Test Charts / Auto Bild Allrad
2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test
Compare each discipline in the tested size. See the measured result, position and gap to the best tyre, then read the verdict for the trade-offs behind the finishing order.
- Tested size
- 235/55 R18
- Tyres tested
- 10
- Disciplines
- 13
Read the measurements, not just the rank
Lower is better for braking distances and lap times; higher is better for subjective scores and aquaplaning speed. Bars start at zero. Read the gap alongside the position: adjacent tyres can be separated by very different margins.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Focus on your tyres
Select tyres to highlight them throughout the charts.
Positions and gaps always refer to the full test field within each group. Selecting tyres does not recalculate rankings or change the best-in-test benchmark.
Dry
2Dry Braking
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
38.4 m | -4.90 m | 0 km/h |
| 43.3 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 43.9 m | +0.60 m | 15 km/h | |
| 44 m | +0.70 m | 16 km/h | |
| 44.1 m | +0.80 m | 18 km/h | |
| 44.6 m | +1.30 m | 22 km/h | |
| 44.8 m | +1.50 m | 24 km/h | |
| 45 m | +1.70 m | 25 km/h | |
| 45.1 m | +1.80 m | 26 km/h | |
| 45.2 m | +1.90 m | 27 km/h | |
| 45.3 m | +2.00 m | 27 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 18% (6.9 m ≈ 1.5 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 would still be travelling at 27 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Dry Handling
Dry Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
96.8 km/h | +1.10 km/h |
| 95.7 km/h | Best | |
| 95.3 km/h | -0.40 km/h | |
| 95.2 km/h | -0.50 km/h | |
| 94.6 km/h | -1.10 km/h | |
| 94.5 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 94.5 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 94.1 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 94.1 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 94.1 km/h | -1.60 km/h | |
| 93.7 km/h | -2.00 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 3.2% (3.1 Km/H).
Wet
5Wet Braking
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41.6 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 41.9 m | +0.30 m | 11 km/h | |
| 42.5 m | +0.90 m | 19 km/h | |
| 42.7 m | +1.10 m | 21 km/h | |
| 42.7 m | +1.10 m | 21 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
43.2 m | +1.60 m | 25 km/h |
| 43.6 m | +2.00 m | 28 km/h | |
| 44.1 m | +2.50 m | 31 km/h | |
| 45.8 m | +4.20 m | 39 km/h | |
| 46.1 m | +4.50 m | 41 km/h | |
| 52.6 m | +11.00 m | 59 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 26.4% (11 m ≈ 2.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Tristar Snowpower UHP would still be travelling at 59 km/h when the Vredestein Wintrac Pro had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Wet Handling
Wet Handling Average Speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 86.9 km/h | Best | |
RefReference Summer |
86.8 km/h | -0.10 km/h |
| 86.6 km/h | -0.30 km/h | |
| 86.6 km/h | -0.30 km/h | |
| 86.2 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 86.2 km/h | -0.70 km/h | |
| 86 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 86 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 85.7 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 85 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 82.1 km/h | -4.80 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 5.5% (4.8 Km/H).
Wet Circle
Wet Circle Lap Time in seconds
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
15.6 s | -0.05 s |
| 15.65 s | Best | |
| 15.68 s | +0.03 s | |
| 15.75 s | +0.10 s | |
| 15.85 s | +0.20 s | |
| 16 s | +0.35 s | |
| 16 s | +0.35 s | |
| 16.05 s | +0.40 s | |
| 16.1 s | +0.45 s | |
| 16.2 s | +0.55 s | |
| 17.1 s | +1.45 s |
The difference between best and worst was 9.6% (1.5 s).
Straight Aqua
Float Speed in Km/H
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 78.5 km/h | Best | |
| 77.3 km/h | -1.20 km/h | |
| 75.6 km/h | -2.90 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
75 km/h | -3.50 km/h |
| 74.6 km/h | -3.90 km/h | |
| 74.4 km/h | -4.10 km/h | |
| 74.3 km/h | -4.20 km/h | |
| 74 km/h | -4.50 km/h | |
| 73 km/h | -5.50 km/h | |
| 68.6 km/h | -9.90 km/h | |
| 68 km/h | -10.50 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 13.4% (10.5 Km/H).
Curved Aquaplaning
Remaining lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
3.79 m/sec2 | +0.32 m/sec2 |
| 3.47 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 3.3 m/sec2 | -0.17 m/sec2 | |
| 3.17 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 | |
| 3.16 m/sec2 | -0.31 m/sec2 | |
| 3.11 m/sec2 | -0.36 m/sec2 | |
| 3.07 m/sec2 | -0.40 m/sec2 | |
| 3.01 m/sec2 | -0.46 m/sec2 | |
| 2.96 m/sec2 | -0.51 m/sec2 | |
| 2.34 m/sec2 | -1.13 m/sec2 | |
| 2.22 m/sec2 | -1.25 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 41.4% (1.57 m/sec2).
