struggled off-road, particularly in mud, demonstrating the clear compromises between road and off-road performance.
The Falken Wildpeak AT3W proved to be the most well-rounded AT tyre, showing strong performance across all conditions without major weaknesses, particularly impressing in wet conditions.
The BFGoodrich KO2 showed a clear split personality - struggling in wet and dry road conditions but excelling in snow and off-road tests.
The non-winter rated Goodyear Wrangler Adventure surprised with strong off-road capability and good road manners, though its lack of winter rating limits its all-season usability.
The General Grabber AT3 maintained consistent performance across all tests without any major weaknesses, though also without dominating any particular area.
The Bridgestone Dueler AT002 favored on-road performance but showed unexpected weaknesses in snow despite its winter rating.
The Loder AT1 demonstrated particular strength in snow conditions and reasonable efficiency, though its wet performance was concerning.
In wet conditions, the differences between road-focused and AT tyres were most dramatic, particularly in aquaplaning resistance and braking distances.
Rolling resistance and noise levels generally correlated with the tyres' off-road capability, with more aggressive tread patterns typically resulting in higher rolling resistance and noise.

Falken Wildpeak A/T AT3 WA was one of the most well-rounded tyres in the test. Dry road performance showed good handling characteristics and steering response, though braking distances were slightly longer than the best. Where it really impressed was in wet conditions - it proved to be the safest AT tyre in the wet with good braking, strong aquaplaning resistance and predictable handling. Snow performance was good across the board with strong grip levels in all disciplines. Offroad capability was excellent, particularly standing out in mud and on gravel surfaces where it showed class-leading grip. Rolling resistance was reasonable for an AT tyre at 9.0 kg/t. While noise levels were on the higher side at 73.4 dB, comfort levels were good with effective bump absorption. This tyre ultimately won the offroad category and proved to be one of the most versatile options tested.

Dry97.1%

Wet93.9%

Snow90.2%

Off road98.6%

Comfort96.1%

Rolling Resistance88.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 7	43.9 m	+1.60 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 7	88.2 km/h	-2.00 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 7	37.7 m	+5.20 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 7	76.6 km/h	-3.80 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	2^nd / 7	6.71 m/s	-0.13 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	2^nd / 7	68 km/h	-1.70 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	2^nd / 7	10.26 m/sec2	-0.06 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	4^th / 5	30.1 m	+3.30 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	4^th / 5	3.51 N	-0.24 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 5	58.8 km/h	-7.70 km/h
Gravel HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 7	66 km/h	Best in this discipline
Gravel BrakingLower is better	1^st / 7	11.2 m	Best in this discipline
Gravel TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 7	4.22 N	-0.01 N
Sand TractionHigher is better	5^th / 7	1.85 N	-0.05 N
Mud TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 7	0.97 N	-0.04 N
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 7	73.4 dB	+2.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 7	9 kg/t	+1.00 kg/t

EU Label: D/C/71
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 17.08 kgs
Tread: 10.4 mm
Price: 154.00

Continental Cross-Contact H/T stands apart as the road-focused option. It demonstrated the best dry road performance with excellent handling, precise steering and strong braking. Wet performance was outstanding across all tests including class-leading aquaplaning resistance. Snow performance wasn't tested as this isn't a winter-rated tyre. Offroad performance was limited compared to the AT tyres, particularly struggling in mud and on loose surfaces. Rolling resistance was very good at 8.0 kg/t. It was the quietest tyre tested at 70.5 dB with excellent comfort and minimal road noise. The clear choice for those who rarely venture offroad and prioritize on-road safety and comfort.

Dry99.1%

Wet100%

Off road87.6%

Comfort100%

Rolling Resistance100%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 7	43.1 m	+0.80 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 7	90.2 km/h	Best in this discipline
Wet BrakingLower is better	1^st / 7	32.5 m	Best in this discipline
Wet HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 7	80.4 km/h	Best in this discipline
Wet CircleHigher is better	1^st / 7	6.84 m/s	Best in this discipline
Straight AquaHigher is better	1^st / 7	69.7 km/h	Best in this discipline
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	1^st / 7	10.32 m/sec2	Best in this discipline
Gravel HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 7	62.2 km/h	-3.80 km/h
Gravel BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 7	11.7 m	+0.50 m
Gravel TractionHigher is better	7^th / 7	4.09 N	-0.14 N
Sand TractionHigher is better	7^th / 7	1.78 N	-0.12 N
Mud TractionHigher is better	7^th / 7	0.58 N	-0.43 N
NoiseLower is better	1^st / 7	70.5 dB	Best in this discipline
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	1^st / 7	8 kg/t	Best in this discipline

