Menu

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004

POTENZA Adrenalin RE004, a street performance tyre, is designed to provide excellent handling and instantaneous response when taking corners and at straight-line driving.

7.9
Tyre Reviews Score Based on User Reviews
Limited Confidence View Breakdown
Dry Grip
88%
Wet Grip
78%
Road Feedback
86%
Handling
89%
Wear
74%
Comfort
76%
Buy again
88%
21 Reviews
82% Average
187,700 miles driven
Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004

Summer Premium
BETA
7.9 / 10
Based on User Reviews · Limited Confidence · Updated 30 Jan 2026

The Tyre Reviews Score is the most comprehensive tyre scoring system available. It aggregates professional test data from multiple independent publications, user reviews, and consistency analysis using Bayesian statistical methods, weighted normalisation, and recency-adjusted scoring to produce a single, reliable performance rating.

Learn more about our methodology
Score Components
Professional Tests
Weight: 80%
Tests: 0
Publications: 0
User Reviews
Weight: 15%
Reviews: 21
Avg Rating: 82.5%
Min Required: 5
Consistency
Weight: 5%
Score Std Dev: 2.37
History Points: 10
Methodology & Configuration
Scoring Process
  1. Collect Test Data: Gather results from professional tyre tests across multiple publications. Minimum 1 test(s) required.
  2. Normalize Positions: Convert test positions to percentile scores using exponential weighting (factor: 1.2).
  3. Apply Recency Weighting: More recent tests are weighted higher with a decay rate of 0.95.
  4. Incorporate User Reviews: Factor in user review data (minimum 5 reviews). Weight: 15%.
  5. Bayesian Smoothing: Apply Bayesian prior (score: 7, weight: 1.5) to prevent extreme scores with limited data.
  6. Calculate Final Score: Combine all components using normalization factor of 1.1. Max score with limited data: 9.5.
Component Weights
Test Data
80%
User Reviews
15%
Consistency
5%
All Configuration Parameters
ParameterValueDescription
safety_weight 0.7 Weight multiplier for safety-related metrics
performance_weight 0.55 Weight multiplier for performance metrics
comfort_weight 0.4 Weight multiplier for comfort metrics
value_weight 0.45 Weight multiplier for value-for-money metrics
user_reviews_weight 0.15 How much user reviews contribute to the final score
test_data_weight 0.8 How much professional test data contributes to the final score
consistency_weight 0.05 How much score consistency contributes to the final score
recency_decay_rate 0.95 Rate at which older test results lose influence (higher = slower decay)
min_test_count 1 Minimum number of professional tests required
min_review_count 5 Minimum number of user reviews required
score_version 1.8 Current version of the scoring algorithm
score_normalization_factor 1.1 Factor used to normalize raw scores to the 0-10 scale
confidence_factor_weight 0.2 How much data confidence affects the final score
position_penalty_weight 0.2 Penalty applied for poor test positions
gap_penalty_threshold 8 Score gap (%) that triggers additional penalties
min_metrics_count 2 Minimum number of test metrics needed per test
limited_data_threshold 2 Number of tests below which data is considered limited
single_test_penalty 0.1 Score multiplier when only one test is available
critical_metric_penalty 0.7 Penalty for poor performance on critical safety metrics
critical_metric_threshold 70 Score below which a critical metric penalty applies
position_exponential_factor 1.2 Exponent used to amplify position-based scoring
position_exponential_threshold 0.9 Position percentile below which exponential scoring applies
gap_multiplier_critical 3 Multiplier for critical gap penalties
max_category_weight 2 Maximum weight any single category can have
max_score_limited_data 9.5 Score cap when data is limited
bayesian_prior_weight 1.5 Weight of the Bayesian prior in smoothing
bayesian_prior_score 7 Prior score used for Bayesian smoothing
evidence_test_multiplier 1.9 Multiplier for test evidence in confidence calculation
evidence_metric_divisor 3 Divisor for metric count in evidence calculation
evidence_review_divisor 10 Divisor for review count in evidence calculation
All Tests

Sorry, we don't currently have any magazine tyre tests for the Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004

Questions and Answers for the Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004

Ask a question
February 11, 2022

I would you to help me to choose between the Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 and Michelin Pilot Sport 4; all in size 205/55/16 for my Kia Cerato (Forte).

While we don't get the the RE004 in Europe, the data I've seen show the Michelin having much higher wet grip so would be my choice.
Ask a question

We will never publish or share your email address

captcha

To verify you are human please type the word you see in the box below.

Review Summary

Based on 20 user reviews

Drivers overwhelmingly praise the Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 for its sharp steering response, strong dry grip, and stable, predictable cornering, with many noting improved wet performance over the RE003. Comfort is acceptable for a performance tyre and value for money is frequently highlighted. A minority report higher road noise (especially on rough surfaces or as the tyre wears) and faster tread wear. Overall sentiment is strongly positive for spirited daily driving.