Snow
4Snow Braking
Snow braking in meters (50 - 0 km/h)
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Residual speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25.3 m | Best | 0 km/h | |
| 25.9 m | +0.60 m | 20 km/h | |
| 26 m | +0.70 m | 21 km/h | |
| 26.2 m | +0.90 m | 24 km/h | |
| 26.5 m | +1.20 m | 28 km/h | |
| 26.6 m | +1.30 m | 29 km/h | |
| 27.2 m | +1.90 m | 34 km/h | |
| 27.6 m | +2.30 m | 38 km/h | |
| 29.7 m | +4.40 m | 50 km/h | |
| 30.8 m | +5.50 m | 55 km/h | |
RefReference Summer |
63.2 m | +37.90 m | 101 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 149.8% (37.9 m ≈ 8.4 Car Lengths). From 130 km/h, the Tristar Snowpower UHP would still be travelling at 55 km/h when the Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV had stopped.
Residual speed is calculated from the measured braking distances, assuming constant deceleration; it is not a separate measurement.
Snow Traction
Pulling Force in Newtons
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 2845 N | Best | |
| 2698 N | -147.00 N | |
| 2668 N | -177.00 N | |
| 2638 N | -207.00 N | |
| 2590 N | -255.00 N | |
| 2580 N | -265.00 N | |
| 2580 N | -265.00 N | |
| 2507 N | -338.00 N | |
| 2455 N | -390.00 N | |
| 2322 N | -523.00 N | |
RefReference Summer |
490 N | -2,355.00 N |
The difference between best and worst was 82.8% (2,355 N).
Snow Handling
Snow handling average speed
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 54 km/h | Best | |
| 53.1 km/h | -0.90 km/h | |
| 52.1 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 52.1 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 52.1 km/h | -1.90 km/h | |
| 51.7 km/h | -2.30 km/h | |
| 51.6 km/h | -2.40 km/h | |
| 51 km/h | -3.00 km/h | |
| 50.1 km/h | -3.90 km/h | |
| 48.6 km/h | -5.40 km/h |
The difference between best and worst was 10% (5.4 Km/H).
Snow Slalom
Lateral acceleration
Higher is better ↑| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 4.16 m/sec2 | Best | |
| 4.04 m/sec2 | -0.12 m/sec2 | |
| 3.93 m/sec2 | -0.23 m/sec2 | |
| 3.91 m/sec2 | -0.25 m/sec2 | |
| 3.89 m/sec2 | -0.27 m/sec2 | |
| 3.86 m/sec2 | -0.30 m/sec2 | |
| 3.78 m/sec2 | -0.38 m/sec2 | |
| 3.71 m/sec2 | -0.45 m/sec2 | |
| 3.36 m/sec2 | -0.80 m/sec2 | |
| 3.14 m/sec2 | -1.02 m/sec2 | |
RefReference Summer |
1.56 m/sec2 | -2.60 m/sec2 |
The difference between best and worst was 62.5% (2.6 m/sec2).
Comfort
1Noise
External noise in dB
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best |
|---|---|---|
| 68.7 dB | Best | |
| 69.4 dB | +0.70 dB | |
| 70 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 70 dB | +1.30 dB | |
| 71 dB | +2.30 dB | |
RefReference Summer |
71.4 dB | +2.70 dB |
| 71.5 dB | +2.80 dB | |
| 71.6 dB | +2.90 dB | |
| 71.9 dB | +3.20 dB | |
| 72 dB | +3.30 dB | |
| 72.9 dB | +4.20 dB |
The difference between best and worst was 6.1% (4.2 dB).
Value
1Rolling Resistance
Rolling resistance in kg t
Lower is better ↓| Position / Tyre | Result | Gap to best | Extra fuel / year |
|---|---|---|---|
RefReference Summer |
6.55 kg/t | -0.28 kg/t | £0 |
| 6.83 kg/t | Best | £0 | |
| 7.11 kg/t | +0.28 kg/t | £18 | |
| 7.43 kg/t | +0.60 kg/t | £39 | |
| 8.02 kg/t | +1.19 kg/t | £77 | |
| 8.03 kg/t | +1.20 kg/t | £77 | |
| 8.09 kg/t | +1.26 kg/t | £81 | |
| 8.51 kg/t | +1.68 kg/t | £108 | |
| 8.59 kg/t | +1.76 kg/t | £114 | |
| 8.88 kg/t | +2.05 kg/t | £132 | |
| 8.96 kg/t | +2.13 kg/t | £137 |
The difference between best and worst was 36.8% (2.41 kg / t). Over 19,000 km a year at £1.45/L, the Hankook Winter i cept evo 3 X uses about 95 L (£137) more fuel than the Continental WinterContact TS 850 P.
Adjust the assumptions
Calculated estimates, not additional measurements. Use the controls to explore the assumptions. These calculators use the full test field, independently of your tyre selection above.
Test setup & methodology
The test setting, the conditions recorded and how the results contribute to the score.
Recorded test conditions
Recorded test conditions
- Dry Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Wet Braking
- 100 → 0 km/h
- Snow Braking
- 50 → 0 km/h
More tyre tests
Cross-check this test
Where these tyres were tested again, and how the verdict held up.
2021 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test
235/55 R1810 tyres tested
6 of these 10 tyres tested again
2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test
225/60 R1810 tyres tested
5 of these 10 tyres tested again
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P / Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 SUV
2019 AMS Winter SUV Tyre Test
215/55 R1711 tyres tested
5 of these 10 tyres tested again