EU Label: D/C/73
Weight: 15.56 kgs
Tread: 9.5 mm
Price: 195.00

General Grabber AT3 proved to be a strong all-round performer and the overall winner for year-round use. Dry performance was decent with average braking distances and stable handling. Wet road behavior was notably good, with safe, predictable handling characteristics and good braking performance despite some weakness in aquaplaning resistance. Snow performance was excellent, nearly matching the best in all test categories. Offroad performance showed some variation - very strong in mud and on dirt tracks, though less impressive on gravel surfaces. Rolling resistance was slightly high at 9.3 kg/t. One of its standout features was refinement - notably quiet at 70.9 dB with very good comfort levels and minimal vibration. This combination of good performance across all conditions with refined road manners made it a compelling overall package.

Dry96.3%

Wet88.9%

Snow98%

Off road96.4%

Comfort99.4%

Rolling Resistance86%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	4^th / 7	44.4 m	+2.10 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 7	87.8 km/h	-2.40 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 7	39.7 m	+7.20 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 7	76.8 km/h	-3.60 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	4^th / 7	6.41 m/s	-0.43 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	7^th / 7	59.4 km/h	-10.30 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	6^th / 7	7.77 m/sec2	-2.55 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 5	27.3 m	+0.50 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 5	3.7 N	-0.05 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 5	64.7 km/h	-1.80 km/h
Gravel HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 7	62.9 km/h	-3.10 km/h
Gravel BrakingLower is better	3^rd / 7	11.7 m	+0.50 m
Gravel TractionHigher is better	5^th / 7	4.15 N	-0.08 N
Sand TractionHigher is better	1^st / 7	1.9 N	Best in this discipline
Mud TractionHigher is better	4^th / 7	0.94 N	-0.07 N
NoiseLower is better	3^rd / 7	70.9 dB	+0.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	5^th / 7	9.3 kg/t	+1.30 kg/t

EU Label: D/D/73
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 16.44 kgs
Tread: 10 mm
Price: 187.00

Goodyear Wrangler All-Terrain Adventure struck an interesting balance as a summer-specific AT tyre. Dry road performance was good with predictable handling and responsive steering. Wet performance was good overall despite some weakness in aquaplaning resistance. Snow performance wasn't tested as this isn't a winter-rated tyre. Offroad capability was impressive, particularly in mud where its harder compound showed excellent grip - often better than the winter-rated AT tyres. Rolling resistance was relatively high at 9.8 kg/t. The tyre proved remarkably refined with low noise levels at 70.7 dB and very good comfort. A strong choice for summer-only use where occasional offroad capability is needed.

Dry96.8%

Wet87.1%

Off road97.7%

Comfort99.7%

Rolling Resistance81.6%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (14)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	5^th / 7	44.6 m	+2.30 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 7	89 km/h	-1.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 7	40.5 m	+8.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 7	75.3 km/h	-5.10 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	4^th / 7	6.41 m/s	-0.43 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	6^th / 7	60.7 km/h	-9.00 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	7^th / 7	6.41 m/sec2	-3.91 m/sec2
Gravel HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 7	64.2 km/h	-1.80 km/h
Gravel BrakingLower is better	5^th / 7	11.8 m	+0.60 m
Gravel TractionHigher is better	5^th / 7	4.15 N	-0.08 N
Sand TractionHigher is better	4^th / 7	1.87 N	-0.03 N
Mud TractionHigher is better	1^st / 7	1.01 N	Best in this discipline
NoiseLower is better	2^nd / 7	70.7 dB	+0.20 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	6^th / 7	9.8 kg/t	+1.80 kg/t

EU Label: D/D/73
Weight: 16.9 kgs
Tread: 9.8 mm
Price: 213.00

Bridgestone Dueler A/T 002 proved to be one of the more road-focused AT tyres. On dry roads it delivered the best braking performance in the test along with good handling stability and steering response. Wet performance was commendably good with reasonable braking distances and safe, predictable handling characteristics. Its main weakness showed in snow conditions where it fell behind other winter-rated tyres in the test across all metrics. Offroad performance was decent overall though it wasn't class-leading, showing particular weakness in muddy conditions. The tyre's strengths lie in its efficiency - rolling resistance was very good at 7.8 kg/t. While relatively loud at 72.9 dB, it offered average comfort levels and good bump absorption. A solid choice for those who spend most time on roads but want occasional offroad capability.

