The 2022 Auto Bild Allrad SUV tyre test tested ten SUV / 4x4 winter tyres in the popular 235/55 R18 size, and included a reference summer tyre.
As in the Tyre Reviews winter tyre test, there was a tie for first place with the Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+ SUV and Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV tying for the win.
Both tyres had slightly different approaches to grip, the Goodyear the more balanced tyre, only winning the wet handling test but scoring well in nearly all other tests, where as the Michelin won every snow test but performed relatively poorly in the wet testing.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 performed well again, it's a tyre that seems to perform well in all tests with its only real weakness the worst dry braking on test, and the Vredestein Wintrac Pro placed fourth with an excellent wet braking and snow grip result.
Dry
While the VW Tiguan test vehicle isn't the heaviest SUV on test, the summer tyre had a significant lead in dry braking, with the Michelin, Goodyear and surprisingly the budget Tristar being the best of the winter tyres.
Dry Braking
Spread: 6.90 M (18%)|Avg: 43.97 M
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre
The summer tyre also led the way in dry handling, with the Tristar the best of the winter tyres. In Tyre Reviews own testing we've seen budget winter tyres perform well in the dry then perform poorly in the wet and snow tests.
Dry Handling
Spread: 3.10 Km/H (3.2%)|Avg: 94.78 Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Reference Summer
96.80 Km/H
Tristar Snowpower UHP
95.70 Km/H
Toyo Snowprox S954 SUV
95.30 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
95.20 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
94.60 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
94.50 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
94.50 Km/H
Nokian WR SUV 4
94.10 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
94.10 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plu
94.10 Km/H
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
93.70 Km/H
Wet
Wet braking had the Tristar performing as expected, with nearly 12 meters between the best and worst winter tyres from 100 kph! The summer tyre was mid pack, the test temperature was unknown.
Wet Braking
Spread: 11.00 M (26.4%)|Avg: 44.25 M
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre
Wet handling was led by Goodyear, with the summer tyre this time placing second overall.
Wet Handling
Spread: 4.80 Km/H (5.5%)|Avg: 85.83 Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plu
86.90 Km/H
Reference Summer
86.80 Km/H
Toyo Snowprox S954 SUV
86.60 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
86.60 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
86.20 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
86.20 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
86.00 Km/H
Nokian WR SUV 4
86.00 Km/H
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
85.70 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
85.00 Km/H
Tristar Snowpower UHP
82.10 Km/H
The Falken HS01 SUV performed well in the straight aquaplaning test.
Straight Aqua
Spread: 10.50 Km/H (13.4%)|Avg: 73.94 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
78.50 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
77.30 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
75.60 Km/H
Reference Summer
75.00 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
74.60 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plu
74.40 Km/H
Toyo Snowprox S954 SUV
74.30 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
74.00 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
73.00 Km/H
Tristar Snowpower UHP
68.60 Km/H
Nokian WR SUV 4
68.00 Km/H
Snow
Shockingly the summer tyre didn't perform in the snow braking testing, taking twice as long to stop the test vehicle than even the worst winter tyre, which was again the budget which took 5 meters longer to stop the V Tiguan SUV than the Michelin.
Snow Braking
Spread: 37.90 M (149.8%)|Avg: 30.45 M
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Snow Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre
The traction test showed a similar story to snow braking.
Snow Traction
Spread: 2355.00 N (82.8%)|Avg: 2397.55 N
Pulling Force in Newtons (Higher is better)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
2845.00 N
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
2698.00 N
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
2668.00 N
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plu
2638.00 N
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
2590.00 N
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
2580.00 N
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
2580.00 N
Nokian WR SUV 4
2507.00 N
Toyo Snowprox S954 SUV
2455.00 N
Tristar Snowpower UHP
2322.00 N
Reference Summer
490.00 N
Michelin rounded out its excellent snow performance with another win.
Snow Handling
Spread: 5.40 Km/H (10%)|Avg: 51.64 Km/H
Snow handling average speed (Higher is better)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
54.00 Km/H
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
53.10 Km/H
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
52.10 Km/H
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
52.10 Km/H
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
52.10 Km/H
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
51.70 Km/H
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plu
51.60 Km/H
Nokian WR SUV 4
51.00 Km/H
Toyo Snowprox S954 SUV
50.10 Km/H
Tristar Snowpower UHP
48.60 Km/H
Environment
The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV was also the quietest winter tyre on test, with five of the winter tyres proving to be quieter than the reference summer tyre.
Noise
Spread: 4.20 dB (6.1%)|Avg: 70.95 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
68.70 dB
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plu
69.40 dB
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
70.00 dB
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
70.00 dB
Nokian WR SUV 4
71.00 dB
Reference Summer
71.40 dB
Toyo Snowprox S954 SUV
71.50 dB
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
71.60 dB
Tristar Snowpower UHP
71.90 dB
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
72.00 dB
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
72.90 dB
The summer tyre had the lowest rolling resistance on test, narrowly beating the Continental.
Rolling Resistance
Spread: 2.41 kg / t (36.8%)|Avg: 7.91 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
Reference Summer
6.55 kg / t
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
6.83 kg / t
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
7.11 kg / t
Nokian WR SUV 4
7.43 kg / t
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
8.02 kg / t
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Plu
8.03 kg / t
Tristar Snowpower UHP
8.09 kg / t
Vredestein Wintrac Pro
8.51 kg / t
Falken Eurowinter HS01 SUV
8.59 kg / t
Toyo Snowprox S954 SUV
8.88 kg / t
Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X
8.96 kg / t
19,000 km
£1.45/L
8.0 L/100km
--
Annual Difference
--
Lifetime Savings
--
Extra Fuel/Energy
--
Extra CO2
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.
There was over 100% difference between the cheapest and most expensive winter tyres on test, however as usual with tyres, you get what you pay for as the most expensive tyres on test were also the best.