Strengths
  • Strong dry grip
  • Sharp steering response and feedback
  • Stable and predictable cornering
  • Improved wet grip vs re003 (good in rain)
  • Good value for money
  • Acceptable daily comfort for a performance tyre
Areas for Improvement
  • Higher road noise (especially as they wear or on rough surfaces)
  • Faster tread wear for some users

Top 3 Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 Reviews

Given 84% while driving a Honda Civic 1.5T (215/50 R17) on mostly country roads for 34,000 average miles
Original tyre is conti MC5 which is very noisy. After replace with RE004, road noise below at speed 80km/h have greatly reduced and a lot more comfortable. Enjoy every corner with these tyres . On the wet road , although it can handle the condition in a ok manner, but the feedback in wet is abit soft will feel like lack of confident. Overall is a very good tyres for daily drive to minor spirit drive.
Ask a question | Helpful 818
December 4, 2024
Given 79% while driving a Honda Jazz (195/55 R15) on a combination of roads for 18,600 average miles
I am a driver who occasionally drives aggressively on city roads, and I was pleasantly surprised by the response it gave me. The performance on dry roads was outstanding, and I could confidently push the limits of every curve on mountain roads. The performance on rainy days/wet roads was also acceptable, and it was not easy to slip. The tires I used before were BFGoodrich's Advantage Touring 185/60/15, and the difference between the two is really huge! Anyway, in this price range, the RE004 is really a very clear choice
December 8, 2024
Given 73% while driving a Toyota 2006 Avalon (225/40 R18) on mostly country roads for 15,000 spirited miles
I bought these for my 2006 Toyota Crown and they were immediately a huge improvement from the Hankook k-energy eco tires I had. Dry grip is amazing and since my car is 4WD breaking traction is basically impossible even though I'm rear wheel biased. The road feel is honestly the best I've ever had, however it does make the driving very involved. The noise is a bit higher than the tires I had but comfort is acceptable. They do not handle portholes at all but that's my fault as I'm running very low profiles. Wet grip is good and predictable, you can tell just how much grip you have left and they don't just snap.

I really love these, save for the terrible wear rate, I'm definitely buying again.
July 8, 2024
Have you driven on the Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 tyre?

Have YOU got experience with the Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004? Help millions of other tyre buyers

Review your Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 >

Latest Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 Reviews

Initial Impressions Review
Given 90% while driving a BMW 3 series (195/55 R15) on for 6,000 miles
The RE004 has become one of my favourite tyres —this is the second car I’ve run it on (after the E39), and the fourth car I’ve fitted with a Potenza Adrenalin series tyre. It suits the E30’s character really well. My car equipped with koni sport dampers and h&r sport and z3 rack swap. I need quite a good enthusiast road tire with no warm up need on my small 15” size rim. The first thing I notice is the improve balance. These tyres keep the car feeling light and eager.

Compared to the older RE003, the sidewall isn’t quite as brick-stiff and as razor shard, yet it actually delivers a touch more outright dry grip. It’s still very much a stiff-carcass performance tyre, so the steering stays direct and response is immediate. Mid-corner stability is strong, and it is very predictable it is at the limit—it slides progressively and never catches me out. On the E30, the RE004 also cleans up that last bit of understeer, especially versus the old Turanza AR-10 which always has a little bit understeer on turn in. With the Koni/H&R setup already tightening things up, the RE004 complements the car without making the ride punishing.

In the wet, it’s a step up from the RE003, but it’s not a rain specialist. Ride comfort is also a bit nicer than the RE003, which makes it easier to live with day-to-day.
January 20, 2026
Given 93% while driving a Honda Civic 1.5T (215/50 R17) on a combination of roads for 30,000 spirited miles
Been using since March 2021 with mileage 45K and still counting. The tread wear 220 is absolutely bullshit for me. The mileage surprise me. The dry handling is absolutely fabulous. U can feel the road and when corner it give u a lot of confident. One cons for this tyre is the noice level. Really very noisy no matter how the road conditions is. As for the wet I don’t drive fast and hard corner during rainy days. Definitely a very good tyre which surprise me.
Ps: I do tyre rotation every 12k km.
January 17, 2024
Check out how the BEST all seasons tyres perform against premium summer and winter tyres!
Given 81% while driving a BMW (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 1,000 spirited miles
This is my 2nd RE004 purchase (first was on the Lotus Elise, see review below). The best feature for this tyre is the superb handling during fast corners. On both cars, there's an increase stability taking high speed sweeping corners even on the heavier E36. Dry grip is good. Wet grip is good when driving on a reasonable quick pace. Noise and comfort level is ok.
December 24, 2023
Given 81% while driving a BMW (225/45 R17) on mostly motorways for 1,000 spirited miles
This is my 2nd RE004 purchase (first was on the Lotus Elise, see review below). The best feature for this tyre is the superb handling during fast corners. On both cars, there's an increase stability taking high speed sweeping corners even on the heavier E36. Dry grip is good. Wet grip is good when driving on a reasonable quick pace. Noise and comfort level is ok.
December 22, 2023
Given 84% while driving a Lotus Elise (225/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 4,000 spirited miles
Very good street performance tyre option for those with 17" rims and below, and want to move away from track tyres. I been using AD08R for years but decided to switch to a less track focus tyre - I do less track days now and want something safer when it rains. Still can do my usual fast road stuff with the RE004 when dry, and I can push the car more when wet compared to a track tyre. Not sure about tyre noise as my engine/exhaust is loud. Really nice road tyres to have.
June 30, 2023
Given 82% while driving a Volkswagen Golf GTI 7.5 (225/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 1,000 spirited miles
My car came with Michelin PS5 but I swapped them out for RE004 after a week as I’ve always felt that Michelin’s PS series of tyres were too soft and vague.