Dry99.4%

Wet90.1%

Snow81.1%

Off road95.9%

Comfort96.7%

Rolling Resistance88.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	1^st / 7	42.3 m	Best in this discipline
Dry HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 7	89.2 km/h	-1.00 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	4^th / 7	40.5 m	+8.00 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 7	75 km/h	-5.40 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	3^rd / 7	6.53 m/s	-0.31 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 7	66.1 km/h	-3.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	3^rd / 7	9.39 m/sec2	-0.93 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	5^th / 5	36 m	+9.20 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	5^th / 5	3.22 N	-0.53 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	5^th / 5	55.7 km/h	-10.80 km/h
Gravel HandlingHigher is better	3^rd / 7	65 km/h	-1.00 km/h
Gravel BrakingLower is better	7^th / 7	12.1 m	+0.90 m
Gravel TractionHigher is better	1^st / 7	4.23 N	Best in this discipline
Sand TractionHigher is better	5^th / 7	1.85 N	-0.05 N
Mud TractionHigher is better	6^th / 7	0.92 N	-0.09 N
NoiseLower is better	5^th / 7	72.9 dB	+2.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	3^rd / 7	9 kg/t	+1.00 kg/t

EU Label: C/C/72
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 16.3 kgs
Tread: 10.2 mm
Price: 187.00

Loder AT1 showed some significant contrasts in performance. Dry road behavior was compromised with longer braking distances, sluggish steering response and less stable handling during emergency maneuvers. Wet performance was concerning with long braking distances and unpredictable handling that alternated between understeer and oversteer. However, it delivered the best snow performance in the test with excellent grip across all metrics. Its high load rating of 1320kg per tyre makes it suitable for heavier motorhomes. Offroad capability was good, particularly in mud where its softer compound helped generate grip. Rolling resistance was reasonable at 8.9 kg/t. Noise levels were moderate at 71.9 dB, though comfort was slightly firm with some impact harshness over bumps. Best suited for winter use and heavier vehicles.

Dry94.8%

Wet82.4%

Snow99.5%

Off road96.2%

Comfort98.1%

Rolling Resistance89.9%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	7^th / 7	45.5 m	+3.20 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 7	87.1 km/h	-3.10 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	7^th / 7	49 m	+16.50 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 7	69.6 km/h	-10.80 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	6^th / 7	6.24 m/s	-0.60 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	3^rd / 7	66.1 km/h	-3.60 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	4^th / 7	8.62 m/sec2	-1.70 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 5	27.1 m	+0.30 m
Snow TractionHigher is better	1^st / 5	3.75 N	Best in this discipline
Snow HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 5	66.2 km/h	-0.30 km/h
Gravel HandlingHigher is better	4^th / 7	64.2 km/h	-1.80 km/h
Gravel BrakingLower is better	6^th / 7	12 m	+0.80 m
Gravel TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 7	4.2 N	-0.03 N
Sand TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 7	1.88 N	-0.02 N
Mud TractionHigher is better	5^th / 7	0.93 N	-0.08 N
NoiseLower is better	4^th / 7	71.9 dB	+1.40 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	2^nd / 7	8.9 kg/t	+0.90 kg/t

EU Label: C/D/73
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 18.6 kgs
Tread: 18.6 mm
Price: 260.00

BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2 produces some concerning results on paved roads. Its dry performance showed significant weaknesses with long braking distances, sluggish steering response and unstable behavior during emergency maneuvers. Wet performance was particularly problematic, with the longest braking distances in the test and poor cornering grip, making it one of the least safe tyres on wet roads. However, it redeemed itself with excellent snow performance, providing strong traction, good braking and stable handling. Offroad capabilities were impressive, especially in mud and on gravel where it showed good bite and predictable behavior. The downsides were significant though - it had the highest rolling resistance in the test at 10.7 kg/t which will impact fuel economy, and was also the loudest tyre tested at 73.4 dB. Comfort was notably poor with noticeable vibrations transmitted through the steering wheel.