Immediately, I noticed a difference in terms of steering feedback and turn-in response. Overall grip is also slightly improved in the dry. In the wet, grip feels similar on a FWD hot hatch. The drawback is that the ride is slightly harsher but comfort is not my priority so that’s an acceptable trade off.

Still too early to comment on wear but I expect the RE004 to wear faster than the PS5 for sure. They are slightly cheaper to replace though. Overall, will recommend this tyre to anyone who enjoys driving and will definitely consider buying again.
June 24, 2023
Given 66% while driving a Honda City (215/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 12,000 average miles
Over 10k km mileage in, I would say the wet and dry grip and handling are superb. However, the tyre wear is the worst I ever used. Only about 12k km, the sign of tyre wear is significant. With that, the noise level is unbearable at low speed on slightly rough roads, even more unbearable at 110kmh on highway. Sometimes it’s difficult to enjoy music and have conversation at those situations. Big thumbs up on its handling and grip (literally no complain and it’s better than PS5) at this price point, but the high noise level and high wear rate made me walk away from this tyre. IMHO, if you like spirited driving and fast cornering with confidence and noise level and wear rate are your least concerns, this is the tyre for you.
June 9, 2023
Given 80% while driving a Subaru Forester 2.0 XT (235/50 R18) on a combination of roads for 8,000 spirited miles
Any car is a sports car if you're daring enough. Replaced my Potenza S007As with these as they were worn and I couldn't wait for stock to arrive since the distributer couldn't give me an estimated time. So I got this as its the next closest thing. Price to performance ratio is good considering how cheap I got the set for though its made in Indonesia not Japan like the S007A. Handles well at the limit of cornering and I still feel there's more to give as they haven't started to really audibly protest yet. Rapid changes in direction feel responsive and planted despite the 50 aspect ratio, it doesn't feel like it's "tripping over itself" thanks to the reinforced shoulder blocks and sidewall. 10/10 will buy again if my first choice isn't available when the time comes.
April 10, 2023
Given 87% while driving a Suzuki swift sport (195/50 R16) on a combination of roads for 15,000 spirited miles
Good value for money. 195/50/16 is an odd size. Fantastic that Bridgestone makes these. Very quiet for a performance type of tire. Good grip as the re003 but much better wet than before. Dry grip is a good as ever. Wet grip only gives up a little from dry. Wear is a tad high, but asymmetric design allows cross rotation to even the wear, so not a huge problem. I intend to fit RE004 to my other car. Can’t be happier.
January 1, 2023
Given 86% while driving a Honda City (215/45 R17) on a combination of roads for 0 average miles
Been using Michelin tires for many years from Primacy to Pilot Sport Series. Wanted to get PS5 as replacement, but it's over budget for me. Friendly boss recommended Bridgestone RE004. RE004 has a stiff sidewall and the handling really surprised me. Dry and wet are better than PS4 and its braking power is awesome! My only small complaint is the noise level, it's noisier than Michelin tires I've used in the past. My family has also complaint about the noise level. Due to the fact that it has a stiff sidewall, the road feedback is stronger as well. Overall, the handling is superb with only complain of higher noise level. Recommended for people who loves spirited driving.
December 28, 2022
Given 83% while driving a BMW 520i (245/45 R19) on a combination of roads for 3,100 average miles
Using front 245/40/19 & rear 275/35/19 Satisfied with the performance it gave. Price is reasonable, Dry and wet grip both good, Suitable for daily driving
July 17, 2022
Given 90% while driving a Audi A4 (245/40 R18) on a combination of roads for 8,500 spirited miles
After 2yrs of using re003, changed to Ps4. Was disappointed. Sidewall softer than Re003 but not as comfortable. The re003 absorbs road harshness like butter but still grips n handles better. A year later change to Ps5. Still almost the same. Abit more comfort. But steering is vague. Sidewall soft n can feel road harshness. End up changing to the Re004. A world of diff again. Harder sidewall which makes turn more fun n sharp. At the same time road harshness was absorbed like butter. So overall, Re004 quieter, more comfort n better steering response than the Ps5. Not to mention cheaper too. Grip i think is about the same. If u hv to choose, go for the Re004.
June 3, 2022