Dry95%

Wet83.4%

Snow98.8%

Off road98.1%

Comfort96.1%

Rolling Resistance74.8%

Category scores (% of best)

All discipline results (17)

Discipline positions compare the ranked tyres in this test, not the whole market. These are individual measurements, not weighted overall scores.

Test	Position in discipline	Result	Gap to best
Dry BrakingLower is better	6^th / 7	44.7 m	+2.40 m
Dry HandlingHigher is better	7^th / 7	86 km/h	-4.20 km/h
Wet BrakingLower is better	6^th / 7	45.9 m	+13.40 m
Wet HandlingHigher is better	6^th / 7	72.1 km/h	-8.30 km/h
Wet CircleHigher is better	7^th / 7	6.2 m/s	-0.64 m/s
Straight AquaHigher is better	5^th / 7	60.9 km/h	-8.80 km/h
Curved AquaplaningHigher is better	5^th / 7	7.9 m/sec2	-2.42 m/sec2
Snow BrakingLower is better	1^st / 5	26.8 m	Best in this discipline
Snow TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 5	3.6 N	-0.15 N
Snow HandlingHigher is better	1^st / 5	66.5 km/h	Best in this discipline
Gravel HandlingHigher is better	2^nd / 7	65.4 km/h	-0.60 km/h
Gravel BrakingLower is better	2^nd / 7	11.3 m	+0.10 m
Gravel TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 7	4.2 N	-0.03 N
Sand TractionHigher is better	2^nd / 7	1.88 N	-0.02 N
Mud TractionHigher is better	3^rd / 7	0.95 N	-0.06 N
NoiseLower is better	6^th / 7	73.4 dB	+2.90 dB
Rolling ResistanceLower is better	7^th / 7	10.7 kg/t	+2.70 kg/t

EU Label: E/B/74
3PMSF: Yes
Weight: 19.98 kgs
Tread: 19.98 mm
Price: 291.00

Discussion

11 comments

Steve Mar 29, 2026 archived

Was this the Falken AT3WA, not the AT3?

#10589
1. TyreReviews Steve Mar 29, 2026 archived
  
  You're most likely correct as it's an EU test
  
  #10590
  1. Steve TyreReviews Mar 30, 2026 archived
    
    Cheers Jon, are you able to update the test with the correct one?
    
    #10594
    1. TyreReviews Steve Apr 1, 2026 archived
      
      done
      
      #10596
Mark Greenhoff Sep 22, 2025 archived

Hi - how does the Continental Cross Contact H/T compare with the equivalent Continental/Pirelli summer tyres off road please?
Thanks for all the awesome testing you do. Keep up the epic work!!

#10305
1. TyreReviews Mark Greenhoff Sep 26, 2025 archived
  
  There's limited tests out there, have you checked to see if TireRack have tested it? I'm sure it's a very good tyre, conti rarely miss.
  
  #10317
İlke Nov 20, 2024 archived

What is the difference between the falken wildpeak at3wa model and at3w model? was at3wa or at3w used in the test?

#9837
1. TyreReviews İlke Nov 20, 2024 archived
  
  As far as I understand the A model is an OE fitment so should not have been tested.
  
  #9839
  1. erpsysscg TyreReviews Nov 21, 2024 archived
    
    AT3W is not sold in Europe. AT3WA is OE fitment for US, but only option that can be bought in Europe.
    Please, confirm which tire is tested.
    
    #9843
    1. TyreReviews erpsysscg Nov 23, 2024 archived
      
      You are correct it was the A version tested. I'll get the site updated when I can.
      
      #9849
      1. Andrii Gumennyi TyreReviews Feb 22, 2025 archived
        
        Thank you both for this clarification. It seems to be a no-brainer because of its price and test results
        
        #9971

Menu

Tyre shortlist

The evidence behind the verdict

Test setup & methodology

Recorded test conditions

Dry

Wet

Snow

Off road

Comfort

Value

Results

Cross-check this test